學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 便利商店促銷贈品收藏行為之研究-以7-ELEVEN為例
The study of collecting behavior on collectable premiums: a case of 7-ELEVEN
作者 王雅芬
Wang, Ya Fen
貢獻者 陳建維
王雅芬
Wang, Ya Fen
關鍵詞 贈品集點活動
知覺風險
知覺價值
日期 2010
上傳時間 29-Sep-2011 16:37:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 7-ELEVEN 便利商店於2005年4月成為台灣第一個推出來店消費滿額送Hello Kitty 造型磁鐵的促銷活動,此舉不僅使7-ELEVEN的來客率與客單價增加,亦造成了一股收集Kitty磁鐵的風潮,大眾瘋狂收集便利商店促銷贈品的熱潮一直延燒至今,也使得其他便利商店業者跟進推出滿額送贈品活動,為的就是要瓜分這個市場所帶來的的龐大商機。縱使便利商店業者推出的贈品促銷活動門檻越來越高,卻能持續吸引大眾目光,藉此本研究想進一步瞭解贈品促銷活動吸引消費者的地方何在,消費者對風險感受程度的不同,如何影響其對此促銷活動的價值感,對其收藏行為是否有任何影響?
     
     本文研究架構包含贈品獲得方案、知覺風險與知覺價值、收藏行為等之間的互相關係,本研究以問卷調查及統計分析,探討上述變數與消費者促銷贈品收藏行為的關係。
     
     研究結果顯示消費者選擇加價購方案相較於選擇免費送方案者,由於「加價」對消費者或社會大眾而言並非免費獲得之贈品,故在自我或他人肯定自己參與便利商店贈品集點活動之認同感上較差。因為免費送方案與加價購方案間互為替代關係,故當消費者認為選擇免費送方案的金錢、時間等風險程度較高時,便傾向選擇加價購方案,反之則傾向選擇免費送方案。對於收藏行為-目標形成、資訊搜尋、收集動機、管理、挑戰、收集努力而言,主要的關鍵影響因素在於便利商店推出之贈品集點活動能獲得社會大眾好評,以及消費者面臨不同門檻方案之選擇其感受之價值孰高孰低。
參考文獻 一、中文部分
1.王又鵬,1993,促銷活動對消費者購買行為影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
2.朱甯興,1982,學習團體:理論與技術,台北市:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
3.尚.布希亞,1997,物體系,林志明譯,時報文化出版。
4.莊麗娟,1999,物質主義傾向、消費價值觀與產品涉入對收藏行為影響之研究,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
5.葉銘壠,2010,連鎖式便利商店的促銷活動對經營績效影響之探討-以7-ELEVEN及全家便利商店為例,南台科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1.Aaker, D. A. 1973. Toward A Normative Model of Promotional Decision Making. Management Science, 19(6), pp. 593-603.
2.Bauer, R. A. 1960. Consumer behavior as risk taking, Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Edited by American Marketing Association, pp. 389-398, Chicago, IL.
3.Beem, E. R. and Shaffer, H. J. 1981. Triggers to customer action- Some elements in a theory of promotional inducement. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, pp. 81-106.
4.Belk, R. W. 1995. Collecting as luxury consumption: Effects on individuals and households. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(3), pp. 477-490.
5.Brissert, M. and Nowicki, S. 1973. Internal versus external of reinforcement
and reaction to intrustration. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25,
pp. 35-59.
6.Campbell, L. and Diamond, W. D. 1990. Framing and Sales Promotions: The Characteristics of A Good Deal, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), pp.
25-31.
7.Cox, D. F. 1967. Risk handing in consumer behavior-an intensive study of two cases. In: Cox, D. F. (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handing in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, pp. 34-81.
8.Cunningham, S. M. 1967. The major dimension of perceived risk. In Donald F. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston, pp. 82-108.
9.Dowling, G. R. and Staelin, R. 1994. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, pp. 119-134.
10.Formanek, R. 1991. Why they collect: Collectors reveal their motivations. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, pp. 275-286.
