1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 美國如何在冷戰期間型塑台灣與中美洲間的外交關係：以巴拿馬為例
How the U.S. shaped the Diplomatic Relations between the ROC and Central America during the Cold War： The Case of Panama
作者 林維樂
Calleja, Veronica Rodriguez
貢獻者 鄧中堅
Teng, Chung Chian
林維樂
Veronica Rodriguez Calleja
關鍵詞 臺灣
中國
美國
中美洲
聯合國
識別
主權
國際關係
外交政策
冷戰
共產主義
民主
Taiwan
China
US
Central America
United Nations
Recognition
Sovereignty
International Relations
Foreign Policy
Cold War
Communism
Democracy
日期 2015
上傳時間 17-Aug-2015 14:18:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 自中國在1949年建立起，台灣已面臨激烈的有關於國際地位認同的外交爭論。已有許多研究都在討論中國在拉丁美洲的崛起以及其如何影響台灣。讓拉丁美洲的國家與台灣維持長期穩定的關係的原因是什麼? 本研究分析了美國在冷戰期間與台灣及中美洲對抗共產主義的重要性，這讓我們了解為什麼這些國家依然支持台灣。從研究結果可得知美國的政策主要導向中美洲而不是中國，這也成為維持中華民國與中美洲之間的主要因素。有三個變數皆已被用來說明為什麼中美洲國家承認臺灣是一個國家: 外交政策、 經濟因素和政權類型。透過本研究，我發現了承認台灣地位的問題根源，也同時瞭解美國、中美洲及台灣間的關係。
Since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, Taiwan has faced a fierce diplomatic battle against China for international recognition. There have been many studies regarding the growing presence of China in Latin America and how that affects Taiwan. What are the reasons for these countries to maintain this long-standing relationship with Taiwan? This study has covered the Cold War years to analyse the importance of the United States and their battle against Communism for Taiwan-Central America relations and it also allowed us to understand the reasons why they still support Taiwan. The result of the analysis showed us how the U.S. policy towards Central America, but not the growing presence of China, has been the main factor to shape the relations between the ROC and Central American countries. Three variables have been used to explain why Central American countries recognize Taiwan as a state: Foreign policy, economic factors and regime type. Through this study, I came across the roots of the problem with Taiwan’s status and also acquired a better understanding of the dynamic in U.S. – Central America – Taiwan relations.
參考文獻 Arnold H. Lubasch (1963, Oct 22) U.N. again votes to bar Red China, The New York Times.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., & Bradford S. J. (1997) Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 1414-1461.
Brockett, C.D. (2010). US Labour and Management Fight It Out in Post-1954 Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 42, No. 3, 517-549.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Lalman, D. (1992) War and reason: Domestic and international imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Burdman, J. (2005, Fall). América Latina en la última batalla diplomática China-Taiwán. Quórum. Revista de pensamiento iberoamericano, No. 12, 211-221. Madrid: Universidad de Alcalá.
Carbonnier, J. (2010). The decision behind Diplomatic Recognition. A quantitative study of Taiwan and Kosovo. Department of Political Science, Lund University. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1758309&fileOId=1763421
Central Intelligence Agency (1971) Document 545: Panama and the Canal Treaty Negotiations, NIC files, Job 79—R01012A, Secret. Retrieved from http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments on June 18 2015.
Chan, S. (2007). China, the US and the Power-transition Theory: A Critique. London, UK: Routledge.
Chang C. H., & Cheng, P. W. (1992). Tax policy and foreign direct investment in Taiwan. In The Political Economy of Tax Reform, NBER-EASE, Vol. 1, 315-338. University of Chicago Press.
Chen, L.C (2007, August 17) Taiwan’s Statehood is undeniable. Taipei Times, p. 8.
Chen, L.C. (2007, August 09) The evolution of Taiwan’s statehood. Taipei Times, p. 8
Choi, Ajin. (2003, Summer). The power of democratic cooperation. International Security Vol. 28, No.1, 142-153.
Conniff, M. L. (2012) Panama and the United States: the End of the Alliance. University of Georgia Press.
Constitución República de Panamá (1904). Ciudad de Panamá: Imprenta Star and Herald, p. 31. https://archive.org/details/constitutionrep00panagoog.
Correction on U.N. Roll-Call (1967, Nov 30) The New York Times, p.27
Crawford, J. R. (2007). The creation of states in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
D`Anieri, P. (2011). International Politics: Power and Purpose in Global Affairs. Cengage Learning.
Democracy Takes its Stand (1950, June 28). The New York Times, p. 12
Dept. of State (1955). Memorandum of a Conversation, FRUS, 1955-1958 Vol. VI, Doc 79. Retrieved on 06/26/2015 from http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v06/d79
Domínguez, J. I. (1999) US-Latin American relations during the cold war and its aftermath. Working Paper Series 99-01. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs Harvard University.
