NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準與幼兒園課程品質評估之研究

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

pdf(1836)

Publication Export

Google Scholar^TM

政大圖書館

學術資源探索系統

Citation Infomation

No doi shows Citation Infomation

Simple Record
Full Record

題名	NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準與幼兒園課程品質評估之研究 A study of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and the curriculum quality evaluation
作者	龔芮誼
貢獻者	徐聯恩龔芮誼
關鍵詞	美國幼教協會NAEYC 課程認證標準課程品質評估 NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards curriculum quality evaluation
日期	2014
上傳時間	1-Jun-2015 11:07:43 (UTC+8)
摘要	本研究以自我評量的觀點，瞭解美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國課程品質之評估，包括「幼兒園基礎評鑑指標教保活動課程部分」、「幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表課程與教學規劃部分」、「幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱」三議題。進而比較其指標內涵，同時採調查法的方式，便利取樣選取公立幼兒園10所，共11位教師，使用美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」，以瞭解其在台灣之適用性，並請現場老師給予相關的回饋與建議。研究結果如下：壹、美國NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準特色有四：一、課程認證標準具發展合宜實務理論依據。二、課程認證標準與時俱進。三、課程認證標準組織架構具體明確且指標具彈性。四、認證標準確實可提升班級課程品質。貳、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國幼兒園課程品質評估之比較：一、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」指標內涵強調幼兒本位。二、我國「幼兒園基礎評鑑指標教保活動課程部分」強調合法性。三、我國「幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表課程與教學規劃部分」定義課程原則。四、我國「幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱」是我國目前課程規劃重要依據。五、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」含括領域指標具體完整值得效法。参、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」之適用性：一、現場教師肯定美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」，並具以下啟示： (一) 幫助教師課程規劃。 (二) 拓展視野放眼國際。 (三) 瞭解班級課程品質。二、方案評鑑標準(The program evaluation standards)確定美國「NAEYC 幼兒園課程認證標準」在台灣之適用性。本研究並根據研究結果提出建議，以「他山之石，可以攻錯」的借鏡觀點，提供對未來台灣幼兒教育發展之建議及後續研究之參考。關鍵字：美國幼教協會NAEYC、課程認證標準、課程品質評估 The main purpose of this study is to understand the concept of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and the curriculum quality evaluation. Include " Preschool Care-taking Activities of Kindergarten Basic Evaluationin"," Curriculum and Teaching Plan of Kindergarten Curriculum and Teaching Quality Assessment Form",and" Curriculum Outlines for Preschool Care-taking Activities". This study also received to 11 teacher’s interview to understand the applicability of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards in Taiwan. Here are the results of this study: A.NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards characteristics: 1. Based on Developmentally Appropriate Practice. 2. Change with time. 3. Organization is clear and specific and the indicators are flexible. 4. Indeed improve the curriculum quality of class. B.Compare NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and the curriculum quality evaluation: 1. NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards emphasize child-centered. 2. Preschool Care-taking Activities of Kindergarten Basic Evaluationin emphasize the legitimacy. 3. Curriculum and Teaching Plan of Kindergarten Curriculum and Teaching Quality Assessment Form define curriculum principle. 4. Curriculum Outlines for Preschool Care-taking Activities is important basis for curriculum planning at present. 5. The fields and indicators of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards are specific and complete and worth our emulation. C. The applicability of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards : 1.Teachers affirm NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and get the following inspirations: a.Help teachers planning curriculum. b. Expand the horizons and looking to international. c.Understand the curriculum quality of class. 2. The program evaluation standards make sure the applicability of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards in Taiwan. Key words: NAEYC, accreditation curriculum standards, curriculum quality evaluation