11.Jacoby, J. and Kaplan, L. B. 1972. The components of perceived risk. Proceedings of the third annual conference, Ann Arbour, MI, Association for Consumer research, pp. 382-393.
12.Kotler, P. 2000. Marketing management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 10th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
13.Kotler and Keller. 2001. A framework for marketing management, 4th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
14.Laurent, G. and Kapferer J-N. 1985. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), pp. 41-53.
15.Nunnally, F. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.Petrick, J. F. 2002. Development of A multi-dimensional scale for measuring perceived value of a service. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), pp. 119-136.
17.Roselius, T. 1971. Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35, pp. 56-61.
18.Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80, pp. 1-28.
19.Rychman, R. M. and Sherman, M.F. 1973. Relationship between self-esteem and internal-external control for man and woman. Psychology Reports, 32, pp. 1100-1106.
20.Schultz, Don E., William A. Robinson and Lisa A. Petrison. 1993. Sales Promotion Essentials, 2nd Edition, NTC Business Books, Illinois, USA.
21.Sweeney, J. C. and Soutar, G. N. 2001. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), p.203.
22.Thaler R. 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4, pp.199-244.
23.William, D. M. and Brandon, S. 2004. Collectors and collecting: A social psychological perspective. Leisure Sciences, 26, pp. 85-97.
24.Wood, Charles M. and Lisa K. Scheer. 1996. Incorporating perceived risk into models of consumer deal assessment and purchase intent. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, pp. 399-404.
25.Zeithaml, V. A. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, pp. 2-22.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
99351005
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099351005
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳建維zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王雅芬zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Ya Fenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 王雅芬zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Ya Fenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Sep-2011 16:37:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Sep-2011 16:37:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Sep-2011 16:37:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099351005en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50759-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99351005zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 7-ELEVEN 便利商店於2005年4月成為台灣第一個推出來店消費滿額送Hello Kitty 造型磁鐵的促銷活動,此舉不僅使7-ELEVEN的來客率與客單價增加,亦造成了一股收集Kitty磁鐵的風潮,大眾瘋狂收集便利商店促銷贈品的熱潮一直延燒至今,也使得其他便利商店業者跟進推出滿額送贈品活動,為的就是要瓜分這個市場所帶來的的龐大商機。縱使便利商店業者推出的贈品促銷活動門檻越來越高,卻能持續吸引大眾目光,藉此本研究想進一步瞭解贈品促銷活動吸引消費者的地方何在,消費者對風險感受程度的不同,如何影響其對此促銷活動的價值感,對其收藏行為是否有任何影響?
     
     本文研究架構包含贈品獲得方案、知覺風險與知覺價值、收藏行為等之間的互相關係,本研究以問卷調查及統計分析,探討上述變數與消費者促銷贈品收藏行為的關係。
     
     研究結果顯示消費者選擇加價購方案相較於選擇免費送方案者,由於「加價」對消費者或社會大眾而言並非免費獲得之贈品,故在自我或他人肯定自己參與便利商店贈品集點活動之認同感上較差。因為免費送方案與加價購方案間互為替代關係,故當消費者認為選擇免費送方案的金錢、時間等風險程度較高時,便傾向選擇加價購方案,反之則傾向選擇免費送方案。對於收藏行為-目標形成、資訊搜尋、收集動機、管理、挑戰、收集努力而言,主要的關鍵影響因素在於便利商店推出之贈品集點活動能獲得社會大眾好評,以及消費者面臨不同門檻方案之選擇其感受之價值孰高孰低。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論1
      第一節 研究動機與背景2
      第二節 研究目的2
      第三節 研究流程2
     第二章 文獻探討4
      第一節 促銷活動4
      第二節 知覺風險與價值8
      第三節 收藏行為13
     第三章 研究方法17
      第一節 研究架構17
      第二節 研究假說19
      第三節 各研究變數之操作性定義與衡量24
      第四節 研究設計31
     第四章 實證分析33
      第一節 樣本結構33
      第二節 因素與信度分析39
      第三節 各研究變數之多元迴歸分析46
     第五章 結論與建議68
      第一節 研究結果與討論68
      第二節 管理意涵75
