1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 國民小學教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願之研究
作者 游淑燕
貢獻者 黃國彥<br>黃光雄
游淑燕
日期 1993
上傳時間 1-Apr-2016 17:15:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 一、研究目的
參考文獻 王文科(民78):課程發展與民主。載於中國教學會主編:民主法治與教育。台北:台 灣書店。
     王亞權(民77):九年國民教育有關法令及課程標準嚴定經過及回顧。載於中國教育學會主編：九年國民教育實施二十周年紀念文集，頁81-103。台北:台灣書店。
     王家通(民79):中日中小學課程比較研究。中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁95-114。台北:師大師苑。
     王淑俐(民78):教室中的主人─老師:論我國教師的課程決定權。國教世紀，二月，頁22-25。
     王麗雲(民79):艾波教育思想之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     方炳林(民72):小學課程發展。台北:正中書局。
     司 琦(民69):近三十年來我國國民教育課程之演進。教育資料集刊，第五輯，頁159-223。
     司 琦(民78):課程導論。台北：五南出版圖書公司。
     司 琦編著(民60):小學課程演進。台北:正中書局。
     台灣省政府(民62):省公報。秋字，第61期，頁13。中興新村:台灣省政府。
     台灣省國民學校教師研習會(民78):第九次國民小學課程標準修訂意見調查報告。台北:台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
     吳 鼎(民55):各國小學課程比較研究。台北:黎明文化出版公司。
     吳 鼎(民63):中西課程理論基礎。載於中國教育學會主編:課程研究。台北:商務印書館。
     吳 鼎(民66):近五十年來中國課程之演進。載於中國教育學會主編:近五十年來之中國教育。台北:復興書局。
     吳文侃、楊漢清(民81):比較教育學。台北：五南書局。
     吳貞祥譯(民65):日本現行小學課程修訂經過。台北:國民學校教師研習會。
     吳清山(民78):課程決定的理論探討。政大教育心理學研究，第12期，頁199-229。
     吳清基(民73):教育行政決定的概念分析─重要性、意義與性質。中等教育，第44期。
     吳清基(民79a):我國中小學課程標準修訂的理念與作法。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁67-94。台北:台灣書店。
     吳清基(民79b):教師與進修。台北：師大書苑。
     宋明順(民78):日本教科書研究。載於中華民國比較教育學會編：各國教科書比較研究，頁343-369。台北:台灣書店。
     何清欽(民71):教師參與學校經營之探討。教育學刊，第四期，頁1-38。
     李園會(民78):戰後日本教科書制度的改革。載於中華民國比較教育學會編:各國教科書比較研究，頁299-324。台北:台灣書店。
     周淑卿(民81):英國國定課程之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     林玉體(民77):台灣教育面貌四十年。台北:自立晚報。
     林彩釉(民78):國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     林清江(民77):英國新教育改革方案的啟示。中央日報，九月二十八日。
     林貴美(民79a):法國教科書編輯的基本概念與評鑑要點。載於中華民國比較教育學會編:各國教科書比較研究，頁413-455。台北:台灣書店。
     林貴美(民79b):法國小學課程探討。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁265-306。台北:師大書苑。
     林貴美(民80):法國教育制度。台北:國立編譯館。
     林進財(民81):主要國家的小學課程實施與改革趨勢。比較教育資訊，第二十八期，頁6-16。
     林寶山譯(民73):國家在危機之中─美國教育的改革計劃。高雄:復文書局。
     林寶山(民74):教育決策與改革。高雄:復文書局。
     邱武科(民81):生活與倫理革新課程實施之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     邱錦昌(民80):教育視導之理論與實際。台北:五南圖書出版。
     高新建(民80):國小教師課程決定之研究。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     徐緝昌(民65):參與管理之研究。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
     逸 心(民81):國小教師在教學層面的課程決定實施。現代教育，第七卷，第二十五期，頁152-158。
     郭文景(民74):國中教師參與決定與工程滿足。高雄師範學院碩士論文。
     黃光雄(民73):課程設計的模式。載於編輯小組編:中國教育的展望，頁287-314。台北:五南書局。
     黃光雄(民76):懸缺課程，現代教育，第二卷第一期，頁160-162。
     黃光雄編(民79a):教育概論。台北:師大書苑。
     黃光雄(民79b):英國國定課程評析。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁379-399。台北:師大書苑。
     黃昆輝(民77):教育行政。台北:文景書局。
     黃政傑(民77):教育理想的追求。台北:心理出版社。
     黃政傑(民78):課程改革。台北:漢文書店。
     黃政傑(民79):課程，頁341-363。載於黃光雄主編:教育概論。台北：師大書苑。
     黃政傑(民80a):課程設計。台北:東華書店。
     黃政傑(民80b):教育理念革新。台北:心理出版社。
     黃炳煌(民75):課程理論之基礎。台北:文景書局。
     黃炳煌(民78):教育與現代化。台北:文景書局。
     黃炳煌(民79a):開放社會的課程政設計與教科書用書制度。載於中國教育學會主編:開放社會的教育政策，頁423-445。台北:台灣書店
     黃炳煌(民76b):教育理念與理想。台北:文景書局。
     黃炳煌、簡礎英、羅文基(民77):技職教育課程發展模式之研究。政治大學教育研究所。
     黃振隆(民69):世界主要國家小學課程之比較研究。載於中國比較教育學會編:世界初等教育改革動向。台北:幼獅書店。
     消費者文教基金會(民73):國中、國小學生參考書評鑑報告。教育資料文摘，78期，頁93-98。
     張玉成(民81):英國小學社會科課程之分析。台北:三民書局。
     張承烈(民78):美國中小學教科書之現況。台灣教育，468期頁19-23。
     張柔慧、黃也瑜(民77):教科書中也有(女權運動)─從另一個角度談男女平等。國立編譯館通訊，第一卷第二期，頁32-37。
     教育部國民教育司(民78):國民小學課程標準。台北:正中書局。
     教育部(民80):中華民國國教育統計。台北教育部。
     教育資料文摘(民78):國小課程標準早已不合時宜。教育資料文摘，第135期，頁107-111。
     教育資料文摘(民80a):國中課程修訂可能延後實施。教育資料文摘，第157期，頁185-193。
     教育資料文摘(民80b):布希選宣布推行復興美國的教育計畫。教育資料文摘，第160期，頁4-6。
     教育資料文摘(民80c):「木蘭從軍」教材引起爭議。教育資訊文摘，第163期，頁113-116。
     陳奎熹(民69):教育社會學。台北:三民書局。
     陳奎熹(民79):教育社會研究譯。台北:師大書苑。
     陳添球(民78):國民小學教師教學自主性之研究─國民小學日常生活世界之探討。私立東吳大學社會研究所碩士論文。
     陳麗華(民79):校長在課程改革中的任務。現代教育，第四卷，第十八期，頁40-49。
     單文經(民81):課程與教學研究。台北：師大書苑。
     游淑燕(民81):教師在課程行政決定模式中的潛在角色形象。嘉義師範學院學報，第六期，頁445-468。
     詹棟樑(民78):教科書與意識型態，頁1-37。中華民國比較教育協會主編:各國教科書比較研究。台北:台灣書店。
     曾燦燈(民74a):1983年以後美國教育改革的新發展。比較教育通訊。第十期，頁30-35。
     楊國樞(民76):緒論─人文及社會科學研究的台灣經驗，頁14-15。載於賴澤涵主編:三十年來我國人文及社會科學之回顧與展望。台北:東大書局。
     歐用生(民74):我國國民小學社會科教科書意識型態之分析。新竹師範師專學報，第12期，頁91-125。
     歐用生(民76):初等教育的問題與改革。台北:南宏圖書公司。
     歐用生(民77):教科書政策自由化的途徑。中國論壇，第312期，頁21-23。
     歐用生(民78):社會科教學研究。台北:師大書苑。
     歐用生(民79):課程發展的基本原理。台北:復文書局。
     歐用生(民81):開放社會的教育改革。台北:心理出版社。
     熊先舉(民77):國民中學教科書的編印。載於中國教育學會編：九年國民教育實施二十周年紀念文集。台北:台灣書店。
     廖春文(民79):英國一九八八年教育改革法案對我國中小學課程發展的啟示。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁347-377。台北:師大書苑。
     趙起楊(民80):國小教育實習。台北:五南書局。
     蔡清華(民75):從法國初等及中等教育改革趨勢展望我國出等級中等教育之革新。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:教育改革親的趨勢與展望。台北:台灣書店。
     劉定霖(民78):政治意識型態與國民中學公民與道德教材之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     鄭照順(民79):國中教師專業社會化之研究。高雄:復文書局。
     盧素碧(民74):幼教課程理論與實際。台北:文景書局。
     謝文全(民74):教育行政論文集。台北:文景書局。
     鍾啟泉(民80):現代課程論。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
     鍾清漢(民78):日本教科書審定制度。台灣教育，第468期，頁35-45。
     顏火龍(民74):台北市立國民小學教師參與學校行政意願之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
     簡良平(民80):國小教科書中「漢族中心」意識型態之批判。現代教育，第六卷第四期，頁153-162。
     魏明通(民77):英國的課程改革。台灣教育，第445期，頁26-28。
     簡楚瑛(民70):我國課程發展模式之初探。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     羅善保(民78):英國中小學教科書的編寫與出版。台灣教育，第468期，頁1-10。
     
     
     
