1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 從互動遊戲製做學習國中數學幾何之教學成效探討
The study of the teaching effects on geometry learning based on interactive game making to junior high school students
作者 翁條雄
貢獻者 江振東
翁條雄
關鍵詞 互動遊戲製做
日期 2012
上傳時間 2-Jan-2013 13:26:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在利用互動遊戲製作的創新教學方式，應用於國中數學幾何的學習上，探討此創新教學型態是否能帶來正向的教學成效，因此所採用的研究方法為實驗研究法，研究對象共為58人，分別為實驗組與對照組兩班，實驗處理為接受結合專題式學習、互動遊戲式學習等教學設計，透過電子白板的教學媒體環境，對照組則接受一般傳統講述式教學；此外，研究工具為針對學習者學習滿意度的意見調查表。研究結論如下所示:
     一、整合專題式導向教學與遊戲式學習理論所發展的互動遊戲製作，其教學設計對於國中數學幾何呈現高學習滿意度。
     二、互動遊戲製作比傳統教學方式能帶來較佳的數學幾何教學成效。
     三、互動遊戲製作使學習者的學習表現呈現正向的學習樣態。
This study aims to see if applying a new interactive game making teaching method on junior high school geometry learning creates positive, favorable teaching effectiveness. The method adopted in this study is experiment-based research. A total of fifty-eight students is divided into two groups, experimental group and control group. Through the aids of the Electronic Interavtive Whiteboard, the experimental group receives project-based learning and works on interactive game making, while the control group is instructed in a traditional way. Besides the pre-test and post-test to examine the teaching and learning effects, a questionnaire to get a better understanding of the students’ feedback is adopted. The findings are as follows:
     
     I. Students are highly satisfied with learning geometry through project-based learning and interactive game making.
     II. Interactive game making brings out better learning effect than traditional teaching.
     III. Interactive game making facilitates developing students’ positvie and active learning attitude.
參考文獻 吳幸宜（譯）（2001）。學習理論與教學應用（Learning and Instruction theory into practice）。台北市：心理出版社。
     吳致維、林建仲（2009）。互動式電子白板在國小教學之探討。生活科技教育月刊， 42（6），14-25。
     李昆霖、劉漢欽（2011）。應用電子白板教學在七年級學生數學概念學習之研究─以一元一次方程式學習為例。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。國立嘉義大學教育科技所。嘉義市。
     李胤禎（2008）。可共同操弄的同步式虛擬教具對學童幾何問題解決過程之影響。國立新竹教育大學數位學習科技研究所，未出版，新竹。
     周孝俊、劉明洲、張逸祥（2008）。以學習者為中心之互動式電子白板學習活動設計。2008年台灣教育傳播暨科技學會學術研討會 (TAECT2008)，文藻外語學院，2008年12月6日。
     范毓娟、郭重吉(1995)。在國中理化課程中試行建構主義教學之個案研究。科學教育，6期，頁69-87。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
     高俊豐(2009)。以合作學習應用互動式電子白板在國小高年級數學縮圖比例尺單元之成效研究。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
     張春興（2005）。《教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐》。臺北：東華書局
     張慧淳、林曉芳（2011）。運用電子白板融入國小二年級數學科教學成效之研究 -以「認識立體形體、容量與重量」單元為例。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。明道大學課程與教學研究所。彰化縣。
     張靜嚳 (1995)。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討, 科學教育學刊, 003(002), 0139-0165.
