學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 創造與感受 ── 榮格《基督教時代》的書寫與風格
作者 洪梓源
貢獻者 蔡怡佳
洪梓源
關鍵詞 榮格
基督教時代
書寫風格
變向
整體理論
日期 2008
上傳時間 9-Dec-2010 11:36:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 榮格(C.G. Jung)的宗教心理學理論,無論是他的原型思維或神話象徵等等,都經常是宗教研究上常常被援用的理論。然而他的理論充滿著爭議性:有人認為他的理論是實證、科學的,也有人認為他是浪漫、非理性的;有人認為他具有宗教情操,但也有人認為其理論破壞了宗教的主體性。這些爭議反映出他的理論在學術定位上的不易。

本文以美學鑑賞與文學批評的角度,透過對榮格晚期代表作《基督教時代》(Aion)做為觀察對象,揭示出榮格理論如何透過「變向」(becoming)的書寫技巧有效地拓展讀者的主觀心理空間,使其理論為讀者所接受。同時,透過對其理論做書寫技巧的分析,亦能明瞭其書寫對於主觀感知上所產生的效果,和其對客觀事實陳述的有效性是兩回事,而這也是榮格理論爭議的來源。
參考文獻 中、英文專書:
1. Barnaby, Karin and D’acierno, Pellegrino, eds. C. G. Jung and the Humanities. London: Routledge, 1990.
2. Blake, William. “The Roaring of Lions,” in The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, ed. David V. Erdman.Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor/Doubleday, 1982.
3. Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon. London : Continuum, 2003.
4. Deleuze, Gilles Pourparler. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
5. Ellwood, Robert. The Politics of Myth. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
6. Hannah, Barbara and Franz, Marie-Luise. von. Lectures on Jung’s Aion. Wilmette: Chiron Publications, 2004.
7. Homans, Peter. Jung in context : modernity and the making of a psychology. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1979.
8. Hebdige, Dick. Subculture, the meaning of style. London: Methuen, 1979.
9. Hyde, Maggie. Jung and Astrology. Lodon: Aquarian, 1992.
10. James, William. Pragmatism (Indianapolis : Hackett Pub. Co., c1981), 25-39.
11. Jones, Raya A. Jung, Psychology, Postmodernity. New York : Routledge, 2007.
12. Jung, C. G. Aion : Researches into the phenomenology of the self. New York : Pantheon Books, c1959.
13. Jung, C. G. and Pauli, W. The Interprtation of Nature and the Psyche. New York: Pantheon Books INC. 1955.
14. Lacan, Jacques Ecrits, A Selection, trans A. Sheridan. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1977.
15. Lindorff, David. Pauli and Jung. Wheaton:The Theosophical Publishing House, 2004.
16. Lodge, David. The Art of Fiction. London : Penguin, 1992.
17. Loewenthal, Del and Snell, Robert. Post-modernism for Psychotherapists. New York: Routledge, 2003.
18. Main, Roderick. The Rupture of Time: Synchronicity and Jung`s Critique of Modern Western Culture. New York: Brunner-Routledge,2004.
19. Noll, Richard The Jung Cult. New jersey, prinstone university pres, 1994.
20. Rowland, Susan. Jung as a writer. London ; New York : Routledge, 2005.
21. Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the post-Jungians. London ; Boston : Routledge & K. Paul, 1985.
22. Selden, Raman. Widdowson, Peter. Brooker, Peter. A reader`s guide to contemporary literary theory. New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1997.