參考文獻	壹、中文部分台北市教育局（2004）。台北市公私立幼稚園評鑑手冊（九十四學年度）。台北市：作者。林佩蓉、張斯寧(2011)。幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表的編製研究。國立東華大學2011年建國百年教育新趨勢—幼教之創新與實踐學術與實務交流研討會論文集，花蓮市。林佩蓉、張斯寧(2012)。教育部幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表。台北市：教育部國教司。周淑惠、江麗莉（1995）。我國幼稚園評鑑制度。載於中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑，327-357。臺北：師大書苑。幸曼玲等(2014)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱的實踐：以台北市南海實驗幼兒園方案教學為例。台北市：心理。洪毓英(譯)(2000)。Sue Bredekmp,Carol Copple著。幼教綠皮書-符合孩子身心發展的幼教專業(Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs)。新竹：和英。教育部(1987)。幼稚園課程標準。台北市：正中。教育部（2013a)。幼兒園輔導計畫。2014年5月26日取自全國教保資訊網http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?p=972 教育部（2013b)。幼兒園評鑑辦法。2014年8月18日取自全國教保資訊網http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?page_id=156 教育部(2013c)。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。台北市：教育部。陳淑芳(2002)。美國《發展合宜實務指引》的發展和修訂對我國幼稚園課程標準修訂之啟示。2014年5月30日取自：www.ntttc.edu.tw/shufang。陳雅玲（2003）。幼稚園評鑑缺失的探討。幼兒教育年刊，15，173-188。徐慧晴（2003）。幼稚園自我評鑑之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育所幼教教學碩士論文，未出版，臺北。黃光雄(2005)。評鑑導論。載於黃光雄(主編)，系統的評鑑：理論與實務的自我教學引導(頁1-52)。台北市：師苑。黃暐鈞（2011）。英國幼兒基礎階段評量與就學準備度之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。楊國賜（1992）。比較教育方法論。台北市：正中。蔡春美（1998）。透視當前幼教教學—回顧與期許。載於台北市立師院兒童發展中心主編，台灣地區幼稚園教學法（頁11-21）。教育部國民教育司薛婷芳（1998）。從幼稚園參與評鑑之經驗看幼稚園轉變之歷程。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。貳、英文部分 Barnard, W., W.E. Smith, R. Fiene, & K. Swanson. 2006. Evaluation of Pennsylvania’s Keystone STARS quality rating system in child care settings. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Office of Child Development and the Pennsylvania State University Prevention Research Center. Online: www.pakeys.org/docs/Keystone%20STARS%20Evaluation.pdf Bereday, George Z.F.（1964）.Comparative Method in Education.New York：Holt, Rinehart&Winston. DCSF (2008). Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. Retrieved May 31, 2014, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809091832/http://teachingandlearni ngresources.org.uk/collection/32458/node/24184 Department for Education (2014). Public Comment Sought for New Competition to Build, Develop and Expand High-Quality Preschool Programs. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.ed.gov/blog/public-comment-sought-for-new-competition-to-build-develop-and-expand-high-quality-preschool-programs/comment-page-2/ Goals 2000:Educate America Act(1994) Herr, J., Johnson, R. D., & Zimmerman, K. (1993, May). Benefits of Accreditation: A Study of Director`s Perceptions. Young Children Jorde Bloom, P. 1996. The quality of work life in early childhood programs: Does accreditation make a difference? In NAEYC Accreditation: A decade of learning and the years ahead, eds. S.Bredekamp & B.A. Willer, 13–24. Washington, DC: NAEYC Kells, H. R.（1992）.Self-regulation in higher education﹕A multinational perspective on collaborative systems of quality assurance and control. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. OFSTED（1995）.Inspection Resource Pack.London:HMSO OECD(2012). Starting Strong III - A Quality Toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/startingstrongiii-aqualitytoolboxforearlychildhooded ucationandcare.htm#4 Minnesota Department of Human Services. 2005. School readiness in child care settings: A developmental assessment of children in 22 accredited child care centers. St. Paul: Author. Online: http://edocs.dhs.state.mn.us/lfserver/Legacy/DHS-4362-ENG National Center for the Early Childhood Work Force (1997) NAEYC Accreditation as a Strategy for Improving Child Care Quality National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014a)Insterested in accreditation .Retrieved March 30,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/interested/whyaccreditation National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014b)About NAEYC\\Our History. Retrieved March 30,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/about/history National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014c) policies . Retrieved Aprail 9,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/policy/overview National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014d) Pursuing accreditation . Retrieved Aprail 11,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/pursuing/overview National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014e) Standards and Criteria . Retrieved Aprail 11,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/primary/standardsintro Yarbrough D, B ,Shulha,L,M,Hopson,R,K and Caruthers,F,A(2010).The program evaluation standards :A gide for evaluators and evaluation users(3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks,CA.sage.
描述	碩士國立政治大學幼兒教育所 97157018 103
資料來源	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097157018
資料類型	thesis