     Acker, Sandra(1991). Teacher relationships and educational reform in England and Waies. The Curriculum Journal, 12(3), 301-316.
     Alutto, J. A. & Belasco, J.A. (1972). Patterns of teacher participation in school system decision-making. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 9(1),Winter, 27-41.
     Anukam, Iheanacho Longinus(1980). Professional Autonomy among Professional /Specialists in Educational Bureaucracy. University of Oregon.
     Apple, Michael W.(1985). Education and Power. N.Y.: Routledge and Kagan Paul Inc.
     Apple, Michael W.(1988). Social crisis and curriculum accords. Educational Theory,38(2), 191-201.
     Apple, Michael W. (1991a). Is Participation enough? Gender, teaching and technology in the classroom. Curriculum Perspective, 11(2),1-13.
     Apple, Michael W. (1991b). The politics of curriculum and teaching. NASSP Bulletin, February, 39-50.
     Apple, Michael W. & Teitelbaum, Kenneth(1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2)., 177-184.
     Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using Textbooks and Teacher’s Curriculum Inquiry, 19(4), 401-423.
     Baller, E. (1991). Hungary. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 233-235. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Barnes, Douglas(1985). Practical Curriculum Study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Bateman, Donald R.(1974). The politics of curriculum. In Willam Pinar (ed.) Heighteded Consciousness, 54-68. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corportaion.
     Bayona, Ellias L. M., Varter, David S. G. & Pubch, Keith F. (199). The Role of Teachers in Curriculum Development. Curriculum Perspectives, 10(4),9-19.
     Beane, James A., Toepfer, Conrad F. & Alessi, Samuel J.(1986). Curriculum Planning and Development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
     Beauchamp, C.(1975). Curriculum Theory. Wilmette, Ill:Kagg Press.
     Bestor, Arthur(1956). The Restoration of Leaming. New York: Knopf.
     Bezzina, Michael (1991). Teachers Perceptions of their participation in school-Based curriculum development: a case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 11(2), 39-47.
     Bobbit, Franklin(1918). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
     Boyd, William Lowe(1978). The changing politics of curriculum policy making for American schools. Review of Educational Research, 48(1),577-628.
     Bradley, Leo. H. (1985). Curriculum Leadership and Development Handbook. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
     Campbell, Jim.(1989). The Education Reform Act 1988: some implications for curriculum decision-making in primary school. In Margaret Preedy (ed.) Approaches to Curriculum management, 62-77. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
     Campbell, R.J.(1985). Developing the Primary School Curriculum London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Carson, Alan Scott(1980). Control of the Curriculum and the Competence of the Teachers. British Thesis. University of London.
     Carson, Alan Scott(1984). Control of the Curriculum: a case for teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1), 19-28.
     Caswell, H. L. & Campbell, D.S. (1935). Curriculum Development. N.Y. : American Book.
     Clark, Richard W. (1988). Who decides? The basic Policy Issue. In Tanner, Laurel N. (ed.) Critical Issues in Curriculum, 175-204. Chicago: The University Press of Chicago Press.
     Cohen, D. (1982). Curriculum Decision Making: School-Based In The International Encyclopedia of Education, 1157-1160.
     Cohen, D. (1991). Australia, In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 226-228. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Cohen, D.& Harrison, Marelle (1982). Curriculum Action Project: A Report of Curriculum Decision-Making in Ausrtalia Secondary Schools. Australia Curriculum Development Center. ED 229843.
     Cohen, Marilyn M. , Kottamp. Robert B. & Provenzo, Eugene F. (1986). To Be a Teacher. Cases, Concepts, Observation Guides. New York: Random House.
     Commonn, Dianne L., Egan, Kieran(1988). The missing soul of models of curriculum implementation –educational theory, Curriculum Perspective, 8(1), 1-10.
     Connelly, F. Michael & Ben-Peretz, Miriam(1980). Teachers roles in the using and doing of research and curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12(2), 95-107.
     Corwin, R. G. (1965). A Sociology of Education. The Ohio State University: Medredith Publishing Company.
     Cox, Theo; Evans, Jane & Sanders, Susan(1991). How primary school teachers view the national curriculum in one Lea. Educational Review, 43(3),
     Cox, Theo, Evans, Jane & Sanders, Susan(1992). How primary school teachers view the national curriculum 1 year on. Educational Review, 44(1)., 19-29.
     Creighton, Helen(1983). Analyzing policy development in curriculum 22(2), 121-136.
     David, K. (1977). Human Relation at Work: Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     David, Martin R. (1990). The English National Curriculum: a landmark in educational reform. Educational Leadership, February,28-29
     Doll, Ronald C.(1988). Curriculum improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Ally and bacon.
