學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 歐中高峰會之研究-以文教合作為例
The EU-China Summit: A Study on Cultural and Educational Cooperation作者 張亦芸
Chang, Yi Yun貢獻者 張台麟
張亦芸
Chang, Yi Yun關鍵詞 柔性權力
歐中高峰會
歐中文教合作
歐中關係
soft power
EU-China summit
cultural and educational cooperation between China and European Union
EU-China relationship日期 2012 上傳時間 2-Sep-2013 17:39:49 (UTC+8) 摘要 在現代講求合作與和平共處的國際環境裡，國與國之間已不太運用傳統的剛性、強迫性的力量來試圖影響對方，反之更多的是在文化、教育等柔性力量上的交流與溝通，慢慢轉變對彼此的觀感，進而改善雙邊或多邊關係。因此在現今國際關係互動上，一國的柔性權力就被廣泛認為可以在許多方面造成巨大的影響，在奈伊提出柔性權力概念之後，更是受到國際關係學界的重視。 歐盟與中國於1975年即建立外交關係，但囿於冷戰的格局，雙方難有合作的發展。到了後冷戰時期，由於中國勢力的增長，歐中即在1998年召開歐中高峰會，除了發展經貿關係之外，也開始將合作推至包括文教在內的多領域議題上。文教議題因具有敏感性低、容易調整之特性，更有促進雙方了解與散播價值觀的力量，達到形塑國家形象的效果，可作為外交策略來使用，因此國際文教交流作為研究柔性權力作用即有其價值。許多國家都試圖透過文教交流等途徑，塑造對本國有利之國際環境、或影響他國之行為，進而使一國能夠在國際行動上取得更大的活動空間。因此，就歐盟與中國在文教領域所擁有的資源，以及如何透過文教領域的合作來試圖影響對方，以及歐中關係基於此的改變，便是本研究想關切的議題。 因此本文運用柔性權力之概念，並以歐中文教合作為出發點，以另一面向來檢視歐中雙邊關係的發展，發掘歐中在文教合作的驅動力、對歐中關係發展之成果與前景，包括探討雙方所採取的文教議題、文教交流之互動過程，以及最後對於歐中雙方文教領域交流範圍與程度的日益加深，是否有助於雙方峰會根本目標的達成，以及是否對於歐中間的對話管道與交流模式有著積極的幫助，提出研究發現與心得。
In the modern international communication and interaction which set pace well on cooperation and harmoniousness, the influence inflicting from one country to another rarely resorts that much to the traditional rigid, enforcing way of negotiation. Rather, more cultural and educative ways of interaction have, slowly changing how countries evaluate each other, improved relationships of both or even multiple sides. Therefore, upon the global relationship, one country’s power of pliable nature can be commonly deemed of creating influential impacts on many aspects, which has gained more attention from fields of international relationship after the concept of soft power has been suggested by Joseph Nye. The European Union has established diplomatic relationship with China since 1975. Owing to the restriction resulted from the cold war; however, both sides had very limited room for further cooperation. After the cold war, China and The European Union, because of China’s growth, established EU-China summit in 1998, starting to push their cooperation, along with economic development, to various fields including cultural and educational ones. The nature of low sensitivity and flexibility of cultural and educational issues makes it easy for both sides to understand and distribute the power of philosophy of value, which helps to shape the image of the country for diplomatic purposes, so international intercourse for cultural and educational purposes has its status in the study of soft power. Many countries have tried to create a comfort zone in the international environment or to influence other countries’ decision making via cultural and educational interaction, and hence strive for a bigger room to take political action. As a consequence, this research aims at exploring the issue of the changes that have been brought about by this cultural and educational cooperation and how they influence each other through the cooperation upon the resources that both sides have. This paper manipulates the idea of soft power and bases on China and European Union cooperation to look at how both sides evolve from this relationship, to discover the drives towards their cooperation, and to oversee their developed relationship and its prospects, including discussing cultural and educational issues that both sides adopt, the interaction along their communication. At the end, this research gives a retrospect and discovery for whether their goals are achieved after their cultural and informational development has been established, and whether their channel of communication and their modes of interaction have been significantly benefited.參考文獻 中文 一、專書 卓忠宏，2010。《歐洲聯盟柔性權力之運用》。台北：時英。 張五岳主編，2003。《兩岸關係研究》。台北：新文京。 張亞中主編，2006。《歐盟全球戰略與對外關係》。台北：晶點文化。 張福昌，2002。《邁向「歐洲聯盟」之路》。台北：三民。 郭秋慶，1999。《歐洲聯盟概論》。臺北：五南。 郭關玉，2006。《中國─歐盟合作研究》。北京：世界知識。 陳勁，2004。《歐盟外交政策與對外關係》。臺北：五南。 黃平、崔之元主編，2005。《中國與全球化：華盛頓共識還是北京共識》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。 黃偉峰主編，2007。《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》。臺北：五南。 黃琛瑜，1999。《歐洲聯盟—跨世紀政治工程》。台北：五南。 蔡政文主編，2008。《當今歐盟─中國─台灣關係的演變與未來》。台北：遠景基金會。 韓培爾，1998。《社會科學方法論：質化與量化Q&A》。台北：風雲論壇出版。 二、譯著 Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S., Jr.著，門洪華譯，2009。《權力與相互依賴：轉變中的世界政治》(Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition)。北京：北京出版社。 Nye, Joseph S., Jr.著，吳家恆、方祖芳譯，2006。《柔性權力》(Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics)。台北：遠流。 