dc.contributor.advisor	徐聯恩	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors)	龔芮誼	zh_TW
dc.creator (作者)	龔芮誼	zh_TW
dc.date (日期)	2014	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	1-Jun-2015 11:07:43 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.available	1-Jun-2015 11:07:43 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間)	1-Jun-2015 11:07:43 (UTC+8)	-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers)	G0097157018	en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI)	http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75447	-
dc.description (描述)	碩士	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	國立政治大學	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	幼兒教育所	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	97157018	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	103	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	本研究以自我評量的觀點，瞭解美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國課程品質之評估，包括「幼兒園基礎評鑑指標教保活動課程部分」、「幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表課程與教學規劃部分」、「幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱」三議題。進而比較其指標內涵，同時採調查法的方式，便利取樣選取公立幼兒園10所，共11位教師，使用美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」，以瞭解其在台灣之適用性，並請現場老師給予相關的回饋與建議。研究結果如下：壹、美國NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準特色有四：一、課程認證標準具發展合宜實務理論依據。二、課程認證標準與時俱進。三、課程認證標準組織架構具體明確且指標具彈性。四、認證標準確實可提升班級課程品質。貳、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國幼兒園課程品質評估之比較：一、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」指標內涵強調幼兒本位。二、我國「幼兒園基礎評鑑指標教保活動課程部分」強調合法性。三、我國「幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表課程與教學規劃部分」定義課程原則。四、我國「幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱」是我國目前課程規劃重要依據。五、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」含括領域指標具體完整值得效法。参、美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」之適用性：一、現場教師肯定美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」，並具以下啟示： (一) 幫助教師課程規劃。 (二) 拓展視野放眼國際。 (三) 瞭解班級課程品質。二、方案評鑑標準(The program evaluation standards)確定美國「NAEYC 幼兒園課程認證標準」在台灣之適用性。本研究並根據研究結果提出建議，以「他山之石，可以攻錯」的借鏡觀點，提供對未來台灣幼兒教育發展之建議及後續研究之參考。關鍵字：美國幼教協會NAEYC、課程認證標準、課程品質評估	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	The main purpose of this study is to understand the concept of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and the curriculum quality evaluation. Include " Preschool Care-taking Activities of Kindergarten Basic Evaluationin"," Curriculum and Teaching Plan of Kindergarten Curriculum and Teaching Quality Assessment Form",and" Curriculum Outlines for Preschool Care-taking Activities". This study also received to 11 teacher’s interview to understand the applicability of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards in Taiwan. Here are the results of this study: A.NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards characteristics: 1. Based on Developmentally Appropriate Practice. 2. Change with time. 3. Organization is clear and specific and the indicators are flexible. 4. Indeed improve the curriculum quality of class. B.Compare NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and the curriculum quality evaluation: 1. NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards emphasize child-centered. 2. Preschool Care-taking Activities of Kindergarten Basic Evaluationin emphasize the legitimacy. 3. Curriculum and Teaching Plan of Kindergarten Curriculum and Teaching Quality Assessment Form define curriculum principle. 4. Curriculum Outlines for Preschool Care-taking Activities is important basis for curriculum planning at present. 5. The fields and indicators of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards are specific and complete and worth our emulation. C. The applicability of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards : 1.Teachers affirm NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and get the following inspirations: a.Help teachers planning curriculum. b. Expand the horizons and looking to international. c.Understand the curriculum quality of class. 2. The program evaluation standards make sure the applicability of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards in Taiwan. Key words: NAEYC, accreditation curriculum standards, curriculum quality evaluation	en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents	第一章緒論 …………………………………………………………1 第一節研究背景與動機 ……………………………………1 第二節研究目的 …………………………………………………6 第三節名詞釋義 …………………………………………………7 第四節研究範圍與限制 ……………………………………9 第二章文獻探討 …………………………………………………11 第一節美國NAEYC認證制度介紹…………………………11 第二節美國NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準內涵……21 第三節我國幼兒園課程品質評估介紹…………………33 第四節美國NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準與我國幼兒園課程品質評估之關係…………58 第三章研究設計 ……………………………………………………61 第一節研究流程…………………………………………………………61 第二節研究對象…………………………………………………………63 第三節研究工具…………………………………………………………64 第四節研究方法…………………………………………………………68 第五節研究程序…………………………………………………………71 第四章分析結果與討論………………………………………… 73 第一節對照美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國「幼兒園基礎評鑑指標教保活動課程部分」之內涵………………………………………………………… 73 第二節對照美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國「幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表課程與教學規劃部分」之內涵………………………………………………………… 79 第三節對照美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」與我國「幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱」之內涵……………………………………………………………85 第四節綜合比較美國「NAEYC課程認證標準」與我國課程品質評估之內涵………………………98 第五節美國「NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準」之使用………108 第五章結論與建議…………………………………………………… 118 第一節研究結論………………………………………………………………118 第二節研究建議………………………………………………………………124 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………127	zh_TW