     Doll, Ronald C.(1992). Curriculum improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
     Duffy, Gerald G., Roehler, Laura R. & Putnam, Joyce(1987). Putting the teacher in control: basal reading textbook and instructional decision making. Elementary School Journal, 3,257-366.
     
     Duke, Daniel L., Showers, Beverly K. & Imber, Michael(1980). Teachers as School Decision Maker. Stanford University.
     Eggleston, John(1977). The Sociology of School Curriculum. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul Ltd.
     Eicher, J.C. (1988). France. In T. Neville Postlethwaite (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education, 267-277. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Eisner, E. W. (1985). The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan.
     Elbaz, F. (1991). Teacher participation in curriculum development. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum,365-367. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
     Feir, Robert E. (1984). Curriculum Politics: Approaching 1984. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the America Educational Research Association. ED244359.
     Frey, Malliou; Langeheine, Rolf & Gillian Horton-Kruger(1991). Studies of the Quality of the Curricular Proces in the Curriculum Conference. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(1), 36-61.
     Glatthorn, Allan A. (1987). Curriculum Leadership. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Good, C. V. (1973). A Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum Inquiry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Gordon(1978). Role of the teacher. In Denis Lawton, Peter Gordon, Maggie Ing, Bill Gibby, Richard Pring and Terry moore(ed.) Theory and Practice of Curriculum Studies, 219-225. London: Routledge & Kegan paul.
     Grant, S. G. (1991). The California History-Social Science framework: A study in the de-professionalization of teacher. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 6(3), 213-221.
     Griffin, G. A. (1979). Level of curricular decision-making In Goodlad. Curriculum Inquiry,77-99. New York: McGaw-Hill.
     Grossman, Pamela L., Wilson, Suzanne & Shulman, Lee S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In Maynard C. Reynold (ed.) Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher, 23-36. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Haertel, G. D.(1991). Cognitive psychology and curriculum, 110-114. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: pergamon Press.
     Haertel, G. D. (1991). Cognitive Psychology and curriculum, 110-114. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Hashisako, Kazuyuki(1990). Personal and social education in Japan: recent curriculum changes in context. Compare, 20(2), 163-178.
     Hawthorne, Rebecca Killen(1987). Classroom Curriculum: Balancing Autonomy and Obligation. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ED280849.
     Hawthorne, Richard D. (1990). Analysing school-based collaborative curriculum decision making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(3), 279-286.
     Hawthorne, Richard D.& Phillips, J. Arch(1978). Political Dimensions of Currivulum Decision-making. Educational Leadership, 35, 362-366.
     Hopper, I. R. (1971). The Curriculum. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
     Hutchins, Robert M.(1936). The Higher Learning in America. New Haven: Johnson, M. (1967). Definitions and models in curriculum theory. Educational Theory,17(April), 127-140.
     Johnston, Sue(1989). Towards and understanding of the values issue in curriculum decision making. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum, 228-236. London: The Open University.
     Johnson, Sun (1990). Understanding curriculum decision-making through teacher images. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(5),463-471.
     Kanaya, T. (1988). Japan. In T. Neville Postlethwait (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education, 403-407.
     Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Meausrement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology,67,341-349.
     Kelly, A. V. (1980). Curriculum Context. Cambridge: Harper & Row, Publisher.
     Kelly, A. V. (1989). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
     Kenny, Kerry J. (1992). School-based curriculum development as a policy option for the 1990s: an Australian perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,7(2), 180-195.
     Kimpston, R. D.(1985). Curriculum fidelity and the implementation tasks emploved by teacher: a research study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(2),186-195.
     Kimpston, R. D. & Anderson, Douglas H. (1982). A study to analysis curriculum decision making in chool district. Educational Ledership, 63-66.
     Kirk, Gordon(1992). The Growth of central influence on the curriculum. In Moore, Rob & Ozga, Jenny(eds.) Curriculum Policy, 17-38. Oxford: Pergamon press.
     Kirst, Michael W. & Walker, Decker F. (1971). An analysis of curriculum policy-making. Review of Educational Research, 41(5), 479-509.
     Knoop, Robert & O’Reilly, Robert(1975). Participative Decision Making in Curriculum. Ed 10284.
     Kobayashi, Victor(1985). Japan. In Torsten Husen & T. Neville Postlethawaite (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Education Research, 696-704. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Kwong, Julia(1985). Changing political culuture and changing curriculum: an analysis of language textbooks in the People of Republic of China. Comparative Education, 21(2)., 197-208.
     Kyle, Diane Wells(1980). Curriculum Decisions: Who Decides what? The Elementary School Journal, 2, 77-85.
     Lawn, Martin(1987). The spur and the bride: Changing the mode of curriculum control. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(3), 227-336.
     Leithwood, K.A., Ross, John A. & Montgomery, Deborah(1982). An Investigation of teacher’s curriculum decision making. In Kenneth A. Leithwood (ed.) Studies in Curriculum Decision Making, 14-26. Ontario : OISE Press.
     Lindbald, Sverker (1986). The practice of school-centered innovation: a Swedish Case. In Taylor, Philip H. (ed.) Recent Development in Curriculum Studies, 193-204. Philadephia: Neer-Nelson.
     Lodahl, T. M. & Kejner(1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
     Lortie, Dan C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
     MacDonald, J. B. (1971). Responsible curriculum development. In Eisner (Ed.). Confronting Curriculum Reform. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
     Mann, John S. (1974). Political Power and the high school curriculum. In Eiilot W. Eisner and Elizabeth Vallance (ed.). Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum, 147-153.
     Marsh, Colin, Day, Christopher, hannay, Lynne & McCutcheon, Gail (1990). Reconceptualizing School-Based Curriculum Development. London: The Falmer Press.
     Marsh, Colin & Huberman, michae(1984). Disseminating curriculum: A look from top down. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1),53-66.
     Marsh, Colin & Stafford, Ken(1988). Curriculum: Practice and Issues. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
     Martin, D. S., Saif, P.S. & Thiel, L.(1987). Curriculum development: Who is involved and how? Educational Leadership, January, 40-47.
     McKenzie, J.D.S.(1983). Politics and school curriculum. In W.J.D. Minogue(ed.) Adventures in Curriculum, 20-34. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
     McKenztie, P. (1988). Australia. In T. Neville Postlethwaite(ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     McKernan, James(1991). Curriculum Acction Research: A Handbook of methods and Resources for the Reflective Practioner. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
     McNeil, John D. (1976). Designing Curriculum: Self- Instructional Modules. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
     McNeil, John D. (1985). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
     McNeil, John D. (1990). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction. Illionis:A Division fo Scott, Foreman and Company.
     
     Mehlinger, Howard D. (1991). The national commission on social studies in the schools:an example of the politics of curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(5), 449-456.
     Miller, T. W. & DHand, H. (1973). The Classroom Teacher as Curriculum developer for Project Candada West. Saskatoon: Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation.
