學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 信任與都市更新參與整合意願之研究
The study of trust in the collective intention of urban renewal participation作者 黃泳涵 貢獻者 邊泰明
黃泳涵關鍵詞 都市更新
集體行動
信任日期 2009 上傳時間 3-Sep-2013 14:50:16 (UTC+8) 摘要 台灣在八零年代開始推動都市更新，民國87年通過都市更新條例，除了使都市更新之推動具有法源效力外，近年更針對都市更新所遭遇課題，逐漸放寬法令限制及容積獎勵，以期加速都市環境改造。實際上都市更新是一種土地產權整合（land assembling）與開發利益分配的過程，也是一種集體行動（collective action）才能完成的行為。都市更新推動績效不彰原因來自於地主、權利關係人與實施者等更新行動者對於更新認知差異與權利變換共識無法達成，造成彼此不信任和不合作行為，地主對都市更新之認知不足，對實施者合作關係的信賴感偏低等種種情形使得都市更新窒礙難行。本研究關注於都市更新集體行動困境如何破除，使整合工作順利推動。據此，本研究以集體行動理論及信任理論為研究立論基礎，選取台北市木柵地區「國立政治大學北側更新示範地區」作為案例地區，本研究以問卷調查法，對當地居民作為抽樣調查之對象，並以因素分析與結構方程模式作為資料分析方法，以更新認知、社會網絡、值得信賴感、信任程度與參與更新意願為五大潛在變項進行結構模式驗證，驗證結果發現信任程度對於參與更新意願具有正向直接影響，更新認知、社會網絡與值得信賴感三者對於信任程度亦有正向直接影響關係，其中又以值得信賴感為影響居民信任程度之最重要因素，並具有更新認知與信任程度間中介效果。
Taiwan in the 80`s began promoting urban renewal, urban renewal, the Republic of China 87 years to develop regulations, in addition to urban renewal to promote the effectiveness of the source with the law, in recent years more for the issues encountered by urban renewal, relaxation of legal restrictions and volume incentives to speed up the urban environment transformation. Urban renewal is a kind of land ownership and development of land assembling process of distribution of interests, but also a collective action. Promote the efficiency was not evident because of urban renewal from the landlord, the right relationship between actors, the perpetrators of cognitive differences for urban renewal, transformation was possible and right, resulting in mutual distrust and non-cooperation, the landlord of the lack of knowledge of urban renewal, the implementation of cooperation between those who trust in the low and many others made the case difficult to implement urban renewal.This study focused on the plight of urban renewal to get rid of collective action to promote a smooth integration. Therefore, this study of collective action theory and the theory of argument based on trust, select the area in north of National Chengchi University in Taipei city as a case region, This study was a survey, sample survey of local residents as the object, and to factor analysis and structural equation model as a data analysis methods to urban renewal in the cognitive, social networks, trustworthiness and willingness to five latent variable structural model validation. Validation results showed that trust in the willingness to participate in the renewal has a positive direct impact, urban renewal in the cognitive, social networks and trustworthiness in the three to have positive direct effect on trust relations, among which trustworthiness in trust for the residents of the most important factor, and have urban renewal in the cognitive and trust between the mediator.參考文獻 一、中文參考文獻吳明隆，2006，『結構方程模式-SIMPLIS的應用』，初版，台北：五南。李金桂，2009，「運用社會資本自組都市更新會實施更新之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。林育全，2009，「協助更新整合一定要知道的資訊」，台北市都市更新處更新系列講座簡報。黃芳銘，2007，『結構方程模式理論與應用』，五版，台北：五南。歐聖榮、李美芬、邱雅詩，1993，「農村居民對計畫之開發影響認知與參與意願之研究」，水土保持局委託研究計畫報告。賴宗裕，2008，『成長管理專題研究課程講義』，國立政治大學地政學系。羅觀翠，2008，「社區網絡與集體行動」，初版，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。劉麟書，2001，「人際信任整合模型之研究」，銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文：台北。鄭仁偉，2005，「人際信任模型之質化研究」，國科會計畫。二、英文參考文獻Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. W., 2002, “Social Capital: Prospects for A New Concept,” Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.Ahn, T. K. and Ostrom, E., 2002, “Social Capital and The Second-Generation Theories of Collective Action: An Analytical Approach to The Forms of Social Capital”, Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29-September 1.Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi. Y., 1988, “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,” Academic of Marketing Science, 16: 76- 94.Barber, B., 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.Bourdieu, P., 1986, “The Forms of Capital,” pp.241-258 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by Richardson, J. G., New York: Greenwood.Boxmeer, B. V., and Beckhoven,E. V., 2005, “Public-Private Partnership in Urban Regeneration: A Comparison of Dutch and Spanish PPPs,” European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(1):1-16.Buckner, J. C., 1988, “The Development of an Instrument to Measure Neighborhood Cohesion,” American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6):771-791.Coleman, J. S., 1988, “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-121.Coleman, J. S., 1990, The Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press.Dietz, G. and Den Hartog, D. N., 2006, “Measuring trust inside organizations,” Personnel review, 35(5): 557-88.Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P. and Mullen, M. R., 1998, “Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the development of Trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3):601-620.Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , New York : Free Press.Golembiewski, R. T. and McConkie, M., 1975, “The Centrality of Interpersonal Trust in Group Processes,” pp.131-185 in Theories of Group Processes, edited by C. L. Cooper, New York, NY: WileyGranovetter, M. 1985, Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510Hagen, J. M. and Choe, S., 1998, “Trust in Japanese Interfirm Relations: Institutional Sanctions Matter,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 589-600.Hall, S. and Hickman, P., 2002, “Neighbourhood renewal and urban policy :A comparison of new approaches in England and France,” Regional Studies, 36(6): 691-707.Hardin, R., 2006, Trust, Malden: Polity Press.Hosmer, L. T., 1995, “Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics,” Academy of Management Review, 20(2):379-403.Lewicki, R. McAllister, D. & Bies, R., 1998, “Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-459Lewis, J. D., and Weigert, A., 1985, “Trust as a social reality,” Social Force, 634: 967-985.Mayer, R. C., Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F. D., 1995, “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” Academy of Management Review, 20: 709-734.McAllister, D. H., 1995, “Affect- and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 38(1): 24-59.Mcknight, D. H., and Chervany, N. L., 1996, “The Meaning of Trust,” Paper presented at the Organizational Behavior Division of the Academy of Management, Minnesota.Mcknight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L., 1998, “Initial Trust Formation in new Organizational Relationships,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 473-490.Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., and Deshpande, R., 1992, “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19:314-328.Oliver, E. P., 1993, “Formal Models of Collective Action,” Annual Review of Sociology, 19: 271-300.Olson, M., 1971, “The Logic of Collective Action,” Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Ostrom, E. and Ahn, T. K., 2003, “Introduction,” pp. xi-xxxix in Foundations of Social Capital, edited by Ostrom, E. and Ahn, T. K., Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.Ostrom, E., 1998, “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association,” The American Political Science Review, 92(1):1-22Porter, A., 2000, “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” pp. 43-68 in Knowledge and Social Capital, edited by Lesser, E. L., Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Putnam, R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy , New Jersey : Princeton University Press.Putnam, R. D., 1993,”The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life”, The American Prospect, 4(13): 35-42Rotter, J. B., 1980, “Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility,” American Psychologist, 35:1-7.Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C., 1998, “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3):393-404.Sandefur, R. L., and Laumann, E. O., 2000, “A Paradigm for Social Capital,” pp. 69-88 in Knowledge and Social Capital, edited by Lesser E. L., Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Sandler, T., 1992, Collective Action, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Shapiro, D., 1987,”The Social Control of Impersonal Trust,” American Journal of Sociology, 93(3): 623-658.Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B., and Cheraskin, L., 1992, “Business on a Handshake,” The Negotiations Journal, 8(4): 356-377.Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., and Winograd, G., 2000, “Organizational trust: what it means, why it matters,” Organization Development Journal, 18(4): 35-48.Torsvik, G., 2000, ”Social Capital and Economic Development,” Rationality and Society, 12(4): 451-476.Tsai and Ghoshal, 1998, “Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(4):464-476.Tzafrir, S. S., and Dolan, S. L., 2004, “Trust me: a scale for measuring manager-employee trust,” Management Research, 2(2): 115-32.Williamson, O. E., 1993, “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization,” Journal of Law and Economics, 36：453-486.Yamagishi, T., and Yamagishi, M., 1994, “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan,” Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129-166.Zucker, L. G., 1986, “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920,” pp.53-111 in Research in Organizational Behavior edited by B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, Vol. 8, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.三、網路資料營建署都市更新入口網，2009，http://twur.cpami.gov.tw/invest/i-index.aspx，取用日期：2009年12月1日。台北市政府都市更新處，2009，http://www.uro.taipei.gov.tw/，取用日期：2009年11月29日。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
97257008
