| dc.contributor.advisor | 何萬順 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Her, One Soon | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 吳郁賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Wu, Yu Hsien | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 吳郁賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wu, Yu Hsien | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 9-Dec-2010 12:32:40 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 9-Dec-2010 12:32:40 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-Dec-2010 12:32:40 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095555002 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49897 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95555002 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 有關漢語動結式的議題，中心語與論元體現皆呈現了複雜的現象。就中心語這部份，過去研究(Cheng & Huang, 1994; Gu, 1992; Huang & Lin, 1992; Y. Li, 1990, 1993, 1995, 1999; C. Li, 2008, 2009; Shen, 1992; Tai, 2003)的論點相當分歧，顯示漢語動結式中心語的位置仍有討論的空間；至於論元體現方面，由於論元與詞類間的互動會帶出許多不同的語意和句法表現，而先前的研究(Her, 2004, 2007; Li, 1990, 1995)尚未足以完整的解釋這些情形。本研究主要從詞彙的角度來探討中心語和論元體現這兩個議題。首先，依照Her (2004, 2007)的分析方式，本研究嘗試排列出漢語動結式合法的論元結構，並利用這些論元結構描述各個動結式的論元體現，解釋可能的語意及句法結構。接著，同樣根據所提出的合法論元結構，以顯現的論元為主，並採用有關判斷中心語的假設(Zwicky, 1984; Y. Li, 1990, 1995; Chung, 2006; C. Li, 2008, 2009)，整理出漢語動結式中心語的位置。最後，詞彙功能語法中的詞彙映照理論驗證了本研究前半部分對論元體現與中心語的討論，這個理論也另外解釋漢語動結式處所詞倒置的現象。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Two issues regarding Mandarin resultative compounds, headedness and argument realization, present a complex phenomenon. For one thing, extensive studies (Cheng & Huang, 1994; Gu, 1992; Huang & Lin, 1992; Y. Li, 1990, 1993, 1995, 1999; C. Li, 2008, 2009; Shen, 1992; Tai, 2003) concerning headedness fail to critically determine the head of a Mandarin resultative compound. For another, despite previous research (Her, 2004, 2007; Li, 1990, 1995), the interaction between arguments and grammatical functions of Mandarin resultative compounds remains inconclusive.To settle the foregoing matters, the purpose of this thesis is to probe into argument realization and headedness from a lexicalist approach, aiming to provide a full account of both issues. In the first part of this thesis, following Her’s (2004, 2007) analysis, the thesis focuses on formulating systematic feasible argument structures for Mandarin resultative compounds, then examining the argument structures of a resultative compound to explain its possible readings and syntactic representations. Based on the available argument structures proposed in the first half, the second part of the thesis investigates the headedness of Mandarin resultative compounds, suggesting that the head can be determined when arguments are overt. The criterion for headedness that is adopted in this thesis involves assumptions proposed by Zwicky (1984), Y. Li (1990, 1995), Chung (2006), and C. Li (2008, 2009). Finally, the thesis demonstrates that both issues of argument realization and headedness are well governed by Lexical Mapping Theory and that Lexical Mapping Theory further clarifies constructions with locative inversion of Mandarin resultative compounds. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements ivChinese Abstract viiiEnglish Abstract xChapter1. Introduction 12. Literature Review 52.1 Characteristics and Classifications 52.2 Argument Realization 92.2.1 Li’s Analysis (1990, 1995) 92.2.2 Her’s Analysis (2004, 2007) 153. Formulating Argument Structures and Argument Realization 233.1 The Linking of Composing Roles 233.2 Suppression in a Composite Role 273.3 Causativity Distribution 293.4 Argument-Function Mapping 313.4.1 Transitive-Transitive Verb Compounds 323.4.2 Transitive-Intransitive Verb Compounds 363.4.3 Intransitive-Transitive Verb Compounds 393.4.4 Intransitive-Intransitive Verb Compounds 404. Headedness 434.1 V1 as Head 434.1.1 Li’s Analysis (1990, 1993, 1995, 1999) 434.1.2 Cheng and Huang’s Analysis (1994) 454.2 V2 as Head 484.2.1 Shen’s Analysis (1992) 484.2.2 Tai’s Analysis (2003) 504.3 Double-headedness 534.3.1 Gu’s Analysis (1992) 534.4 Headlessness 544.4.1 Huang and Lin’s Analysis (1992) 554.4.2 Li’s Analysis (2008, 2009) 594.5 An Alternative of Determining Headedness 615. Argument Realization and Headedness in Lexical Mapping Theory 715.1 Lexical Mapping Theory 715.2 The Application 755.3 Locative Inversion in Resultative Constructions 896. Conclusion 95References 97 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 493928 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095555002 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 動結式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 中心語 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論元體現 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論元結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 詞彙映照理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 處所詞倒置 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | resultative compounds | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | headedness | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | argument realization | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | argument structure | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Lexical Mapping Theory | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | locative inversion | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 漢語動結式中的中心語與論元體現 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Headedness and argument realization in mandarin resultative compounds | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Babby, L. (1989). Subjectlessness, external subcategorization, and the projection principle. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju I lingvistiku, 32, 7-40. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, J. (1995). Lexicality and argument structure. Paper presented at Paris Syntax and Semantics Conference, October 12, 1995. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~bresnan/paris.pdf | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, J., & Kanerva, J. (1989). Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 1-50. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, J., & Kanerva, J. (1992). The thematic hierarchy and locative inversion in UG: A reply to Schachter’s comments. Syntax and Semantics: Syntax and the Lexicon (pp. 111-125), New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carrier-Duncan, J. (1985). Linking of thematic roles in derivational word formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 1-34. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carrier, J., & Randall, J. (1992). The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 173-234. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, C. H.-H. (1998). V-V compounds in Mandarin Chinese: Argument structures and semantics. In J. L. Packard (Ed.), New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation: Morphology, Phonology, and the Lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese (pp. 77-101). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, L.-S.L., & Huang, C.-T.J. (1994). On the argument structure of resultative compounds, in honor of William S.-Y. Wang. In M. Chen and O. Tzeng (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change (pp. 187-221). Taipei: Pyramid Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chung, K. S. (2006). Mandarin Compound Verbs. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dalrymple, M. (2001). Lexical Functional Grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547-619. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Falk, Y. (2001). Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, A. & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80(3), 532-568. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gu, Y. (1992). The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, O.-S. (1997). Interaction and Variation in the Chinese VO Construction. Taipei: Crane Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, O.-S. (2003). Chinese inversion constructions within a simplified LMT. In: Bodomo, A., Luke, K. (Eds.), Lexical-Functional Grammar Analysis of Chinese, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph, No. 19. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, O.-S. (2004). Argument-function linking in resultatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 30(2), 1-34. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, O.-S. (2006). Justifying part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei. Lingua, 116, 1274-1302. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, O.-S. (2007). Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin resultatives: A lexical mapping account. Lingua, 117, 221-246. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547-593. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Langauge, 56(2), 251-299. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, C.-R., & Lin, F.-W. (1992). Composite event structure and complex predicates: a template-based approach to argument selection. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indianan, pp. 90-108. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, C.-T.J. (2006). Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. In Bulletin of Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan, 253, 1-43. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3353765/Huang_Resultatives.pdf?sequence=2 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, C.-T.J., Li, Y.-H.A, & Li, Y. (2009). The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, H.-T., & Her, O.-S. (1998). Locative inversion: English, Chinese and Universal Gammer. In S.-F. Huang (Ed.), Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Language in Taiwan (pp. 287-304). Taipei: Crane Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, C.N., & Thompson, S.A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, C. (2008). On the “scare reading” of resultatives. Language Sciences, 31(4), 389-408. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, C. (2009). On the headedness of Mandarin resultative verb compounds. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 35(1), 27-63. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Y. (1990). On V-V compounds in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 177-207. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Y. (1993). Structural head and aspectuality. Language, 69, 480-504. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Y. (1995). The thematic hierarchy and causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 255-282. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin, P.-S. (2007). Interpretational ambiguity in Chinese resultative constructions. MA thesis, University College London. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCloskey, J. (1999). On the distribution of subject properties in Irish. Paper presented at the Workshop on Grammatical Functions, University of Illinois, July, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Packard, J. (2000). The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Randall, J. (2010). Linking: The geometry of argument structure. [Adobe Digital Editions Version]. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8308-2 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shen, L. (1992). Guanyu hanyu jieguo fuhe dongci zhong canxiang jiegou de wenti [On the argument structure of resultative compounds in Chinese]. MS thesis, Kyoto University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shibagaki, R. (2009). Affected Roles and Linking in Mandarin Resultatives. In J. Brooke et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on East Asian Linguistics. Simon Fraser University Working Papers in Linguistics 2: http://www.sfu.ca/gradlings/wp_2.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simpson, J. (1991). Warlpiri Morpho-syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, J.H.-Y. (2003). Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 4, 301-316. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thompson, S. (1973). Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A case for lexical rules. Language, 49(2), 361-379. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zwicky, A. (1984). Heads. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 1-29. | zh_TW |