     Mitchell, T. R. (1973). Motivation and participation: An integration. Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), 670-679.
     Moon, Bob(1989). Who’s in control? Pressure group politics and curriculum change. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum, 220-227. London: The Open University.
     Neagley, Ross L. & Evans, N. Dean(1967). Handbook for Effective Curriculum Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     Nicholls, A. & Nicholls, S. H. (1983). Development a Curriculum: A Pracitce Gudie. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
     Oberg, A. A. (1991). Curriculum decisions. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 302-303. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Oliva, Peter F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Oliva, Peter F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Oliver., Albert l. (1977). Curriculum Improvement: A Guide to Problems, Priciples and Process. New York: Harper, Row, Publishers.
     Orden, A. De La (1991). Spain. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 239-240. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Ornstein, Alln C. & hunkins, Francis(1988). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs.
     Phenix,P.P.(1962). The Disciplices as curriculum content. In A. Harry Passow (ed.) Curriculum Crossroads. N. Y.: Teacher College Press.
     Pickett, Faye David(1979). The Development and Evaluation of a Teacher-Oriented Curriculum Development Process. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Memphis State University.
     Piper, Kevin(1989). National curriculum: prospects and possibilities. Curriculum Perspectives, September, 3-7.
     Ponder, A. A. & Bulock, J.W. (1976). Friction point rating: A blueprint for selective decentralization in school system. The Canadian Administator, 15(6), 1-6.
     Popham, W.J.(1969). Instructional Objectives. Chicago: Rand McNally.
     Popham, W.J.(1975). Validated instructional materials as the focus of an effective curriculum. In Schaffarzick & Hampson (Eds.) Strategies for Curriculum Development, 89-103.
     Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum: Design and Development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
     Saleh, S.D.& Hosek, J.(1976). Job involvement: Concepts and measurement. Academy, 19,213-226.
     Samples, Bob(1984). Reflections on curriculum, teachers and teaching. Educational leadership, April,64-67.
     Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, William M.(1966). Curriculum Planning for modern Schools. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, William M.(1974). Planning Curriculum for Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Saylor, J.G, Alexander, William M., Lewis, Arthur J.(1981). Curriculum Panning for Better teaching and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Saylor, J.G, Alexander, William M., Lewis, Arthur J.(1981). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Schiro, M. (1978). Curriculum for Better Schools. N. J.: Educational Techology.
     Schmidt, William H., Porter, Andrew C., Floden, Robert E., Freeman. Donald J., & Schwille, John R. (1987). Four patterns of teacher content decision-making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(5)5, 493-455.
     Schubert, William H. (1986). Curriculum :Perspective, Paradigm and Possibility. New York: Macmillian Company.
     Shipman, Marten(1985). Local education authorities and the curriculum. In Peter Raggeatt & Gaby Weiner(eds.) Curriculum and Assement:Some Policy Issues. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Short, E. C. (1991). Curriculum design: a wider perspective for today and tomorrow. NASSP Bulletin, Fubrauary, 27-37.
     Simpson, Mary(1989). School base and centrally directed curriculum development—the uneasy middle ground. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum,257-268. London: The Open University.
     Skilbeck, M (1984). School-Based Curriculum Development. Harper and Row, London.
     Skilbeck, M. (1991). Econmic, Social , and cltural fctor. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 122-125. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Smith, B.O., Stanley, W. O. & Shores, J. H. (1975). Fundamentals of Curriculum Development. New York: Harcourt Beace Jovanovich.
     South, O. (1975). School-Base-Management. Mimeographed. Tallahassss:Florida Deaprtmet of Education.
     Stenhouse, L.(1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heimemann.
     
     Stevenson, Harold W. (1991). Japanese Elementary School Edcation. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 109-120.
     Taba, Hida (1962). Curriculum Development. New York: Harcourt, Barace & World, Inc.
     Tankard, George G. (1974). Curriculum Improvement: An Adminstrator’s Guide. New York: Parker Publishing Company, Inc.
     Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum Development. New York: Macmillan
     Tyler, R. W.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     Unruh, Glenys G. & Unruh, Adolph(1984). Curriculum Development: Problems, Processes and Progress. California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
     Walker, Decker (1990). Fundamentals of Curriculum. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
     Wheeler, D. K. (1967). Curriculum Process. London: University of London Press.
     White, Paula A. (1992). Teacher Empowerment under ‘ideal’ School-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
     Wilde, Sandra(1990). Teacher autonomy and nonsexist curriculum: case studies from two rural schools. Cumiculum Inquiry, 20(1),41-62.
     Wiles, Jon & Bondi, Joseph(1989). Curriculum Development: A Guide to practice. Golumbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
     Williamson, John & Fraser, Barry(1991). Elementary Education in Australia. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 5-21.
     Willis, George(1990). Assumptions underlying curriculum decisions in Australia: An American perspective. Curriculum Perspective, August, 1-13.
     Wilkson, L. C. (1990). Educational Reform in the U.S.: Impact at the Nation, State & Local Levels. 板橋教師研習會：七十九學年度國小課程研究學術研討會專輯。
     Wood, George H.(1988). Democracy and the curriculum. In Landon E. Beyer & Michael W. Apple (eds.) The Curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities, 166-187. New York: State University of New York Press.
     Yinger, Robert(1980). A study of teacher planning. Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107-127.
     Young,J. H. (1977). The Curriculum Decision Making Preferences of School personnel. Emontion Alta.: The University of Alberta.
     Young, J. H.(1979a). The curriculum Decision-making prefetnces ofo school personnel. Alberta Journal of Educationa Research, 25(1), 20-29.
     Young, J. H. (1979b). Teacher participation in curriculum decision making: An organization dilemma. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 113-127.
     Young, J. H. (1985). Participation in curriculum development: an inquiry into the response of teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4),384-414.
     Young, J. H. (1988). Teacher Participation in curriculum development: What status does it have? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(2), 109-121.
     Young, J. H. (1989). Teacher interest in curriculum committees: What factors are involved? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 363-376.
     Yuki, G. A. (1981). Leadership in Organizations.　台北：華泰書局。
     Zahorik, J.A. (1975). Teacher s planning model. Educational leadership, 22,134-139.
