學術產出-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 採用爭議審議機制及早預防與解決工程履約爭議之研究
其他題名 A Study of Dispute Boards for the Timely Prevention and Resolution of Construction Disputes
作者 顏玉明
貢獻者 法科所
關鍵詞 履約爭議;替代性紛爭解決機制;建議;裁決;爭議審議機制;爭議審查委員會;爭議裁決委員會;國際商會;國際諮詢工程師聯合會
Dispute;Alternative Dispute esolution/ADR;Recommendation;Adjudication;Dispute Board/DB;Dispute Review Board/DRB;Dispute Adjudication Board/DAB;International Commercial Chamber/ICC;Federation Internationale des Ingenieures-Conseils/FIDIC
日期 2012.10
上傳時間 11-Feb-2014 17:29:49 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文介紹國際間爭議審議機制之產生背景,及其運用於及早預防及解決工程履約爭議之狀況;同時藉由比較國際間類似之機制與其運作模式,深入瞭解其特性及相關規範,並參考國際間及中港臺近年來運作現況與趨勢,提出我國可行之修法建議,期能利用爭議審議機制即時、專業、迅速之優點,及早預防工程履約爭議之發生,強化替代性紛爭解決機制應用於工程履約爭議處理之功能,以協助工程履約之順利推動,並達分流訴訟壓力與即時控制爭議之功效。
This paper aims to introduce the background of Dispute Boards in a worldwide context, and their application in the timely prevention and resolution of construction disputes. It also explores the characteristics and regulations of similar mechanisms by comparing various practices. At the end of this paper, the practices, trends and the pros in global and in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan are pointed out for reference of domestic usage as suggestions for amending regulations. It is hoped the advantages of the Dispute Board, that is the timely, professional and prompt management of conflict, will help to prevent the formation of disputes and to strengthen the functions of ADR in construction dispute resolution. Also it is hoped be beneficial to smooth the progress of construction projects, to minimize loads in the litigation system, and to foster the timely management of disputes.
關聯 政大法學評論, 129, 1-73
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 法科所en_US
dc.creator (作者) 顏玉明zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2012.10en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Feb-2014 17:29:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Feb-2014 17:29:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Feb-2014 17:29:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63805-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文介紹國際間爭議審議機制之產生背景,及其運用於及早預防及解決工程履約爭議之狀況;同時藉由比較國際間類似之機制與其運作模式,深入瞭解其特性及相關規範,並參考國際間及中港臺近年來運作現況與趨勢,提出我國可行之修法建議,期能利用爭議審議機制即時、專業、迅速之優點,及早預防工程履約爭議之發生,強化替代性紛爭解決機制應用於工程履約爭議處理之功能,以協助工程履約之順利推動,並達分流訴訟壓力與即時控制爭議之功效。en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper aims to introduce the background of Dispute Boards in a worldwide context, and their application in the timely prevention and resolution of construction disputes. It also explores the characteristics and regulations of similar mechanisms by comparing various practices. At the end of this paper, the practices, trends and the pros in global and in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan are pointed out for reference of domestic usage as suggestions for amending regulations. It is hoped the advantages of the Dispute Board, that is the timely, professional and prompt management of conflict, will help to prevent the formation of disputes and to strengthen the functions of ADR in construction dispute resolution. Also it is hoped be beneficial to smooth the progress of construction projects, to minimize loads in the litigation system, and to foster the timely management of disputes.en_US
dc.format.extent 110 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 政大法學評論, 129, 1-73en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 履約爭議;替代性紛爭解決機制;建議;裁決;爭議審議機制;爭議審查委員會;爭議裁決委員會;國際商會;國際諮詢工程師聯合會en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dispute;Alternative Dispute esolution/ADR;Recommendation;Adjudication;Dispute Board/DB;Dispute Review Board/DRB;Dispute Adjudication Board/DAB;International Commercial Chamber/ICC;Federation Internationale des Ingenieures-Conseils/FIDICen_US
dc.title (題名) 採用爭議審議機制及早預防與解決工程履約爭議之研究zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) A Study of Dispute Boards for the Timely Prevention and Resolution of Construction Disputesen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen