學術產出-National Sci-Tech Programs
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 歐盟研究在亞洲﹕台灣-大陸-日本-南韓之比較(III) 其他題名 Eu Studies in Asia---Taiwan, China, Japan, and South Korea(III) 作者 盧倩儀 貢獻者 行政院國家科學委員會
國立政治大學國際關係研究中心關鍵詞 政治學;歐洲聯盟;歐盟研究
Political Science; the European Union; EU studies日期 2009 上傳時間 30-Nov-2012 15:07:46 (UTC+8) 摘要 近年來「歐盟研究」在台灣政治學學門中有逐漸成為「顯學」的趨勢。歐盟的從無到有及其持續之深化與廣化自然是歐盟研究之興起最直接而重要的原因。與歐美相較﹐台灣的歐盟研究似乎在先天上即受到相當限制。在設法突破這些限制之同時﹐我們也應對台灣之歐盟研究有一全面性之瞭解﹔而歐盟研究在亞洲鄰近國家之發展程度及發展軌跡對於台灣歐盟研究之成長亦必然存有極高的參考借鏡價值。本研究就台灣､中國大陸､日本､南韓之歐盟研究發展情形作一比較﹐描繪出其歐盟研究知識社群之輪廓﹐藉著勾勒各國歐盟研究發展之軌跡及趨勢來評估與亞洲鄰近國家相較﹐台灣歐盟研究之強弱項各為何。本研究比較項目包括﹕與歐盟相關之期刊論文篇數之成長軌跡､各國是否有以歐盟為主軸的期刊及其消長情形､博碩士產出數量及系所､學程的成長變化﹔歐洲/歐盟研究中心及學會之設立及經費來源﹔已獲博士學位之歐盟學者之背景(包括留學地)之統計分析﹔各國歐盟學者在國際知名期刊出版之情況等。歐盟研究之興起有其歷史原因﹐而投身歐盟研究的人數成長一方面固然反映了對歐盟更深入之了解的需求﹐但「量」的增加絕對不代表「質」的提昇。本研究同時從量化(如期刊､研究機構之統計)及質化(研究內容屬性分析)的角度去瞭解台灣以及亞洲其他地區—中國大陸､日本､南韓—歐盟研究的發展軌跡及現況﹐透過學習與比較提昇台灣歐盟研究的研究環境､研究水準､競爭力﹐並作為增進國際交流､與國際接軌的藍本。
The study of the European Union is gaining ground as a prominent category in the discipline of political science in Taiwan. Whereas this phenomenon is doubtlessly a result of the rapid and far-reaching developments within the EU itself, the popularity of the study of the EU can by no means be seen as a proof for quality research in this area. In fact, far from being in an ideal state, the study of the EU continues to face tremendous challenges in Taiwan, ranging from the geographic distance, under-explored resources, to the insufficient dialogues with the Europeanists outside Taiwan. This research intends to take a close look at the content, nature, quantity, path, as well as future trajectory of EU studies in Taiwan. A comparison will then be made among Taiwan, Mainland China, Japan, and South Korea. In order to lay out the contour of this sub-field in each country, This research will first build a data base that contains journal articles, degree theses, scholar background, publication in journals overseas, research centers, departments, programs, professional associations, and supporting funding sources in the field. In-depth interviews with scholars in all four countries will be conducted to ensure the reliability of the data. A content analysis of these data will then lead to statistic figures that can help us map out the path of the developments in EU studies in the past two and a half decades in the four countries and help us predict the future trajectory of EU studies. Most importantly, this research will help the Taiwanese scholars working on the EU to sort out the strengths as well as weaknesses in EU studies here and to identify ways to improve EU research關聯 基礎研究
學術補助
研究期間:9808~ 9907