     Zais, Robert S. (1976). Curriculum: Principle and Foundation. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000154
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃國彥<br>黃光雄zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 游淑燕zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 游淑燕zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 1993en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2016 17:15:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Apr-2016 17:15:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2016 17:15:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) A2002000154en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83877-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 一、研究目的zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
     第一節 研究動機與目的．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１
     第二節 研究問題與假設．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．８
     第三節 重要名詞詮釋．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１０
     第四節 研究範圍與限制．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１６
     第二章 　文獻探討
     第一節 課程決定的意義、範圍與內容．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１９
     第二節 課程決定的層次．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３９
     第三節 課程決定權取向．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．６８
     第四節 課程決定之參與．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１０１
     第五節 工作因素、專業因素、課程決定權取向及其參與意願之相關研究．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１２３
     第三章　研究方法
     　　第一節　研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１３３
     　　第二節　研究樣本．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１３５
     　　第三節　研究工具．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１３７
     　　第四節　實施程序．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１４６
     　　第五節　資料處理．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１４７
     第四章　研究結果
     　　第一節　工作因素、專業因素與國小教師課程決定權責任歸屬之關係研究結
     　　　　　　果分析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．１５１
     　　第二節　工作因素專業因素與課程決定參與意願的相關係研究結果分
     　　　　　　析．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．２７７
     　　第三節　教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願之關係研究結果分析．．２９６
     第五章　結論與建議
     　　第一節　研究發現與討論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．２９９
     　　第二節　重驗研究結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３１５
     　　第三節　建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３１７
     參考書目
     　中文．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３２７
     　英文．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．３３３
     附錄
     附錄一　國小教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願調查問卷．．．．．．．３４５		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000154en_US
dc.title (題名) 國民小學教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王文科(民78):課程發展與民主。載於中國教學會主編:民主法治與教育。台北:台 灣書店。
     王亞權(民77):九年國民教育有關法令及課程標準嚴定經過及回顧。載於中國教育學會主編：九年國民教育實施二十周年紀念文集，頁81-103。台北:台灣書店。
     王家通(民79):中日中小學課程比較研究。中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁95-114。台北:師大師苑。
     王淑俐(民78):教室中的主人─老師:論我國教師的課程決定權。國教世紀，二月，頁22-25。
     王麗雲(民79):艾波教育思想之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     方炳林(民72):小學課程發展。台北:正中書局。
     司 琦(民69):近三十年來我國國民教育課程之演進。教育資料集刊，第五輯，頁159-223。
     司 琦(民78):課程導論。台北：五南出版圖書公司。
     司 琦編著(民60):小學課程演進。台北:正中書局。
     台灣省政府(民62):省公報。秋字，第61期，頁13。中興新村:台灣省政府。
     台灣省國民學校教師研習會(民78):第九次國民小學課程標準修訂意見調查報告。台北:台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
     吳 鼎(民55):各國小學課程比較研究。台北:黎明文化出版公司。
     吳 鼎(民63):中西課程理論基礎。載於中國教育學會主編:課程研究。台北:商務印書館。
     吳 鼎(民66):近五十年來中國課程之演進。載於中國教育學會主編:近五十年來之中國教育。台北:復興書局。
     吳文侃、楊漢清(民81):比較教育學。台北：五南書局。
     吳貞祥譯(民65):日本現行小學課程修訂經過。台北:國民學校教師研習會。
     吳清山(民78):課程決定的理論探討。政大教育心理學研究，第12期，頁199-229。
     吳清基(民73):教育行政決定的概念分析─重要性、意義與性質。中等教育，第44期。
     吳清基(民79a):我國中小學課程標準修訂的理念與作法。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁67-94。台北:台灣書店。
     吳清基(民79b):教師與進修。台北：師大書苑。
     宋明順(民78):日本教科書研究。載於中華民國比較教育學會編：各國教科書比較研究，頁343-369。台北:台灣書店。
     何清欽(民71):教師參與學校經營之探討。教育學刊，第四期，頁1-38。
     李園會(民78):戰後日本教科書制度的改革。載於中華民國比較教育學會編:各國教科書比較研究，頁299-324。台北:台灣書店。
     周淑卿(民81):英國國定課程之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     林玉體(民77):台灣教育面貌四十年。台北:自立晚報。
     林彩釉(民78):國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     林清江(民77):英國新教育改革方案的啟示。中央日報，九月二十八日。
     林貴美(民79a):法國教科書編輯的基本概念與評鑑要點。載於中華民國比較教育學會編:各國教科書比較研究，頁413-455。台北:台灣書店。
     林貴美(民79b):法國小學課程探討。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁265-306。台北:師大書苑。
     林貴美(民80):法國教育制度。台北:國立編譯館。
     林進財(民81):主要國家的小學課程實施與改革趨勢。比較教育資訊，第二十八期，頁6-16。
     林寶山譯(民73):國家在危機之中─美國教育的改革計劃。高雄:復文書局。
     林寶山(民74):教育決策與改革。高雄:復文書局。
     邱武科(民81):生活與倫理革新課程實施之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     邱錦昌(民80):教育視導之理論與實際。台北:五南圖書出版。
     高新建(民80):國小教師課程決定之研究。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     徐緝昌(民65):參與管理之研究。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
     逸 心(民81):國小教師在教學層面的課程決定實施。現代教育，第七卷，第二十五期，頁152-158。
     郭文景(民74):國中教師參與決定與工程滿足。高雄師範學院碩士論文。
     黃光雄(民73):課程設計的模式。載於編輯小組編:中國教育的展望，頁287-314。台北:五南書局。
     黃光雄(民76):懸缺課程，現代教育，第二卷第一期，頁160-162。
     黃光雄編(民79a):教育概論。台北:師大書苑。
     黃光雄(民79b):英國國定課程評析。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁379-399。台北:師大書苑。
     黃昆輝(民77):教育行政。台北:文景書局。
     黃政傑(民77):教育理想的追求。台北:心理出版社。
     黃政傑(民78):課程改革。台北:漢文書店。
     黃政傑(民79):課程，頁341-363。載於黃光雄主編:教育概論。台北：師大書苑。
     黃政傑(民80a):課程設計。台北:東華書店。
     黃政傑(民80b):教育理念革新。台北:心理出版社。
     黃炳煌(民75):課程理論之基礎。台北:文景書局。
     黃炳煌(民78):教育與現代化。台北:文景書局。
     黃炳煌(民79a):開放社會的課程政設計與教科書用書制度。載於中國教育學會主編:開放社會的教育政策，頁423-445。台北:台灣書店
     黃炳煌(民76b):教育理念與理想。台北:文景書局。
     黃炳煌、簡礎英、羅文基(民77):技職教育課程發展模式之研究。政治大學教育研究所。
     黃振隆(民69):世界主要國家小學課程之比較研究。載於中國比較教育學會編:世界初等教育改革動向。台北:幼獅書店。
     消費者文教基金會(民73):國中、國小學生參考書評鑑報告。教育資料文摘，78期，頁93-98。
     張玉成(民81):英國小學社會科課程之分析。台北:三民書局。
     張承烈(民78):美國中小學教科書之現況。台灣教育，468期頁19-23。
     張柔慧、黃也瑜(民77):教科書中也有(女權運動)─從另一個角度談男女平等。國立編譯館通訊，第一卷第二期，頁32-37。
     教育部國民教育司(民78):國民小學課程標準。台北:正中書局。
     教育部(民80):中華民國國教育統計。台北教育部。
     教育資料文摘(民78):國小課程標準早已不合時宜。教育資料文摘，第135期，頁107-111。
     教育資料文摘(民80a):國中課程修訂可能延後實施。教育資料文摘，第157期，頁185-193。
     教育資料文摘(民80b):布希選宣布推行復興美國的教育計畫。教育資料文摘，第160期，頁4-6。
