1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 後設認知閱讀策略訓練對國中生英語閱讀理解及態度的效益研究
The effects of metacognitive reading strategy training on English reading comprehension and attitudes of junior high school students
作者 曾鈺惠
Tseng, Yu Hwei
貢獻者 余明忠
Yu, Ming Chun
曾鈺惠
Tseng, Yu Hwei
關鍵詞 後設認知閱讀策略
Metacognitive Reading Strategies
日期 2008
上傳時間 9-Dec-2010 12:24:18 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究的目的在探討後設認知閱讀策略在EFL國中生英語閱讀上的效益。尤其是探究此訓練對高、低分組學生後設認知閱讀策略的使用差異，對英語閱讀觀點及理解之影響，以及學生對後設認知閱讀策略訓練所作的回應。
本研究以新竹縣某國中的一個七年級班級30位學生為研究對象，將學生分為高分組及低分組。這些學生接受為期四週的三種後設認知閱讀策略訓練 (分別為文意圖像策略、預測策略、總結策略)在英語閱讀上之運用。
在資料分析上，主要是針對高、低分組在前後實驗，在後設認知閱讀策略使用上的差異作比較及質的分析。高分組及低分組在閱讀理解測驗上的閱讀能力表現也會做量的分析。除此之外，學生們對於後設認知策略訓練所作的回應，予以質的分析。
本研究的主要總結如下：
1. 後設認知閱讀策略訓練能有效提升高分組及低分組兩組在後設認知閱讀策略上的使用。
2. 後設認知閱讀策略訓練有助於改善高分組及低分組的英語閱讀理解，學生們對後設認知閱讀策略訓練在閱讀理解方面的效益，皆抱持肯定的態度，尤其是低分組學生。
3. 後設認知閱讀策略訓練有助於高分組及低分組的學生，尤其是低分組學生，建立更正確的英語閱讀觀念。
4. 大部分的學生對於後設認知閱讀策略訓練的效益皆表示肯定的態度，並且樂於運用這些後設認知閱讀策略於英語閱讀上，且樂於學習新的閱讀策略。
最後，根據實驗的結果提供一些教學上的建議。
The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effects of metacognitive reading strategy training (MRST) on junior-high-school students’ EFL reading. Specifically, the differences of metacognitive reading strategy use between HPG and LPG, perceptions of reading, English reading comprehension, and their responses to the metacognitive reading strategy training (MRST) are probed.
The participants of this study were thirty junior high school students from one seven-grade class in Shingchu C. The participants were divided into high-proficient group and low-proficient group. These participants received the four-week training (MRST) with three metacognitive reading strategies (semantic mapping, prediction, and summarizing) in reading English texts. In the data collection, the differences between HPG and LPG in metacognitive reading strategy use in the pre-treatment and post-treatment were compared and analyzed qualitatively. Also, HPG and LPG students’ reading performance in reading comprehension tests between the pre-treatment and post-treatment were analyzed quantitatively. In addition, students’ perceptions toward the effects of the MRST were analyzed qualitatively.
Based on the data analyses, the findings of the study are summarized as follows:
1. The MRST was effective in enhancing both HPG and LPG readers’ metacognitive awareness of strategy use.
2. The MRST helped improve both HPG and LPG readers’ comprehension in reading English texts, and students, especially LPG, had positive attitude toward the effectiveness of the MRST in improving reading comprehension.
3. The MRST helped both groups of students, especially LPG readers, have more correct perceptions toward English reading.
4. Most of the students exhibited positive attitude toward the effectiveness of the MRST and showed their willingness to apply the learned metacognitive reading strategies as well as to learn new reading strategies in English reading.
Finally, some pedagogical implications and suggestions are provided on the basis of the findings in this study.
參考文獻 Abromitis, B. (1994). The role of metacognition: Implication for instruction. Literacy Research Report, 19, 3-31. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371291).
Alessi, S. M., Anderson, T. H., & Goetz, E. T. (1979). An investigation of lookbacks during studying. Discourse Processes, 2, 197-212.
Alexander, P., & Judy, J. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.
Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic process in reading. New York: The Guilford Press.
Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 461-472.
Anderson, R. C. (1984). Some reflections on the requisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 13, 5-10.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission On Reading. Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-381.
Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Anderson, M. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in connected discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 433-440.
Andre, M., & Anderson, T. H. (1978-79). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605-623.
Antonacci, P.A. (1991). Students search for meaning in the text through semantic mapping . Social Education, 55(3), 174-175.
Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1981). Content area textbooks (Rdg. Ed. Rep. No. 23). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 39-53.
Ausubel, D. P. (1980). Schemata, cognitive structure, and advance organizers: A reply to Anderson, Spiro, and Anderson. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 400-404.
Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions (Tech. Rep. No. 145). Champion: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 525)
Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 365-374.
Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don’t know? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 155-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Baker, L. (1985b). How do we know when we don’t understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 155-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Baker, L., & Anderson, R. I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 281-294.
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394).
Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984b). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Flood
(Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984b). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D.P. Pearson (ED.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Baumann, J. F., Seifert-Kessell, N., & Jones, L. (1987, December). Effects of think-aloud instruction on elementary students’ ability to monitor their comprehension. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, ST. Petersburg, FL.
Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, E.L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297-306.
Block, E. L. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.
Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319-343.
Borko, H., Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Teacher’s decisions in planning of reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 449-466.
Brandsford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brandsford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383-438). New York: Academic Press.
Braun, C., Rennie, B. J., & Labercane, G. D. (1986). A conference approach to the development of metacognitive awareness. Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers. The 35th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 204-209.
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 501-526). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1984). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), A decade of reading research: Implications for practice (pp. 49-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.
Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A., Brandsford, J., Ferrara, R., & Champione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & J. Flavell & E. Markman (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.
Brown, A.L., & Campione, J. C. (1979). The effects of knowledge and experience on the formation of retrieval plans for studying from texts. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sukes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic.
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14-21.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.
Brown, A.L., & Smiley, S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49, 1076-1088.
Bruinsma, R. (1990). Learning to ride a bike and learning to read: Children’s conception of reading. Australian Journal of Reading:13:114-127.
Calfee, R. (1981). Cognitive psychology and educational practice. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 9, pp. 3-73). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Canney, G., & Winograd, P. (1979). Schemata for reading and reading comprehension performance (Tech. Rep. No. 120). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Studying of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 169 520)
Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
Carrell, P. L. (1992). Awareness of text structure: Effects on recall. Language Learning, 42, 1-20.
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G. & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategies training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.
Cassanave, C. P. (1988). Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: A neglected essential. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 282-302.
Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11-28.
Chang, C. K. (2000). The relationship between four metacognitive factors and reading ability. The Proceeding of the 17th International Symposium on English Teaching, 227-293. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co. Ltd.
Chen, J. C. (2005). Explicit instruction of reading strategies at senior high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Cheng, C. K. (2000). The relationship between metacognitive factors and reading ability. In the Proceeding of the Seventeenth conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 277-294). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Cheng, L.Y. (1991). The study of freshman English reading: The application of metacognitive strategies. In the Proceedings of the Second Education Research in Taiwan Province (pp. 596-635). Taichung: Taiwan Province Government.
Chern, C.L. (1994). Chinese Readers’ Metacognitive Awareness in Reading Chinese and English (FL 023 225). Papers presented at the Annual International Language in Education Conference (Hong Kong, 1993). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 060)
Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121-150.
Clarke, M. A. (1980). The short-circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209.
Craig, M. T., & Yore, L. D. (1995). Middle school students’ metacognitive knowledge about science reading and science text: An interview study. Reading Psychology, 16, 169-213.
Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. (1988). Developmental and instructional analysis of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131.
Cummins, J. (1981). Four misconceptions about language proficiency in bilingual education. NABE Journal, 5(3), 31-45.
Cziko, G. A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first-and second-language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101-104.
Day, J. D. (1980). Teaching summarization skills: a comparison of training methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
Dewitz, P., Carr, E. M., & Patberg, J. P. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99-119.
Dole, Janice, Gerald G. Duffy, Laura R. Roehler, and P. David Pearson (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research 61 (2): 239-264.
Duffy, G. G. (1982). Fighting off the alligators: What research in real classrooms has to say about reading instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 357-373.
Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Herman, B. A. (1988) Modeling mental process helps poor readers become strategic readers. The Reading Teacher, 41, 762-767.
Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaning the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
Duffy, G. G, Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-553.
Durkin, D. (1981). Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 515-544.
Ehrlich, M. F., Remond, M., & Tardieu, H. (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11 (1), 29-63.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W.P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral Communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Forrest-Pressley, D. L., & Waller, T. G. (1984). Cognition, metacogniton, and reading. New York: Springer.
Gambrell, L. B., & Heathington, B. S. (1981). Adult disabled readers’ metacognitive awareness about reading tasks and strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 215-222.
Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of good and poor readers’ awareness of induced miscomprehension of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 55-64.
Garner, R. (1981). Monitoring of passage inconsistency among poor comprehenders: A preliminary test of the “piecemeal processing” explanation. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 159-162.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Garner, R. (1992). Metacognition and self-monitoring strategies. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 236-252). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Garner, R., & Kraus, C. (1981-1982). Good and poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors. Educational Research Quarterly, 6, 5-12.
