學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 路途上:《兩個閒散徒弟的懶惰旅遊》中的空間實踐
On the Road: Spatial Practices in The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices
作者 杜古筠
Tu, Ku Yun
貢獻者 楊麗敏
Yang, Li Min
杜古筠
Tu, Ku Yun
關鍵詞 兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行
列斐伏爾
空間的再現
空間實踐
再現的空間
狄更斯
柯林斯
The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices
Lefebvre
representation of space
spatial practice
space of representation
Charles Dickens
Wilkie Collins
日期 2011
上傳時間 30-Oct-2012 10:53:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 《兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行》(The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices, 1857) 是一本由查理‧狄更斯(Charles Dickens)與威爾基‧柯林斯(Wilkie Collins)根據他們的旅途見聞再加上各自創作的兩篇短篇故事所集結而成的小說。在過去,許多批評家只單論文本中的兩篇短篇故事,而忽略鑲嵌短篇故事的主架構,把文本切割至互不相連的碎片。本論文主要採取昂希‧列斐伏爾(Henri Lefebvre)對於空間三面向的理論概念來剖析《兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行》在文本中反覆出現,並且被不同主體所論述的閒蕩(idleness)一詞,試圖藉由呈現閒蕩的多重意義而把《兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行》視為一有機的整體。論文第二章借助空間的再現(representation of space)概念論述看似懶散、不事生產的地景是如何被規劃,最終喪失其神性(deity)。論文的第三章則檢視空間使用者與空間的互動。本章從空間實踐(spatial practice)的角度切入,試圖證明文本中的精神病院(lunatic asylum)、火車站(railway station)與賽馬週(race-week)的空間規劃異化(alienate)了生活在其中的空間居民,而居民無所事事的遊蕩正是此異化的展現。第四章援引再現的空間(space of representation)之概念,試圖證明閒蕩也有其積極面向。藉由檢視故事主人翁法蘭西‧古柴爾德(Francis Goodchild)與湯瑪士‧艾朵(Thomas Idle)既合作又競爭的夥伴關係,閒蕩對於湯瑪士‧艾朵而言,是一種在文本中爭取發言權的手段。至於對缺乏官方實證的怪談野史而言,閒蕩也是一種抵抗大論述收編、並且同時揭露資本主義中金錢對於人性腐蝕的路徑。
The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices is a travelogue worked in collaboration between Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins. Besides noting down what they observe and encounter during the trip, Dickens and Collins also enclose two gothic tales which is written respectively by them. Nevertheless, when most critics mention The Lazy Tour, they limit their concerns to simply the two interpolated tales, which violates the integrity of The Lazy Tour by dissecting it into disconnected pieces. This thesis proposes to apply Henri Lefebvre’s conceptual triad to analyze the recurring theme, idleness, which is interpreted by different subjects. By presenting the variations of the concept of idleness, this thesis attempts to see The Lazy Tour as an organic whole. Applying the idea of representation of space, Chapter Two explains how the seemingly inoperative landscapes are programmed and designed, which results in the demise of the deity of Nature. With the support of the concept of spatial practice, Chapter Three proposes to demonstrate how the spatial designs of the lunatic asylum, railway station, and the festive occasion, the race-week, respectively alienate the spatial inhabitants. The idleness manifested by these spatial inhabitants is the syndrome of their alienation. Chapter Four analyzes the constructive aspect of the idleness with the assistance of Lefebvre’s idea of space of representation. In terms of Thomas Idle, one of the protagonists, idleness serves as a resistant measure to develop his own narrative. As far as the two interpolated tales are concerned, idleness can be compared to a way to resist the incorporation of the narrative framework of The Lazy Tour, and in the meanwhile discloses the moral corruption brought by Capitalism.
參考文獻 Abuzeid, Ahinad Elsayyad Ahxaad. “The Theme of Alienation in the Major Novels of Thomas Hardy.” Diss. U of Glasgow, 1987. RroQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Web. 10. Jan. 2012.
     Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Academic Discourse: Readings for Argument and Analysis. Ed. Gail Stygall. 3 ed. Ohio: Thomson Custom Printing, 2002.