Eckert, A. (2002). Constructing States: The Role of the International Community in the Creation of New States. Journal of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, 13, 19-39.
Erickson, D. P., & Chen, J. (2007, Summer). China, Taiwan, and the battle for Latin America. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. Vol. 31: 2, 69-89.
Esteban, M. (2008). La batalla diplomática de Beijing y Taipei en América Latina y el Caribe. Revista Cidob d’Afers Internationals 81, 209-231.
Esteban, M. (2013). ¿China o Taiwán?: Las paradojas de Costa Rica y Nicaragua (2006-2008). Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 33.2, 513-532.
Expósito, F. L. P. (2004). Taiwán y América Latina: Estrategia de aproximación y situación actual. UNISCI Discussion Papers 4, 3-22.
Farnham, B. (2003). The theory of democratic peace and threat perception. International studies quarterly 47, 3, 395-415.
Forman, J.M., & Moreira, S. (2008). Taiwan-China balancing act in Latin America. ARI (15 April-26 November 2008). Retrieved from: http://www.realinstitutoelcano. org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng/Content
Gartzke, E. & Gleditsch, K.S. (2004). Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 4, 775-795.
Gaubatz, K. T. (1996, Winter). Democratc States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization vol. 50, no. 1, 109-39.
Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Contested States in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Grant, T. D. (1998). Defining statehood: The Montevideo Convention and its discontents. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37, 403-457
Griffin, Keith (1991), Foreign Aid After the Cold War. In Development and Change, Vol. 22, No. 4, 645–85.
Gwertzman, B. (1979, February 13). Senate Panel Balks at Letting U.S. Shift Funds to New Office in Taipei. New York Times, p. 10
H.J. Morgenthau (1962). A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 301-309.
Halper, S. (2012). The Beijing consensus: Legitimizing authoritarianism in our time. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hamilton, T.J. (1950, April 18). Dulles wants U.N. to admit Red China if it proves power. New York Times, p. 1
Heller, T. C. and Sofaer, A. D. (2001). Sovereignty. The Practitioners’ Perspective. In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
Holden, R. H. (1999). Securing Central America against Communism: The United States and the Modernization of Surveillance in the Cold War. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 1, v+1-30. Miami: Central for Latin American Studies at the University of Miami.
http://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/01/1-02/rights-duties-states.xml Montevideo Convention, 1933. (Retrieved: 22-04-2015)
https://thenewinternationallaw.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/what-makes-a-state/ (Retrieved: 22-04-2015)
International Court of Justice (1986). Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua. 1986 I.C.J. 14.
Kan, S. A., & Morrison, W. M. (2012). US-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues. Congressional Research Service.
Kennedy, S. (2010). The myth of the Beijing consensus. Journal of Contemporary China 19.65, 461-477.
Keohane, R. O., & Joseph S. N. Jr. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival 15.4, 158-165.
Keshk, O., Brian, M. G. Pollins, M., & Reuveny, R.. (2004). Trade still follows the flag: The primacy of politics in a simultaneous model of interdependence and armed conflict. Journal of Politics 66.4, 1155-1179.
Kissinger signs Panama agreement as demonstrator shout ‘Gringo Animal’ (February 8, 1974). Lodi News Sentinel, p. 1.
Kissinger, H. (1982). Years of Upheaval. The Second Volume of His Classic Memoirs. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Lai, B., & Reiter, D. (2000). Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44.2, 203-227.
Lattimore bares his memorandum on Far East Policy (1950, April 4) The New York Times, p. 1, 24.
Lauterpacht, H. (1948). Recognition in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leonard, T. M. (2015). Historical dictionary of Panama. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Little, R. (2007). The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths, and Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Long, T. (2014). Putting the Canal on the map: Panamanian agenda-setting and the 1973 Security Council meetings*, Diplomatic History, Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 431-455.
Madrigal, D.A. (1964, January 16) La O.E.A. demostró en el caso de Panamá que es un instrumento efectivo para mantener la paz, La Nación, p. 14.
Madsen, R. A. (2001). The Struggle for Sovereignty Between China and Taiwan. In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
McKinley, R.D. & Little, R. (1979). The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and The Donor Interest Models*. Political Studies, 27 (2), 236-250.
Meernik, J., Krueger E. L., and Poe S. C. (1998) Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War. Journal of Politics 60, pp. 63-85.
Mengin, F. (1998). The Foreign Policy of the ROC on Taiwan since 1971: An Overview. In M.L. Näth, ed., The Republic of China on Taiwan in International Politics (pp. 21-36). Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
Mesquita, B., & Lalman, D. (1992). War and reason domestic and international imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Meyer, P. J., & Sullivan, M. P. (2012). US foreign assistance to Latin American and the Caribbean: Recent trends and FY2013 appropriations. Congressional Research Service, 26, 1-44.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1973). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
National Security Council, NSC 144/1, March 18, 1953
Nixon, R. (1970 February 18) Report by President Nixon to the Congress. Foreign relations of the United States 1969-1976, Vol. 1, Foundations of Foreign Policy, 1969-1972, Document 60. Department of State, Office of the Historian.
Oksenberg, M. (2001). The Issue of Sovereignty in the Asian Historical Context. In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
Onis, J. (1970, Sept 3). Panama tells U.S. that proposed canal treaties are unacceptable, The New York Times, p. 11.
Orakhelashvili, A. (2015) The dynamics of statehood in the practice of international and English courts. In Christine Chinkin & Freya Baetens, eds., Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Panamá necesita una política internacional coherente y comprensiva (2013, March 22). La Estrella de Panamá. Retrieved on 2015-05-20 from https://laestrella.com.pa/opinion/panama-necesita-politica-internacional-coherente-comprensiva/23476969
Pérez E., Francisco L. (2004), Taiwan y America Latina: Estrategia de aproximación y situación actual, UNISCI Discussion Papers, Tamkang University, Taiwan.
Priestley, G. (2004). Antillean-Panamanians or Afro-Panamanians?: Political participation and the politics of identity during the Carter-Torrijos Treaty Negotiations. Transforming Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 1&2, pp. 50-67.
Proposal Fail (1950, Sept 20),The New York Times, p. 3
Rabe, S. G. (1990). Latin America and Anticommunism. In Immerman, Richard H., ed., John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War. New Yersey: Princeton University Press.
Read, R. (2002, September). Foreign Direct Investment & the Growth of Taiwan & Korea. Paper presented at the IBRG FDI: Country Case Studies Conference, Grange-over-Sands.
Red China denied seat in U.N., 48-37; victory for U.S. (1964, Dec 16), The New York Times, p. 10
Reiter, D. (1994). Learning, realism, and alliances: the weight of the shadow of the past. World Politics 46.04, 490-526.
Rich, T.S. (2009). Status for Sale : Taiwan and the competition for diplomatic recognition. Issues & Studies 45, no. 4, pp. 159-188.
Robinson, L. (1991) Intervention or neglect: the United States and Central America beyond the 1980s. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.
Roettinger, P. C. (1986 Apr 13). U.S. must not repeat its historic Guatemalan mistake. Toronto Star.
Roll-Call in Assembly on seat for Red China (1958, Sept 24), The New York Times, p. 15
Roll-Call vote in U.N on seat for Red China (1962, Oct 31), The New York Times
Romero, P. (2014) El caballero de la diplomacia: Aquilino E. Boyd (1921 – 2004). La Estrella de Panamá. Retrieved 06-10-2015 http://laestrella.com.pa/opinion/columnistas/caballero-diplomacia-aquilino-boyd-1921-2004/23801904
Romero, P. C. (2007). Algunos antecedentes de los Tratados Torrijos-Carter, Revista Cultural Lotería, No. 473-474, pp. 86-99.
Ryábov, A. (2008). América Latina: Vuelta a la Izquierda como retorno al proscenio de la Política Mundial. In La administración Bush y la guerra contral el terrorismo 2001-2005: Política Exterior e Intereses en el inicio del Siglo XXI, Discussion paper No. 33, Argentine Center of International Studies.
Sangrientos Disturbios en Panamá (1964, Jan 10). La Nación, p. 16.
Senate Rejects, 57-38, a move to strengthen U.S. Links to Taiwan. (1979, March 6). New York Times, p. 12.
Sewell, B. (2008). A Perfect (free-market) world? Economics, the Eisenhower administration, and the Soviet economic offensive in Latin America. Diplomatic History, 32(5), 841-868.
Slater, D. (2007). Imperial geopolitics and the promise of democracy. Development and change 38.6, 1041-1054.
Slaughter, A. M. (2011). International Relations, Principal Theories. In Wolfrum, R. (Ed.) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.
Small, M. & Singer, J. D. (1976, Summer) The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816-1965. The Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 4.
Soler, R. (1991). La invasión de Estados Unidos a Panamá. Nacionalismo en la posguerra fría. México: Siglo XXI editores, S.A.
Suárez, O.J. (2007). Historia de las negociaciones de los Tratados Torrijos-Carter. Revista Cultural Lotería, No. 473-474, pp. 9-44.
Sullivan, M.J. (2004). American Adventurism Abroad: 30 Invasions, Interventions, and Regime Changes since World War II. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Tanner, H. (1971, October 18). U.N. China debate opens with Taipei and the U.S. split. New York Times, p. 12.
Teng, C.C. (2007). Hegemony or partnership: China’s strategy and diplomacy toward Latin America. In J. Eisenman, E. Heginbotham & D. Mitchell China and the Developing World: Bejing`s Strategy for the Twenty-First Century. London and New York, ME Sharpe.