      第三節 研究限制與建議78
     參考文獻80
     附錄一 問卷83
     附錄二 2005年-2011年4月7-ELEVEN 全店整合式行銷活動89
     
     表目錄
     表3-1 本研究假說整理23
     表3-2 知覺風險之衡量問項25
     表3-3 便利商店贈品集點活動贈品獲得方案之問項26
     表3-4 知覺價值之衡量問項27
     表3-5 收藏行為之衡量問項28
     表3-6 人格特質之衡量問項30
     表4-1 性別次數分配表33
     表4-2年齡次數分配表33
     表4-3教育程度次數分配表34
     表4-4職業次數分配表34
     表4-5居住地區次數分配表35
     表4-6家庭總所得次數分配表35
     表4-7參與贈品集點前到便利商店之消費次數分配表36
     表4-8參與贈品集點前到便利商店之消費金額次數分配表36
     表4-9參與贈品集點後到便利商店之消費次數分配表37
     表4-10參與贈品集點後到便利商店之消費金額次數分配表37
     表4-11為誰收集便利商店集點活動之吊飾次數分配表38
     表4-12參與集點活動者收集多少Kitty吊飾次數分配表38
     表4-13參與集點活動者之贈品獲得方案次數分配表39
     表4-14 知覺風險之因素分析(第一部分:集點方案知覺衡量)39
     表4-15 知覺風險之因素分析(第二部分:整體知覺衡量)40
     表4-16 知覺價值之因素分析(第一部分:集點方案之知覺價值)41
     表4-17 知覺價值之因素分析(第二部分:整體知覺衡量)42
     表4-18 收藏行為之因素分析43
     表4-19 各衡量變數與構面之信度分析45
     表4-20 修正後研究假說47
     表4-21 知覺風險、贈品獲得方案與收藏行為-目標形成之多元迴歸分析48
     表4-22 中介變數之中介效果檢測迴歸分析(一)49
     表4-23 知覺風險、贈品獲得方案與收藏行為-資訊搜尋之多元迴歸分析50
     表4-24 中介變數之中介效果檢測迴歸分析(二)50
     表4-25 知覺風險、贈品獲得方案與收藏行為-收藏動機之多元迴歸分析51
     表4-26 中介變數之中介效果檢測迴歸分析(三)52
     表4-27 知覺風險、贈品獲得方案與收藏行為-管理之多元迴歸分析53
     表4-28 中介變數之中介效果檢測迴歸分析(四)53
     表4-29 知覺風險、贈品獲得方案與收藏行為-挑戰之多元迴歸分析54
     表4-30 中介變數之中介效果檢測迴歸分析(五)55
     表4-31 知覺風險、贈品獲得方案與收藏行為-收集努力之多元迴歸分析56
     表4-32 中介變數之中介效果檢測迴歸分析(六)56
     表4-33 免費送成本風險與贈品獲得方案之Logistic迴歸分析57
     表4-34 加價購成本風險與贈品獲得方案之Logistic迴歸分析58
     表4-35 心理風險與贈品獲得方案之Logistic迴歸分析58
     表4-36 兌換風險與贈品獲得方案之Logistic迴歸分析59
     表4-37 贈品獲得方案與知覺價值-認同價值之多元迴歸分析59
     表4-38 贈品獲得方案與知覺價值-加價購價值之多元迴歸分析60
     表4-39 贈品獲得方案與知覺價值-免費送價值之多元迴歸分析60
     表4-40 知覺風險與知覺價值-認同價值之多元迴歸分析61
     表4-41 知覺風險與知覺價值-加價購價值之多元迴歸分析62
     表4-42 知覺風險與知覺價值-免費送價值之多元迴歸分析63
     表4-43 知覺價值與收藏行為-目標形成之多元迴歸分析64
     表4-44 知覺價值與收藏行為-資訊搜尋之多元迴歸分析64
     表4-45 知覺價值與收藏行為-收集動機之多元迴歸分析65
     表4-46 知覺價值與收藏行為-管理之多元迴歸分析65
     表4-47 知覺價值與收藏行為-挑戰之多元迴歸分析66
     表4-48 知覺價值與收藏行為-收集努力之多元迴歸分析67
     表5-1 研究假說與實證結果彙整表68
     表5-2 贈品獲得方案與性別交叉分析表75
     表5-3 贈品獲得方案與年齡交叉分析表76
     
     圖目錄
     圖1-1 研究流程圖3
     圖2-1 交易效用理論11
     圖2-2 消費者價格、品質與價值認知模型12
     圖3-1 研究架構圖18
     圖4-1修正後研究架構關係圖46
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099351005en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 贈品集點活動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知覺風險zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知覺價值zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 便利商店促銷贈品收藏行為之研究-以7-ELEVEN為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The study of collecting behavior on collectable premiums: a case of 7-ELEVENen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.王又鵬,1993,促銷活動對消費者購買行為影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.朱甯興,1982,學習團體:理論與技術,台北市:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.尚.布希亞,1997,物體系,林志明譯,時報文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.莊麗娟,1999,物質主義傾向、消費價值觀與產品涉入對收藏行為影響之研究,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.葉銘壠,2010,連鎖式便利商店的促銷活動對經營績效影響之探討-以7-ELEVEN及全家便利商店為例,南台科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Aaker, D. A. 1973. Toward A Normative Model of Promotional Decision Making. Management Science, 19(6), pp. 593-603.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Bauer, R. A. 1960. Consumer behavior as risk taking, Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Edited by American Marketing Association, pp. 389-398, Chicago, IL.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Beem, E. R. and Shaffer, H. J. 1981. Triggers to customer action- Some elements in a theory of promotional inducement. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, pp. 81-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Belk, R. W. 1995. Collecting as luxury consumption: Effects on individuals and households. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(3), pp. 477-490.