Studwell, Joe著，齊思賢譯，2002。《中國熱 China Dream》。台北：時報出版。 三、專書論文與期刊論文 中華人民共和國，2007/12。〈中歐文教交流統計2007年〉，《中歐文化交流公開訊息》。 中歐關係重點科學課題組，2012。〈2011年中歐關係的回顧與展望〉，《歐洲研究》，第1期，頁1-31。 王滬寧，1993。〈作為國家實力的文化：軟權力〉，《復旦學報》，第3期，頁91-96。 甘逸驊，2007。〈歐盟柔性強權身分認同的建構與批判〉，《問題與研究》，第46卷第4期，頁1-25。 朱景鵬，2002。〈歐洲聯盟與中共雙邊互動經驗之探討－兼論歐盟之對外關係〉，《遠景季刊》，第3 卷第2期，頁43-86。 朱國仁，2010。〈新世紀國際教育改革發展方向及啟示〉，《北京清華大學教育研究》，第31卷第3期，頁1-11。 左存信，2012。〈歐盟對華政治態度〉，張利華、史志欽編，《中國與歐盟關係研究》，頁87-104。 呂郁女，2008。〈中國大陸軟權力的發展與影響〉，《全球政治評論》，第21期，頁1-18。 李智，2003。〈試論文化外交〉，《外交學院學報》，第1期，頁83-87。 李靜波，2009。〈論孔子學院與對外漢語教學的新使命〉，《時代教育》，第9期，頁41-42。 周弘，2009。〈中國與歐洲關係60年〉，《歐洲研究》第5期，頁1-52。 周弘、劉作奎、范勇鵬，2009。〈2008年中國人的歐洲觀〉，《歐洲研究》，第5期，頁100-155。 邱坤玄，1999。〈結構現實主義與中共大國外交格局〉，《東亞季刊》，第30卷第3期，頁23-38。 邱坤玄，2004。〈中共對冷戰後美日安全關係的認知與新安全觀的形成〉，《東亞研究》，第35卷第2期，頁1-32。 邱坤玄，2009。〈台灣的中共外交研究與國際關係理論的對話〉，《東亞研究》，第40卷第2期，頁1-27。 胡文濤，2004。〈解讀文化外交：一種學理分析〉，《外交評論》，第96期，頁53-55。 姜家雄，2008。〈中國與歐盟關係─現在與未來〉，蔡政文主編，《當今歐盟─中國─台灣關係的演變與未來》，頁225-267。 馬祥佑，2009。〈論中國的多邊外交：以中歐關係發展為例〉，《亞太通訊》，第6期，頁61-106。 張利華、王亮，2012。〈歐盟對華政策文件解讀〉，張利華、史志欽編，《中國與歐盟關係研究》，頁70-86。 張台麟，〈2012年中歐關係發展之回顧與前瞻〉，發表於「2013年第一次台灣歐盟論壇」研討會(台北：國家圖書館)，頁22。 張台麟，2006/12。〈歐盟推動多元語言制度的發展與挑戰〉，《全球化下的歐洲語言與文化政策—台灣的觀點》。台北：政大外語學院及歐盟莫內教學模組計畫。頁157-188。 張台麟，2008/6。〈歐盟高峰會議通過「里斯本條約」之背景與意涵〉，《歐盟統合與里斯本條約》。台北：政大外語學院及歐盟莫內教學模組計畫。頁1-19。 張台麟，2009/7。〈歐洲聯盟推動共同移民政策的發展與挑戰：台灣的觀點與借鏡〉，《歐盟在全球化下的角色：機會與挑戰》。台北：政大外語學院及歐盟莫內教學模組計畫。頁1-38。 張清敏，2006。〈全球化環境下的中國文化外交〉，《外交評論》，第87期，頁38-41。 曹雲華、林濤，2004。〈中國睦鄰外交新思維在東南亞的實踐〉，《深圳大學學報》，第21卷第3期，頁43-46。 許志嘉，2010。〈中國新睦鄰外交政策：戰略意涵與作為〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第8卷第3期，頁43-90。 陳剛華，2008。〈從文化傳播角度看孔子學院的意義〉，《學術論壇》，第7期，頁162-167。 彭新良，2006。〈外交學研究中的一個新領域——關於文化外交的幾點思考〉，《寧波大學學報：人文科學版》，第19卷第4期，頁59-64。 黃金輝、丁忠毅，2010。〈中國國家軟實力研究述評〉，《社會科學》，第5期，頁32。 郭震遠，《建設和諧世界：理論與實踐》(北京：世界知識出版社，2008)，頁190。 楊昊、蕭新煌、趙晧嵎，2012。〈中國知識社群如何重構「柔性權力」理論：回顧與批判〉，《中國大陸研究》，第55卷第4期，頁59-88。 趙磊，2007。〈理解中國軟實力的三個維度：文化外交、多邊外交、對外援助政策〉，《社會科學論壇》，2007年5期，頁151。 駐歐盟兼駐比利時文化代表處文教組，2004。〈歐盟文教剪輯〉，第11期，頁21-22。 駐歐盟兼駐比利時文化代表處文教組，2004。〈歐盟文教剪輯〉，第12期，頁10-11。 盧連偉，2008。〈從孔子學院看漢語和中國教育的國際化認同〉，《管子學刊》，第4期，頁77-79。 藍玉春，2005。〈歐盟多層次治理：論點與現象〉，《政治科學論叢》，第24期，頁49-76。 蘇宏達，2009/6。〈里斯本條約生效後對歐盟對外行動能力與民主治理機制可能的影響〉，《政治科學論叢》，第40期，頁81-126。 蘇宏達，2010/6。〈從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程〉，《問題與研究》，第49卷第2期，頁1-38。 英文 一、專書 Bernstein, Richard & Munro, Ross H., 1997. The Coming Conflict with China. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Buzan, Barry, 1991. People, States and Fear: A Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder Colo.: L. Eatwell, Roger, 1997. European Political Cultures-Conflict or Convergence? UK: Routledge. Edmonds, Richard Louis, 2002. China and Europe since 1978: A European Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kennedy, Paul. M., 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House. Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S., 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Kerr, David & Fei, Liu, 2007. The International Politics of EU-China Relations. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press. Kurlantzick, Joshua, 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power Is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press. Men, Jing & Balducci, Giuseppe eds., 2010. Prospects and challenges for EU-China relations in the 21st century: the partnership and cooperation agreement. New York: P.I.E. Peter Lang. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. New York: Oxford University Press. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 2004. Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 2011.The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs Press. Pina-Cabral, Joao De, 2002. Between China and Europe. London: Continuum. Rosamond, Ben, 2000. Theories of European Integration. London: Macmillan Press LTD. 二、期刊 Algieri, Franco, 2002. “EU Economic Relations with China: An Institutionalist Perspective,” The China Quarterly, No.169 (16), pp. 64-77. Asia-Europe Foundation, “Mapping Asia-Europe culture cooperation,” Asia-Europe Foundation, Vol. 144, No. 91, July 2010, pp. 1-65. Bachtler, J. & Mendez, C., 2007. “Who Governs EU Cohesion Policy? Deconstructing the Reforms of the Structural Funds,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 535-564. Bachtler, J. & Wishlade, F. & Mendez, C., 2007. “New budget, new regulations, new strategies: The 2006 reform of EU Cohesion Policy,” European Policy Research Paper, No. 63, pp. i-79. Bendiek, Annegret & Kramer, Heinz, 2010. “The EU as a ‘Strategic’ International