98資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097257008 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 邊泰明 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃泳涵 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 黃泳涵 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2009 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Sep-2013 14:50:16 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Sep-2013 14:50:16 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Sep-2013 14:50:16 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097257008 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59812 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 97257008 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 98 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 台灣在八零年代開始推動都市更新，民國87年通過都市更新條例，除了使都市更新之推動具有法源效力外，近年更針對都市更新所遭遇課題，逐漸放寬法令限制及容積獎勵，以期加速都市環境改造。實際上都市更新是一種土地產權整合（land assembling）與開發利益分配的過程，也是一種集體行動（collective action）才能完成的行為。都市更新推動績效不彰原因來自於地主、權利關係人與實施者等更新行動者對於更新認知差異與權利變換共識無法達成，造成彼此不信任和不合作行為，地主對都市更新之認知不足，對實施者合作關係的信賴感偏低等種種情形使得都市更新窒礙難行。本研究關注於都市更新集體行動困境如何破除，使整合工作順利推動。據此，本研究以集體行動理論及信任理論為研究立論基礎，選取台北市木柵地區「國立政治大學北側更新示範地區」作為案例地區，本研究以問卷調查法，對當地居民作為抽樣調查之對象，並以因素分析與結構方程模式作為資料分析方法，以更新認知、社會網絡、值得信賴感、信任程度與參與更新意願為五大潛在變項進行結構模式驗證，驗證結果發現信任程度對於參與更新意願具有正向直接影響，更新認知、社會網絡與值得信賴感三者對於信任程度亦有正向直接影響關係，其中又以值得信賴感為影響居民信任程度之最重要因素，並具有更新認知與信任程度間中介效果。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Taiwan in the 80`s began promoting urban renewal, urban renewal, the Republic of China 87 years to develop regulations, in addition to urban renewal to promote the effectiveness of the source with the law, in recent years more for the issues encountered by urban renewal, relaxation of legal restrictions and volume incentives to speed up the urban environment transformation. Urban renewal is a kind of land ownership and development of land assembling process of distribution of interests, but also a collective action. Promote the efficiency was not evident because of urban renewal from the landlord, the right relationship between actors, the perpetrators of cognitive differences for urban renewal, transformation was possible and right, resulting in mutual distrust and non-cooperation, the landlord of the lack of knowledge of urban renewal, the implementation of cooperation between those who trust in the low and many others made the case difficult to implement urban renewal.This study focused on the plight of urban renewal to get rid of collective action to promote a smooth integration. Therefore, this study of collective action theory and the theory of argument based on trust, select the area in north of National Chengchi University in Taipei city as a case region, This study was a survey, sample survey of local residents as the object, and to factor analysis and structural equation model as a data analysis methods to urban renewal in the cognitive, social networks, trustworthiness and willingness to five latent variable structural model validation. Validation results showed that trust in the willingness to participate in the renewal has a positive direct impact, urban renewal in the cognitive, social networks and trustworthiness in the three to have positive direct effect on trust relations, among which trustworthiness in trust for the residents of the most important factor, and have urban renewal in the cognitive and trust between the mediator. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究範疇與研究內容 4第三節 研究方法與流程 7第二章 相關文獻與理論回顧 9第一節 集體行動理論及相關文獻 9第二節 信任理論及相關文獻 16第三節 小結 24第三章 都市更新特性與困境 31第一節 都市更新特性 31第二節 都市更新交易成本 34第三節 都市更新推動困境 38第四章 研究設計 41第一節 研究架構與研究假設 41第二節 研究變數說明與問卷設計 44第三節 研究對象與資料收集 49第四節 實證研究方法 50第五章 實證結果與分析 57第一節 因素構面確立 57第二節 敘述性統計分析 59第三節 產權特性統計變數對主要變數之差異分析 63第四節 參與更新意願影響之關係模式 66第五節 參與更新意願模式驗證結果討論 73第六章 結論與建議 75第一節 結論 75第二節 建議 77參考文獻 79附錄 83附錄一 「都市更新認知、信任與參與更新意願」調查問卷 83附錄二 反映像相關矩陣表 85附錄三 SEM結果之t檢定值 86 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1546658 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097257008 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 都市更新 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 集體行動 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 信任 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 信任與都市更新參與整合意願之研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The study of trust in the collective intention of urban renewal participation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文參考文獻吳明隆，2006，『結構方程模式-SIMPLIS的應用』，初版，台北：五南。李金桂，2009，「運用社會資本自組都市更新會實施更新之研究」，政治大學地政學系碩士論文：台北。林育全，2009，「協助更新整合一定要知道的資訊」，台北市都市更新處更新系列講座簡報。黃芳銘，2007，『結構方程模式理論與應用』，五版，台北：五南。歐聖榮、李美芬、邱雅詩，1993，「農村居民對計畫之開發影響認知與參與意願之研究」，水土保持局委託研究計畫報告。賴宗裕，2008，『成長管理專題研究課程講義』，國立政治大學地政學系。羅觀翠，2008，「社區網絡與集體行動」，初版，北京：社會科學文獻出版社。劉麟書，2001，「人際信任整合模型之研究」，銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文：台北。鄭仁偉，2005，「人際信任模型之質化研究」，國科會計畫。二、英文參考文獻Adler, P. S. and Kwon, S. W., 2002, “Social Capital: Prospects for A New Concept,” Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.Ahn, T. K. and Ostrom, E., 2002, “Social Capital and The Second-Generation Theories of Collective Action: An Analytical Approach to The Forms of Social Capital”, Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 29-September 1.Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi. Y., 1988, “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,” Academic of Marketing Science, 16: 76- 94.Barber, B., 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.Bourdieu, P., 1986, “The Forms of Capital,” pp.241-258 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by Richardson, J. G., New York: Greenwood.Boxmeer, B. V., and Beckhoven,E. V., 2005, “Public-Private Partnership in Urban Regeneration: A Comparison of Dutch and Spanish PPPs,” European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(1):1-16.Buckner, J. C., 1988, “The Development of an Instrument to Measure Neighborhood Cohesion,” American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6):771-791.Coleman, J. S., 1988, “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-121.Coleman, J. S., 1990, The Foundation of Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press.Dietz, G. and Den Hartog, D. N., 2006, “Measuring trust inside organizations,” Personnel review, 35(5): 557-88.Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P. and Mullen, M. R., 1998, “Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the development of Trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3):601-620.Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , New York : Free Press.Golembiewski, R. T. and McConkie, M., 1975, “The Centrality of Interpersonal Trust in Group Processes,” pp.131-185 in Theories of Group Processes, edited by C. L. Cooper, New York, NY: WileyGranovetter, M. 1985, Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510Hagen, J. M. and Choe, S., 1998, “Trust in Japanese Interfirm Relations: Institutional Sanctions Matter,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 589-600.Hall, S. and Hickman, P., 2002, “Neighbourhood renewal and urban policy :A comparison of new approaches in England and France,” Regional Studies, 36(6): 691-707.Hardin, R., 2006, Trust, Malden: Polity Press.Hosmer, L. T., 1995, “Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics,” Academy of Management Review, 20(2):379-403.Lewicki, R. McAllister, D. & Bies, R., 1998, “Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-459Lewis, J. D., and Weigert, A., 1985, “Trust as a social reality,” Social Force, 634: 967-985.Mayer, R. C., Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F. D., 1995, “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” Academy of Management Review, 20: 709-734.McAllister, D. H., 1995, “Affect- and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 38(1): 24-59.Mcknight, D. H., and Chervany, N. L., 1996, “The Meaning of Trust,” Paper presented at the Organizational Behavior Division of the Academy of Management, Minnesota.Mcknight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., and Chervany, N. L., 1998, “Initial Trust Formation in new Organizational Relationships,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 473-490.Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., and Deshpande, R., 1992, “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 19:314-328.Oliver, E. P., 1993, “Formal Models of Collective Action,” Annual Review of Sociology, 19: 271-300.Olson, M., 1971, “The Logic of Collective Action,” Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Ostrom, E. and Ahn, T. K., 2003, “Introduction,” pp. xi-xxxix in Foundations of Social Capital, edited by Ostrom, E. and Ahn, T. K., Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.Ostrom, E., 1998, “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association,” The American Political Science Review, 92(1):1-22Porter, A., 2000, “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” pp. 43-68 in Knowledge and Social Capital, edited by Lesser, E. L., Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Putnam, R. D., 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy , New Jersey : Princeton University Press.Putnam, R. D., 1993,”The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life”, The American Prospect, 4(13): 35-42Rotter, J. B., 1980, “Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility,” American Psychologist, 35:1-7.Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C., 1998, “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3):393-404.Sandefur, R. L., and Laumann, E. O., 2000, “A Paradigm for Social Capital,” pp. 69-88 in Knowledge and Social Capital, edited by Lesser E. L., Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.Sandler, T., 1992, Collective Action, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Shapiro, D., 1987,”The Social Control of Impersonal Trust,” American Journal of Sociology, 93(3): 623-658.Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B., and Cheraskin, L., 1992, “Business on a Handshake,” The Negotiations Journal, 8(4): 356-377.Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., and Winograd, G., 2000, “Organizational trust: what it means, why it matters,” Organization Development Journal, 18(4): 35-48.Torsvik, G., 2000, ”Social Capital and Economic Development,” Rationality and Society, 12(4): 451-476.Tsai and Ghoshal, 1998, “Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(4):464-476.Tzafrir, S. S., and Dolan, S. L., 2004, “Trust me: a scale for measuring manager-employee trust,” Management Research, 2(2): 115-32.Williamson, O. E., 1993, “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization,” Journal of Law and Economics, 36：453-486.Yamagishi, T., and Yamagishi, M., 1994, “Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan,” Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129-166.Zucker, L. G., 1986, “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920,” pp.53-111 in Research in Organizational Behavior edited by B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings, Vol. 8, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.三、網路資料營建署都市更新入口網，2009，http://twur.cpami.gov.tw/invest/i-index.aspx，取用日期：2009年12月1日。台北市政府都市更新處，2009，http://www.uro.taipei.gov.tw/，取用日期：2009年11月29日。 zh_TW