The Assembly’s vote on the China item (1960, Oct 9), The New York Times, p. 11
The Independence of Panama (1903, November 13). The New York Times, p. 8
Tien, H.M. & S, C.J. (1992, fall) Taiwan’s Democratization: A Summary. World Affairs, Vol. 155 (2), 58-61.
Tokatlian, J. G. (2008). A view from Latin America. In China’s Expansion into the Western Hemisphere. Implications for Latin America and the United States, 59-89. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Truman orders U.S. Air, Navy units to fight in aid of Korea; U.N. council supports him; our fliers in action; fleet guards Formosa. Statement on Korea (1950, June 28). New York Times, p. 1.
U.N. Roll-Calls on China (1971, Oct 27) The New York Times, p.1
U.N. Roll-Calls on China issue (1966, Dec 1),The New York Times, p. 20
U.N. Roll-Calls on Peking (1970, Nov 21) The New York Times, p.6
U.N. Roll-Calls on Red China issue (1967, Nov 29), The New York Times, p.15
U.N. Roll-Calls on Red China issue (1968, Nov 20) The New York Times, p.18
U.N. Roll-Calls on the China issue (1969, Nov 12) The New York Times, p. 17
U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) (1957). Mutual Security Program. Vol. IV, Program Estimates Fiscal Year 1957: Latin America Non-Regional. Rossylin: US. USAID Library.
U.S. and Panama sign Agreement to restore ties (1964, April 4). The New York Times, p.1
U.S. Department of State (1979). Taiwan Relations Act. U.S. Code. Title 22, ch. 48, secs. 3301-16.
U.S. Dept. of State. (2011) A Guide to the United States’ History of Recognition, Diplomatic, and consular relations , by country, since 1776: Panama. Accessed on 06/20/2015 http://history.state.gov/countries/panama
United Nations (1951). Treaty of Peace with Japan (with two declarations). Signed at San Francisco, on 8 September 1951. No. 1832. Registered by the United States of America on August 1952.
Unofficial Japan-Taiwan Link Set Up (1972, December 27).New York Times, p, 3.
Vattel, E. (1916). The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Vote in U.N. on issue of seating Red China (1961, Dec 16), The New York Times, p. 17
Votes in U.N. since ’50 on seating of Chinese (1965, Nov 18), The New York Times, p. 26
Voting since ’50 on China Question (1971, Oct 26), The New York Times, p. 12
Walker, S. (2011). Does Forced Democratization Work?. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 73-94.
Walt, S. M. (1987). Origins of Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Warren W. Jr. (1979, March 13). Unofficial U.S. Links to Taiwan Approved by House and Senate; Congress Approves Taiwan Bills Stronger Measure Defeated. New York Times, Page A1.
Weinraub, B. (1979, January 14). U.S. Proposal on Taiwan Relations Sets Up ‘Institute’ to Direct Affairs. New York Times, p. A4.
Winkler, S. (2011). Biding time: The challenge of Taiwan’s international status. The Brookings Institution. Available at . Accessed on 2015 February 27.
Wu, L. (1996). Limitations and prospects of Taiwan’s informal diplomacy. In Jean-Marie Henckaerts, ed., The international status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations, London: Kluwer Law International.
Yamali, N. (2009). What is meant by state recognition in international law. General Directorate of International Laws and Foreign Affairs. Turkey: Ministry of Justice 5.
Yung, W. (1998). USA – ROC Relations and the Partition of China: Parameters and Variables. In M. L. Näth (Ed.), The Republic of China on Taiwan in International Politics (pp. 71-86). Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
Zhu, Z. (2013). China`s New Diplomacy: Rationale Strategies and Significance. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
102926022
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1029260222
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 鄧中堅zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Teng, Chung Chianen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林維樂zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Veronica Rodriguez Callejaen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林維樂zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Calleja, Veronica Rodriguezen_US
dc.date (日期) 2015en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Aug-2015 14:18:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Aug-2015 14:18:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Aug-2015 14:18:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1029260222en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77616-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102926022zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 自中國在1949年建立起，台灣已面臨激烈的有關於國際地位認同的外交爭論。已有許多研究都在討論中國在拉丁美洲的崛起以及其如何影響台灣。讓拉丁美洲的國家與台灣維持長期穩定的關係的原因是什麼? 本研究分析了美國在冷戰期間與台灣及中美洲對抗共產主義的重要性，這讓我們了解為什麼這些國家依然支持台灣。從研究結果可得知美國的政策主要導向中美洲而不是中國，這也成為維持中華民國與中美洲之間的主要因素。有三個變數皆已被用來說明為什麼中美洲國家承認臺灣是一個國家: 外交政策、 經濟因素和政權類型。透過本研究，我發現了承認台灣地位的問題根源，也同時瞭解美國、中美洲及台灣間的關係。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, Taiwan has faced a fierce diplomatic battle against China for international recognition. There have been many studies regarding the growing presence of China in Latin America and how that affects Taiwan. What are the reasons for these countries to maintain this long-standing relationship with Taiwan? This study has covered the Cold War years to analyse the importance of the United States and their battle against Communism for Taiwan-Central America relations and it also allowed us to understand the reasons why they still support Taiwan. The result of the analysis showed us how the U.S. policy towards Central America, but not the growing presence of China, has been the main factor to shape the relations between the ROC and Central American countries. Three variables have been used to explain why Central American countries recognize Taiwan as a state: Foreign policy, economic factors and regime type. Through this study, I came across the roots of the problem with Taiwan’s status and also acquired a better understanding of the dynamic in U.S. – Central America – Taiwan relations.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 1.Introduction 2