Actor: Substantial and Analytical Ambiguities,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 453-474. Berman, Jacqueline & Friesendorf, Cornelius, 2008. “EU Foreign Policy and the Fight Against Human Trafficking: Coercive Governance as Crime Control,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 189-209. Carrapiço, Helena & Trauner, Florian, 2012. “The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs after the Lisbon Treaty: Analysing the Dynamics of Expansion and Diversification,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/1, pp. 1-18. Compagnia di San Paolo, “Transatlantic Trends 2012,” Luso-American Foundation, 2012, pp. 2-52. Cummings, Milton C. Jr., 2003. “Cultural Diplomacy and the United States Government: A Survey” Center for Arts and Culture, pp. 1. David Shambaugh, “China and Europe: The Emerging Axis,” Current History, Vol. 103, Issue 674, September 2004, pp. 246-247. Dent, Christopher M., 1999. “The EU-East Asia Economic Relationship: The Persisting Weak Triadic Link?,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 371-394. EACEA, “About Erasmus Mundus 2009-2013,” EACEA, Vol. 30, Mar 2009, pp. 22. Edmonds, Richard Louis, 2002. “China and Europe since 1978: An Introduction,” The China Quarterly, No. 169, pp. 1-9. Foundation Charles Leopold Mayer, “Status, quality and characteristics of existing partnership between Chinese and European cities,” Europe-China Platform Survey, July 2010, pp. 1-48. Grevi, Giovanni, 2008. “The EU and the European Security Strategy: Forging a Global Europe,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 281-282. Holslag, Jonathan, 2006. “The European Union and China: The Great Disillusion,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 555-580. Hoof, Lieve Van, 2012. “Why the EU is Failing in its Neighbourhood: The Case of Armenia,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/2, pp. 285-302. Huelss, Hendrik, 2010. “A Force for Good Governance? The European Union’s Normative Power and Standards of Appropriate Governing,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 1, pp. 93-112. John E. Hill, Through the Jade Gate to Rome: A Study of the Silk Routes during the Later Han Dynasty, First to Second Centuries CE. (South Carolina: BookSurge Publishing, 2009), pp. 5 & p. 27. Jones, William J., 2009-2010. “European Union Soft Power: Cultural Diplomacy and Higher Education in Southeast Asia,” Silpakorn University International Journal, Vol. 9-10, pp. 41-70. Kay Möller, “Diplomatic Relations and Mutual Strategic Perceptions: China and the European Union,” The China Quarterly, Vol. 169, pp. 11-23. Lan, Yuchun, 2004. “The European Parliament and the China–Taiwan Issue: An Empirical Approach,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 1, pp. 115-140. Lee, Michael, 1999. “Europe in the World: The Persistence of Power Politics, by Maurice Keens-Soper,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 583-585. Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle, 2010. “EU Cultural Policy between Community-building and Market-making: putting the EU’s Cultural Agenda into Historical Perspective,” Fondation Pierre du Bois, No. 2, pp. 1-7. Lucarelli, Sonia, 2007. “The European Union in the Eyes of Others: Towards Filling a Gap in the Literature,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 249-270. MacKenzie, Alex & Servent, Ariadna Ripoll, 2012. “The European Parliament as a ‘Norm Taker’? EU-US Relations after the SWIFT Agreement,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/1, pp. 71-86. Manners, Ian, 2009. “The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 5, pp. 785-803. Martins, Bruno, 2008. “The Quest for a European Strategic Culture: Changing Norms on Security and Defence in the European Union,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 286-287. McMahon. M. E, “Higher Education in a World Market: A history look at the global context of international study,” Higher Educational, 1992, pp. 13-19. Meissner, Werner, 2002. “Cultural Relations between China and the Member States of the European Union,” The China Quarterly, No.169, pp. 181-203. Missiroli, Antonio, 2010. “The New EU ‘Foreign Policy’ System after Lisbon: A Work in Progress,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 427.452. Munro, Ross M., 1992. “Wakening Dragon: The Real Danger in Asia is From China?” Policy Review, No .62, pp. 6-10. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 1990. “Soft Power,” Foreign Policy, No. 80, pp. 153-171. Oplez, Hannes, 2006. “Anti-Amerericanism and the Paradox of Soft Power,” Talent, p. 10. Pawlak, Patryk, 2012. “The Unintentional Development of the EU’s Security Governance beyond Borders,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/1, pp. 87-107. Peruzzi, Roberto & Poletti, Arlo & Shuangquan, Zhang, 2007. “China’s Views of Europe: A Maturing Partnership,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 311-330. Reslow, Natasja & Vanhoonacker, Sophie, 2010. “The European External Action Service: Living Forwards by Understanding Backwards,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 1, pp. 1-18. Robles, Alfredo C., Jr., 2011. “Negotiating Services with ASEAN: The EU between the WTO and Japan,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 379-400. Schneider, Cynthia P., 2003. “Diplomacy that works: Best Practices in Cultural Diplomacy,” Center for Arts and Culture, pp. 1-16. Seeberg, Peter, 2010. “European Neighbourhood Policy, Post-normativity, and Pragmatism,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 5, pp. 663-679. Shimko, Keith L., 1992. “Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism,” The Review of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 281-301. Smith, Michael, 2007. “The European Union and International Order: European and Global Dimensions,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 437-456. Ulusoy, Kivanc, 2008. “The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem,” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 309-329. Umber Eco, “EU-China High Level Culture Forum,” Institute International Transcultural, July 2012, pp. 1-14. Yu-Nu Lu, “The Development and Impact of China’s Soft Power,” Review of Global Politics, No. 21, 2008, pp. 12. Zelikow, Philip, 1994. “Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory Practice and Back again,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 143-171. Zimmermann, Hubert, 2008. “How the EU Negotiates Trade and Democracy: The Cases of China’s Accession to the WTO and the Doha Round,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 255-280. 三、官方文件 Council of the European Union, 2006/9/11. Joint Press Communique 9th EU-China Summit, Press 249, 12642/06, pp. 1-11. Council of the European Union, 2007/9/28. Joint Press Communique 10th EU-China Summit, Press 279, 16070/07, pp. 1-18. Council of the European Union, 2009/5/20. Joint Press Communique 11th EU-China Summit, Press 147, 10234/09, pp. 1-2. Council of the European Union, 2010/10/06. Joint Press Communique 13th EU-China Summit, Press 267, 14577/10, pp. 1-3. Council of the European Union, 2012/9/20. Joint Press Communique 1-8th EU-China Summit, Press 388, 14022/12, pp. 1-7. Council of the European Union, 2012/9/20. Joint Press Communique 15th EU-China Summit, Press 388, 14022/12, pp. 1-7. Lehann, Alexandra, 2010. “Future European Educational Strategies,” European Union Delegation to China and Mogolia Cooper Section, pp. 1-4. European Commission, Toward a New Asia Strategy, COM (1994) 314 final. European Commission, A long term policy for China-Europe Relations, COM (1995) 279 final. European Commission, Building a Comprehensive strategic partnership with China, COM (1998) 181 final. European Commission, A maturing partnership - shared interests and challenges in EU-China relations, COM (2003) 533 final. 網際網路 〈中國人權發展概況〉，《中國人權網》， 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
歐洲語文學程碩士在職專班(MPES)
98952004
101資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098952004 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 張台麟 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張亦芸 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Yi Yun en_US dc.creator (作者) 張亦芸 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yi Yun en_US dc.date (日期) 2012 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Sep-2013 17:39:49 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Sep-2013 17:39:49 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Sep-2013 17:39:49 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0098952004 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59605 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 歐洲語文學程碩士在職專班(MPES) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98952004 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在現代講求合作與和平共處的國際環境裡，國與國之間已不太運用傳統的剛性、強迫性的力量來試圖影響對方，反之更多的是在文化、教育等柔性力量上的交流與溝通，慢慢轉變對彼此的觀感，進而改善雙邊或多邊關係。