     張舋今、林原宏（2011）。互動式電子白板應用於國小數學教學之成效－以國小五年級梯形面積單元為例。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     教育部(2008)。振興經濟擴大公共建設投資資訊服務業擴大公共建設計畫－建置中小學優質化均等數位教育環境計畫。
     教育部(2003) 。「國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要：社會學習領域」。
     教育部電算中心（2003）。在職教師及教育行政人員數位學習人才培訓計劃草案，台北，教育部電算中心。
     曹勝傑（2009）。以互動式電子白板為基礎之ICT教學環境建置及提升學生學習成效之研究。未出版碩士，臺中技術學院資訊傳播學研究所，台中。
     莊護林、李肖蘭(2006)。在小學中文科及常識科應用互動電子白板的策略，發表於第十一屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會中小學教師論壇，中國廣州。
     陳秀雯（2009）。運用互動式電子白板於國小四年級數學領域教學之研究。未出版碩士，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班，台北。
     陳惠邦 (2006)。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考，發表於台北市全球華人資訊教育創新論壇，台灣宜蘭。
     郭麗玲 (1991)。在畫中說故事的「圖畫書」, 在畫中說故事的「圖畫書」。社教雙月刊, 46(),
      20-33
     黃昭陵（2008）。以軟體式電子白板－JoinNet應用於「分數的四則運算」教學之行動研究。義守大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
     黃昱嘉、許天維（2011）。互動式電子白板之教學成效分析-以國小五年級梯形面積概念為例-第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     黃國禎（2008）。互動式電子白板融入國小數學領域教學之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學數學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
     鄒慧英（2001）。課程、教學、評量三位一體的專題學習。台南師院學報， 34 期，155-194。
     廖婷怡、林原宏（2011）。互動式電子白板融入國小二年級時間單元教學之成效探討。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     劉正山(2008)。交互白板環境下國小數學領域教學設計的互動研究。國立台北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
     劉好 (1998)。平面圖形教材的處理, 載於甯自強（主編）, 國立嘉義師範學院八十六學年度數學教育研討會論文暨會議實錄彙編, （頁33-50）, 嘉義: 國立嘉義師範學院.
     鄭惠敏(2008)。教師使用互動式電子白板於自然科教學之教學信念與師生互動個案研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處應用科學系教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
     盧宗賢、林原宏（2011）。互動式電子白板應用於數學教學成效之研究，第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     蕭英勳(2007) 。教學媒體新寵兒—互動式電子白板，師友月刊， 477，56-59。
     戴文雄（1998）。不同正增強回饋形式電腦輔助學習系統對不同認知型態與空間能力高工學生機械製圖學習成效之研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。計畫編號NSC86-2516-S-018-010-TG。
     英文部分
     Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994).Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 4, 465-483.
     Ames, C.(1992). Classrooms : goals structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3),261-271
     Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath,19(1), 4-7.
     Barron, B. J. S.,Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-311.
     Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M., (1993).Surpassing ourselves : An inquiry into the nature and implications of experts. Chicago :Open Court.
     Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A.(1991). Motivating project-based learning : Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist , 26(3&4),369-398.
     British Educational Communications and Technology Agency [BECTA]（2004）. Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard - a guide for primary school. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency [BECTA]（2003）. What the research says about interactive whiteboards.
     Brown, J. S., Collins A. and Dugid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher , 18(1),32-42.
     Cathy, L., Bridget, S., andStephen, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291-303.
     Curriculum Review (1994). Constructing buildings, bridges and minds: Building an integrated curriculum through social studies, Curriculum Review, 33(9), 25-26
     Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom.Alexandria, Virginia: Associa- tion for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
     Dickson, S. V., Chard, D. J., and Simmons, D. C. (1993). An integrated reading/writing curriculum: A focus on scaffolding. LD Forum, 18(4), 12-16.
     Glaser, R. (1988). On the nature of expertise. In C. Schooler and W. Schaie(Eds.). Cognitive functioning and social structure over the life course.Norwood,NJ:Ablex.
     Glover, D. and Miller, D. （2001）. Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10（3）, 257–275.
     Glover, T. (1993). The teaching of educational psychology through project- based learning.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.367703）
     Green, A. M. (1998). Project-based learning: Moving students through the GED with meaningful learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422466.
     Hall, I.and Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students` perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
     Hilton, J. U. (1988). Project-based learning for foreign students in an English speaking environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language.
     Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365.
     Jacobs, H.H.（1989）. Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 316506）
     Jones, B.F., Rasmussen,C. M., & Moffitt, M. C.(1997). Real-life problem solving : A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
     Kennewell, S.（2001）. Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10（2）, 101–116.
     Krajcik, J. ; Blumenfeld, P. C. ; Marx, R. W. ; Bass, K. M., ; Fredricks, J. (1998), Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 313-350.
     Krajcik, J. S. ; Czerniak, C. M., ; Berger, C. (1999), Teaching children science: A project-based approach, : McGraw-HillCollege.
     Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W. and Soloway, E., “A collaborative model for helping teachers learn project-based instruction”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 95:5, pp. 483-497. 1994.
     Levy, P. (2002). Interactive Whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Unpublished Master dissertation at DIS of University of Sheffield, 2000-2001.
     Martin-Kniep, G., Feige, D.,and Soodak, L. (1995). Curriculum integration: An expanded view of an abused idea. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(3), 227-249.
     Marx, R. W. ; Blumenfeld, P. C. ; Krajcik, J. S., ; Soloway, E. (1997), Enacting project-based science, The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.
     Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J.S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., andMeyer,K. M.(1994). Enacting Project-based science : Experiences of four middle gradeteachers.The Elementary School Journal, 94（5）,517-538
     McDonald, J. ; Czerniak, C. (1994), Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples, School Science and Mathematics, 94(), 5-10.
     Moore, M. G. (1989). Three type of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
     Moss, D. and Van Duzer, C.（1998）.Project-based learning for adult English language learners.ERICDigest.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 556）
     Murcia, K. (2008). Teaching for scientific literacy with an interactive whiteboard.Teaching Science - the Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(4), 17-21.
     Ozel, S., Yetkiner, Z. E.and Capraro, R. M. (2008).Technology in K-12 Mathematics Classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 108(2), 80-85.
     Polman , J. L.(2000). Designing Project-based science : connecting learners through guided inquiry. Teacher s College Press.
     Prensky, M. (2001), Types of learning and possible game styles, Digital. Game- Based Learning, USA: McGraw-Hill.
     Price, r. V. (1991). Computer-aided instruction: a guide for authors Belmont. CA: Wadsworth.
     Shoemaker, B. J. E., ; Lewin, L. (1993), Curriculum and assessment: Two sides of the same coin, Educational Leadership, 50(8), 55-57.
     Thomas, J.W., Mergendoller, J. R. and Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning : A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: Education.
     Tobin, K., and Tippins, D. (1993).Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning.In K., Tobin (Ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education (Preface: ix-xvi), Washington, DC: AAAS.
     Torff B. and Tirotta, R. (2010), Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics, , 54(2), 379-383.
     Victoria, A., Sally, B., Rosamund S., Sarah C., Simon M. and Ian T. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, November 2005 Interactive whiteboard technology.
     Von Glasersfeld, E., (1981). An introduction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics. (pp. 193-218). SeasideCalifornia: Intersystem Publications.
     Vygotsky,L.S.(1978).Mind in society：The development of higher psychological process.Cambridge,MA: HarvardUniversity press.
     Walker, D.（2003）. Breathe of Life. Times Educational Supplement, 1 (3), 67.
     Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 42-45.
     Wood, J. W（1998）. .Adapting instruction to accommodate students in inclusive setting(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     Wood, P., Bruner, J., and Ross, G.（1976）. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班
99972012
101
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099972012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 江振東zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 翁條雄zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 翁條雄zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Jan-2013 13:26:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Jan-2013 13:26:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Jan-2013 13:26:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099972012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56530-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 應用數學系數學教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99972012zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在利用互動遊戲製作的創新教學方式，應用於國中數學幾何的學習上，探討此創新教學型態是否能帶來正向的教學成效，因此所採用的研究方法為實驗研究法，研究對象共為58人，分別為實驗組與對照組兩班，實驗處理為接受結合專題式學習、互動遊戲式學習等教學設計，透過電子白板的教學媒體環境，對照組則接受一般傳統講述式教學；此外，研究工具為針對學習者學習滿意度的意見調查表。研究結論如下所示:
     一、整合專題式導向教學與遊戲式學習理論所發展的互動遊戲製作，其教學設計對於國中數學幾何呈現高學習滿意度。
     二、互動遊戲製作比傳統教學方式能帶來較佳的數學幾何教學成效。
     三、互動遊戲製作使學習者的學習表現呈現正向的學習樣態。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study aims to see if applying a new interactive game making teaching method on junior high school geometry learning creates positive, favorable teaching effectiveness. The method adopted in this study is experiment-based research. A total of fifty-eight students is divided into two groups, experimental group and control group. Through the aids of the Electronic Interavtive Whiteboard, the experimental group receives project-based learning and works on interactive game making, while the control group is instructed in a traditional way. Besides the pre-test and post-test to examine the teaching and learning effects, a questionnaire to get a better understanding of the students’ feedback is adopted. The findings are as follows:
     