1.1.Background 3
1.2.Research-Problem 7
1.2.1.Hypothesis 8
1.2.2.Variables 10
1.2.3.Data 10

1.3.Theoretical Framework 11
1.3.1.International Law and the Theory of Recognition 11
1.3.2.Realism and Balance of Power 12

2.Literature Review 13
2.1.Recognition, Statehood and Sovereignty 13
2.1.1.Recognition 13
2.1.1.1.Declaratory theory 15
2.1.1.2.Constitutive theory. 15
2.1.1.3.United Nations’ Membership 17
2.1.2.Sovereignty 19

2.2.International Status of Taiwan 22
2.2.1.Background 23
2.2.2.Legal Status 27

3.The Influence and Power of the U.S. 30
3.1.Foreign Policy 30
3.1.1.Alliances and National Security 31
3.1.2.U.S. Foreign Policy in Latin America 32
3.1.3.How the U.S. Foreign Policy helped the ROC 34
3.1.4.Cold War, bipolarity, and the new way of doing politics 40

3.2.Economic Factors 41
3.2.1.Foreign Aid 41
3.2.2.Private Investment 43
3.2.3.The effect of the rising nationalism on economic policy 45
3.2.4 How U.S. economic assistance helped the ROC 49
3.2.4.1.ROC’s use of foreign aid 50

3.3.Regime Type 52
3.3.1.Democratic Peace? 53
3.3.2.Cold War ideological rationale 55
3.3.3.Ideologically-driven U.S. policy: The use of democracy 56
3.3.4. Taiwan’s democratization 59

4.The case of Panama 61
4.1.Panama’s abstention in the 1971 UN Resolution 62
4.1.1.The road to the Torrijos-Carter Treaties 63
4.1.2.The day of the vote 65

5.Conclusion 71

Appendix 74
I. Timeline 74
II. UN Vote on Seating China (PRC) 1958-197178
III.U.S. Economic and Military Assistance to Panama (1959 – 1990)81

References82		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 7831694 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1029260222en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺灣zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中美洲zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 聯合國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 識別zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外交政策zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 冷戰zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共產主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民主zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwanen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Chinaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) USen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Central Americaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) United Nationsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Recognitionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sovereigntyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) International Relationsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Foreign Policyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cold Waren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Communismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Democracyen_US
dc.title (題名) 美國如何在冷戰期間型塑台灣與中美洲間的外交關係：以巴拿馬為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) How the U.S. shaped the Diplomatic Relations between the ROC and Central America during the Cold War： The Case of Panamaen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arnold H. Lubasch (1963, Oct 22) U.N. again votes to bar Red China, The New York Times.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., & Bradford S. J. (1997) Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 1414-1461.
Brockett, C.D. (2010). US Labour and Management Fight It Out in Post-1954 Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 42, No. 3, 517-549.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Lalman, D. (1992) War and reason: Domestic and international imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Burdman, J. (2005, Fall). América Latina en la última batalla diplomática China-Taiwán. Quórum. Revista de pensamiento iberoamericano, No. 12, 211-221. Madrid: Universidad de Alcalá.
Carbonnier, J. (2010). The decision behind Diplomatic Recognition. A quantitative study of Taiwan and Kosovo. Department of Political Science, Lund University. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1758309&fileOId=1763421
Central Intelligence Agency (1971) Document 545: Panama and the Canal Treaty Negotiations, NIC files, Job 79—R01012A, Secret. Retrieved from http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments on June 18 2015.
Chan, S. (2007). China, the US and the Power-transition Theory: A Critique. London, UK: Routledge.
Chang C. H., & Cheng, P. W. (1992). Tax policy and foreign direct investment in Taiwan. In The Political Economy of Tax Reform, NBER-EASE, Vol. 1, 315-338. University of Chicago Press.
Chen, L.C (2007, August 17) Taiwan’s Statehood is undeniable. Taipei Times, p. 8.
Chen, L.C. (2007, August 09) The evolution of Taiwan’s statehood. Taipei Times, p. 8
Choi, Ajin. (2003, Summer). The power of democratic cooperation. International Security Vol. 28, No.1, 142-153.