因此在現今國際關係互動上，一國的柔性權力就被廣泛認為可以在許多方面造成巨大的影響，在奈伊提出柔性權力概念之後，更是受到國際關係學界的重視。 歐盟與中國於1975年即建立外交關係，但囿於冷戰的格局，雙方難有合作的發展。到了後冷戰時期，由於中國勢力的增長，歐中即在1998年召開歐中高峰會，除了發展經貿關係之外，也開始將合作推至包括文教在內的多領域議題上。文教議題因具有敏感性低、容易調整之特性，更有促進雙方了解與散播價值觀的力量，達到形塑國家形象的效果，可作為外交策略來使用，因此國際文教交流作為研究柔性權力作用即有其價值。許多國家都試圖透過文教交流等途徑，塑造對本國有利之國際環境、或影響他國之行為，進而使一國能夠在國際行動上取得更大的活動空間。因此，就歐盟與中國在文教領域所擁有的資源，以及如何透過文教領域的合作來試圖影響對方，以及歐中關係基於此的改變，便是本研究想關切的議題。 因此本文運用柔性權力之概念，並以歐中文教合作為出發點，以另一面向來檢視歐中雙邊關係的發展，發掘歐中在文教合作的驅動力、對歐中關係發展之成果與前景，包括探討雙方所採取的文教議題、文教交流之互動過程，以及最後對於歐中雙方文教領域交流範圍與程度的日益加深，是否有助於雙方峰會根本目標的達成，以及是否對於歐中間的對話管道與交流模式有著積極的幫助，提出研究發現與心得。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the modern international communication and interaction which set pace well on cooperation and harmoniousness, the influence inflicting from one country to another rarely resorts that much to the traditional rigid, enforcing way of negotiation. Rather, more cultural and educative ways of interaction have, slowly changing how countries evaluate each other, improved relationships of both or even multiple sides. Therefore, upon the global relationship, one country’s power of pliable nature can be commonly deemed of creating influential impacts on many aspects, which has gained more attention from fields of international relationship after the concept of soft power has been suggested by Joseph Nye. The European Union has established diplomatic relationship with China since 1975. Owing to the restriction resulted from the cold war; however, both sides had very limited room for further cooperation. After the cold war, China and The European Union, because of China’s growth, established EU-China summit in 1998, starting to push their cooperation, along with economic development, to various fields including cultural and educational ones. The nature of low sensitivity and flexibility of cultural and educational issues makes it easy for both sides to understand and distribute the power of philosophy of value, which helps to shape the image of the country for diplomatic purposes, so international intercourse for cultural and educational purposes has its status in the study of soft power. Many countries have tried to create a comfort zone in the international environment or to influence other countries’ decision making via cultural and educational interaction, and hence strive for a bigger room to take political action. As a consequence, this research aims at exploring the issue of the changes that have been brought about by this cultural and educational cooperation and how they influence each other through the cooperation upon the resources that both sides have. This paper manipulates the idea of soft power and bases on China and European Union cooperation to look at how both sides evolve from this relationship, to discover the drives towards their cooperation, and to oversee their developed relationship and its prospects, including discussing cultural and educational issues that both sides adopt, the interaction along their communication. At the end, this research gives a retrospect and discovery for whether their goals are achieved after their cultural and informational development has been established, and whether their channel of communication and their modes of interaction have been significantly benefited. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章、緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法與章節架構 6 第三節 研究範圍與限制 9 第四節 文獻探討 10 第貳章、柔性權力與國際文教合作 13 第一節 柔性權力之概念 13 第二節 國際文教交流與政策 20 第參章、歐中文教合作的沿革 31 第一節 歐中高峰會與歐中文教合作 31 第二節 歐中文教合作之發展歷程 35 第肆章、歐中文教合作之成效與影響 54 第一節 歐中文教合作與柔性權力概念 54 第二節 歐中文教合作互動成效研析 59 第三節 歐中文教合作對歐中關係之影響 64 第伍章、結論 73 參考書目 76 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098952004 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 柔性權力 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歐中高峰會 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歐中文教合作 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歐中關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) soft power en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) EU-China summit en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) cultural and educational cooperation between China and European Union en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) EU-China relationship en_US dc.title (題名) 歐中高峰會之研究-以文教合作為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The EU-China Summit: A Study on Cultural and Educational Cooperation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文 一、專書 卓忠宏，2010。