Garner, R., Macready, G. B., & Wagoner, S. (1984). Readers’ acquisition of the components of the text-lookback strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 300-309.
Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 439-447.
Garner, R., Wagoner, S., & Smith, T. (1983). Externalizing question-answering strategies of good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 439-447.
Geva, E. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading. Scientific Studies in Reading, 4, 295-312.
Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 10, 597-602.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second-language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.
Hare, V. C. (1981). Readers’ problem identification and problem solving strategies for high and low knowledge articles. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 359-365.
Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 62-78.
Harris, P. L., Kruithof, A., Terwogt, M. M., & Visser, T. (1981). Children’s detection and awareness of textual anomaly. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 212-230.
Harvey, Stephanie and Ann Goudivs (2000). Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension to Enhance Understanding. New York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Hiebert, E. H. (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 231-255.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
Ko, M. Y. (2004). A critical literature review of metacognitive reading strategy instruction. Journal of National Huwei University of Science & Technology, 1, 239-250.
Kolers, P. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading (pp. 90-118). New York: Basic Books.
Krashen, S. D. (1988). Do we learn to read by reading? The relationship between free reading and reading ability. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in content: Connecting observation and understanding: Vol. 2. Advances in discourse processes (pp. 269-298). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1, Serial No.159)
Lesgold, A. M., & Perfetti, C. A. (1978). Interactive processes in reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 1, 323-336.
Lin, W. L. (2004). An investigation of reading strategy instruction on EFL junior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University.
Lonberger, R. (1988, February). Effects of training in a self-generated learning strategy on the prose processing abilities of 4th and 6th graders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Education Association, Savannah, GA.
Masur, E. F., McIntyre, C. W., & Flavell, J. H. ( 1973). Developmental changes in apportionment of study time among items in multiple free recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 237-246.
McNeil, J. D. (1987). Metacognition in reading comprehension. In McNeil (Eds.), Reading comprehension: New direction for classroom practice (2nd edit.) (pp. 91-105). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Mosenthal, P. (1983). The influence of social situation on children’s classroom comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 537-547.
Myers, M., & Paris, S. G.. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge abinstruout reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Reviews, 84, 231-259.
Nist, S., & Holschuh, J., (2000). Comprehension strategies at the college level. In R. Flippo & D. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 75-104). Mahwh, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann.
Otto, W. (1985). Metacognition and reading instruction Journal of Reading, 28, 573-575.
Oxford, R., Crookall, D., Cohen, A., Lavine, R., Nyikos, M. & Sutter, W. (1990). Strategy training for language learners: Six situational case studies and a training model. Foreign Language Annals, 22:197-216.
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
Paris, S. G. & Oka, E. (1986). Children’s reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 25-26.
Palincsar, A. M. (1985, April). Unpacking “multicomponent, metacognitive training packages.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Palinscar, A. M., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.
Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 333-349). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension Monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5-22.
Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of the research and a new conceptualization of instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 153-167.
Persson, U. B. (1994). Reading for understanding: An empirical contribution to the metacognition of reading comprehension. Linkoping Studies in Education and Psychology Dissertations, No. 41.
Pichert, J. W. (1979). Sensitivity to what is important in prose (Tech. Rep. No. 149). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 179 946).
Pintrich, P.R. (2002) The role of metacogitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41 (4) 219-225.
Pintrich, P.R., & Degroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P.R., & Wolters, C., & Baxer, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulation learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 301-342.
Resnick, L. B. (1984). Comprehending and learning: Implications for a cognitive theory of instruction. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), learning and comprehension of text (pp. 431-443). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Risko, V. J., & Feldman, N. (1986). Teaching young remedial readers to generate questions as they read. Reading Psychology, 23, 54-64.
Rinehart, S.D., Stahl, S. A, & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21,442-438.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1984). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 185-224). New York: Longman.
Sarig, G. (1987). High-level reading in the first and in the foreign language: Some comparative process data. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 105-120). Washington, D. C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
Schmitt, M. C. (1988). The effects of an elaborated, directed activity on the metacomprehension skills of third graders. Dialogues in literacy research. The 37th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 167-181.
Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A Questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, March, 1990, 454-461.
Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431-449.
Smith, F. (1977). Making sense of reading-and of reading instruction. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 386-395.
Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Smith, H. K. (1967). The responses of good and poor readers when asked to read for different purposes. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 53 -83.
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18, 275-290.
Spiro, R. J. (1979). Etiology of reading comprehension style. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Reading Research: Studies and applications (pp. 118-122). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
Spiro, R. J., & Tirre, W. C. (1980). Individual differences in schema utilization during discourse processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 204-208.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
Steffensen, M. S., Joag-dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10-29.
Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children’s comprehension and memory for expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 401-405.
Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 134-146.
Taylor, B. M., & Berkowitz, B. S. (1980). Facilitating children’s comprehension of content material. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives in reading research and instruction (Twenty-ninth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 64-68). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.
Tulving, E., & Gold, C. (1963). Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journals of Experimental Psychology, 66, 319-327.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Vygotsky, Lev Semonovich, (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 328-346.
Wagoner, R. K. & Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Executive control of reading. Unpublished manuscript.
Wellman, H. M. (1978). Knowledge of the interaction of memory variables: A developmental study of metamemory. Developmental Psychologist, 14, 24-29.
Wellman, H. M., Collins, J., & Glieberman, J. (1981). Understanding the combination of memory variables: Developing conceptions of memory limitations. Child Development, 52, 1313-1317.
Winograd, P. N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.
Winograd, P. N., & Johnston, P. (1982). Comprehension monitoring and the error detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 61-76.
Yuill, N., & Joscelyne, T. (1988) Effect of organizational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders’ story understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 152-158.
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1989). Effects of reading ability on children’s comprehension evaluation and regulation. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 69-84.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
93951019
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0939510191
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 余明忠zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Ming Chunen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 曾鈺惠zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tseng, Yu Hweien_US
dc.creator (作者) 曾鈺惠zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tseng, Yu Hweien_US
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Dec-2010 12:24:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Dec-2010 12:24:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Dec-2010 12:24:18 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0939510191en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49894-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93951019zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的目的在探討後設認知閱讀策略在EFL國中生英語閱讀上的效益。尤其是探究此訓練對高、低分組學生後設認知閱讀策略的使用差異，對英語閱讀觀點及理解之影響，以及學生對後設認知閱讀策略訓練所作的回應。
本研究以新竹縣某國中的一個七年級班級30位學生為研究對象，將學生分為高分組及低分組。這些學生接受為期四週的三種後設認知閱讀策略訓練 (分別為文意圖像策略、預測策略、總結策略)在英語閱讀上之運用。
在資料分析上，主要是針對高、低分組在前後實驗，在後設認知閱讀策略使用上的差異作比較及質的分析。高分組及低分組在閱讀理解測驗上的閱讀能力表現也會做量的分析。除此之外，學生們對於後設認知策略訓練所作的回應，予以質的分析。
本研究的主要總結如下：
1. 後設認知閱讀策略訓練能有效提升高分組及低分組兩組在後設認知閱讀策略上的使用。
2. 後設認知閱讀策略訓練有助於改善高分組及低分組的英語閱讀理解，學生們對後設認知閱讀策略訓練在閱讀理解方面的效益，皆抱持肯定的態度，尤其是低分組學生。
3. 後設認知閱讀策略訓練有助於高分組及低分組的學生，尤其是低分組學生，建立更正確的英語閱讀觀念。
4. 大部分的學生對於後設認知閱讀策略訓練的效益皆表示肯定的態度，並且樂於運用這些後設認知閱讀策略於英語閱讀上，且樂於學習新的閱讀策略。
最後，根據實驗的結果提供一些教學上的建議。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effects of metacognitive reading strategy training (MRST) on junior-high-school students’ EFL reading. Specifically, the differences of metacognitive reading strategy use between HPG and LPG, perceptions of reading, English reading comprehension, and their responses to the metacognitive reading strategy training (MRST) are probed.
The participants of this study were thirty junior high school students from one seven-grade class in Shingchu C. The participants were divided into high-proficient group and low-proficient group. These participants received the four-week training (MRST) with three metacognitive reading strategies (semantic mapping, prediction, and summarizing) in reading English texts. In the data collection, the differences between HPG and LPG in metacognitive reading strategy use in the pre-treatment and post-treatment were compared and analyzed qualitatively. Also, HPG and LPG students’ reading performance in reading comprehension tests between the pre-treatment and post-treatment were analyzed quantitatively. In addition, students’ perceptions toward the effects of the MRST were analyzed qualitatively.
Based on the data analyses, the findings of the study are summarized as follows:
1. The MRST was effective in enhancing both HPG and LPG readers’ metacognitive awareness of strategy use.
2. The MRST helped improve both HPG and LPG readers’ comprehension in reading English texts, and students, especially LPG, had positive attitude toward the effectiveness of the MRST in improving reading comprehension.
3. The MRST helped both groups of students, especially LPG readers, have more correct perceptions toward English reading.
4. Most of the students exhibited positive attitude toward the effectiveness of the MRST and showed their willingness to apply the learned metacognitive reading strategies as well as to learn new reading strategies in English reading.