     I. Students are highly satisfied with learning geometry through project-based learning and interactive game making.
     II. Interactive game making brings out better learning effect than traditional teaching.
     III. Interactive game making facilitates developing students’ positvie and active learning attitude.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     研究背景與動機 1
     第二節 研究問題 4
     第三節 名詞定義 5
     一、 互動遊戲 5
     二、 專題式導向教學 5
     三、 教學成效 5
     四、 電子白板 5
     第四節 研究範圍與限制 7
     一、 研究範圍 7
     二、 研究限制 7
     三、 研究貢獻 7
     第二章 文獻探討 9
     第一節 專題式導向學習與相關研究 9
     一、 專題式導向學習定義 9
     二、 專題式學習的理論基礎 10
     三、 專題式學習的特徵 15
     四、 專題式學習的設計模式 16
     五、 專題式學習的相關研究 17
     第二節 遊戲式數位學習理論與相關研究 19
     一、 遊戲式數位學習發展與應用 19
     二、 遊戲式網路教材可協助國內數學教學應用 21
     第三節 電子白板與數學學習與教學之相關研究 23
     一、 電子白板之界定與其發展之理論基礎 23
     二、 電子白板之特色 27
     三、 互動學習相關理論在互動式電子白板上的運用 28
     第四節 小結 37
     第三章 研究方法 39
     第一節 研究架構 39
     一、研究架構與變項說明 39
     二、研究路徑 40
     第二節 研究對象 41
     第三節 研究工具 42
     一、 文獻閱讀 42
     二、 編製問卷 42
     三、 問卷預試 42
     四、 正式施測 43
     第四節 實施程序 44
     一、 蒐集相關資料 44
     二、 編製研究工具 44
     三、 撰寫研究計畫 44
     四、 正式教學 44
     五、 統計分析 44
     六、 論文撰寫 45
     第五節 資料處理 46
     第四章 結果與討論 49
     第一節 互動遊戲製作對學生數學學習滿意度分析 49
     第二節 背景變項在學習滿意度上的差異分析 52
     數學成績在不同組別上的差異分析 57
     第三節 綜合討論 60
     第五章 結論與建議 61
     第一節 研究結論 61
     第二節 研究建議 63
     一、對未來研究之建議 63
     二、對未來研究之建議 64
     第三節 研究貢獻 66
     附錄一 前測 67
     附錄二 後測 68
     附錄三 組員互評表 69
     附錄四 組間互評表 70
     附錄五 滿意度調查表 71
     參考文獻 74		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099972012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 互動遊戲製做zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 從互動遊戲製做學習國中數學幾何之教學成效探討zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The study of the teaching effects on geometry learning based on interactive game making to junior high school studentsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳幸宜（譯）（2001）。學習理論與教學應用（Learning and Instruction theory into practice）。台北市：心理出版社。
     吳致維、林建仲（2009）。互動式電子白板在國小教學之探討。生活科技教育月刊， 42（6），14-25。
     李昆霖、劉漢欽（2011）。應用電子白板教學在七年級學生數學概念學習之研究─以一元一次方程式學習為例。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。國立嘉義大學教育科技所。嘉義市。
     李胤禎（2008）。可共同操弄的同步式虛擬教具對學童幾何問題解決過程之影響。國立新竹教育大學數位學習科技研究所，未出版，新竹。
     周孝俊、劉明洲、張逸祥（2008）。以學習者為中心之互動式電子白板學習活動設計。2008年台灣教育傳播暨科技學會學術研討會 (TAECT2008)，文藻外語學院，2008年12月6日。
     范毓娟、郭重吉(1995)。在國中理化課程中試行建構主義教學之個案研究。科學教育，6期，頁69-87。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。
     高俊豐(2009)。以合作學習應用互動式電子白板在國小高年級數學縮圖比例尺單元之成效研究。國立屏東教育大學教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
     張春興（2005）。《教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐》。臺北：東華書局
     張慧淳、林曉芳（2011）。運用電子白板融入國小二年級數學科教學成效之研究 -以「認識立體形體、容量與重量」單元為例。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。明道大學課程與教學研究所。彰化縣。
     張靜嚳 (1995)。問題中心教學在國中發展之經過、效果及可行性之探討, 科學教育學刊, 003(002), 0139-0165.
