學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 A Harmonized Southeast Asia? Explanatory Typologies of ASEAN Countries` Strategies to the Rise of China
作者 楊昊
Chen, Ian Tsung-Yen ; Yang, Alan Hao
貢獻者 國關第二所
關鍵詞 Southeast Asia;China;explanatory typology;hedging;bandwagoning;balancing
日期 2012.04
上傳時間 12-Nov-2013 16:46:33 (UTC+8)
摘要 In the face of a rising China, some scholars have argued that ASEAN countries will choose to either bandwagon with or balance against China, while others believe they will respond with a more moderate policy known as ‘hedging’. In considering these options, ASEAN countries must take into account their individual interests within the economic and security structure of this region. In this research, we argue that each ASEAN country confronts divergent sets of security and economic relations with China, which play a major role in shaping their policy responses. We can characterize their responses into four quadrants. Each cell can be categorized in terms of a high or low degree of threat perception (HT or LT) from China, as well as a positive or negative economic expectation (PE or NE) with China. We thus hypothesize that ASEAN countries in the HT–NE situation will balance against China; those in the LT–PE situation will bandwagon with China; those in the HT–PE or LT–NE situations will hedge against China. Hypotheses are supported by three case studies, Vietnam–China (HT–NE), Cambodia–China (LT–PE) and Singapore–China (HT–PE) relations.
關聯 The Pacific Review, 26(3), 265-288
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2012.759260
dc.contributor 國關第二所en_US
dc.creator (作者) 楊昊zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Ian Tsung-Yen ; Yang, Alan Haoen_US
dc.date (日期) 2012.04en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-Nov-2013 16:46:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Nov-2013 16:46:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Nov-2013 16:46:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61636-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the face of a rising China, some scholars have argued that ASEAN countries will choose to either bandwagon with or balance against China, while others believe they will respond with a more moderate policy known as ‘hedging’. In considering these options, ASEAN countries must take into account their individual interests within the economic and security structure of this region. In this research, we argue that each ASEAN country confronts divergent sets of security and economic relations with China, which play a major role in shaping their policy responses. We can characterize their responses into four quadrants. Each cell can be categorized in terms of a high or low degree of threat perception (HT or LT) from China, as well as a positive or negative economic expectation (PE or NE) with China. We thus hypothesize that ASEAN countries in the HT–NE situation will balance against China; those in the LT–PE situation will bandwagon with China; those in the HT–PE or LT–NE situations will hedge against China. Hypotheses are supported by three case studies, Vietnam–China (HT–NE), Cambodia–China (LT–PE) and Singapore–China (HT–PE) relations.en_US
dc.format.extent 232345 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) The Pacific Review, 26(3), 265-288en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Southeast Asia;China;explanatory typology;hedging;bandwagoning;balancingen_US
dc.title (題名) A Harmonized Southeast Asia? Explanatory Typologies of ASEAN Countries` Strategies to the Rise of Chinaen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/09512748.2012.759260-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2012.759260-