     Baudelaire, Charles. “The Painter of Modern Life.” The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays. Trans. and Ed. Jonathan Mayne. New York : Phaidon Press, 2003. 1-42.
     Bertuzzo, Elisa T. Fragmented Dhaka : Analysing Everyday Life with Henri Lefebvre`s Theory of Production of Space. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2009.
     Buckley, Jerome Hamilton. The Victorian Temper: A Study in Literary Culture. New York: Cambridge, 1981.
     Burkart, A. J. and S. Medlik. “The Beginnings of Tourism to 1840.” Tourism: Past, Present & Future. London: Heinemann, 1990. 1-10.
     Buzard, James. The Beaten Track: European Tourism, Literature, and the Ways to Culture, 1800-1918. London: Clarendon Press, 1993.
     Cormack, Bill. “Yesterday.” A History of Holidays, 1812-1990. London: Routledge, 1998. 1-6.
     Cunningham, Hugh. Leisure in the Industrial Revolution. London: Palgrave, 1980.
     Dant, Tim. “Lefebvre: Alienation and disalienation.” Critical Social Theory: Culture, Society and Critique. London: Sage, 2003. 71-74.
     de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. London: University of California Press, 1988.
     Dickens, Charles. The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices. ‘Gone Astray’ and Other Papers from Household Words, 1851-59. Ed. Michael Slater. Vol. 4. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999.
     Elden, Stuart. Understanding Henri Lefebvre. London: Continuum, 2006.
     Feuer, Lewis. “What is alienation? The Career of a Concept.” Libcom.org. V. 4.1. N. p., n. d. Web. 10. Jan. 2012. .
     Gardiner, Michael E. “Henri Lefebvre: Philosopher of the Ordinary.” Crituques of Everyday Life. London: Routledge, 2000. 71-99.
     Gilloch, Graeme. Myth and Metropolis: Walter Benjamin and the City. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1996.
     Gregory, Derek. “Modernity and the Production of Space.” Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.
     Highmore, Ben. “The Zoo of Everyday Practices: Literature, Narratives, Voices.” Michel de Certeau: Analyzing Culture. London: Continuum, 2007.
     “Horse Racing.” Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Online, 2012. Web. 19 Jan. 2012.
     Houghton, Walter E. The Victorian Frame of Mind 1830-1870. London: Yale University Press, 1985.
     “idleness, n.”. OED Online. September 2011. Oxford University Press. 21 November 2011., .
     Lefebvre, Henri. Critique of Everyday Life. Trans. John Moore. Vol. 1. London: Verso, 1991.
     ---. Everyday Life in the Modern World. Trans. Sacha Rabinovitch. London: Transaction Publishers, 1984.
     ---. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
     Marx, Karl. “Alienated Labour.” Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Trans. and Ed. Loyd D. Easton and Kurt H. Guddat. Indiana: Hackett Pub. Co., 1997. 287-300.
     ---. “Private Property and Communism.” Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Trans. and Ed. Loyd D. Easton and Kurt H. Guddat. Indiana: Hackett Pub. Co., 1997. 301-313.
     Maycroft, Neil. “Henri Lefebvre: Alienation and the Ethics of Bodily Reappropriation.” Marxism’s Ethical Thinkers. Ed. Lawrence Wilde. New York: Palgrave, 2001. 116-143.
     Merrifield, Andy. Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge, 2006.
     Nayder, Lillian. Unequal Partners: Charles Dickens, Wilkie Collins, and Victorian Authorship. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2002.
     Salotto, Eleanor. “Wandering and Plotting: Dickens’s Journalistic Writing.” Gothic Returns in Collins, Dickens, Zola, and Hitchcock. New York: Palgrave, 2006. 145-173.
     Schimind, Christian. “Henri Lefebvre’s Theory of the Production of Space: Towards a Three-Dimensional Dialectic.” Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Ed. Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, Christian Schmid. London: Routledge, 2008. 27-45.
     Schlicke, Paul. “The ‘Other World’ of A Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices.” Dickens, Europe and the New World. Ed. Anny Sadrin. London: Palgrave, 2001. 194-199.
