學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 布丹主權概念發展之研究
On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereignty
作者 蔣馥朵
貢獻者 蕭高彥
蔣馥朵
關鍵詞 布丹
主權
憲政主義
絕對主義
立法權
日期 2012
上傳時間 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)
摘要 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚,是布丹留名於政治思想史之作,其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論;部分學者認為兩書間理路一致,細節差異微不足道,但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統,《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現,其脈絡下的君主,不但受到神法與自然法的限制,更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律,無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面,布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞,令王國既有法律成為一實在限制,但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上,可以視情形廢除、修訂,甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中,則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾,並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論:主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制,但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向,與其說是前後期理論斷裂,毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。
參考文獻 一、布丹著作

1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.
1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.
1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著,朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編,李衛海,錢俊文譯,北京:北京大學出版社。

二、西文書目

Allen
1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of
the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.
Arendt, Hannah
1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.
Aristotle
1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Beaud, Olivier
1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Berns, Thomas
2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque
d`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.
Church, William Farr
1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the
Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eulau, Heinz H. F.
1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of
Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Franklin, Julian
1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three
Treatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.
1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in
Anthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.
Gilmore, Myron Piper
1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York:
Russell& Russell.
Holmes, Stephen
1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and
Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holt, Mack P.
1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, Ronald
2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.
Jacobsen, Mogens Chrom
2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne.
København : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
Keohane, Nannerl O.
1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
King, Preston
1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and
Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.
Lewis, J. U.
1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.
Mesnard, Pierre
1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.
Mousnier, Roland
1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789.
Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Neumann, Franz
1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern
Society. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher.
Reynolds, Beatrice
1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis
Hotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.
Schmitt, Carl
1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shepard, Max Adams
1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science
Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.
Seyssel, Claude de
1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and
London: Yale University Press.
Skinner, Quentin
2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Spitz, Jean-Fabien
1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Strauss, Leo
1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Owen Ulph,
1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian
Franklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Veogelin, Eric
1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The
Collected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press

三、中文書目

史金納 (Quentin Skinner)
2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二):宗教改革》,台北:左岸文化。
施密特 (Carl Schmitt)
2004 《憲法學說》,劉楓譯,台北:聯經。
2005 《政治的概念》,劉宗坤譯,上海:上海人民。
2006 《論斷與概念》,朱雁冰譯,上海:上海人民。
陳秀鳳
2005 政權“神聖化”?-以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討,新史學16卷
4期。
2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”-中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探
討,新史學18卷3期。
2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38
期。
薩孟武
1993 《西洋政治思想史》,台北:三民書局。
賽班
1991《西洋政治思想史》,台北:桂冠。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治研究所
96252015
101
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭高彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔣馥朵zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 蔣馥朵zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096252015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57593-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 政治研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96252015zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚,是布丹留名於政治思想史之作,其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論;部分學者認為兩書間理路一致,細節差異微不足道,但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統,《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現,其脈絡下的君主,不但受到神法與自然法的限制,更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律,無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面,布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞,令王國既有法律成為一實在限制,但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上,可以視情形廢除、修訂,甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中,則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾,並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論:主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制,但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向,與其說是前後期理論斷裂,毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 緒論-------------------------------------------------------1

第一節 前言------------------------------------------------1
第二節 布丹著作與生平簡介-------------------------------------2
第三節 問題意識與文獻檢閱-------------------------------------5
第四節 章節安排--------------------------------------------10

第一章 十六世紀法國憲政思想----------------------------------12

第一節 《法蘭西君主國》---------------------------------------12
第二節 《法蘭克高盧》----------------------------------------21

第二章 《理解歷史的簡易方法》與主權理論-------------------------31

第一節 政治共同體之要素--------------------------------------32
第二節 國家體制分類-----------------------------------------36
第三節 主權理論--------------------------------------------44

第三章 《邦國論六卷》與主權理論-------------------------------53

第一節 主權理論--------------------------------------------53
第二節 主權者與法律-----------------------------------------60
第三節 主權者與政治共同體------------------------------------68


結論------------------------------------------------------84

參考書目---------------------------------------------------89
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 布丹zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 憲政主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 絕對主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立法權zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 布丹主權概念發展之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereigntyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、布丹著作

1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.
1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.
1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著,朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編,李衛海,錢俊文譯,北京:北京大學出版社。

二、西文書目

Allen
1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of
the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.
Arendt, Hannah
1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.
Aristotle
1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Beaud, Olivier
1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
Berns, Thomas
2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque
d`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.
Church, William Farr
1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the
Evolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eulau, Heinz H. F.
1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of
Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.
Franklin, Julian
1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three
Treatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.
1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in
Anthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.
Gilmore, Myron Piper
1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York:
Russell& Russell.
Holmes, Stephen
1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and
Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Holt, Mack P.
1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hutton, Ronald
2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.
Jacobsen, Mogens Chrom
2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne.
København : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
Keohane, Nannerl O.
1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
King, Preston
1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and
Thomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.
Lewis, J. U.
1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.
Mesnard, Pierre
1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.
Mousnier, Roland
1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789.
Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Neumann, Franz
1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern
Society. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher.
Reynolds, Beatrice
1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis
Hotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.
Schmitt, Carl
1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shepard, Max Adams
1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science
Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.
Seyssel, Claude de
1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and
London: Yale University Press.
Skinner, Quentin
2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Spitz, Jean-Fabien
1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Strauss, Leo
1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Owen Ulph,
1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian
Franklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Veogelin, Eric
1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The
Collected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press

三、中文書目

史金納 (Quentin Skinner)
2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二):宗教改革》,台北:左岸文化。
施密特 (Carl Schmitt)
2004 《憲法學說》,劉楓譯,台北:聯經。
2005 《政治的概念》,劉宗坤譯,上海:上海人民。
2006 《論斷與概念》,朱雁冰譯,上海:上海人民。
陳秀鳳
2005 政權“神聖化”?-以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討,新史學16卷
4期。
2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”-中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探
討,新史學18卷3期。
2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38
期。
薩孟武
1993 《西洋政治思想史》,台北:三民書局。
賽班
1991《西洋政治思想史》,台北:桂冠。
zh_TW