dc.format.extent	1283344 bytes	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	-
dc.source.uri (資料來源)	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097157018	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	美國幼教協會NAEYC	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	課程認證標準	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	課程品質評估	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	NAEYC	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	accreditation curriculum standards	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	curriculum quality evaluation	en_US
dc.title (題名)	NAEYC幼兒園課程認證標準與幼兒園課程品質評估之研究	zh_TW
dc.title (題名)	A study of NAEYC accreditation curriculum standards and the curriculum quality evaluation	en_US
dc.type (資料類型)	thesis	en
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	壹、中文部分台北市教育局（2004）。台北市公私立幼稚園評鑑手冊（九十四學年度）。台北市：作者。林佩蓉、張斯寧(2011)。幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表的編製研究。國立東華大學2011年建國百年教育新趨勢—幼教之創新與實踐學術與實務交流研討會論文集，花蓮市。林佩蓉、張斯寧(2012)。教育部幼兒園課程與教學品質評估表。台北市：教育部國教司。周淑惠、江麗莉（1995）。我國幼稚園評鑑制度。載於中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑，327-357。臺北：師大書苑。幸曼玲等(2014)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱的實踐：以台北市南海實驗幼兒園方案教學為例。台北市：心理。洪毓英(譯)(2000)。Sue Bredekmp,Carol Copple著。幼教綠皮書-符合孩子身心發展的幼教專業(Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs)。新竹：和英。教育部(1987)。幼稚園課程標準。台北市：正中。教育部（2013a)。幼兒園輔導計畫。2014年5月26日取自全國教保資訊網http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?p=972 教育部（2013b)。幼兒園評鑑辦法。2014年8月18日取自全國教保資訊網http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?page_id=156 教育部(2013c)。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。台北市：教育部。陳淑芳(2002)。美國《發展合宜實務指引》的發展和修訂對我國幼稚園課程標準修訂之啟示。2014年5月30日取自：www.ntttc.edu.tw/shufang。陳雅玲（2003）。幼稚園評鑑缺失的探討。幼兒教育年刊，15，173-188。徐慧晴（2003）。幼稚園自我評鑑之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育所幼教教學碩士論文，未出版，臺北。黃光雄(2005)。評鑑導論。載於黃光雄(主編)，系統的評鑑：理論與實務的自我教學引導(頁1-52)。台北市：師苑。黃暐鈞（2011）。英國幼兒基礎階段評量與就學準備度之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。楊國賜（1992）。比較教育方法論。台北市：正中。蔡春美（1998）。透視當前幼教教學—回顧與期許。載於台北市立師院兒童發展中心主編，台灣地區幼稚園教學法（頁11-21）。教育部國民教育司薛婷芳（1998）。從幼稚園參與評鑑之經驗看幼稚園轉變之歷程。國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。貳、英文部分 Barnard, W., W.E. Smith, R. Fiene, & K. Swanson. 2006. Evaluation of Pennsylvania’s Keystone STARS quality rating system in child care settings. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Office of Child Development and the Pennsylvania State University Prevention Research Center. Online: www.pakeys.org/docs/Keystone%20STARS%20Evaluation.pdf Bereday, George Z.F.（1964）.Comparative Method in Education.New York：Holt, Rinehart&Winston. DCSF (2008). Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. Retrieved May 31, 2014, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110809091832/http://teachingandlearni ngresources.org.uk/collection/32458/node/24184 Department for Education (2014). Public Comment Sought for New Competition to Build, Develop and Expand High-Quality Preschool Programs. Retrieved March 18, 2014, from http://www.ed.gov/blog/public-comment-sought-for-new-competition-to-build-develop-and-expand-high-quality-preschool-programs/comment-page-2/ Goals 2000:Educate America Act(1994) Herr, J., Johnson, R. D., & Zimmerman, K. (1993, May). Benefits of Accreditation: A Study of Director`s Perceptions. Young Children Jorde Bloom, P. 1996. The quality of work life in early childhood programs: Does accreditation make a difference? In NAEYC Accreditation: A decade of learning and the years ahead, eds. S.Bredekamp & B.A. Willer, 13–24. Washington, DC: NAEYC Kells, H. R.（1992）.Self-regulation in higher education﹕A multinational perspective on collaborative systems of quality assurance and control. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. OFSTED（1995）.Inspection Resource Pack.London:HMSO OECD(2012). Starting Strong III - A Quality Toolbox for Early Childhood Education and Care. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/startingstrongiii-aqualitytoolboxforearlychildhooded ucationandcare.htm#4 Minnesota Department of Human Services. 2005. School readiness in child care settings: A developmental assessment of children in 22 accredited child care centers. St. Paul: Author. Online: http://edocs.dhs.state.mn.us/lfserver/Legacy/DHS-4362-ENG National Center for the Early Childhood Work Force (1997) NAEYC Accreditation as a Strategy for Improving Child Care Quality National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014a)Insterested in accreditation .Retrieved March 30,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/interested/whyaccreditation National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014b)About NAEYC\\Our History. Retrieved March 30,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/about/history National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014c) policies . Retrieved Aprail 9,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/policy/overview National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014d) Pursuing accreditation . Retrieved Aprail 11,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/pursuing/overview National Association for the Education of Young Children.(2014e) Standards and Criteria . Retrieved Aprail 11,2014,from http://www.naeyc.org/academy/primary/standardsintro Yarbrough D, B ,Shulha,L,M,Hopson,R,K and Caruthers,F,A(2010).The program evaluation standards :A gide for evaluators and evaluation users(3rd ed.).Thousand Oaks,CA.sage.	zh_TW

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

Google Scholar^TM