     Shields, Rob. Lefebvre, Love, and Struggle. London: Routledge, 1999.
     Soja, Edward W. Third Space: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996.
     Stone, Harry. “Great Expectations: The Factual Matrix.” Dickens and the Invisible World: Fairy Tales, Fantasy, and Novel-Making. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1979. 280-297.
     Tester, Keith. The Flâneur. New York : Routledge, 1994.
     Thomas, Deborah. “Murder and Self-Effacement.” Dickens`s Later Work: Assessments since 1870. Ed. Michael Hollington. Vol. 3. New York: Helm Information, 1996.
     ---. Dickens and the Short Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982.
     “United Kingdom: Culture and Recreation.” Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Online, 2012. Web. 17 Jan. 2012.
     Urry, John. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications, 1990.
     Wander, Philip. “Introduction to the Transaction Edition.” Everyday Life in the Modern World. By Henri Lefebvre. Trans. Sacha Rabinovitch. London: Transaction Publishers, 1984. viii-xxiii.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
97551009
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0975510091
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 楊麗敏zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yang, Li Minen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 杜古筠zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tu, Ku Yunen_US
dc.creator (作者) 杜古筠zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tu, Ku Yunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 30-Oct-2012 10:53:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-Oct-2012 10:53:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Oct-2012 10:53:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0975510091en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54368-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97551009zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 《兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行》(The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices, 1857) 是一本由查理‧狄更斯(Charles Dickens)與威爾基‧柯林斯(Wilkie Collins)根據他們的旅途見聞再加上各自創作的兩篇短篇故事所集結而成的小說。在過去,許多批評家只單論文本中的兩篇短篇故事,而忽略鑲嵌短篇故事的主架構,把文本切割至互不相連的碎片。本論文主要採取昂希‧列斐伏爾(Henri Lefebvre)對於空間三面向的理論概念來剖析《兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行》在文本中反覆出現,並且被不同主體所論述的閒蕩(idleness)一詞,試圖藉由呈現閒蕩的多重意義而把《兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行》視為一有機的整體。論文第二章借助空間的再現(representation of space)概念論述看似懶散、不事生產的地景是如何被規劃,最終喪失其神性(deity)。論文的第三章則檢視空間使用者與空間的互動。本章從空間實踐(spatial practice)的角度切入,試圖證明文本中的精神病院(lunatic asylum)、火車站(railway station)與賽馬週(race-week)的空間規劃異化(alienate)了生活在其中的空間居民,而居民無所事事的遊蕩正是此異化的展現。第四章援引再現的空間(space of representation)之概念,試圖證明閒蕩也有其積極面向。藉由檢視故事主人翁法蘭西‧古柴爾德(Francis Goodchild)與湯瑪士‧艾朵(Thomas Idle)既合作又競爭的夥伴關係,閒蕩對於湯瑪士‧艾朵而言,是一種在文本中爭取發言權的手段。至於對缺乏官方實證的怪談野史而言,閒蕩也是一種抵抗大論述收編、並且同時揭露資本主義中金錢對於人性腐蝕的路徑。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices is a travelogue worked in collaboration between Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins. Besides noting down what they observe and encounter during the trip, Dickens and Collins also enclose two gothic tales which is written respectively by them. Nevertheless, when most critics mention The Lazy Tour, they limit their concerns to simply the two interpolated tales, which violates the integrity of The Lazy Tour by dissecting it into disconnected pieces. This thesis proposes to apply Henri Lefebvre’s conceptual triad to analyze the recurring theme, idleness, which is interpreted by different subjects. By presenting the variations of the concept of idleness, this thesis attempts to see The Lazy Tour as an organic whole. Applying the idea of representation of space, Chapter Two explains how the seemingly inoperative landscapes are programmed and designed, which results in the demise of the deity of Nature. With the support of the concept of spatial practice, Chapter Three proposes to demonstrate how the spatial designs of the lunatic asylum, railway station, and the festive occasion, the race-week, respectively alienate the spatial inhabitants. The idleness manifested by these spatial inhabitants is the syndrome of their alienation. Chapter Four analyzes the constructive aspect of the idleness with the assistance of Lefebvre’s idea of space of representation. In terms of Thomas Idle, one of the protagonists, idleness serves as a resistant measure to develop his own narrative. As far as the two interpolated tales are concerned, idleness can be compared to a way to resist the incorporation of the narrative framework of The Lazy Tour, and in the meanwhile discloses the moral corruption brought by Capitalism.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Chinese Abstract.........................................vii
