學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 環境政策與最適汙染減量之研發策略
Environment policy and the strategy of R&D
作者 施睿明
貢獻者 賴育邦
施睿明
關鍵詞 環境政策
研發策略
R&D
污染稅
環境協定
R&D
Environmental policy
Emission-tax
Environmental agreements
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-Dec-2010 16:08:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 經濟快速發展帶來的環境衝擊,近年來逐漸成為全球關注的焦點,為了達成環境與經濟永續發展的目標,各國政府如何透過政策的實行,提高有關污染減量的研發誘因以調整產業結構亦為重要的課題,大部分的文獻著重於策略性環境政策與貿易之間的關係,並進一步分析福利的變化,本文主要係從產業組織的觀點出發,將產業研發決策與環境政策作連結,探討環境政策與污染減量之研發投入間的關係,並進一步分析研發投入在兩國合作與非合作之環境政策的影響。
透過兩國三地模型的應用並輔以二階段賽局之分析方法,本文發現環境政策對污染減量之研發投入水準的影響,取決於消費者對產品的需求與研發的外溢效果大小而定,至於兩國在環境政策上,在廠商之研發投入為外生變數的前提下,各別訂定的污染稅隨著廠商研發的投入而調降,而共同訂定的污染稅反而隨著研發的投入而提高。
There has been a growing concern about the impact of economic development on the global environment which has deeply influenced by the uncontrolled pollution emissions. In order to reduce pollution emissions, governments have incentives to use environmental policies to encourage the private R&D spending which targets on reducing pollutions. Therefore, in this paper we develop a three-country model to examine the relationship between environmental policy and the level of the private R&D. And we also investigate the effects of the private R&D investments in the environmental agreements between countries. A principal finding is that when governments levy tax on pollution emissions, it turns out that firms may or may not increase its level of the R&D spending. In addition, in setting the R&D spending as the exogenous variable, ceteris paribus, the non-cooperative emission-tax will decrease when the R&D spending increases. However, on the contrary, the increased R&D spending will lead to the increasing of the cooperative emission-tax.
參考文獻 一、中文部分
劉錦龍、許菁君、謝壯堃(2005), “能源環境政策與誘發創新”, 經濟論文叢刊, 33, 181-212.
徐學忍與巫和懋(2005), “不同合作機制對研發策略聯盟的均衡與最適結構之影響”, 經濟論文, 33, 405-432.
賴育邦(2007), “跨國污染與國際環境協定”, 經社法制論叢, 40, 151-174.
二、英文部分
Atallah, G. (2002), “Vertical R&D Spillover, Cooperation, Market Structure, and
Innovation,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, pp. 179-209.
Brander, J. and P. Krugman (1983), “A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 15, 313-323.
Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
D’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin, (1988), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers,” American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137.
Duval, Y. and S.F. Hamilton (2002), “Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade in Asymmetric Oligopoly Markets,” International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 259-271.
Hinloopen, J. (1997), “Subsidizing Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers,” Journal of Economics, 66, 151-175.
Kamien, M.I., E. Muller, and I. Zang, (1992), “Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels,” American Economic Review, 17, 1293-1306.
Katz, M.L. (1986), “An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 527-543.
Kennedy, P.W. (1994), “Equilibrium Pollution Taxes in Open Economies with Imperfect Competition,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 49-63.
Lai Y .-B and C.-H. Hu (2008), “Trade Agreements, Domestic Environmental Regulation, and Transboundary Pollution, ” Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 209-228.
Mansfield, E. (1985), “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak out?”Jjournal of Industrial Economics, 34, 907-918.
Spence, A.M. (1984), “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance,”Econometrica, 52, 101-121.
Suzumura, K. (1992), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in an Oligopoly with Spillovers,” American Economic Review, 82, 1307-1320.
Tanguay, G.A. (2001), “Strategic Environmental Policies under International Duopolistic Competition,” International Tax and Public Finance, 8, 793-811.
Takarada, Y. (2005), “Transboundary Pollution and the Welfare Effects of Technology Transfer,” Journal of Economics, 85, 251-275.
Ulph, A. (1996), “Environmental Policy and International Trade when Governments and Producers Act Strategically,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 265-281.
Walz, U. and D. Wellisch (1997), “Is Free Trade in the Interest of Exporting Countries when There is Ecological Dumping?” Journal of Public Economics, 66, 275-291.