Conniff, M. L. (2012) Panama and the United States: the End of the Alliance. University of Georgia Press.
Constitución República de Panamá (1904). Ciudad de Panamá: Imprenta Star and Herald, p. 31. https://archive.org/details/constitutionrep00panagoog.
Correction on U.N. Roll-Call (1967, Nov 30) The New York Times, p.27
Crawford, J. R. (2007). The creation of states in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
D`Anieri, P. (2011). International Politics: Power and Purpose in Global Affairs. Cengage Learning.
Democracy Takes its Stand (1950, June 28). The New York Times, p. 12
Dept. of State (1955). Memorandum of a Conversation, FRUS, 1955-1958 Vol. VI, Doc 79. Retrieved on 06/26/2015 from http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v06/d79
Domínguez, J. I. (1999) US-Latin American relations during the cold war and its aftermath. Working Paper Series 99-01. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs Harvard University.
Eckert, A. (2002). Constructing States: The Role of the International Community in the Creation of New States. Journal of Public and International Affairs, Princeton, 13, 19-39.
Erickson, D. P., & Chen, J. (2007, Summer). China, Taiwan, and the battle for Latin America. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. Vol. 31: 2, 69-89.
Esteban, M. (2008). La batalla diplomática de Beijing y Taipei en América Latina y el Caribe. Revista Cidob d’Afers Internationals 81, 209-231.
Esteban, M. (2013). ¿China o Taiwán?: Las paradojas de Costa Rica y Nicaragua (2006-2008). Revista de ciencia política (Santiago) 33.2, 513-532.
Expósito, F. L. P. (2004). Taiwán y América Latina: Estrategia de aproximación y situación actual. UNISCI Discussion Papers 4, 3-22.
Farnham, B. (2003). The theory of democratic peace and threat perception. International studies quarterly 47, 3, 395-415.
Forman, J.M., & Moreira, S. (2008). Taiwan-China balancing act in Latin America. ARI (15 April-26 November 2008). Retrieved from: http://www.realinstitutoelcano. org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng/Content
Gartzke, E. & Gleditsch, K.S. (2004). Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, No. 4, 775-795.
Gaubatz, K. T. (1996, Winter). Democratc States and Commitment in International Relations. International Organization vol. 50, no. 1, 109-39.
Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Contested States in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Grant, T. D. (1998). Defining statehood: The Montevideo Convention and its discontents. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37, 403-457
Griffin, Keith (1991), Foreign Aid After the Cold War. In Development and Change, Vol. 22, No. 4, 645–85.
Gwertzman, B. (1979, February 13). Senate Panel Balks at Letting U.S. Shift Funds to New Office in Taipei. New York Times, p. 10
H.J. Morgenthau (1962). A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 301-309.
Halper, S. (2012). The Beijing consensus: Legitimizing authoritarianism in our time. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Hamilton, T.J. (1950, April 18). Dulles wants U.N. to admit Red China if it proves power. New York Times, p. 1
Heller, T. C. and Sofaer, A. D. (2001). Sovereignty. The Practitioners’ Perspective. In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
Holden, R. H. (1999). Securing Central America against Communism: The United States and the Modernization of Surveillance in the Cold War. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 41, No. 1, v+1-30. Miami: Central for Latin American Studies at the University of Miami.
http://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/01/1-02/rights-duties-states.xml Montevideo Convention, 1933. (Retrieved: 22-04-2015)
https://thenewinternationallaw.wordpress.com/2012/05/02/what-makes-a-state/ (Retrieved: 22-04-2015)
International Court of Justice (1986). Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua. 1986 I.C.J. 14.
Kan, S. A., & Morrison, W. M. (2012). US-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues. Congressional Research Service.
Kennedy, S. (2010). The myth of the Beijing consensus. Journal of Contemporary China 19.65, 461-477.
Keohane, R. O., & Joseph S. N. Jr. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival 15.4, 158-165.
Keshk, O., Brian, M. G. Pollins, M., & Reuveny, R.. (2004). Trade still follows the flag: The primacy of politics in a simultaneous model of interdependence and armed conflict. Journal of Politics 66.4, 1155-1179.
Kissinger signs Panama agreement as demonstrator shout ‘Gringo Animal’ (February 8, 1974). Lodi News Sentinel, p. 1.
Kissinger, H. (1982). Years of Upheaval. The Second Volume of His Classic Memoirs. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Lai, B., & Reiter, D. (2000). Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances, 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44.2, 203-227.
Lattimore bares his memorandum on Far East Policy (1950, April 4) The New York Times, p. 1, 24.
Lauterpacht, H. (1948). Recognition in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leonard, T. M. (2015). Historical dictionary of Panama. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Little, R. (2007). The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths, and Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Long, T. (2014). Putting the Canal on the map: Panamanian agenda-setting and the 1973 Security Council meetings*, Diplomatic History, Vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 431-455.
Madrigal, D.A. (1964, January 16) La O.E.A. demostró en el caso de Panamá que es un instrumento efectivo para mantener la paz, La Nación, p. 14.
Madsen, R. A. (2001). The Struggle for Sovereignty Between China and Taiwan. In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
McKinley, R.D. & Little, R. (1979). The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and The Donor Interest Models*. Political Studies, 27 (2), 236-250.
Meernik, J., Krueger E. L., and Poe S. C. (1998) Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War. Journal of Politics 60, pp. 63-85.
Mengin, F. (1998). The Foreign Policy of the ROC on Taiwan since 1971: An Overview. In M.L. Näth, ed., The Republic of China on Taiwan in International Politics (pp. 21-36). Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
Mesquita, B., & Lalman, D. (1992). War and reason domestic and international imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Meyer, P. J., & Sullivan, M. P. (2012). US foreign assistance to Latin American and the Caribbean: Recent trends and FY2013 appropriations. Congressional Research Service, 26, 1-44.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1973). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
National Security Council, NSC 144/1, March 18, 1953
Nixon, R. (1970 February 18) Report by President Nixon to the Congress. Foreign relations of the United States 1969-1976, Vol. 1, Foundations of Foreign Policy, 1969-1972, Document 60. Department of State, Office of the Historian.
Oksenberg, M. (2001). The Issue of Sovereignty in the Asian Historical Context. In Stephen D. Krasner, ed., Contested Rules and Political Possibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
Onis, J. (1970, Sept 3). Panama tells U.S. that proposed canal treaties are unacceptable, The New York Times, p. 11.
Orakhelashvili, A. (2015) The dynamics of statehood in the practice of international and English courts. In Christine Chinkin & Freya Baetens, eds., Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Panamá necesita una política internacional coherente y comprensiva (2013, March 22). La Estrella de Panamá. Retrieved on 2015-05-20 from https://laestrella.com.pa/opinion/panama-necesita-politica-internacional-coherente-comprensiva/23476969
Pérez E., Francisco L. (2004), Taiwan y America Latina: Estrategia de aproximación y situación actual, UNISCI Discussion Papers, Tamkang University, Taiwan.
Priestley, G. (2004). Antillean-Panamanians or Afro-Panamanians?: Political participation and the politics of identity during the Carter-Torrijos Treaty Negotiations. Transforming Anthropology, Vol. 12, No. 1&2, pp. 50-67.
Proposal Fail (1950, Sept 20),The New York Times, p. 3
Rabe, S. G. (1990). Latin America and Anticommunism. In Immerman, Richard H., ed., John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War. New Yersey: Princeton University Press.
Read, R. (2002, September). Foreign Direct Investment & the Growth of Taiwan & Korea. Paper presented at the IBRG FDI: Country Case Studies Conference, Grange-over-Sands.
Red China denied seat in U.N., 48-37; victory for U.S. (1964, Dec 16), The New York Times, p. 10
Reiter, D. (1994). Learning, realism, and alliances: the weight of the shadow of the past. World Politics 46.04, 490-526.
Rich, T.S. (2009). Status for Sale : Taiwan and the competition for diplomatic recognition. Issues & Studies 45, no. 4, pp. 159-188.
Robinson, L. (1991) Intervention or neglect: the United States and Central America beyond the 1980s. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.
Roettinger, P. C. (1986 Apr 13). U.S. must not repeat its historic Guatemalan mistake. Toronto Star.
Roll-Call in Assembly on seat for Red China (1958, Sept 24), The New York Times, p. 15
Roll-Call vote in U.N on seat for Red China (1962, Oct 31), The New York Times
Romero, P. (2014) El caballero de la diplomacia: Aquilino E. Boyd (1921 – 2004). La Estrella de Panamá. Retrieved 06-10-2015 http://laestrella.com.pa/opinion/columnistas/caballero-diplomacia-aquilino-boyd-1921-2004/23801904
Romero, P. C. (2007). Algunos antecedentes de los Tratados Torrijos-Carter, Revista Cultural Lotería, No. 473-474, pp. 86-99.
Ryábov, A. (2008). América Latina: Vuelta a la Izquierda como retorno al proscenio de la Política Mundial. In La administración Bush y la guerra contral el terrorismo 2001-2005: Política Exterior e Intereses en el inicio del Siglo XXI, Discussion paper No. 33, Argentine Center of International Studies.
Sangrientos Disturbios en Panamá (1964, Jan 10). La Nación, p. 16.
Senate Rejects, 57-38, a move to strengthen U.S. Links to Taiwan. (1979, March 6). New York Times, p. 12.
Sewell, B. (2008). A Perfect (free-market) world? Economics, the Eisenhower administration, and the Soviet economic offensive in Latin America. Diplomatic History, 32(5), 841-868.