Finally, some pedagogical implications and suggestions are provided on the basis of the findings in this study.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………...iv
LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………….vi
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………..vii
CHINESE ABSTRACT………………………………………………..viii
ENGLISH ABSTRACT…………………………………………………ix
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….1
1.1 Motivation and Goal…………………………………………………………...1
1.2 Purpose of the Study…………………………………………………………...5
1.3 Significance of the Study…………………………………………………........5
1.4 Research Questions……………………………………………………………6
1.5 Definition of Terms……………………………………………………………6

2. LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………..8
2.1 An Interactive Model of Reading……………………………………………...8
2.2 Schema Theory……………………………………………………………….12
2.3 Metacognition………………………………………………………………..14
2.4 Metacognition in Reading……………………………………………………18
2.5 Difference in Metacognition Among Learners……………………………….21
2.6 Difference in Strategy Use Among Learners…………………………………25
2.7 The Relationship Between First and Second Language Reading…………….28
2.8 Selected Metacognitive Reading Strategies………………………………….33

3. METHOD……………………………………………………………39
3.1 Subjects………………………………………………………………………39
3.2 Materials and Instruments……………………………………………………40
3.2.1 The Pretest and Post-test Questionnaires on the Students’ Perception of Reading……………………………………………………………….40
3.2.2 The Reading Materials……………………………………………….40
3.2.3 The pretest and Post-test of Reading Comprehension Tests………….41
3.2.4 Questionnaire II: The Questionnaire on Metacognitive Reading Strategies……………………………………………………………..42
3.2.5 Questionnaire III: A Questionnaire on Responses to the Metacognitive Reading Strategy Training……………………………………………44
3.3 Procedures & Instruction…………………………………………………......45
3.4 Data Analysis…………………………………………………………………47
4. Results and Discussion………………………………………………51
4.1 The Results of Questionnaire II Before the MRST by HPG & LPG…..51
4.2 The Results of Questionnaire II After the MRST by HPG & LPG...…...56
4.2.1 Comparison of Strategic Reading of Using Title or Pictures and Using Background Knowledge in Prediction for HPG & LPG between the Pretest and Post-test……………………………………………….....64
4.2.2 Comparison of Strategic Reading of Summarizing for Students Beteween the Pretest and the Post-test……………………………….66
4.3 Comparison of Perception of Reading for Students Before the MRST..68
4.3.1 Comparison of Perception of the fixed-up Behaviors for HPG & LPG before the MRST……………………………………………………..68
4.3.2 Comparison of Attitudes Toward the Nature of Good Reading For LPG and HPG Before the MRST………………………………………….70
4.4 Comparison of Perceptions of Reading For Students After the MRST………………………………………………………………….72
4.4.1 Comparison of Perception of the fixed-up Behaviors for HPG & LPG after the MRST………………………………………………………...73
4.4.2 Comparison of Attitudes Toward the Nature of Good Reading for the HPG and LPG After the MRST………………………………………..75
4.5 Reading Comprehension Improvement For Both HPG and LPG……….80
4.5.1 The Responses of HPG and LPG to the Effect of MRST on Reading Comprehension…………………………………………………...80
4.5.2 The Responses of HPG and LPG to Effect of MRST On Answering Reading Comprehension Questions
4.5.3 Results of Reading Comprehension Tests For HPG and LPG Between The Pretest and Post-test………………………………. 85
4.6 The Results of Questionnaire III: Evaluation of Responses to the Three
Metacognitive Reading Strategies for Participants……………………..87
4.6.1 HPG & LPG Students’ Responses to the Effectiveness of the Three Metacognitive Reading Strategies………………………………………………87
4.6.2 HPG & LPG Students’ Response to the Three Metacognitive Reading Strategies………….……………………………………………………...91
4.6.3 The Responses of HPG & LPG to the Preference for the MRST.......….93
4.6.4 The Responses of HPG & LPG to the Effect of MRST on Promoting Interest in English Reading......................................................................95
5. Conclusions, Implications, and Suggestions…………………………99
5.1 Conclusions……………………………………………………………99
5.2 Implication…………………………………………………………...101
5.3 Suggestions…………………………………………………………..103

REFERENCES………………………………………………………...106
APPENDIX A: The Questionnaire on the Students’ Perception of Reading (Questionnaire I)……………………………………………122
APPENDIX B: The Reading Materials…………………………………….124
APPENDIX C: English Reading Comprehension Tests…………………...142
APPENDIX D: The Questionnaire of Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategy (Questionnaire II)………………………………..151
APPENDIX E: Response to the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Instruction
(Questionnaire III)………………………………………...161














LIST OF TABLES

TABLE Page
Table 4.1 Frequency and Percentage of Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by HPG and LPG in Questionnaire II before the MRST…………...53
Table 4.2 Frequency and Percentage of Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by HPG and LPG in Questionnaire II after the MRST……………..59
Table 4.3 Comparison of Strategic Reading of Using Title or Pictures, Using Context, and Using Background Knowledge in Prediction for HPG & LPG Between the Pretest and Post-test…………………………….65
Table 4.4 Comparison of Summarizing for HPG & LPG Students between the Pretest and Post-test………………………………………………...66
Table 4.5 Comparison of Perception of the fixed-up Behaviors for HPG & LPG Students Between the Pretest and Post-test……………………...74
Table 4.6 Comparison of Attitudes Toward Good Reading for Students Between the Pre-test and Post-test………………………………..................78
Table 4.7 The Responses of HPG & LPG to the Effect of MRST on the
Reading Comprehension…………………………………………....81
Table 4.8 The Responses of HPG & LPG to the Effect of MRST on Answering the Reading Comprehension Questions………………………….84
Table 4.9 The Paired Samples T-test for the Pre-tests and Post-test of HPG…86
Table 4.10 The Paired Samples T-test for the Pre-tests and Post-test of LPG...86
Table 4.11 HPG & LPG Students’ Responses to the Effectiveness of the Three
Metacognitive Reading Strategies………………………………..89
Table 4.12 HPG & LPG Students’ Responses to the Three Metacognitive
Reading Strategies……………………………………………….93
Table 4.13 HPG & LPG Students’ Likes and Dislikes for the MRST……….95
Table 4.14 The Responses of HPG & LPG to the Effect of MRST on Promoting
Interest in English Reading………………………………………96






















LIST OF FIGURES

PAGE
Figure 1 Interaction of Metacognitive Components…………………………..17		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 3329744 bytes-
dc.format.extent 3891777 bytes-
dc.format.extent 3739824 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1281629 bytes-
dc.format.extent 11734949 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1223804 bytes-
dc.format.extent 12133408 bytes-
dc.format.extent 884295 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1235761 bytes-
dc.format.extent 33375752 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1068102 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0939510191en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 後設認知閱讀策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Metacognitive Reading Strategiesen_US