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Brissert, M. and Nowicki, S. 1973. Internal versus external of reinforcementzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and reaction to intrustration. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) pp. 35-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Campbell, L. and Diamond, W. D. 1990. Framing and Sales Promotions: The Characteristics of A Good Deal, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(4), pp.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Cox, D. F. 1967. Risk handing in consumer behavior-an intensive study of two cases. In: Cox, D. F. (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handing in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, pp. 34-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Cunningham, S. M. 1967. The major dimension of perceived risk. In Donald F. Cox (Ed.), Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston, pp. 82-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Dowling, G. R. and Staelin, R. 1994. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, pp. 119-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Formanek, R. 1991. Why they collect: Collectors reveal their motivations. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, pp. 275-286.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Jacoby, J. and Kaplan, L. B. 1972. The components of perceived risk. Proceedings of the third annual conference, Ann Arbour, MI, Association for Consumer research, pp. 382-393.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Kotler, P. 2000. Marketing management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 10th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Kotler and Keller. 2001. A framework for marketing management, 4th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Laurent, G. and Kapferer J-N. 1985. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), pp. 41-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Nunnally, F. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Petrick, J. F. 2002. Development of A multi-dimensional scale for measuring perceived value of a service. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), pp. 119-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Roselius, T. 1971. Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35, pp. 56-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external of reinforcement, Psychological Monographs, 80, pp. 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Rychman, R. M. and Sherman, M.F. 1973. Relationship between self-esteem and internal-external control for man and woman. Psychology Reports, 32, pp. 1100-1106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Schultz, Don E., William A. Robinson and Lisa A. Petrison. 1993. Sales Promotion Essentials, 2nd Edition, NTC Business Books, Illinois, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Sweeney, J. C. and Soutar, G. N. 2001. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), p.203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Thaler R. 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4, pp.199-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.William, D. M. and Brandon, S. 2004. Collectors and collecting: A social psychological perspective. Leisure Sciences, 26, pp. 85-97.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Wood, Charles M. and Lisa K. Scheer. 1996. Incorporating perceived risk into models of consumer deal assessment and purchase intent. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, pp. 399-404.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Zeithaml, V. A. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, pp. 2-22.zh_TW