     English Abstract..........................................ix
     Abbreviations.............................................xi
     Chapter One Introduction: The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices and Spatial Practices.........................01
     1.1 Introduction..........................................01
     1.2 Literary Review.......................................02
     1.3 Thesis Argument.......................................10
     1.4 Theoretical Approach..................................13
     1.5 Chapter Organization..................................16
     
     Chapter Two The Rationalized Idleness and the Incorporated Geographical Landscapes...19
     2.1 Introduction..........................................19
     2.2 The Incorporation of Capitalism in Space..............21
     2.3 The Rationalized Idleness.............................22
     2.4 The Landscapes Impregnated with Capitalistic Ideologies................................................27
     2.5 Conclusion............................................37
     
     Chapter Three Those who are Alienated.....................39
     3.1 Introduction..........................................39
     3.2 Spatial Practice Clarification........................40
     3.3 A Bureaucratized Place: The Lunatic Asylum............43
     3.4 An Industrialized Place: The Railway Station..........48
     3.5 Another Side of the Quotidian: The Race-Week in Doncaster.................................................54
     3.6 Conclusion............................................60
     
     Chapter Four The Make-Shift Energy of Idleness............63
     4.1 Introduction..........................................63
     4.2 Goodchild and Idle’s Companionship....................64
     4.3 Thomas Idle’s Operations of Memory and His Sprained Ankles....................................................72
     4.4 The Resistance of the Two Interpolated Tales..........84
     4.5 Conclusion............................................90
     
     Chapter Five Conclusion: Idleness and The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices..........................................93
     Works Cited...............................................98
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0975510091en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兩個閒蕩徒弟的懶惰旅行zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 列斐伏爾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 空間的再現zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 空間實踐zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 再現的空間zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 狄更斯zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 柯林斯zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprenticesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Lefebvreen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) representation of spaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) spatial practiceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) space of representationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Charles Dickensen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Wilkie Collinsen_US
dc.title (題名) 路途上:《兩個閒散徒弟的懶惰旅遊》中的空間實踐zh_TW
dc.title (題名) On the Road: Spatial Practices in The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprenticesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abuzeid, Ahinad Elsayyad Ahxaad. “The Theme of Alienation in the Major Novels of Thomas Hardy.” Diss. U of Glasgow, 1987. RroQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Web. 10. Jan. 2012.
     Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” Academic Discourse: Readings for Argument and Analysis. Ed. Gail Stygall. 3 ed. Ohio: Thomson Custom Printing, 2002.
     Baudelaire, Charles. “The Painter of Modern Life.” The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays. Trans. and Ed. Jonathan Mayne. New York : Phaidon Press, 2003. 1-42.
     Bertuzzo, Elisa T. Fragmented Dhaka : Analysing Everyday Life with Henri Lefebvre`s Theory of Production of Space. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2009.
     Buckley, Jerome Hamilton. The Victorian Temper: A Study in Literary Culture. New York: Cambridge, 1981.
     Burkart, A. J. and S. Medlik. “The Beginnings of Tourism to 1840.” Tourism: Past, Present & Future. London: Heinemann, 1990. 1-10.
     Buzard, James. The Beaten Track: European Tourism, Literature, and the Ways to Culture, 1800-1918. London: Clarendon Press, 1993.
     Cormack, Bill. “Yesterday.” A History of Holidays, 1812-1990. London: Routledge, 1998. 1-6.
     Cunningham, Hugh. Leisure in the Industrial Revolution. London: Palgrave, 1980.