dc.title (題名) 後設認知閱讀策略訓練對國中生英語閱讀理解及態度的效益研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The effects of metacognitive reading strategy training on English reading comprehension and attitudes of junior high school studentsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abromitis, B. (1994). The role of metacognition: Implication for instruction. Literacy Research Report, 19, 3-31. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371291).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alessi, S. M., Anderson, T. H., & Goetz, E. T. (1979). An investigation of lookbacks during studying. Discourse Processes, 2, 197-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alexander, P., & Judy, J. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375-404.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Almasi, J. F. (2003). Teaching strategic process in reading. New York: The Guilford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 461-472.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, R. C. (1984). Some reflections on the requisition of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 13, 5-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission On Reading. Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-381.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Anderson, M. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in connected discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 433-440.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Andre, M., & Anderson, T. H. (1978-79). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605-623.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Antonacci, P.A. (1991). Students search for meaning in the text through semantic mapping . Social Education, 55(3), 174-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1981). Content area textbooks (Rdg. Ed. Rep. No. 23). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 39-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ausubel, D. P. (1980). Schemata, cognitive structure, and advance organizers: A reply to Anderson, Spiro, and Anderson. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 400-404.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions (Tech. Rep. No. 145). Champion: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 525)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 365-374.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don’t know? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 155-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L. (1985b). How do we know when we don’t understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 155-205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L., & Anderson, R. I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 281-294.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984b). Cognitive monitoring in reading. In J. Floodzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose (pp. 21-44). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984b). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D.P. Pearson (ED.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baumann, J. F., Seifert-Kessell, N., & Jones, L. (1987, December). Effects of think-aloud instruction on elementary students’ ability to monitor their comprehension. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, ST. Petersburg, FL.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, E.L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297-306.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Block, E. L. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463-494.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 319-343.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borko, H., Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Teacher’s decisions in planning of reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 449-466.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brandsford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brandsford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383-438). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braun, C., Rennie, B. J., & Labercane, G. D. (1986). A conference approach to the development of metacognitive awareness. Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers. The 35th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 204-209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from texts. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 501-526). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1984). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), A decade of reading research: Implications for practice (pp. 49-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A., Brandsford, J., Ferrara, R., & Champione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & J. Flavell & E. Markman (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 77-166). New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A.L., & Campione, J. C. (1979). The effects of knowledge and experience on the formation of retrieval plans for studying from texts. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sukes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, A.L., & Smiley, S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49, 1076-1088.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bruinsma, R. (1990). Learning to ride a bike and learning to read: Children’s conception of reading. Australian Journal of Reading:13:114-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Calfee, R. (1981). Cognitive psychology and educational practice. In D. C. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 9, pp. 3-73). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Canney, G., & Winograd, P. (1979). Schemata for reading and reading comprehension performance (Tech. Rep. No. 120). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Studying of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 169 520)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carrell, P. L. (1992). Awareness of text structure: Effects on recall. Language Learning, 42, 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G. & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategies training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 647-678.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cassanave, C. P. (1988). Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: A neglected essential. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 282-302.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chang, C. K. (2000). The relationship between four metacognitive factors and reading ability. The Proceeding of the 17th International Symposium on English Teaching, 227-293. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co. Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, J. C. (2005). Explicit instruction of reading strategies at senior high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cheng, C. K. (2000). The relationship between metacognitive factors and reading ability. In the Proceeding of the Seventeenth conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 277-294). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cheng, L.Y. (1991). The study of freshman English reading: The application of metacognitive strategies. In the Proceedings of the Second Education Research in Taiwan Province (pp. 596-635). Taichung: Taiwan Province Government.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chern, C.L. (1994). Chinese Readers’ Metacognitive Awareness in Reading Chinese and English (FL 023 225). Papers presented at the Annual International Language in Education Conference (Hong Kong, 1993). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 060)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121-150.