| dc.contributor.advisor | 孫善豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 周家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 周家瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2005 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 19-Sep-2009 15:43:59 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 19-Sep-2009 15:43:59 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Sep-2009 15:43:59 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0922520172 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34544 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 政治研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92252017 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文主旨是要說明：就《道德形上學》的論述而言，康德在何種意義上能夠被視為一個契約論思想家。本文將從兩條線索出發來理解康德所提出的契約論，這兩條線索分別是：康德的財產權理論、以及契約論中處理政治權威正當性時所必須面對的統一性問題。本文認為：康德所提出的作為理念的原初契約，是一種提供給已處身在政治社會之下的個人，去設想當下所面對的法律強制力之正當性的方式。藉由康德在《純粹理性批判》之中對於「理念」的界定，可以將賦予原初契約一個確實的契約作用：人民的同意。儘管是一個被想像的同意，但康德賦予它積極的意義即形塑公民為一個自主、自律的主體，因此，在這個面向上，本文認為康德提出了儘管與霍布斯、洛克、盧梭迥異但卻仍然極富意義的契約論。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The purpose of this thesis is that Kant should be seen as a theorist of the social contract theory in the discourse of the Metaphysics of Morals. This thesis will perceive the social contract theory provided by Kant in accordance to two clues, including the theory of property and the problem of unity. The main point of the thesis is that the original social contract as an idea of reason is the method providing for the individual existing in the civil society of constructing the legitimacy of the political authority. By definition of “Idea” in Critique of Pure reason, Kant gives the original social contract a meaningful function: the consent of people. Though the consent is a concept imagined by the people, Kant gives it a positive meaning of forming the people to the independent subject in politics. In conclusion, this thesis claims that Kant provided a meaningful social contract theory different from other theorists in the social contract tradition, such as Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 引註凡例 導論 第一節 研究源起 第二節 問題意識與文獻檢閱 第三節 章節安排 第一章、從《道德形上學》看財產權與統一性問題 第一節 在自然狀態與市民狀態下的財產權 第二節 原初契約提供統一性 第三節 小結：康德為何是契約論者？ 第二章、康德在契約論的定位：相對於霍布斯、洛克、盧梭 第一節 洛克的契約論 第二節 霍布斯的契約論 第三節 盧梭的契約論 第三章 結論 參考文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 104421 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 43030 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 63835 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 92692 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 379604 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 325644 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 477489 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 128232 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 184137 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922520172 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 康德 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 契約論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 財產權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 統一性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 原初契約 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 霍布斯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Kant | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | social contract theory | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | property | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | unity | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | original social contract | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Hobbes | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 財產權與統一性─康德社會契約論之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Property and Unity：A Study of Kant`s Social Contract Theory | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 西文著作 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Books | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bobbio, N. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 Thomas Hobbes and The Natural Law Tradition, The University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boucher, David and Kelly, Paul | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1994 The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, London and New York Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gierke, Otto Von | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1966 The Development of Political Theory. translated by Bernard Freyd, New York: Norton & Company Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hobbes, Thomas | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1994 Leviathan, ed. Edwin Curley, Hackett Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lessnoff, Michael ed. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 Social Contract Theory, Printed in Great Britain by Billing & Sons Ltd, Worcester, Basil Blackwell Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Macpherson, C. B. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1962 The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, London：Oxford Univ. Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Minogue, Kenneth. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1980 The Concept of Property and Its Contemporary Significance. In J.R. Pennock & J.W. Chapman eds., Property ( NOMOS XXII ), New York: New York University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mullholland, Leslie Arthur | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990. Kant’s System of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Macpherson, C. B. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1978 The Meaning of Property. In C. B. Macpherson ed., Property, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riley, Patrick. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1982 Will and Political Legitimacy：A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kant’s Political Philosophy. New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shell, Susan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1980 The Rights of Reason：A study of Kant’s philosophy and Politics. London: University of Toronto Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williams, Howard. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983 Kant’s Political Philosophy. New York: St. Martin’s Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Articles: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baynes, Kenneth. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1989. "Kant on Property Right and the Social Contract." The Monist, Vol. 48, 433-53. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Caygill, Howard. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995. A Kant Dictionary, Oxford：Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Day. J.P. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1966. "Locke on Property." The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 16, No.64, History of Philosophy Number.（Jul. 1966, 207-220. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dodson. Kevin E. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1975. "Autonomy and Authority in Kant’s Rechtslehre." Political Theory, Vol. 25, No.1（Feb. 1997, 93-111. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Flikshuh, Kartin. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999. "Freedom and Constraint In Kant’s Metaphysical Elements of Justice." History of Political Thought, Vol. XX, No.2, Summer 1999, 250-71 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997. "On Kant’s Rechtslehre." Europea Journal of Philosophy , Vol. 5, Issue.1, 50-73 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goerner. E. A. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1975. "On Patrick Riley’s On Kant as the most Adequate of the Social Contract Theorist." Political Theory, Vol. 3, No.4 ( Nov., 1975 ), 467-468. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gregor, Mary | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1988. "Kant’s Theory of Property." Review of Metaphysics, No.41（June）, 757-87. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993. "Kant on Obligation, Rights and Virtue." Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Bd. 1, 69-102. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995. " Natural Right or Natural Law？” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Bd. 3, 11-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kant, Immanuel | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. H. J. Paton, New York：Harper & Row Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1991 Kant：Political Writings, tr. H.B. Nisbet, ed. Hans Reiss, Cambridge Univ. Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1996 The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Mary Gregor. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, tr. Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Houston, Harper & Row Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000 Critique of Pure Reason, tr. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, Cambridge Univ. Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ladd, John | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1984. "Kant’s Political Philosophy." Political Theory, No.41（Feb.）, 124-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lewis W. Beck. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1992. Ed.. Chadwick, Ruth F. Cazeux, Clive. Critical Assessments II.p. 399-411. London ; New York : Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Locke, John | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1980 Second Treatise of Government, ed. C. B. Macpherson, Hackett Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lopata, Benjamin B. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1973. "Property Theory in Hobbes." Political Theory, vol.1, No.2（May, 1973）, 203-18. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ludwig, Bernd. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990. "The Right of a State in Immanuel Kant’s Doctrine of Right." Journal of the History of Philosophy,.28：3（July）,403-15. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pitkin, Hanna. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1964. "Hobbes’s Concept of Representation--I." The American Political Science Review, Vol. 58, No.2 ( Jun. ), 328-340. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1964. "Hobbes’s Concept of Representation--II." The American Political Science Review, Vol. 58, No.4 ( Dec. ), 902-18. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riley. Patrick. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1973. "On Kant as the most Adequate of the Social Contract Theorist." Political Theory, Vol. 1, No.4（Nov.,1973）, 450-471. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1978. "On Susan Shell’s “Kant’s Theory of Property”." Political Theory, Vol. 6, No.1（February,1978）, 91-99. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riedel, Manfred. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1981. "Transcendental Politics？Political Legitimacy and the Concept of Civil Society in Kant." Social Research, Vol. 48, 588-613. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rousseau, J. J. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983 Discourse on the Origin of Inequality in On the Social Contract and Discourses, tr. Donal A. Cress, Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 105-61. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983 On the Social Contract in On the Social Contract and Discourses, tr. Donal A. Cress, Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 15-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Seebom, Thomas. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1981. "Kant’s Theory of Revolution." Social Research, Vol. 48, 557-87. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shell, Susan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1978. "Kant’s theory of Property." Political Theory, Vol. 6, No.1 ( Nov.,1978 ), 75-90. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tierney, Brian. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001. "Kant on Property: The Problem of Permissive Law." Journal of History of Ideas, Vol. 48, 72, 301-12. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yang, Chih-Sheng. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2005. "Right Has To Be Right: Why Hegel Presents His Ethics in A Philosophy of Right." Philosophy, Culture, & Traditions, Vol. 3, 105-113. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文譯著 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 卡西勒(Cassirer, Ernst) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1983《國家的神話》，黃漢青、陳衛平譯，台北：成均出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1984《啟蒙運動的哲學》，李日章譯，台北：聯經出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 登特列夫( A.P.d’Entreves ) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2000《自然法─法律哲學導論》，李日章譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 康德( Kant, Immanuel ) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1990 《道德底形上學之基礎》，李明輝譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1991 《法的形而上學原理》，沈叔平譯，北京：商務印書館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1997 《單純理性限度內的宗教》，李秋零譯，漢語基督教文化研究所。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 《康德歷史哲學論文集》，李明輝譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2004 《純粹理性批判》，鄧曉芒、楊祖陶譯，台北：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 列奧‧史特勞斯( Strauss, Leo ) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2005《自然權利與歷史》，彭剛譯，台北：左岸。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 塔利( Tully, James ) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 《語境中的洛克》，梅雪芹，石楠，張煒等譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文著作 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 沈清松 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 〈盧梭社會契約論的評析：一個奠基性迷思的轉變〉，《民主理論：古典與現代》，張福建、蘇文流主編，中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書( 35 )，51─72。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林國基 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2005《神義論語境中的社會契約論傳統》，上海：華東師範大學出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 孫善豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1995 〈超驗幻象與拜物教〉，《哲學雜誌》，第十一期：208─223。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002 〈價值形式與統治形式：對社會契約論的一個馬克思式的理解〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第二期：47─83。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許國賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1993 《馬克弗森─民主的政治哲學》，台北：東大圖書出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許漢 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1999 〈國家之理據與合法性 – 對於契約論的證立理論的一些初步反省〉於【台灣哲學會1999年會暨學術研討會】，台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 勞思光 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 《康德知識論要義新編》，香港：中文大學出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蕭高彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 〈從共和主義到激進民主─盧梭的政治秩序論〉，《自由主義》，蔡英文、張福建主編，中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書( 49 )：1─24。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2001 〈立法家、政治空間、與民族文化─盧梭的政治創造論〉，《政治科學論叢》，第十四期：25─46。 | zh_TW |