     Dant, Tim. “Lefebvre: Alienation and disalienation.” Critical Social Theory: Culture, Society and Critique. London: Sage, 2003. 71-74.
     de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. London: University of California Press, 1988.
     Dickens, Charles. The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices. ‘Gone Astray’ and Other Papers from Household Words, 1851-59. Ed. Michael Slater. Vol. 4. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999.
     Elden, Stuart. Understanding Henri Lefebvre. London: Continuum, 2006.
     Feuer, Lewis. “What is alienation? The Career of a Concept.” Libcom.org. V. 4.1. N. p., n. d. Web. 10. Jan. 2012. .
     Gardiner, Michael E. “Henri Lefebvre: Philosopher of the Ordinary.” Crituques of Everyday Life. London: Routledge, 2000. 71-99.
     Gilloch, Graeme. Myth and Metropolis: Walter Benjamin and the City. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1996.
     Gregory, Derek. “Modernity and the Production of Space.” Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.
     Highmore, Ben. “The Zoo of Everyday Practices: Literature, Narratives, Voices.” Michel de Certeau: Analyzing Culture. London: Continuum, 2007.
     “Horse Racing.” Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Online, 2012. Web. 19 Jan. 2012.
     Houghton, Walter E. The Victorian Frame of Mind 1830-1870. London: Yale University Press, 1985.
     “idleness, n.”. OED Online. September 2011. Oxford University Press. 21 November 2011., .
     Lefebvre, Henri. Critique of Everyday Life. Trans. John Moore. Vol. 1. London: Verso, 1991.
     ---. Everyday Life in the Modern World. Trans. Sacha Rabinovitch. London: Transaction Publishers, 1984.
     ---. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
     Marx, Karl. “Alienated Labour.” Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Trans. and Ed. Loyd D. Easton and Kurt H. Guddat. Indiana: Hackett Pub. Co., 1997. 287-300.
     ---. “Private Property and Communism.” Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society. Trans. and Ed. Loyd D. Easton and Kurt H. Guddat. Indiana: Hackett Pub. Co., 1997. 301-313.
     Maycroft, Neil. “Henri Lefebvre: Alienation and the Ethics of Bodily Reappropriation.” Marxism’s Ethical Thinkers. Ed. Lawrence Wilde. New York: Palgrave, 2001. 116-143.
     Merrifield, Andy. Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge, 2006.
     Nayder, Lillian. Unequal Partners: Charles Dickens, Wilkie Collins, and Victorian Authorship. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2002.
     Salotto, Eleanor. “Wandering and Plotting: Dickens’s Journalistic Writing.” Gothic Returns in Collins, Dickens, Zola, and Hitchcock. New York: Palgrave, 2006. 145-173.
     Schimind, Christian. “Henri Lefebvre’s Theory of the Production of Space: Towards a Three-Dimensional Dialectic.” Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Ed. Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, Christian Schmid. London: Routledge, 2008. 27-45.
     Schlicke, Paul. “The ‘Other World’ of A Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices.” Dickens, Europe and the New World. Ed. Anny Sadrin. London: Palgrave, 2001. 194-199.
     Shields, Rob. Lefebvre, Love, and Struggle. London: Routledge, 1999.
     Soja, Edward W. Third Space: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1996.
     Stone, Harry. “Great Expectations: The Factual Matrix.” Dickens and the Invisible World: Fairy Tales, Fantasy, and Novel-Making. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1979. 280-297.
     Tester, Keith. The Flâneur. New York : Routledge, 1994.
     Thomas, Deborah. “Murder and Self-Effacement.” Dickens`s Later Work: Assessments since 1870. Ed. Michael Hollington. Vol. 3. New York: Helm Information, 1996.
     ---. Dickens and the Short Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982.
     “United Kingdom: Culture and Recreation.” Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Online, 2012. Web. 17 Jan. 2012.
     Urry, John. The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications, 1990.
     Wander, Philip. “Introduction to the Transaction Edition.” Everyday Life in the Modern World. By Henri Lefebvre. Trans. Sacha Rabinovitch. London: Transaction Publishers, 1984. viii-xxiii.
zh_TW