Slater, D. (2007). Imperial geopolitics and the promise of democracy. Development and change 38.6, 1041-1054.
Slaughter, A. M. (2011). International Relations, Principal Theories. In Wolfrum, R. (Ed.) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.
Small, M. & Singer, J. D. (1976, Summer) The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816-1965. The Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 4.
Soler, R. (1991). La invasión de Estados Unidos a Panamá. Nacionalismo en la posguerra fría. México: Siglo XXI editores, S.A.
Suárez, O.J. (2007). Historia de las negociaciones de los Tratados Torrijos-Carter. Revista Cultural Lotería, No. 473-474, pp. 9-44.
Sullivan, M.J. (2004). American Adventurism Abroad: 30 Invasions, Interventions, and Regime Changes since World War II. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Tanner, H. (1971, October 18). U.N. China debate opens with Taipei and the U.S. split. New York Times, p. 12.
Teng, C.C. (2007). Hegemony or partnership: China’s strategy and diplomacy toward Latin America. In J. Eisenman, E. Heginbotham & D. Mitchell China and the Developing World: Bejing`s Strategy for the Twenty-First Century. London and New York, ME Sharpe.
The Assembly’s vote on the China item (1960, Oct 9), The New York Times, p. 11
The Independence of Panama (1903, November 13). The New York Times, p. 8
Tien, H.M. & S, C.J. (1992, fall) Taiwan’s Democratization: A Summary. World Affairs, Vol. 155 (2), 58-61.
Tokatlian, J. G. (2008). A view from Latin America. In China’s Expansion into the Western Hemisphere. Implications for Latin America and the United States, 59-89. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Truman orders U.S. Air, Navy units to fight in aid of Korea; U.N. council supports him; our fliers in action; fleet guards Formosa. Statement on Korea (1950, June 28). New York Times, p. 1.
U.N. Roll-Calls on China (1971, Oct 27) The New York Times, p.1
U.N. Roll-Calls on China issue (1966, Dec 1),The New York Times, p. 20
U.N. Roll-Calls on Peking (1970, Nov 21) The New York Times, p.6
U.N. Roll-Calls on Red China issue (1967, Nov 29), The New York Times, p.15
U.N. Roll-Calls on Red China issue (1968, Nov 20) The New York Times, p.18
U.N. Roll-Calls on the China issue (1969, Nov 12) The New York Times, p. 17
U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) (1957). Mutual Security Program. Vol. IV, Program Estimates Fiscal Year 1957: Latin America Non-Regional. Rossylin: US. USAID Library.
U.S. and Panama sign Agreement to restore ties (1964, April 4). The New York Times, p.1
U.S. Department of State (1979). Taiwan Relations Act. U.S. Code. Title 22, ch. 48, secs. 3301-16.
U.S. Dept. of State. (2011) A Guide to the United States’ History of Recognition, Diplomatic, and consular relations , by country, since 1776: Panama. Accessed on 06/20/2015 http://history.state.gov/countries/panama
United Nations (1951). Treaty of Peace with Japan (with two declarations). Signed at San Francisco, on 8 September 1951. No. 1832. Registered by the United States of America on August 1952.
Unofficial Japan-Taiwan Link Set Up (1972, December 27).New York Times, p, 3.
Vattel, E. (1916). The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Vote in U.N. on issue of seating Red China (1961, Dec 16), The New York Times, p. 17
Votes in U.N. since ’50 on seating of Chinese (1965, Nov 18), The New York Times, p. 26
Voting since ’50 on China Question (1971, Oct 26), The New York Times, p. 12
Walker, S. (2011). Does Forced Democratization Work?. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 73-94.
Walt, S. M. (1987). Origins of Alliance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Warren W. Jr. (1979, March 13). Unofficial U.S. Links to Taiwan Approved by House and Senate; Congress Approves Taiwan Bills Stronger Measure Defeated. New York Times, Page A1.
Weinraub, B. (1979, January 14). U.S. Proposal on Taiwan Relations Sets Up ‘Institute’ to Direct Affairs. New York Times, p. A4.
Winkler, S. (2011). Biding time: The challenge of Taiwan’s international status. The Brookings Institution. Available at . Accessed on 2015 February 27.
Wu, L. (1996). Limitations and prospects of Taiwan’s informal diplomacy. In Jean-Marie Henckaerts, ed., The international status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations, London: Kluwer Law International.
Yamali, N. (2009). What is meant by state recognition in international law. General Directorate of International Laws and Foreign Affairs. Turkey: Ministry of Justice 5.
Yung, W. (1998). USA – ROC Relations and the Partition of China: Parameters and Variables. In M. L. Näth (Ed.), The Republic of China on Taiwan in International Politics (pp. 71-86). Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
Zhu, Z. (2013). China`s New Diplomacy: Rationale Strategies and Significance. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.		zh_TW