學術產出-National Sci-Tech Programs

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 科索伏獨立爭議中的國際法議題
其他題名 International Legal Issues Arising in the Kosovo Independence Controversy
作者 蕭琇安
貢獻者 行政院國家科學委員會
國立政治大學國際關係研究中心
關鍵詞 科索伏獨立;國際法;分離主義;國家承認;民族自決
Kosovo Independence; UDI; International Law; Secession; Self-determination; Recognition of States
日期 2010
上傳時間 30-Nov-2012 15:09:34 (UTC+8)
摘要 2008 年2 月17 日,科索伏臨時議會宣布獨立,在國際間引起重大的爭議。美國和歐盟多數成員支持科索伏,認為科索伏的獨立是解決科索伏與塞維亞兩民族間長久衝突的最後手段。以俄羅斯和塞維亞為主的反對陣營則主張科索伏為塞維亞共和國之一部份,科索伏單方宣布獨立的行為,既違反國際法尊重國家領土與主權完整的原則,亦不符合1999 年聯合國安理會第1244 號之相關決議,應屬無效。2008 年10 月,聯合國大會通過決議,將科索伏單方宣布獨立之行為是否符合國際法的問題,交付國際法院提供諮詢意見。科索伏獨立合法性爭議,重啟了國際法中,關於國家形成要件、程序該當性,以及國家承認的性質與效力等國際公法基本理論的討論。本計畫擬對科索伏爭議中出現有關這些理論的法律問題進行深度分析,並從國家間對於此案的相關法律論辯,國際法院最後對此爭議之見解,以及國際社會最後如何解決科索伏國家地位問題,探討科索伏爭議對國際法理論發展之影響。
On 17 February 2008, the Assembly of the provisional Kosovo authorities declared Kosovo as an independent and sovereign state, which provoked controversy within the international community. The United States and other countries supporting Kosovo’s move took the view that independence was the last resort for putting an end to the long-standing conflict between Serbia and Kosovo. Those in the opposing camp, especially Russia and Serbia, argued that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence violated the international law principle on the respect for territorial and sovereign integrity of states as well as United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 1999, and should be “null and void”. In October 2008, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to refer the question of the legality of Kosovo’s unilateral declaration on independence to the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion. The Kosovo independence controversy has re-opened the fundamental theories of public international law relating to the requirements for statehood, the legitimate procedure of the creation of states, and the nature and function of recognition of states. This research intends to conduct a thorough analysis on these theoretical issues. In addition, by examining the relevant legal debates between states, the World Court’s advisory opinion, and how the international community subsequently proceeds to resolve Kosovo’s pending statehood, it will assess how the Kosovo independence controversy impacts on the development of international law.
關聯 基礎研究
學術補助
研究期間:9908~ 10007
研究經費:455仟元
行政院國家科學委員會
計畫編號NSC99-2410-H004-076
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 行政院國家科學委員會en_US
dc.contributor 國立政治大學國際關係研究中心en_US
dc.creator (作者) 蕭琇安zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 30-Nov-2012 15:09:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-Nov-2012 15:09:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Nov-2012 15:09:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56263-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 2008 年2 月17 日,科索伏臨時議會宣布獨立,在國際間引起重大的爭議。美國和歐盟多數成員支持科索伏,認為科索伏的獨立是解決科索伏與塞維亞兩民族間長久衝突的最後手段。以俄羅斯和塞維亞為主的反對陣營則主張科索伏為塞維亞共和國之一部份,科索伏單方宣布獨立的行為,既違反國際法尊重國家領土與主權完整的原則,亦不符合1999 年聯合國安理會第1244 號之相關決議,應屬無效。2008 年10 月,聯合國大會通過決議,將科索伏單方宣布獨立之行為是否符合國際法的問題,交付國際法院提供諮詢意見。科索伏獨立合法性爭議,重啟了國際法中,關於國家形成要件、程序該當性,以及國家承認的性質與效力等國際公法基本理論的討論。本計畫擬對科索伏爭議中出現有關這些理論的法律問題進行深度分析,並從國家間對於此案的相關法律論辯,國際法院最後對此爭議之見解,以及國際社會最後如何解決科索伏國家地位問題,探討科索伏爭議對國際法理論發展之影響。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) On 17 February 2008, the Assembly of the provisional Kosovo authorities declared Kosovo as an independent and sovereign state, which provoked controversy within the international community. The United States and other countries supporting Kosovo’s move took the view that independence was the last resort for putting an end to the long-standing conflict between Serbia and Kosovo. Those in the opposing camp, especially Russia and Serbia, argued that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence violated the international law principle on the respect for territorial and sovereign integrity of states as well as United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 1999, and should be “null and void”. In October 2008, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to refer the question of the legality of Kosovo’s unilateral declaration on independence to the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion. The Kosovo independence controversy has re-opened the fundamental theories of public international law relating to the requirements for statehood, the legitimate procedure of the creation of states, and the nature and function of recognition of states. This research intends to conduct a thorough analysis on these theoretical issues. In addition, by examining the relevant legal debates between states, the World Court’s advisory opinion, and how the international community subsequently proceeds to resolve Kosovo’s pending statehood, it will assess how the Kosovo independence controversy impacts on the development of international law.en_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 基礎研究en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 學術補助en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究期間:9908~ 10007en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究經費:455仟元en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 行政院國家科學委員會-
dc.relation (關聯) 計畫編號NSC99-2410-H004-076-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科索伏獨立;國際法;分離主義;國家承認;民族自決en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Kosovo Independence; UDI; International Law; Secession; Self-determination; Recognition of Statesen_US
dc.title (題名) 科索伏獨立爭議中的國際法議題zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) International Legal Issues Arising in the Kosovo Independence Controversyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) reporten