學術產出-Research Reports

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 「我國社會品質發展現況及未來相關發展議題」政策建議書委託案計畫書
其他題名 Social Quality Development & Related Issues in Taiwan--Policy Research Recommendation
作者 陳小紅;盧淑華;彭裕婷
貢獻者 行政院研考會
國立政治大學社會系
關鍵詞 社會品質;social quality
日期 2007
上傳時間 5-Oct-2010 15:01:25 (UTC+8)
關聯 計畫編號 rdec-096-007
多年來,大多數國家皆以「經濟成長」做為重要的發展指標;而在社會發展領域中,迄今似尚未出現具代表性的指標。其中有以「生活品質」(quality of life)加以衡量者,也有以「人類發展指標」(Human Development Index- HDI)或「人類貧窮指標」(Human Poverty Index-HPI)測量社會發展狀況者;唯這些指標均被批評為加深了政策的碎片化,以致很難掌握個體與社會群體間的相互關聯性。近年來歐陸學者強調融福利政策、經濟政策、就業政策、司法政策甚至文化政策等於一體的研究指出了「社會品質」概念或可解決上述侷限。基於各國社會發展狀況不完全一致的事實,本計畫擬以「社會品質」研究次級資料之收集與分析為主,輔以專家學者焦點團體座談,據以提出「建構我國社會品質指標」可/應研究之方向與議題,以供決策者酌參。
In the past, “economic growth” has been considered as the main development indicators over most countries. However, consensus on social development indicators is lacking. Some has adopted "Quality of Life" measurements, others has relied upon "Human Development Index" and/or "Human Poverty Development Index". These indicators, nevertheless, have been criticized as deepening the fragmentation of social policy to the extent that it is rather difficult to comprehend the relationships between individuals and collectives. For this reason, "social quality" research propounded by European scholars in recent years which tried to integrate welfare policy, economic policy, employment policy, justice policy and cultural policy seem to shed some light in this regard. Cognizant of the fact that levels and nature of each country’s social development are not quite the same, this research expect to generate some policy research directions and issues of "social quality" for Taiwan based mainly on secondary data analysis and focus group discussion.
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 行政院研考會en_US
dc.contributor 國立政治大學社會系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳小紅;盧淑華;彭裕婷zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Oct-2010 15:01:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Oct-2010 15:01:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Oct-2010 15:01:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/45033-
dc.language zh-Twen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號 rdec-096-007-
dc.relation (關聯) 多年來,大多數國家皆以「經濟成長」做為重要的發展指標;而在社會發展領域中,迄今似尚未出現具代表性的指標。其中有以「生活品質」(quality of life)加以衡量者,也有以「人類發展指標」(Human Development Index- HDI)或「人類貧窮指標」(Human Poverty Index-HPI)測量社會發展狀況者;唯這些指標均被批評為加深了政策的碎片化,以致很難掌握個體與社會群體間的相互關聯性。近年來歐陸學者強調融福利政策、經濟政策、就業政策、司法政策甚至文化政策等於一體的研究指出了「社會品質」概念或可解決上述侷限。基於各國社會發展狀況不完全一致的事實,本計畫擬以「社會品質」研究次級資料之收集與分析為主,輔以專家學者焦點團體座談,據以提出「建構我國社會品質指標」可/應研究之方向與議題,以供決策者酌參。-
dc.relation (關聯) In the past, “economic growth” has been considered as the main development indicators over most countries. However, consensus on social development indicators is lacking. Some has adopted "Quality of Life" measurements, others has relied upon "Human Development Index" and/or "Human Poverty Development Index". These indicators, nevertheless, have been criticized as deepening the fragmentation of social policy to the extent that it is rather difficult to comprehend the relationships between individuals and collectives. For this reason, "social quality" research propounded by European scholars in recent years which tried to integrate welfare policy, economic policy, employment policy, justice policy and cultural policy seem to shed some light in this regard. Cognizant of the fact that levels and nature of each country’s social development are not quite the same, this research expect to generate some policy research directions and issues of "social quality" for Taiwan based mainly on secondary data analysis and focus group discussion.-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會品質;social quality-
dc.title (題名) 「我國社會品質發展現況及未來相關發展議題」政策建議書委託案計畫書zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Social Quality Development & Related Issues in Taiwan--Policy Research Recommendation-
dc.type (資料類型) reporten