學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Democratization and the Environment: Entrepreneurial Politics and Interest Representation in Taiwan
作者 Shui-Yan Tang;湯京平
Tang, Ching-Ping
貢獻者 政治系
日期 1999.06
上傳時間 29-Jul-2014 18:05:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 How does democratization affect environmental politics and policy? While some scholars have cited empirical evidence showing that democratic countries tend to have better environmental records than their authoritarian counterparts, others have debated the compatibility between democracy and sustainable environmental management. One may, for example, note that many environmental problems involve large numbers of individuals who suffer from spill-over effects of actions by small numbers of individuals or firms. Many serious water and air pollution problems, for instance, are caused by a few industrial plants, yet their effects are suffered by many people. Although popularly elected officials may have an incentive to develop policies to protect the environmental welfare of the many, these officials may also be influenced by a few polluters who are better organized and more resourceful in pressing their case in the policy process. Following this logic, one cannot definitely predict, at least in the short term, that democratization will help improve the environment.
關聯 The China Quarterly, 158, 66-82
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000005804
dc.contributor 政治系en_US
dc.creator (作者) Shui-Yan Tang;湯京平en_US
dc.creator (作者) Tang, Ching-Pingen_US
dc.date (日期) 1999.06en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Jul-2014 18:05:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Jul-2014 18:05:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Jul-2014 18:05:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67990-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) How does democratization affect environmental politics and policy? While some scholars have cited empirical evidence showing that democratic countries tend to have better environmental records than their authoritarian counterparts, others have debated the compatibility between democracy and sustainable environmental management. One may, for example, note that many environmental problems involve large numbers of individuals who suffer from spill-over effects of actions by small numbers of individuals or firms. Many serious water and air pollution problems, for instance, are caused by a few industrial plants, yet their effects are suffered by many people. Although popularly elected officials may have an incentive to develop policies to protect the environmental welfare of the many, these officials may also be influenced by a few polluters who are better organized and more resourceful in pressing their case in the policy process. Following this logic, one cannot definitely predict, at least in the short term, that democratization will help improve the environment.en_US
dc.format.extent 144 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) The China Quarterly, 158, 66-82en_US
dc.title (題名) Democratization and the Environment: Entrepreneurial Politics and Interest Representation in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1017/S0305741000005804en_US
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000005804en_US