《歐洲聯盟柔性權力之運用》。台北：時英。 張五岳主編，2003。《兩岸關係研究》。台北：新文京。 張亞中主編，2006。《歐盟全球戰略與對外關係》。台北：晶點文化。 張福昌，2002。《邁向「歐洲聯盟」之路》。台北：三民。 郭秋慶，1999。《歐洲聯盟概論》。臺北：五南。 郭關玉，2006。《中國─歐盟合作研究》。北京：世界知識。 陳勁，2004。《歐盟外交政策與對外關係》。臺北：五南。 黃平、崔之元主編，2005。《中國與全球化：華盛頓共識還是北京共識》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。 黃偉峰主編，2007。《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》。臺北：五南。 黃琛瑜，1999。《歐洲聯盟—跨世紀政治工程》。台北：五南。 蔡政文主編，2008。《當今歐盟─中國─台灣關係的演變與未來》。台北：遠景基金會。 韓培爾，1998。《社會科學方法論：質化與量化Q&A》。台北：風雲論壇出版。 二、譯著 Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S., Jr.著，門洪華譯，2009。《權力與相互依賴：轉變中的世界政治》(Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition)。北京：北京出版社。 Nye, Joseph S., Jr.著，吳家恆、方祖芳譯，2006。《柔性權力》(Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics)。台北：遠流。 Studwell, Joe著，齊思賢譯，2002。《中國熱 China Dream》。台北：時報出版。 三、專書論文與期刊論文 中華人民共和國，2007/12。〈中歐文教交流統計2007年〉，《中歐文化交流公開訊息》。 中歐關係重點科學課題組，2012。〈2011年中歐關係的回顧與展望〉，《歐洲研究》，第1期，頁1-31。 王滬寧，1993。〈作為國家實力的文化：軟權力〉，《復旦學報》，第3期，頁91-96。 甘逸驊，2007。〈歐盟柔性強權身分認同的建構與批判〉，《問題與研究》，第46卷第4期，頁1-25。 朱景鵬，2002。〈歐洲聯盟與中共雙邊互動經驗之探討－兼論歐盟之對外關係〉，《遠景季刊》，第3 卷第2期，頁43-86。 朱國仁，2010。〈新世紀國際教育改革發展方向及啟示〉，《北京清華大學教育研究》，第31卷第3期，頁1-11。 左存信，2012。〈歐盟對華政治態度〉，張利華、史志欽編，《中國與歐盟關係研究》，頁87-104。 呂郁女，2008。〈中國大陸軟權力的發展與影響〉，《全球政治評論》，第21期，頁1-18。 李智，2003。〈試論文化外交〉，《外交學院學報》，第1期，頁83-87。 李靜波，2009。〈論孔子學院與對外漢語教學的新使命〉，《時代教育》，第9期，頁41-42。 周弘，2009。〈中國與歐洲關係60年〉，《歐洲研究》第5期，頁1-52。 周弘、劉作奎、范勇鵬，2009。〈2008年中國人的歐洲觀〉，《歐洲研究》，第5期，頁100-155。 邱坤玄，1999。〈結構現實主義與中共大國外交格局〉，《東亞季刊》，第30卷第3期，頁23-38。 邱坤玄，2004。〈中共對冷戰後美日安全關係的認知與新安全觀的形成〉，《東亞研究》，第35卷第2期，頁1-32。 邱坤玄，2009。〈台灣的中共外交研究與國際關係理論的對話〉，《東亞研究》，第40卷第2期，頁1-27。 胡文濤，2004。〈解讀文化外交：一種學理分析〉，《外交評論》，第96期，頁53-55。 姜家雄，2008。〈中國與歐盟關係─現在與未來〉，蔡政文主編，《當今歐盟─中國─台灣關係的演變與未來》，頁225-267。 馬祥佑，2009。〈論中國的多邊外交：以中歐關係發展為例〉，《亞太通訊》，第6期，頁61-106。 張利華、王亮，2012。〈歐盟對華政策文件解讀〉，張利華、史志欽編，《中國與歐盟關係研究》，頁70-86。 張台麟，〈2012年中歐關係發展之回顧與前瞻〉，發表於「2013年第一次台灣歐盟論壇」研討會(台北：國家圖書館)，頁22。 張台麟，2006/12。〈歐盟推動多元語言制度的發展與挑戰〉，《全球化下的歐洲語言與文化政策—台灣的觀點》。台北：政大外語學院及歐盟莫內教學模組計畫。頁157-188。 張台麟，2008/6。〈歐盟高峰會議通過「里斯本條約」之背景與意涵〉，《歐盟統合與里斯本條約》。台北：政大外語學院及歐盟莫內教學模組計畫。頁1-19。 張台麟，2009/7。〈歐洲聯盟推動共同移民政策的發展與挑戰：台灣的觀點與借鏡〉，《歐盟在全球化下的角色：機會與挑戰》。台北：政大外語學院及歐盟莫內教學模組計畫。頁1-38。 張清敏，2006。〈全球化環境下的中國文化外交〉，《外交評論》，第87期，頁38-41。 曹雲華、林濤，2004。〈中國睦鄰外交新思維在東南亞的實踐〉，《深圳大學學報》，第21卷第3期，頁43-46。 許志嘉，2010。〈中國新睦鄰外交政策：戰略意涵與作為〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第8卷第3期，頁43-90。 陳剛華，2008。〈從文化傳播角度看孔子學院的意義〉，《學術論壇》，第7期，頁162-167。 彭新良，2006。〈外交學研究中的一個新領域——關於文化外交的幾點思考〉，《寧波大學學報：人文科學版》，第19卷第4期，頁59-64。 黃金輝、丁忠毅，2010。〈中國國家軟實力研究述評〉，《社會科學》，第5期，頁32。 郭震遠，《建設和諧世界：理論與實踐》(北京：世界知識出版社，2008)，頁190。 楊昊、蕭新煌、趙晧嵎，2012。〈中國知識社群如何重構「柔性權力」理論：回顧與批判〉，《中國大陸研究》，第55卷第4期，頁59-88。 趙磊，2007。〈理解中國軟實力的三個維度：文化外交、多邊外交、對外援助政策〉，《社會科學論壇》，2007年5期，頁151。 駐歐盟兼駐比利時文化代表處文教組，2004。〈歐盟文教剪輯〉，第11期，頁21-22。 駐歐盟兼駐比利時文化代表處文教組，2004。〈歐盟文教剪輯〉，第12期，頁10-11。 盧連偉，2008。〈從孔子學院看漢語和中國教育的國際化認同〉，《管子學刊》，第4期，頁77-79。 藍玉春，2005。〈歐盟多層次治理：論點與現象〉，《政治科學論叢》，第24期，頁49-76。 蘇宏達，2009/6。〈里斯本條約生效後對歐盟對外行動能力與民主治理機制可能的影響〉，《政治科學論叢》，第40期，頁81-126。 蘇宏達，2010/6。〈從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程〉，《問題與研究》，第49卷第2期，頁1-38。 英文 一、專書 Bernstein, Richard & Munro, Ross H., 1997. The Coming Conflict with China. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Buzan, Barry, 1991. People, States and Fear: A Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Boulder Colo.: L. Eatwell, Roger, 1997. European Political Cultures-Conflict or Convergence? UK: Routledge. Edmonds, Richard Louis, 2002. China and Europe since 1978: A European Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kennedy, Paul. M., 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House. Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S., 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Kerr, David & Fei, Liu, 2007. The International Politics of EU-China Relations. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press. Kurlantzick, Joshua, 2007. Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power Is Transforming the World. New Haven: Yale University Press. Men, Jing & Balducci, Giuseppe eds., 2010. Prospects and challenges for EU-China relations in the 21st century: the partnership and cooperation agreement. New York: P.I.E. Peter Lang. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 2002. The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. New York: Oxford University Press. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 2004. Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 2011.The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs Press. Pina-Cabral, Joao De, 2002. Between China and Europe. London: Continuum. Rosamond, Ben, 2000. Theories of European Integration. London: Macmillan Press LTD. 二、期刊 Algieri, Franco, 2002. “EU Economic Relations with China: An Institutionalist Perspective,” The China Quarterly, No.169 (16), pp. 64-77. Asia-Europe Foundation, “Mapping Asia-Europe culture cooperation,” Asia-Europe Foundation, Vol. 144, No. 91, July 2010, pp. 1-65. Bachtler, J. & Mendez, C., 2007. “Who Governs EU Cohesion Policy? Deconstructing the Reforms of the Structural Funds,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 535-564. Bachtler, J. & Wishlade, F. & Mendez, C., 2007. “New budget, new regulations, new strategies: The 2006 reform of EU Cohesion Policy,” European Policy Research Paper, No. 63, pp. i-79. Bendiek, Annegret & Kramer, Heinz, 2010. “The EU as a ‘Strategic’ International Actor: Substantial and Analytical Ambiguities,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 453-474. Berman, Jacqueline & Friesendorf, Cornelius, 2008. “EU Foreign Policy and the Fight Against Human Trafficking: Coercive Governance as Crime Control,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 189-209. Carrapiço, Helena & Trauner, Florian, 2012. “The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs after the Lisbon Treaty: Analysing the Dynamics of Expansion and Diversification,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/1, pp. 1-18. Compagnia di San Paolo, “Transatlantic Trends 2012,” Luso-American Foundation, 2012, pp. 2-52. Cummings, Milton C. Jr., 2003. “Cultural Diplomacy and the United States Government: A Survey” Center for Arts and Culture, pp. 1. David Shambaugh, “China and Europe: The Emerging Axis,” Current History, Vol. 103, Issue 674, September 2004, pp. 246-247. Dent, Christopher M., 1999. “The EU-East Asia Economic Relationship: The Persisting Weak Triadic Link?,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 371-394. EACEA, “About Erasmus Mundus 2009-2013,” EACEA, Vol. 30, Mar 2009, pp. 22. Edmonds, Richard Louis, 2002. “China and Europe since 1978: An Introduction,” The China Quarterly, No. 169, pp. 1-9. Foundation Charles Leopold Mayer, “Status, quality and characteristics of existing partnership between Chinese and European cities,” Europe-China Platform Survey, July 2010, pp. 1-48. Grevi, Giovanni, 2008. “The EU and the European Security Strategy: Forging a Global Europe,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 281-282. Holslag, Jonathan, 2006. “The European Union and China: The Great Disillusion,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 555-580. Hoof, Lieve Van, 2012. “Why the EU is Failing in its Neighbourhood: The Case of Armenia,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/2, pp. 285-302. Huelss, Hendrik, 2010. “A Force for Good Governance? The European Union’s Normative Power and Standards of Appropriate Governing,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 1, pp. 93-112. John E. Hill, Through the Jade Gate to Rome: A Study of the Silk Routes during the Later Han Dynasty, First to Second Centuries CE. (South Carolina: BookSurge Publishing, 2009), pp. 5 & p. 27. Jones, William J., 2009-2010. “European Union Soft Power: Cultural Diplomacy and Higher Education in Southeast Asia,” Silpakorn University International Journal, Vol. 9-10, pp. 41-70. Kay Möller, “Diplomatic Relations and Mutual Strategic Perceptions: China and the European Union,” The China Quarterly, Vol. 169, pp. 11-23. Lan, Yuchun, 2004. “The European Parliament and the China–Taiwan Issue: An Empirical Approach,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 1, pp. 115-140. Lee, Michael, 1999. “Europe in the World: The Persistence of Power Politics, by Maurice Keens-Soper,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 583-585. Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle, 2010. “EU Cultural Policy between Community-building and Market-making: putting the EU’s Cultural Agenda into Historical Perspective,” Fondation Pierre du Bois, No. 2, pp. 1-7. Lucarelli, Sonia, 2007. “The European Union in the Eyes of Others: Towards Filling a Gap in the Literature,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 249-270. MacKenzie, Alex & Servent, Ariadna Ripoll, 2012. “The European Parliament as a ‘Norm Taker’? EU-US Relations after the SWIFT Agreement,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/1, pp. 71-86. Manners, Ian, 2009. “The Social Dimension of EU Trade Policies: Reflections from a Normative Power Perspective,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 5, pp. 785-803. Martins, Bruno, 2008. “The Quest for a European Strategic Culture: Changing Norms on Security and Defence in the European Union,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 286-287. McMahon. M. E, “Higher Education in a World Market: A history look at the global context of international study,” Higher Educational, 1992, pp. 13-19. Meissner, Werner, 2002. “Cultural Relations between China and the Member States of the European Union,” The China Quarterly, No.169, pp. 181-203. Missiroli, Antonio, 2010. “The New EU ‘Foreign Policy’ System after Lisbon: A Work in Progress,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 427.452. Munro, Ross M., 1992. “Wakening Dragon: The Real Danger in Asia is From China?” Policy Review, No .62, pp. 6-10. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., 1990. “Soft Power,” Foreign Policy, No. 80, pp. 153-171. Oplez, Hannes, 2006. “Anti-Amerericanism and the Paradox of Soft Power,” Talent, p. 10. Pawlak, Patryk, 2012. “The Unintentional Development of the EU’s Security Governance beyond Borders,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2/1, pp. 87-107. Peruzzi, Roberto & Poletti, Arlo & Shuangquan, Zhang, 2007. “China’s Views of Europe: A Maturing Partnership,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 311-330. Reslow, Natasja & Vanhoonacker, Sophie, 2010. “The European External Action Service: Living Forwards by Understanding Backwards,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 1, pp. 1-18. Robles, Alfredo C., Jr., 2011. “Negotiating Services with ASEAN: The EU between the WTO and Japan,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 3, pp. 379-400. Schneider, Cynthia P., 2003. “Diplomacy that works: Best Practices in Cultural Diplomacy,” Center for Arts and Culture, pp. 1-16. Seeberg, Peter, 2010. “European Neighbourhood Policy, Post-normativity, and Pragmatism,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 5, pp. 663-679. Shimko, Keith L., 1992. “Realism, Neorealism, and American Liberalism,” The Review of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 281-301. Smith, Michael, 2007. “The European Union and International Order: European and Global Dimensions,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 4, pp. 437-456. Ulusoy, Kivanc, 2008. “The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem,” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 309-329. Umber Eco, “EU-China High Level Culture Forum,” Institute International Transcultural, July 2012, pp. 1-14. Yu-Nu Lu, “The Development and Impact of China’s Soft Power,” Review of Global Politics, No. 21, 2008, pp. 12. Zelikow, Philip, 1994. “Foreign Policy Engineering: From Theory Practice and Back again,” International Security, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 143-171. Zimmermann, Hubert, 2008. “How the EU Negotiates Trade and Democracy: The Cases of China’s Accession to the WTO and the Doha Round,” European Foreign Affairs Review, Issue 2, pp. 255-280. 三、官方文件 Council of the European Union, 2006/9/11. Joint Press Communique 9th EU-China Summit, Press 249, 12642/06, pp. 1-11. Council of the European Union, 2007/9/28. Joint Press Communique 10th EU-China Summit, Press 279, 16070/07, pp. 1-18. Council of the European Union, 2009/5/20. Joint Press Communique 11th EU-China Summit, Press 147, 10234/09, pp. 1-2. Council of the European Union, 2010/10/06. Joint Press Communique 13th EU-China Summit, Press 267, 14577/10, pp. 1-3. Council of the European Union, 2012/9/20. Joint Press Communique 1-8th EU-China Summit, Press 388, 14022/12, pp. 1-7. Council of the European Union, 2012/9/20. Joint Press Communique 15th EU-China Summit, Press 388, 14022/12, pp. 1-7. Lehann, Alexandra, 2010. “Future European Educational Strategies,” European Union Delegation to China and Mogolia Cooper Section, pp. 1-4. European Commission, Toward a New Asia Strategy, COM (1994) 314 final. European Commission, A long term policy for China-Europe Relations, COM (1995) 279 final. European Commission, Building a Comprehensive strategic partnership with China, COM (1998) 181 final. European Commission, A maturing partnership - shared interests and challenges in EU-China relations, COM (2003) 533 final. 網際網路 〈中國人權發展概況〉，《中國人權網》， zh_TW