     教育資料文摘(民80c):「木蘭從軍」教材引起爭議。教育資訊文摘，第163期，頁113-116。
     陳奎熹(民69):教育社會學。台北:三民書局。
     陳奎熹(民79):教育社會研究譯。台北:師大書苑。
     陳添球(民78):國民小學教師教學自主性之研究─國民小學日常生活世界之探討。私立東吳大學社會研究所碩士論文。
     陳麗華(民79):校長在課程改革中的任務。現代教育，第四卷，第十八期，頁40-49。
     單文經(民81):課程與教學研究。台北：師大書苑。
     游淑燕(民81):教師在課程行政決定模式中的潛在角色形象。嘉義師範學院學報，第六期，頁445-468。
     詹棟樑(民78):教科書與意識型態，頁1-37。中華民國比較教育協會主編:各國教科書比較研究。台北:台灣書店。
     曾燦燈(民74a):1983年以後美國教育改革的新發展。比較教育通訊。第十期，頁30-35。
     楊國樞(民76):緒論─人文及社會科學研究的台灣經驗，頁14-15。載於賴澤涵主編:三十年來我國人文及社會科學之回顧與展望。台北:東大書局。
     歐用生(民74):我國國民小學社會科教科書意識型態之分析。新竹師範師專學報，第12期，頁91-125。
     歐用生(民76):初等教育的問題與改革。台北:南宏圖書公司。
     歐用生(民77):教科書政策自由化的途徑。中國論壇，第312期，頁21-23。
     歐用生(民78):社會科教學研究。台北:師大書苑。
     歐用生(民79):課程發展的基本原理。台北:復文書局。
     歐用生(民81):開放社會的教育改革。台北:心理出版社。
     熊先舉(民77):國民中學教科書的編印。載於中國教育學會編：九年國民教育實施二十周年紀念文集。台北:台灣書店。
     廖春文(民79):英國一九八八年教育改革法案對我國中小學課程發展的啟示。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁347-377。台北:師大書苑。
     趙起楊(民80):國小教育實習。台北:五南書局。
     蔡清華(民75):從法國初等及中等教育改革趨勢展望我國出等級中等教育之革新。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:教育改革親的趨勢與展望。台北:台灣書店。
     劉定霖(民78):政治意識型態與國民中學公民與道德教材之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     鄭照順(民79):國中教師專業社會化之研究。高雄:復文書局。
     盧素碧(民74):幼教課程理論與實際。台北:文景書局。
     謝文全(民74):教育行政論文集。台北:文景書局。
     鍾啟泉(民80):現代課程論。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
     鍾清漢(民78):日本教科書審定制度。台灣教育，第468期，頁35-45。
     顏火龍(民74):台北市立國民小學教師參與學校行政意願之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
     簡良平(民80):國小教科書中「漢族中心」意識型態之批判。現代教育，第六卷第四期，頁153-162。
     魏明通(民77):英國的課程改革。台灣教育，第445期，頁26-28。
     簡楚瑛(民70):我國課程發展模式之初探。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
     羅善保(民78):英國中小學教科書的編寫與出版。台灣教育，第468期，頁1-10。
     
     
     
     Acker, Sandra(1991). Teacher relationships and educational reform in England and Waies. The Curriculum Journal, 12(3), 301-316.
     Alutto, J. A. & Belasco, J.A. (1972). Patterns of teacher participation in school system decision-making. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 9(1),Winter, 27-41.
     Anukam, Iheanacho Longinus(1980). Professional Autonomy among Professional /Specialists in Educational Bureaucracy. University of Oregon.
     Apple, Michael W.(1985). Education and Power. N.Y.: Routledge and Kagan Paul Inc.
     Apple, Michael W.(1988). Social crisis and curriculum accords. Educational Theory,38(2), 191-201.
     Apple, Michael W. (1991a). Is Participation enough? Gender, teaching and technology in the classroom. Curriculum Perspective, 11(2),1-13.
     Apple, Michael W. (1991b). The politics of curriculum and teaching. NASSP Bulletin, February, 39-50.
     Apple, Michael W. & Teitelbaum, Kenneth(1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2)., 177-184.
     Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using Textbooks and Teacher’s Curriculum Inquiry, 19(4), 401-423.
     Baller, E. (1991). Hungary. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 233-235. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Barnes, Douglas(1985). Practical Curriculum Study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Bateman, Donald R.(1974). The politics of curriculum. In Willam Pinar (ed.) Heighteded Consciousness, 54-68. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corportaion.
     Bayona, Ellias L. M., Varter, David S. G. & Pubch, Keith F. (199). The Role of Teachers in Curriculum Development. Curriculum Perspectives, 10(4),9-19.
     Beane, James A., Toepfer, Conrad F. & Alessi, Samuel J.(1986). Curriculum Planning and Development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
     Beauchamp, C.(1975). Curriculum Theory. Wilmette, Ill:Kagg Press.
     Bestor, Arthur(1956). The Restoration of Leaming. New York: Knopf.
     Bezzina, Michael (1991). Teachers Perceptions of their participation in school-Based curriculum development: a case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 11(2), 39-47.
     Bobbit, Franklin(1918). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
     Boyd, William Lowe(1978). The changing politics of curriculum policy making for American schools. Review of Educational Research, 48(1),577-628.
     Bradley, Leo. H. (1985). Curriculum Leadership and Development Handbook. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
     Campbell, Jim.(1989). The Education Reform Act 1988: some implications for curriculum decision-making in primary school. In Margaret Preedy (ed.) Approaches to Curriculum management, 62-77. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
     Campbell, R.J.(1985). Developing the Primary School Curriculum London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Carson, Alan Scott(1980). Control of the Curriculum and the Competence of the Teachers. British Thesis. University of London.
     Carson, Alan Scott(1984). Control of the Curriculum: a case for teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1), 19-28.
     Caswell, H. L. & Campbell, D.S. (1935). Curriculum Development. N.Y. : American Book.
     Clark, Richard W. (1988). Who decides? The basic Policy Issue. In Tanner, Laurel N. (ed.) Critical Issues in Curriculum, 175-204. Chicago: The University Press of Chicago Press.
     Cohen, D. (1982). Curriculum Decision Making: School-Based In The International Encyclopedia of Education, 1157-1160.
     Cohen, D. (1991). Australia, In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 226-228. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Cohen, D.& Harrison, Marelle (1982). Curriculum Action Project: A Report of Curriculum Decision-Making in Ausrtalia Secondary Schools. Australia Curriculum Development Center. ED 229843.
     Cohen, Marilyn M. , Kottamp. Robert B. & Provenzo, Eugene F. (1986). To Be a Teacher. Cases, Concepts, Observation Guides. New York: Random House.
     Commonn, Dianne L., Egan, Kieran(1988). The missing soul of models of curriculum implementation –educational theory, Curriculum Perspective, 8(1), 1-10.
     Connelly, F. Michael & Ben-Peretz, Miriam(1980). Teachers roles in the using and doing of research and curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12(2), 95-107.