     張舋今、林原宏（2011）。互動式電子白板應用於國小數學教學之成效－以國小五年級梯形面積單元為例。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     教育部(2008)。振興經濟擴大公共建設投資資訊服務業擴大公共建設計畫－建置中小學優質化均等數位教育環境計畫。
     教育部(2003) 。「國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要：社會學習領域」。
     教育部電算中心（2003）。在職教師及教育行政人員數位學習人才培訓計劃草案，台北，教育部電算中心。
     曹勝傑（2009）。以互動式電子白板為基礎之ICT教學環境建置及提升學生學習成效之研究。未出版碩士，臺中技術學院資訊傳播學研究所，台中。
     莊護林、李肖蘭(2006)。在小學中文科及常識科應用互動電子白板的策略，發表於第十一屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會中小學教師論壇，中國廣州。
     陳秀雯（2009）。運用互動式電子白板於國小四年級數學領域教學之研究。未出版碩士，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班，台北。
     陳惠邦 (2006)。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考，發表於台北市全球華人資訊教育創新論壇，台灣宜蘭。
     郭麗玲 (1991)。在畫中說故事的「圖畫書」, 在畫中說故事的「圖畫書」。社教雙月刊, 46(),
      20-33
     黃昭陵（2008）。以軟體式電子白板－JoinNet應用於「分數的四則運算」教學之行動研究。義守大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
     黃昱嘉、許天維（2011）。互動式電子白板之教學成效分析-以國小五年級梯形面積概念為例-第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     黃國禎（2008）。互動式電子白板融入國小數學領域教學之行動研究。國立臺北教育大學數學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
     鄒慧英（2001）。課程、教學、評量三位一體的專題學習。台南師院學報， 34 期，155-194。
     廖婷怡、林原宏（2011）。互動式電子白板融入國小二年級時間單元教學之成效探討。第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     劉正山(2008)。交互白板環境下國小數學領域教學設計的互動研究。國立台北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
     劉好 (1998)。平面圖形教材的處理, 載於甯自強（主編）, 國立嘉義師範學院八十六學年度數學教育研討會論文暨會議實錄彙編, （頁33-50）, 嘉義: 國立嘉義師範學院.
     鄭惠敏(2008)。教師使用互動式電子白板於自然科教學之教學信念與師生互動個案研究。國立新竹教育大學人資處應用科學系教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
     盧宗賢、林原宏（2011）。互動式電子白板應用於數學教學成效之研究，第三屆科技與數學教育學術研討會論文集。臺中教育大學數學教育系。台中市。
     蕭英勳(2007) 。教學媒體新寵兒—互動式電子白板，師友月刊， 477，56-59。
     戴文雄（1998）。不同正增強回饋形式電腦輔助學習系統對不同認知型態與空間能力高工學生機械製圖學習成效之研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫。計畫編號NSC86-2516-S-018-010-TG。
     英文部分
     Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994).Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 4, 465-483.
     Ames, C.(1992). Classrooms : goals structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3),261-271
     Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath,19(1), 4-7.
     Barron, B. J. S.,Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-311.
     Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M., (1993).Surpassing ourselves : An inquiry into the nature and implications of experts. Chicago :Open Court.
     Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A.(1991). Motivating project-based learning : Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist , 26(3&4),369-398.
     British Educational Communications and Technology Agency [BECTA]（2004）. Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard - a guide for primary school. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency [BECTA]（2003）. What the research says about interactive whiteboards.
     Brown, J. S., Collins A. and Dugid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher , 18(1),32-42.
     Cathy, L., Bridget, S., andStephen, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291-303.
     Curriculum Review (1994). Constructing buildings, bridges and minds: Building an integrated curriculum through social studies, Curriculum Review, 33(9), 25-26
     Delisle, R. (1997). How to use problem-based learning in the classroom.Alexandria, Virginia: Associa- tion for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
     Dickson, S. V., Chard, D. J., and Simmons, D. C. (1993). An integrated reading/writing curriculum: A focus on scaffolding. LD Forum, 18(4), 12-16.
     Glaser, R. (1988). On the nature of expertise. In C. Schooler and W. Schaie(Eds.). Cognitive functioning and social structure over the life course.Norwood,NJ:Ablex.
     Glover, D. and Miller, D. （2001）. Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10（3）, 257–275.
     Glover, T. (1993). The teaching of educational psychology through project- based learning.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.367703）
     Green, A. M. (1998). Project-based learning: Moving students through the GED with meaningful learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422466.
     Hall, I.and Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students` perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
     Hilton, J. U. (1988). Project-based learning for foreign students in an English speaking environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language.
     Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365.
     Jacobs, H.H.（1989）. Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 316506）
     Jones, B.F., Rasmussen,C. M., & Moffitt, M. C.(1997). Real-life problem solving : A collaborative approach to interdisciplinary learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
     Kennewell, S.（2001）. Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10（2）, 101–116.
     Krajcik, J. ; Blumenfeld, P. C. ; Marx, R. W. ; Bass, K. M., ; Fredricks, J. (1998), Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 313-350.
     Krajcik, J. S. ; Czerniak, C. M., ; Berger, C. (1999), Teaching children science: A project-based approach, : McGraw-HillCollege.
     Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W. and Soloway, E., “A collaborative model for helping teachers learn project-based instruction”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 95:5, pp. 483-497. 1994.
     Levy, P. (2002). Interactive Whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Unpublished Master dissertation at DIS of University of Sheffield, 2000-2001.
     Martin-Kniep, G., Feige, D.,and Soodak, L. (1995). Curriculum integration: An expanded view of an abused idea. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10(3), 227-249.
     Marx, R. W. ; Blumenfeld, P. C. ; Krajcik, J. S., ; Soloway, E. (1997), Enacting project-based science, The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341-358.
     Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J.S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., andMeyer,K. M.(1994). Enacting Project-based science : Experiences of four middle gradeteachers.The Elementary School Journal, 94（5）,517-538
     McDonald, J. ; Czerniak, C. (1994), Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples, School Science and Mathematics, 94(), 5-10.
     Moore, M. G. (1989). Three type of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
     Moss, D. and Van Duzer, C.（1998）.Project-based learning for adult English language learners.ERICDigest.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 556）
     Murcia, K. (2008). Teaching for scientific literacy with an interactive whiteboard.Teaching Science - the Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 54(4), 17-21.
     Ozel, S., Yetkiner, Z. E.and Capraro, R. M. (2008).Technology in K-12 Mathematics Classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 108(2), 80-85.
     Polman , J. L.(2000). Designing Project-based science : connecting learners through guided inquiry. Teacher s College Press.
     Prensky, M. (2001), Types of learning and possible game styles, Digital. Game- Based Learning, USA: McGraw-Hill.
     Price, r. V. (1991). Computer-aided instruction: a guide for authors Belmont. CA: Wadsworth.
     Shoemaker, B. J. E., ; Lewin, L. (1993), Curriculum and assessment: Two sides of the same coin, Educational Leadership, 50(8), 55-57.
     Thomas, J.W., Mergendoller, J. R. and Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning : A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: Education.
     Tobin, K., and Tippins, D. (1993).Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning.In K., Tobin (Ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education (Preface: ix-xvi), Washington, DC: AAAS.
     Torff B. and Tirotta, R. (2010), Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics, , 54(2), 379-383.
     Victoria, A., Sally, B., Rosamund S., Sarah C., Simon M. and Ian T. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, November 2005 Interactive whiteboard technology.
     Von Glasersfeld, E., (1981). An introduction of knowledge: Contributions to conceptual semantics. (pp. 193-218). SeasideCalifornia: Intersystem Publications.
     Vygotsky,L.S.(1978).Mind in society：The development of higher psychological process.Cambridge,MA: HarvardUniversity press.
     Walker, D.（2003）. Breathe of Life. Times Educational Supplement, 1 (3), 67.
     Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 42-45.
     Wood, J. W（1998）. .Adapting instruction to accommodate students in inclusive setting(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     Wood, P., Bruner, J., and Ross, G.（1976）. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17, 89-100.		zh_TW