Youssef, S.B. (2009), “Transboundary Pollution, R&D Spillovers and International Trade,” The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 235-250.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
97255009
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0972550091
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 賴育邦zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 施睿明zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 施睿明zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Dec-2010 16:08:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Dec-2010 16:08:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Dec-2010 16:08:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0972550091en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50009-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97255009zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 經濟快速發展帶來的環境衝擊,近年來逐漸成為全球關注的焦點,為了達成環境與經濟永續發展的目標,各國政府如何透過政策的實行,提高有關污染減量的研發誘因以調整產業結構亦為重要的課題,大部分的文獻著重於策略性環境政策與貿易之間的關係,並進一步分析福利的變化,本文主要係從產業組織的觀點出發,將產業研發決策與環境政策作連結,探討環境政策與污染減量之研發投入間的關係,並進一步分析研發投入在兩國合作與非合作之環境政策的影響。
透過兩國三地模型的應用並輔以二階段賽局之分析方法,本文發現環境政策對污染減量之研發投入水準的影響,取決於消費者對產品的需求與研發的外溢效果大小而定,至於兩國在環境政策上,在廠商之研發投入為外生變數的前提下,各別訂定的污染稅隨著廠商研發的投入而調降,而共同訂定的污染稅反而隨著研發的投入而提高。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) There has been a growing concern about the impact of economic development on the global environment which has deeply influenced by the uncontrolled pollution emissions. In order to reduce pollution emissions, governments have incentives to use environmental policies to encourage the private R&D spending which targets on reducing pollutions. Therefore, in this paper we develop a three-country model to examine the relationship between environmental policy and the level of the private R&D. And we also investigate the effects of the private R&D investments in the environmental agreements between countries. A principal finding is that when governments levy tax on pollution emissions, it turns out that firms may or may not increase its level of the R&D spending. In addition, in setting the R&D spending as the exogenous variable, ceteris paribus, the non-cooperative emission-tax will decrease when the R&D spending increases. However, on the contrary, the increased R&D spending will lead to the increasing of the cooperative emission-tax.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究方法與限制 3
第三節 本文架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 研發策略的應用 5
第二節 環境政策的應用 9
第三節 綜合整理 13
第三章 模型設定 14
第一節 基本假設 14
第二節 廠商行為 16
第三節 政府行為 18
第四章 最適之研發投入 19
第一節 廠商非合作之研發決策 19
第二節 廠商合作之研發決策 22
第三節 綜合比較與整理 25
第五章 最適之環境政策 28
第一節 非合作之環境政策分析 28
第二節 合作之環境政策分析 31
第三節 綜合比較與整理 33
第六章 結論 36
參考文獻 37
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 668492 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0972550091en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 環境政策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&Dzh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 污染稅zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 環境協定zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) R&Den_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Environmental policyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Emission-taxen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Environmental agreementsen_US
dc.title (題名) 環境政策與最適汙染減量之研發策略zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Environment policy and the strategy of R&Den_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉錦龍、許菁君、謝壯堃(2005), “能源環境政策與誘發創新”, 經濟論文叢刊, 33, 181-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐學忍與巫和懋(2005), “不同合作機制對研發策略聯盟的均衡與最適結構之影響”, 經濟論文, 33, 405-432.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴育邦(2007), “跨國污染與國際環境協定”, 經社法制論叢, 40, 151-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Atallah, G. (2002), “Vertical R&D Spillover, Cooperation, Market Structure, andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Innovation,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, pp. 179-209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brander, J. and P. Krugman (1983), “A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 15, 313-323.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985), “Export Subsidies and Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) D’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin, (1988), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers,” American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duval, Y. and S.F. Hamilton (2002), “Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade in Asymmetric Oligopoly Markets,” International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 259-271.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hinloopen, J. (1997), “Subsidizing Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers,” Journal of Economics, 66, 151-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kamien, M.I., E. Muller, and I. Zang, (1992), “Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels,” American Economic Review, 17, 1293-1306.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katz, M.L. (1986), “An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development,” Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 527-543.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kennedy, P.W. (1994), “Equilibrium Pollution Taxes in Open Economies with Imperfect Competition,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 49-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lai Y .-B and C.-H. Hu (2008), “Trade Agreements, Domestic Environmental Regulation, and Transboundary Pollution, ” Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 209-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mansfield, E. (1985), “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak out?”Jjournal of Industrial Economics, 34, 907-918.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spence, A.M. (1984), “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance,”Econometrica, 52, 101-121.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suzumura, K. (1992), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in an Oligopoly with Spillovers,” American Economic Review, 82, 1307-1320.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tanguay, G.A. (2001), “Strategic Environmental Policies under International Duopolistic Competition,” International Tax and Public Finance, 8, 793-811.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Takarada, Y. (2005), “Transboundary Pollution and the Welfare Effects of Technology Transfer,” Journal of Economics, 85, 251-275.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ulph, A. (1996), “Environmental Policy and International Trade when Governments and Producers Act Strategically,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 265-281.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walz, U. and D. Wellisch (1997), “Is Free Trade in the Interest of Exporting Countries when There is Ecological Dumping?” Journal of Public Economics, 66, 275-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Youssef, S.B. (2009), “Transboundary Pollution, R&D Spillovers and International Trade,” The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 235-250.zh_TW