研究經費:955仟元資料類型 report dc.contributor 行政院國家科學委員會 en_US dc.contributor 國立政治大學國際關係研究中心 en_US dc.creator (作者) 盧倩儀 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2009 en_US dc.date.accessioned 30-Nov-2012 15:07:46 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 30-Nov-2012 15:07:46 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Nov-2012 15:07:46 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56236 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來「歐盟研究」在台灣政治學學門中有逐漸成為「顯學」的趨勢。歐盟的從無到有及其持續之深化與廣化自然是歐盟研究之興起最直接而重要的原因。與歐美相較﹐台灣的歐盟研究似乎在先天上即受到相當限制。在設法突破這些限制之同時﹐我們也應對台灣之歐盟研究有一全面性之瞭解﹔而歐盟研究在亞洲鄰近國家之發展程度及發展軌跡對於台灣歐盟研究之成長亦必然存有極高的參考借鏡價值。本研究就台灣､中國大陸､日本､南韓之歐盟研究發展情形作一比較﹐描繪出其歐盟研究知識社群之輪廓﹐藉著勾勒各國歐盟研究發展之軌跡及趨勢來評估與亞洲鄰近國家相較﹐台灣歐盟研究之強弱項各為何。本研究比較項目包括﹕與歐盟相關之期刊論文篇數之成長軌跡､各國是否有以歐盟為主軸的期刊及其消長情形､博碩士產出數量及系所､學程的成長變化﹔歐洲/歐盟研究中心及學會之設立及經費來源﹔已獲博士學位之歐盟學者之背景(包括留學地)之統計分析﹔各國歐盟學者在國際知名期刊出版之情況等。歐盟研究之興起有其歷史原因﹐而投身歐盟研究的人數成長一方面固然反映了對歐盟更深入之了解的需求﹐但「量」的增加絕對不代表「質」的提昇。本研究同時從量化(如期刊､研究機構之統計)及質化(研究內容屬性分析)的角度去瞭解台灣以及亞洲其他地區—中國大陸､日本､南韓—歐盟研究的發展軌跡及現況﹐透過學習與比較提昇台灣歐盟研究的研究環境､研究水準､競爭力﹐並作為增進國際交流､與國際接軌的藍本。 en_US dc.description.abstract (摘要) The study of the European Union is gaining ground as a prominent category in the discipline of political science in Taiwan. Whereas this phenomenon is doubtlessly a result of the rapid and far-reaching developments within the EU itself, the popularity of the study of the EU can by no means be seen as a proof for quality research in this area. In fact, far from being in an ideal state, the study of the EU continues to face tremendous challenges in Taiwan, ranging from the geographic distance, under-explored resources, to the insufficient dialogues with the Europeanists outside Taiwan. This research intends to take a close look at the content, nature, quantity, path, as well as future trajectory of EU studies in Taiwan. A comparison will then be made among Taiwan, Mainland China, Japan, and South Korea. In order to lay out the contour of this sub-field in each country, This research will first build a data base that contains journal articles, degree theses, scholar background, publication in journals overseas, research centers, departments, programs, professional associations, and supporting funding sources in the field. In-depth interviews with scholars in all four countries will be conducted to ensure the reliability of the data. A content analysis of these data will then lead to statistic figures that can help us map out the path of the developments in EU studies in the past two and a half decades in the four countries and help us predict the future trajectory of EU studies. Most importantly, this research will help the Taiwanese scholars working on the EU to sort out the strengths as well as weaknesses in EU studies here and to identify ways to improve EU research en_US dc.language.iso en_US - dc.relation (關聯) 基礎研究 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 學術補助 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 研究期間:9808~ 9907 en_US dc.relation (關聯) 研究經費:955仟元 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政治學;歐洲聯盟;歐盟研究 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Political Science; the European Union; EU studies en_US dc.title (題名) 歐盟研究在亞洲﹕台灣-大陸-日本-南韓之比較(III) zh_TW dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Eu Studies in Asia---Taiwan, China, Japan, and South Korea(III) en_US dc.type (資料類型) report en