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clarke, M. A. (1980). The short-circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203-209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Craig, M. T., & Yore, L. D. (1995). Middle school students’ metacognitive knowledge about science reading and science text: An interview study. Reading Psychology, 16, 169-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. (1988). Developmental and instructional analysis of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cummins, J. (1981). Four misconceptions about language proficiency in bilingual education. NABE Journal, 5(3), 31-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cziko, G. A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first-and second-language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101-104.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Day, J. D. (1980). Teaching summarization skills: a comparison of training methods. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dewitz, P., Carr, E. M., & Patberg, J. P. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99-119.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dole, Janice, Gerald G. Duffy, Laura R. Roehler, and P. David Pearson (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research 61 (2): 239-264.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffy, G. G. (1982). Fighting off the alligators: What research in real classrooms has to say about reading instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 357-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Herman, B. A. (1988) Modeling mental process helps poor readers become strategic readers. The Reading Teacher, 41, 762-767.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaning the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffy, G. G, Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Durkin, D. (1978-1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-553.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Durkin, D. (1981). Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 515-544.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ehrlich, M. F., Remond, M., & Tardieu, H. (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11 (1), 29-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W.P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral Communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Forrest-Pressley, D. L., & Waller, T. G. (1984). Cognition, metacogniton, and reading. New York: Springer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gambrell, L. B., & Heathington, B. S. (1981). Adult disabled readers’ metacognitive awareness about reading tasks and strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 215-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R. (1980). Monitoring of understanding: An investigation of good and poor readers’ awareness of induced miscomprehension of text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 55-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R. (1981). Monitoring of passage inconsistency among poor comprehenders: A preliminary test of the “piecemeal processing” explanation. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 159-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R. (1992). Metacognition and self-monitoring strategies. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 236-252). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R., & Kraus, C. (1981-1982). Good and poor comprehender differences in knowing and regulating reading behaviors. Educational Research Quarterly, 6, 5-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R., Macready, G. B., & Wagoner, S. (1984). Readers’ acquisition of the components of the text-lookback strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 300-309.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 439-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garner, R., Wagoner, S., & Smith, T. (1983). Externalizing question-answering strategies of good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 439-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Geva, E. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading. Scientific Studies in Reading, 4, 295-312.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 10, 597-602.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second-language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hare, V. C. (1981). Readers’ problem identification and problem solving strategies for high and low knowledge articles. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 359-365.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of summarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 62-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harris, P. L., Kruithof, A., Terwogt, M. M., & Visser, T. (1981). Children’s detection and awareness of textual anomaly. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 212-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harvey, Stephanie and Ann Goudivs (2000). Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension to Enhance Understanding. New York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hiebert, E. H. (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 231-255.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ko, M. Y. (2004). A critical literature review of metacognitive reading strategy instruction. Journal of National Huwei University of Science & Technology, 1, 239-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kolers, P. A. (1970). Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading (pp. 90-118). New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krashen, S. D. (1988). Do we learn to read by reading? The relationship between free reading and reading ability. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in content: Connecting observation and understanding: Vol. 2. Advances in discourse processes (pp. 269-298). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40(1, Serial No.159)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lesgold, A. M., & Perfetti, C. A. (1978). Interactive processes in reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 1, 323-336.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lin, W. L. (2004). An investigation of reading strategy instruction on EFL junior high school students. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chung Cheng University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lonberger, R. (1988, February). Effects of training in a self-generated learning strategy on the prose processing abilities of 4th and 6th graders. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Education Association, Savannah, GA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Masur, E. F., McIntyre, C. W., & Flavell, J. H. ( 1973). Developmental changes in apportionment of study time among items in multiple free recall task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 237-246.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNeil, J. D. (1987). Metacognition in reading comprehension. In McNeil (Eds.), Reading comprehension: New direction for classroom practice (2nd edit.) (pp. 91-105). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mosenthal, P. (1983). The influence of social situation on children’s classroom comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 537-547.