23. Sontag, Susan. Against Interpretation. New York: Doubleday,1966.
24. Tacey, David. Jung and the New Age. East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge, 2001.
25. Murray Stein著、朱侃如譯,《榮格心靈地圖》,台北市:立緒,1999。
26. Robert H. Hopcke著、蔣韜譯,《導讀榮格》,台北縣:立緒出版社,1997。
27. 榮格(C.G. Jung)著、吳康、丁傳林、趙善華譯,《心理類型》,台北市:桂冠,1999。
28. 榮格(C.G. Jung)著、劉國彬、楊德友譯,《榮格自傳——回憶、夢、省思》,台北市:張老師,1997。
29. 尚.勒狄克(Jean Leduc)著、林錚譯,《史家與時間》,台北市:麥田出版社,2004。
30. 羅蘭巴特(Roland Barthes)著、汪耀進、武佩榮譯,《戀人絮語--一本解構主義的文本》,台北市,桂冠出版社:1994。
31. 羅洛梅(Rollo May)著、傅佩榮譯,《創造的勇氣》,台北市:立緒出版社,2001。
32. 大江健三郎著、王成譯,《小說的方法》,台北市:城邦出版社,2008。
33. 河合隼雄著、趙金貴譯,《榮格:靈魂的現實性》,石家莊:河北教育出版社,2001。
34. 河合隼雄著、廣梅芳譯,《日本人的傳說與心靈》,台北市:心靈工坊,2004。
35. 馮川,《榮格的精神》,海口:海南出版社,2006。
36. 蒂費纳.薩莫瓦約(Tiphaine Samovault)著、邵煒譯,《互文性研究》,天津:天津人民出版社,2002。
37. 萬胥亭,《德勒茲.巴洛克.全球化》,台北市:唐山書局,2009。
38. 劉康,《對話的喧聲:巴赫汀文化理論述評》,台北市:麥田出版社,19。
期刊論文:
1. Bright, George “Synchronicity as a basis of analytic attitude”, Journal of Analytical Psychology 42,4(1997): 613-635.
2. Eckman, Barbara “Jung, Hegel, and Subjective Universe” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 54-65.
3. Edinger, E.F. “Trinity and Quaternity”, The Journal of Analytical Psychology,9(1964),103-115.
4. Foucault, M. “What is an Author”, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 1977), 113-138.
5. Gunter, Pete A. Y. “Bergson and Jung” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 100-118.
6. Holt, David “Jung and Marx: Alchemy, Christianity, and the Work against Nature” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 66-92.
7. Miller, David “An Other Jung and An Other…,” in C.G Jung and the Humanities: Toward a Hermeneutics of Culture, eds. K. Barnaby and P. D’Acierno. (London: Routledge, 1990), 325-330.
8. Rowland, Susan Literary Jung: Aion and the History of the Imagination. Conference: University of Greenwich, July 6-9th 2006.
9. Rowland,Susan ”Jung’s Ghost stories.” In Post-Jungian Criticism. (New York: State University of New York Press, 2004) , 33-38.
10. Samuels, Andrew “Introduction: Jung and the post-junians” in Polly Young-Eisendrat and Terence Dawson (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Jung (New York : Cambridge University Press, 2008) ,1.
11. Voogd, Stephanie de “Fantacy versus Fiction: Jung’s Kantianism Appraised” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I (London ; New York : Routledge, 1992), 27-53.
12. 方尚芩,〈從影像體驗時間--從柏格森的電影放映機制到德勒茲的電影美學〉11(長熟市:長熟理工學院學報(哲學社會科學版),2007.11),15。
13. 馬樂伯(Robert Magliola)著、蔡佳瑾、施以明譯,〈轉化理論與後殖民言說:論容格之為拉崗、拉崗之為戴希達的後裔(下降左傾斜線)〉,《中外文學》,8.12(台北市:1992.1):40-44。
14. 施春華,〈榮格和後榮格流派關係中的三個基本問題〉,《江蘇教育學院學報(社台科學版)》,17.2(江蘇:2001.3),24-28。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
宗教研究所
94156007
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094156007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡怡佳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 洪梓源zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 洪梓源zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Dec-2010 11:36:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Dec-2010 11:36:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Dec-2010 11:36:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094156007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49866-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 宗教研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94156007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 榮格(C.G. Jung)的宗教心理學理論,無論是他的原型思維或神話象徵等等,都經常是宗教研究上常常被援用的理論。然而他的理論充滿著爭議性:有人認為他的理論是實證、科學的,也有人認為他是浪漫、非理性的;有人認為他具有宗教情操,但也有人認為其理論破壞了宗教的主體性。這些爭議反映出他的理論在學術定位上的不易。

本文以美學鑑賞與文學批評的角度,透過對榮格晚期代表作《基督教時代》(Aion)做為觀察對象,揭示出榮格理論如何透過「變向」(becoming)的書寫技巧有效地拓展讀者的主觀心理空間,使其理論為讀者所接受。同時,透過對其理論做書寫技巧的分析,亦能明瞭其書寫對於主觀感知上所產生的效果,和其對客觀事實陳述的有效性是兩回事,而這也是榮格理論爭議的來源。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 書名頁 1
謝辭 2
摘要 3
目錄 5
第一章:緒論 7
第一節、前言 7
第二節、正反相呈的榮格現象 9
第三節、以書寫技巧的分析取代轉譯式的研究 14
第四節、章節簡介 17
第二章: 23
雙面榮格--榮格宗教心理學的兩種面向 23
前言:榮格理論的爭議性 23
第一節:脈絡中的榮格--以佛洛伊德作為一個起點 25
第二節:後現代榮格學派 30
第三節:在看得見的脈絡與看不見的秘思之間 33
第四節:小結 35
第三章:風格間的連結、變形與開展 37
