| dc.contributor | 新聞學系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Georgette | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 汪琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2014-11 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 9-Apr-2015 17:52:39 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 9-Apr-2015 17:52:39 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-Apr-2015 17:52:39 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74445 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The discussion on geocultural theory has underscored the urgency for us to re-examine the way cultural differences are handled in academic discourse. Boundaries need to be drawn, because European universality neglects cultural and also paradigm differences. This article argues that as locking universality and particularity in a dualist paradigm is part of the problem, drawing boundaries to concepts and theories will lead to further problems. Borrowing from the Chinese yin/yang dynamic worldview and the Kuhnian notion of incommensurability, the author proposes a methodological framework in which commensurability, rather than universality, is the major concern. The commensurability model and the universality model are compared with examples to illustrate how the former may help advance theory development from a local perspective. | |
| dc.format.extent | 657370 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Communication Theory,24(4),373-393 | |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 10.1111/comt.12045 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Paradigm;Indigenization;Commensurability;Universality;Geocultural Theory | |
| dc.title (題名) | Culture, Paradigm, and Communication Theory: A Matter of Boundary or Commensurability? | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.1111/comt.12045 | en_US |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12045 | en_US |