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, M., & Paris, S. G.. (1978). Children’s metacognitive knowledge abinstruout reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680-690.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Reviews, 84, 231-259.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nist, S., & Holschuh, J., (2000). Comprehension strategies at the college level. In R. Flippo & D. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 75-104). Mahwh, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Otto, W. (1985). Metacognition and reading instruction Journal of Reading, 28, 573-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oxford, R., Crookall, D., Cohen, A., Lavine, R., Nyikos, M. & Sutter, W. (1990). Strategy training for language learners: Six situational case studies and a training model. Foreign Language Annals, 22:197-216.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S. G. & Oka, E. (1986). Children’s reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6, 25-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Palincsar, A. M. (1985, April). Unpacking “multicomponent, metacognitive training packages.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Palinscar, A. M., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children’s reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S. G., & Lindauer, B. K. (1982). The development of cognitive skills during childhood. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 333-349). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension Monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, S., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pearson, P. D., & Dole, J. A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of the research and a new conceptualization of instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 153-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Persson, U. B. (1994). Reading for understanding: An empirical contribution to the metacognition of reading comprehension. Linkoping Studies in Education and Psychology Dissertations, No. 41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pichert, J. W. (1979). Sensitivity to what is important in prose (Tech. Rep. No. 149). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 179 946).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pintrich, P.R. (2002) The role of metacogitive knowledge in learning, teaching and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41 (4) 219-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pintrich, P.R., & Degroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pintrich, P.R., & Wolters, C., & Baxer, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulation learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 301-342.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Resnick, L. B. (1984). Comprehending and learning: Implications for a cognitive theory of instruction. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), learning and comprehension of text (pp. 431-443). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Risko, V. J., & Feldman, N. (1986). Teaching young remedial readers to generate questions as they read. Reading Psychology, 23, 54-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rinehart, S.D., Stahl, S. A, & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21,442-438.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 573-603). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Samuels, S. J., & Kamil, M. L. (1984). Models of the reading process. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 185-224). New York: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sarig, G. (1987). High-level reading in the first and in the foreign language: Some comparative process data. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 105-120). Washington, D. C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmitt, M. C. (1988). The effects of an elaborated, directed activity on the metacomprehension skills of third graders. Dialogues in literacy research. The 37th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 167-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A Questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, March, 1990, 454-461.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431-449.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, F. (1977). Making sense of reading-and of reading instruction. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 386-395.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, H. K. (1967). The responses of good and poor readers when asked to read for different purposes. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 53 -83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18, 275-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spiro, R. J. (1979). Etiology of reading comprehension style. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Reading Research: Studies and applications (pp. 118-122). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spiro, R. J., & Tirre, W. C. (1980). Individual differences in schema utilization during discourse processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 204-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Steffensen, M. S., Joag-dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children’s comprehension and memory for expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 401-405.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students’ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2), 134-146.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, B. M., & Berkowitz, B. S. (1980). Facilitating children’s comprehension of content material. In M. L. Kamil & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives in reading research and instruction (Twenty-ninth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 64-68). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tulving, E., & Gold, C. (1963). Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journals of Experimental Psychology, 66, 319-327.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vygotsky, Lev Semonovich, (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 328-346.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wagoner, R. K. & Sternberg, R. J. (1983). Executive control of reading. Unpublished manuscript.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wellman, H. M. (1978). Knowledge of the interaction of memory variables: A developmental study of metamemory. Developmental Psychologist, 14, 24-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wellman, H. M., Collins, J., & Glieberman, J. (1981). Understanding the combination of memory variables: Developing conceptions of memory limitations. Child Development, 52, 1313-1317.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Winograd, P. N.(1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Winograd, P. N., & Johnston, P. (1982). Comprehension monitoring and the error detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 61-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yuill, N., & Joscelyne, T. (1988) Effect of organizational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders’ story understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 152-158.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1989). Effects of reading ability on children’s comprehension evaluation and regulation. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 69-84.zh_TW