學術產出-NSC Projects

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 以美國聯邦最高法院KSR案為借鏡再建構我國專利法下專利進步性要件之合理詮釋
其他題名 Reconstruction of Legal Interpretation of Non-Obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Law through Examining KSR Case of U.S. Supreme Court
作者 沈宗倫
貢獻者 國立政治大學法律學系
行政院國家科學委員會
關鍵詞 進步性;教示因果關係;先前技術;組合專利;發明;專利;專利審查;專利侵害;技術創新;技術實效
日期 2010
上傳時間 26-Nov-2012 09:37:39 (UTC+8)
摘要 專利進步性不僅是專利的適格要件,亦為專利法下控制專利授予品質的重要條件。向來,專利進步性一直為行政爭訟案件的爭議中心,現今,智慧財案件審理法已公布實施,專利進步性更進一步成為專利侵權訴訟的侵權抗辯事由。由此顯見專利進步性於專利法下的重要性。雖然我國關於專利進步性的判決累積一定龐大的數量,但似無明確地建立專利「進步性」的法理基礎與解釋判斷原則。再加之,美國聯邦最高法院KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.的判決,就組合發明與先前技術的教示因果關係,於專利進步性的詮釋上,提出新的法理,該法理對於專利進步性判斷原則的發展,有相當的影響。基於上述的理由,本研究計畫將以比較法的觀點,藉由對於美國專利法與歐洲專利法的借鏡與檢討,嘗試建構我國專利法體系下的專利進步性判斷原則與合理詮釋。
Not only is non-obviousness the patentable requirement, but also a significant condition for controlling patent quality. Non-obviousness has been being the focus of the disputes on patentability under administrative law. Currently, it also has reached out to become a defense against patent infringement since Taiwanese Trial Law on Intellectual Property Cases came into effect. Although many judicial cases on the issue of non-obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Act have been made, it seems that the fundamental jurisprudence and the object test on non-obviousness have not been completely established. Additionally, KSR case under U.S. Supreme Court brought new patent jurisprudence into interpretation of non-obviousness, especially on the causation between prior arts and combined inventions. In view of reasons above-mentioned, this research project would attempt to construct the object test and the interpretation principle for non-obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Law, through the comparative view of U.S. and European experiences.
關聯 基礎研究
學術補助
研究期間:9908~ 10007
研究經費:490仟元
行政院國家科學委員會
計畫編號NSC99-2410-H004-222
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 國立政治大學法律學系en_US
dc.contributor 行政院國家科學委員會en_US
dc.creator (作者) 沈宗倫zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 26-Nov-2012 09:37:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 26-Nov-2012 09:37:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 26-Nov-2012 09:37:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55905-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 專利進步性不僅是專利的適格要件,亦為專利法下控制專利授予品質的重要條件。向來,專利進步性一直為行政爭訟案件的爭議中心,現今,智慧財案件審理法已公布實施,專利進步性更進一步成為專利侵權訴訟的侵權抗辯事由。由此顯見專利進步性於專利法下的重要性。雖然我國關於專利進步性的判決累積一定龐大的數量,但似無明確地建立專利「進步性」的法理基礎與解釋判斷原則。再加之,美國聯邦最高法院KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.的判決,就組合發明與先前技術的教示因果關係,於專利進步性的詮釋上,提出新的法理,該法理對於專利進步性判斷原則的發展,有相當的影響。基於上述的理由,本研究計畫將以比較法的觀點,藉由對於美國專利法與歐洲專利法的借鏡與檢討,嘗試建構我國專利法體系下的專利進步性判斷原則與合理詮釋。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Not only is non-obviousness the patentable requirement, but also a significant condition for controlling patent quality. Non-obviousness has been being the focus of the disputes on patentability under administrative law. Currently, it also has reached out to become a defense against patent infringement since Taiwanese Trial Law on Intellectual Property Cases came into effect. Although many judicial cases on the issue of non-obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Act have been made, it seems that the fundamental jurisprudence and the object test on non-obviousness have not been completely established. Additionally, KSR case under U.S. Supreme Court brought new patent jurisprudence into interpretation of non-obviousness, especially on the causation between prior arts and combined inventions. In view of reasons above-mentioned, this research project would attempt to construct the object test and the interpretation principle for non-obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Law, through the comparative view of U.S. and European experiences.en_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 基礎研究en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 學術補助en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究期間:9908~ 10007en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究經費:490仟元en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 行政院國家科學委員會-
dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號NSC99-2410-H004-222-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 進步性;教示因果關係;先前技術;組合專利;發明;專利;專利審查;專利侵害;技術創新;技術實效en_US
dc.title (題名) 以美國聯邦最高法院KSR案為借鏡再建構我國專利法下專利進步性要件之合理詮釋zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Reconstruction of Legal Interpretation of Non-Obviousness under Taiwanese Patent Law through Examining KSR Case of U.S. Supreme Courten_US
dc.type (資料類型) reporten