前言:本質與效應 37
第一節:風格與陌生化 40
第二節:兩種風格的結合:抽象概念與具體形象 43
第三節:具體形象內部的變形 47
第四節:抽象概念間的變形 52
小結 56
第四章:整體與時空的書寫 59
前言 59
第一節:四方位體作為整體理論的展演 60
第二節:想像力的終止與朝向整體的個體化歷程 67
第三節:同時性理論與時空的書寫 77
第四節:小結 86
第五章:結論 89
章節回顧 89
超越真假的美學態度 91
傳統與創造 92
面向未來的榮格研究 96
參考書目 98
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 92811 bytes-
dc.format.extent 112958 bytes-
dc.format.extent 118474 bytes-
dc.format.extent 136225 bytes-
dc.format.extent 348131 bytes-
dc.format.extent 315454 bytes-
dc.format.extent 339010 bytes-
dc.format.extent 367836 bytes-
dc.format.extent 256633 bytes-
dc.format.extent 194189 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094156007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 榮格zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 基督教時代zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 書寫風格zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 變向zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 整體理論zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 創造與感受 ── 榮格《基督教時代》的書寫與風格zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中、英文專書:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Barnaby, Karin and D’acierno, Pellegrino, eds. C. G. Jung and the Humanities. London: Routledge, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Blake, William. “The Roaring of Lions,” in The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, ed. David V. Erdman.Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor/Doubleday, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon. London : Continuum, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Deleuze, Gilles Pourparler. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Ellwood, Robert. The Politics of Myth. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Hannah, Barbara and Franz, Marie-Luise. von. Lectures on Jung’s Aion. Wilmette: Chiron Publications, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Homans, Peter. Jung in context : modernity and the making of a psychology. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Hebdige, Dick. Subculture, the meaning of style. London: Methuen, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Hyde, Maggie. Jung and Astrology. Lodon: Aquarian, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. James, William. Pragmatism (Indianapolis : Hackett Pub. Co., c1981), 25-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Jones, Raya A. Jung, Psychology, Postmodernity. New York : Routledge, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Jung, C. G. Aion : Researches into the phenomenology of the self. New York : Pantheon Books, c1959.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Jung, C. G. and Pauli, W. The Interprtation of Nature and the Psyche. New York: Pantheon Books INC. 1955.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Lacan, Jacques Ecrits, A Selection, trans A. Sheridan. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Lindorff, David. Pauli and Jung. Wheaton:The Theosophical Publishing House, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Lodge, David. The Art of Fiction. London : Penguin, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Loewenthal, Del and Snell, Robert. Post-modernism for Psychotherapists. New York: Routledge, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Main, Roderick. The Rupture of Time: Synchronicity and Jung`s Critique of Modern Western Culture. New York: Brunner-Routledge,2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Noll, Richard The Jung Cult. New jersey, prinstone university pres, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Rowland, Susan. Jung as a writer. London ; New York : Routledge, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the post-Jungians. London ; Boston : Routledge & K. Paul, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Selden, Raman. Widdowson, Peter. Brooker, Peter. A reader`s guide to contemporary literary theory. New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. Sontag, Susan. Against Interpretation. New York: Doubleday,1966.