     Corwin, R. G. (1965). A Sociology of Education. The Ohio State University: Medredith Publishing Company.
     Cox, Theo; Evans, Jane & Sanders, Susan(1991). How primary school teachers view the national curriculum in one Lea. Educational Review, 43(3),
     Cox, Theo, Evans, Jane & Sanders, Susan(1992). How primary school teachers view the national curriculum 1 year on. Educational Review, 44(1)., 19-29.
     Creighton, Helen(1983). Analyzing policy development in curriculum 22(2), 121-136.
     David, K. (1977). Human Relation at Work: Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     David, Martin R. (1990). The English National Curriculum: a landmark in educational reform. Educational Leadership, February,28-29
     Doll, Ronald C.(1988). Curriculum improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Ally and bacon.
     Doll, Ronald C.(1992). Curriculum improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
     Duffy, Gerald G., Roehler, Laura R. & Putnam, Joyce(1987). Putting the teacher in control: basal reading textbook and instructional decision making. Elementary School Journal, 3,257-366.
     
     Duke, Daniel L., Showers, Beverly K. & Imber, Michael(1980). Teachers as School Decision Maker. Stanford University.
     Eggleston, John(1977). The Sociology of School Curriculum. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul Ltd.
     Eicher, J.C. (1988). France. In T. Neville Postlethwaite (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education, 267-277. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Eisner, E. W. (1985). The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan.
     Elbaz, F. (1991). Teacher participation in curriculum development. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum,365-367. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
     Feir, Robert E. (1984). Curriculum Politics: Approaching 1984. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the America Educational Research Association. ED244359.
     Frey, Malliou; Langeheine, Rolf & Gillian Horton-Kruger(1991). Studies of the Quality of the Curricular Proces in the Curriculum Conference. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(1), 36-61.
     Glatthorn, Allan A. (1987). Curriculum Leadership. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Good, C. V. (1973). A Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum Inquiry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
     Gordon(1978). Role of the teacher. In Denis Lawton, Peter Gordon, Maggie Ing, Bill Gibby, Richard Pring and Terry moore(ed.) Theory and Practice of Curriculum Studies, 219-225. London: Routledge & Kegan paul.
     Grant, S. G. (1991). The California History-Social Science framework: A study in the de-professionalization of teacher. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 6(3), 213-221.
     Griffin, G. A. (1979). Level of curricular decision-making In Goodlad. Curriculum Inquiry,77-99. New York: McGaw-Hill.
     Grossman, Pamela L., Wilson, Suzanne & Shulman, Lee S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In Maynard C. Reynold (ed.) Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher, 23-36. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Haertel, G. D.(1991). Cognitive psychology and curriculum, 110-114. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: pergamon Press.
     Haertel, G. D. (1991). Cognitive Psychology and curriculum, 110-114. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Hashisako, Kazuyuki(1990). Personal and social education in Japan: recent curriculum changes in context. Compare, 20(2), 163-178.
     Hawthorne, Rebecca Killen(1987). Classroom Curriculum: Balancing Autonomy and Obligation. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ED280849.
     Hawthorne, Richard D. (1990). Analysing school-based collaborative curriculum decision making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(3), 279-286.
     Hawthorne, Richard D.& Phillips, J. Arch(1978). Political Dimensions of Currivulum Decision-making. Educational Leadership, 35, 362-366.
     Hopper, I. R. (1971). The Curriculum. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
     Hutchins, Robert M.(1936). The Higher Learning in America. New Haven: Johnson, M. (1967). Definitions and models in curriculum theory. Educational Theory,17(April), 127-140.
     Johnston, Sue(1989). Towards and understanding of the values issue in curriculum decision making. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum, 228-236. London: The Open University.
     Johnson, Sun (1990). Understanding curriculum decision-making through teacher images. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(5),463-471.
     Kanaya, T. (1988). Japan. In T. Neville Postlethwait (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education, 403-407.
     Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Meausrement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology,67,341-349.
     Kelly, A. V. (1980). Curriculum Context. Cambridge: Harper & Row, Publisher.
     Kelly, A. V. (1989). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
     Kenny, Kerry J. (1992). School-based curriculum development as a policy option for the 1990s: an Australian perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,7(2), 180-195.
     Kimpston, R. D.(1985). Curriculum fidelity and the implementation tasks emploved by teacher: a research study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(2),186-195.
     Kimpston, R. D. & Anderson, Douglas H. (1982). A study to analysis curriculum decision making in chool district. Educational Ledership, 63-66.
     Kirk, Gordon(1992). The Growth of central influence on the curriculum. In Moore, Rob & Ozga, Jenny(eds.) Curriculum Policy, 17-38. Oxford: Pergamon press.
     Kirst, Michael W. & Walker, Decker F. (1971). An analysis of curriculum policy-making. Review of Educational Research, 41(5), 479-509.
     Knoop, Robert & O’Reilly, Robert(1975). Participative Decision Making in Curriculum. Ed 10284.
     Kobayashi, Victor(1985). Japan. In Torsten Husen & T. Neville Postlethawaite (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Education Research, 696-704. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Kwong, Julia(1985). Changing political culuture and changing curriculum: an analysis of language textbooks in the People of Republic of China. Comparative Education, 21(2)., 197-208.
     Kyle, Diane Wells(1980). Curriculum Decisions: Who Decides what? The Elementary School Journal, 2, 77-85.
     Lawn, Martin(1987). The spur and the bride: Changing the mode of curriculum control. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(3), 227-336.
     Leithwood, K.A., Ross, John A. & Montgomery, Deborah(1982). An Investigation of teacher’s curriculum decision making. In Kenneth A. Leithwood (ed.) Studies in Curriculum Decision Making, 14-26. Ontario : OISE Press.
     Lindbald, Sverker (1986). The practice of school-centered innovation: a Swedish Case. In Taylor, Philip H. (ed.) Recent Development in Curriculum Studies, 193-204. Philadephia: Neer-Nelson.
     Lodahl, T. M. & Kejner(1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
     Lortie, Dan C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
     MacDonald, J. B. (1971). Responsible curriculum development. In Eisner (Ed.). Confronting Curriculum Reform. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
     Mann, John S. (1974). Political Power and the high school curriculum. In Eiilot W. Eisner and Elizabeth Vallance (ed.). Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum, 147-153.
     Marsh, Colin, Day, Christopher, hannay, Lynne & McCutcheon, Gail (1990). Reconceptualizing School-Based Curriculum Development. London: The Falmer Press.
     Marsh, Colin & Huberman, michae(1984). Disseminating curriculum: A look from top down. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1),53-66.
     Marsh, Colin & Stafford, Ken(1988). Curriculum: Practice and Issues. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
     Martin, D. S., Saif, P.S. & Thiel, L.(1987). Curriculum development: Who is involved and how? Educational Leadership, January, 40-47.