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. Tacey, David. Jung and the New Age. East Sussex: Brunner-Routledge, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. Murray Stein著、朱侃如譯,《榮格心靈地圖》,台北市:立緒,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. Robert H. Hopcke著、蔣韜譯,《導讀榮格》,台北縣:立緒出版社,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. 榮格(C.G. Jung)著、吳康、丁傳林、趙善華譯,《心理類型》,台北市:桂冠,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. 榮格(C.G. Jung)著、劉國彬、楊德友譯,《榮格自傳——回憶、夢、省思》,台北市:張老師,1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. 尚.勒狄克(Jean Leduc)著、林錚譯,《史家與時間》,台北市:麥田出版社,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. 羅蘭巴特(Roland Barthes)著、汪耀進、武佩榮譯,《戀人絮語--一本解構主義的文本》,台北市,桂冠出版社:1994。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. 羅洛梅(Rollo May)著、傅佩榮譯,《創造的勇氣》,台北市:立緒出版社,2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. 大江健三郎著、王成譯,《小說的方法》,台北市:城邦出版社,2008。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. 河合隼雄著、趙金貴譯,《榮格:靈魂的現實性》,石家莊:河北教育出版社,2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. 河合隼雄著、廣梅芳譯,《日本人的傳說與心靈》,台北市:心靈工坊,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. 馮川,《榮格的精神》,海口:海南出版社,2006。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. 蒂費纳.薩莫瓦約(Tiphaine Samovault)著、邵煒譯,《互文性研究》,天津:天津人民出版社,2002。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. 萬胥亭,《德勒茲.巴洛克.全球化》,台北市:唐山書局,2009。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. 劉康,《對話的喧聲:巴赫汀文化理論述評》,台北市:麥田出版社,19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期刊論文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Bright, George “Synchronicity as a basis of analytic attitude”, Journal of Analytical Psychology 42,4(1997): 613-635.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Eckman, Barbara “Jung, Hegel, and Subjective Universe” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 54-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Edinger, E.F. “Trinity and Quaternity”, The Journal of Analytical Psychology,9(1964),103-115.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Foucault, M. “What is an Author”, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press, 1977), 113-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Gunter, Pete A. Y. “Bergson and Jung” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 100-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Holt, David “Jung and Marx: Alchemy, Christianity, and the Work against Nature” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I. (New York: Routledge, 1992), 66-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Miller, David “An Other Jung and An Other…,” in C.G Jung and the Humanities: Toward a Hermeneutics of Culture, eds. K. Barnaby and P. D’Acierno. (London: Routledge, 1990), 325-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Rowland, Susan Literary Jung: Aion and the History of the Imagination. Conference: University of Greenwich, July 6-9th 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Rowland,Susan ”Jung’s Ghost stories.” In Post-Jungian Criticism. (New York: State University of New York Press, 2004) , 33-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Samuels, Andrew “Introduction: Jung and the post-junians” in Polly Young-Eisendrat and Terence Dawson (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Jung (New York : Cambridge University Press, 2008) ,1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Voogd, Stephanie de “Fantacy versus Fiction: Jung’s Kantianism Appraised” in Renos K. Papadopoulos (eds) Carl Gustav Jung: Critical Assessments I (London ; New York : Routledge, 1992), 27-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. 方尚芩,〈從影像體驗時間--從柏格森的電影放映機制到德勒茲的電影美學〉11(長熟市:長熟理工學院學報(哲學社會科學版),2007.11),15。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. 馬樂伯(Robert Magliola)著、蔡佳瑾、施以明譯,〈轉化理論與後殖民言說:論容格之為拉崗、拉崗之為戴希達的後裔(下降左傾斜線)〉,《中外文學》,8.12(台北市:1992.1):40-44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. 施春華,〈榮格和後榮格流派關係中的三個基本問題〉,《江蘇教育學院學報(社台科學版)》,17.2(江蘇:2001.3),24-28。zh_TW