     McKenzie, J.D.S.(1983). Politics and school curriculum. In W.J.D. Minogue(ed.) Adventures in Curriculum, 20-34. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
     McKenztie, P. (1988). Australia. In T. Neville Postlethwaite(ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     McKernan, James(1991). Curriculum Acction Research: A Handbook of methods and Resources for the Reflective Practioner. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
     McNeil, John D. (1976). Designing Curriculum: Self- Instructional Modules. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
     McNeil, John D. (1985). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
     McNeil, John D. (1990). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction. Illionis:A Division fo Scott, Foreman and Company.
     
     Mehlinger, Howard D. (1991). The national commission on social studies in the schools:an example of the politics of curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(5), 449-456.
     Miller, T. W. & DHand, H. (1973). The Classroom Teacher as Curriculum developer for Project Candada West. Saskatoon: Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation.
     Mitchell, T. R. (1973). Motivation and participation: An integration. Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), 670-679.
     Moon, Bob(1989). Who’s in control? Pressure group politics and curriculum change. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum, 220-227. London: The Open University.
     Neagley, Ross L. & Evans, N. Dean(1967). Handbook for Effective Curriculum Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
     Nicholls, A. & Nicholls, S. H. (1983). Development a Curriculum: A Pracitce Gudie. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
     Oberg, A. A. (1991). Curriculum decisions. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 302-303. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Oliva, Peter F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Oliva, Peter F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Oliver., Albert l. (1977). Curriculum Improvement: A Guide to Problems, Priciples and Process. New York: Harper, Row, Publishers.
     Orden, A. De La (1991). Spain. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 239-240. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Ornstein, Alln C. & hunkins, Francis(1988). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs.
     Phenix,P.P.(1962). The Disciplices as curriculum content. In A. Harry Passow (ed.) Curriculum Crossroads. N. Y.: Teacher College Press.
     Pickett, Faye David(1979). The Development and Evaluation of a Teacher-Oriented Curriculum Development Process. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Memphis State University.
     Piper, Kevin(1989). National curriculum: prospects and possibilities. Curriculum Perspectives, September, 3-7.
     Ponder, A. A. & Bulock, J.W. (1976). Friction point rating: A blueprint for selective decentralization in school system. The Canadian Administator, 15(6), 1-6.
     Popham, W.J.(1969). Instructional Objectives. Chicago: Rand McNally.
     Popham, W.J.(1975). Validated instructional materials as the focus of an effective curriculum. In Schaffarzick & Hampson (Eds.) Strategies for Curriculum Development, 89-103.
     Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum: Design and Development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
     Saleh, S.D.& Hosek, J.(1976). Job involvement: Concepts and measurement. Academy, 19,213-226.
     Samples, Bob(1984). Reflections on curriculum, teachers and teaching. Educational leadership, April,64-67.
     Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, William M.(1966). Curriculum Planning for modern Schools. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, William M.(1974). Planning Curriculum for Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
     Saylor, J.G, Alexander, William M., Lewis, Arthur J.(1981). Curriculum Panning for Better teaching and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Saylor, J.G, Alexander, William M., Lewis, Arthur J.(1981). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     Schiro, M. (1978). Curriculum for Better Schools. N. J.: Educational Techology.
     Schmidt, William H., Porter, Andrew C., Floden, Robert E., Freeman. Donald J., & Schwille, John R. (1987). Four patterns of teacher content decision-making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(5)5, 493-455.
     Schubert, William H. (1986). Curriculum :Perspective, Paradigm and Possibility. New York: Macmillian Company.
     Shipman, Marten(1985). Local education authorities and the curriculum. In Peter Raggeatt & Gaby Weiner(eds.) Curriculum and Assement:Some Policy Issues. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Short, E. C. (1991). Curriculum design: a wider perspective for today and tomorrow. NASSP Bulletin, Fubrauary, 27-37.
     Simpson, Mary(1989). School base and centrally directed curriculum development—the uneasy middle ground. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum,257-268. London: The Open University.
     Skilbeck, M (1984). School-Based Curriculum Development. Harper and Row, London.
     Skilbeck, M. (1991). Econmic, Social , and cltural fctor. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 122-125. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
     Smith, B.O., Stanley, W. O. & Shores, J. H. (1975). Fundamentals of Curriculum Development. New York: Harcourt Beace Jovanovich.
     South, O. (1975). School-Base-Management. Mimeographed. Tallahassss:Florida Deaprtmet of Education.
     Stenhouse, L.(1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heimemann.
     
     Stevenson, Harold W. (1991). Japanese Elementary School Edcation. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 109-120.
     Taba, Hida (1962). Curriculum Development. New York: Harcourt, Barace & World, Inc.
     Tankard, George G. (1974). Curriculum Improvement: An Adminstrator’s Guide. New York: Parker Publishing Company, Inc.
     Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum Development. New York: Macmillan
     Tyler, R. W.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     Unruh, Glenys G. & Unruh, Adolph(1984). Curriculum Development: Problems, Processes and Progress. California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
     Walker, Decker (1990). Fundamentals of Curriculum. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
     Wheeler, D. K. (1967). Curriculum Process. London: University of London Press.
     White, Paula A. (1992). Teacher Empowerment under ‘ideal’ School-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
     Wilde, Sandra(1990). Teacher autonomy and nonsexist curriculum: case studies from two rural schools. Cumiculum Inquiry, 20(1),41-62.
     Wiles, Jon & Bondi, Joseph(1989). Curriculum Development: A Guide to practice. Golumbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
     Williamson, John & Fraser, Barry(1991). Elementary Education in Australia. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 5-21.
     Willis, George(1990). Assumptions underlying curriculum decisions in Australia: An American perspective. Curriculum Perspective, August, 1-13.
     Wilkson, L. C. (1990). Educational Reform in the U.S.: Impact at the Nation, State & Local Levels. 板橋教師研習會：七十九學年度國小課程研究學術研討會專輯。
     Wood, George H.(1988). Democracy and the curriculum. In Landon E. Beyer & Michael W. Apple (eds.) The Curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities, 166-187. New York: State University of New York Press.
     Yinger, Robert(1980). A study of teacher planning. Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107-127.
     Young,J. H. (1977). The Curriculum Decision Making Preferences of School personnel. Emontion Alta.: The University of Alberta.
     Young, J. H.(1979a). The curriculum Decision-making prefetnces ofo school personnel. Alberta Journal of Educationa Research, 25(1), 20-29.
     Young, J. H. (1979b). Teacher participation in curriculum decision making: An organization dilemma. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 113-127.
     Young, J. H. (1985). Participation in curriculum development: an inquiry into the response of teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4),384-414.
     Young, J. H. (1988). Teacher Participation in curriculum development: What status does it have? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(2), 109-121.
     Young, J. H. (1989). Teacher interest in curriculum committees: What factors are involved? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 363-376.
     Yuki, G. A. (1981). Leadership in Organizations.　台北：華泰書局。
     Zahorik, J.A. (1975). Teacher s planning model. Educational leadership, 22,134-139.
     Zais, Robert S. (1976). Curriculum: Principle and Foundation. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.		zh_TW