1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Communication
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 議題設定理論第二層次探析－以台北市公娼存廢議題為例
作者 陳芸芸
Chen, Tracy
貢獻者 金溥聰
King, Pu Tsung
陳芸芸
Tracy Chen
關鍵詞 議題設定
公娼
公娼存廢議題
屬性
形象
第二層次
agenda-setting
attributes
image
second dimension
日期 1998
上傳時間 20-Apr-2016 14:23:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 　　本論文是台灣地區首篇以「議題設定理論第二層次」中的「媒介議題屬性設定效果」為主旨的實證研究。論文以「台北市公娼存廢議題」做為分析個案，目的在於驗證「媒介設定公娼議題的第二層次效果」。研究方法係以報紙內容分析與民意調查兩種方式，檢驗報紙所強調報導的屬性，是否也是民眾腦海中比較凸顯的屬性。研究結果證實了媒介的議題屬性設定效果。其他主要發現如下：
參考文獻 中文部份
     王石番（1991）《傳播內容分析法－理論與實證》 台北：幼獅文化事業
     牟迎馨（1997）《新聞跨媒體影響力之探析－以晚報與無線電視晚間新聞為例》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     行政院主計處（1998.10）《中華民國台灣地區人力資源統計月報》第300期
     台北：行政院主計處出版
     吳統雄（1995）傳播與投票行為：「選民結構」與「形象投票」新理論建構 《政治大學新聞教育六十週年學術研討會論文集》 台北：國立政治大學新聞學系
     金溥聰（1997）報紙的形象設定效果研究：以83年台北市市長選舉為例《新聞學研究》第五十五集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     金溥聰（1998）一九九六總統候選人形象分析 收錄於金溥聰（1998）主編《總統選舉與新聞報導》台北：國立政治大學新聞學系
     金溥聰（1998）選戰與候選人形象 台北：國立政治大學廣告系第六屆廣告與公共關係學術研討會
     林清山（1992）《心理與教育統計學》台北：東華書局
     胡晉翔（1994），《消息來源策略對社會運動的影響：框架理論的觀點》，台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
     胡淑裕（1985）《大眾傳播媒介塑造政治人物形象之研究---孫運璿、林洋港、李登輝之個案分析》 台北：中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     李天任 藍莘等譯（1995）《大眾媒體研究》
     李茂政（1981）《台灣地區新聞媒介議題設定功能研究》台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     李慧馨（1998）《框架害怕犯罪》論文發表於中華傳播學會1998年會 1998.6.28-6.30
     李郁青（1996）《媒介議題設定效果的第二面向：候選人形象設定效果研究》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     林芳玫（1995）師大強暴「疑」案報紙報導之分析：誰是加害者？誰是受害者？ 《新聞學研究》第五十一集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     林芳玫（1998）當代台灣婦運的認同政治︰以公娼存廢爭議為例《中外文學》第27卷第1期 1998年6月號
     林珍良（1994）《新聞言說結構對資訊處理策略影響之研究》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     高振盛（1991）《電視廣告議題設定效果之初探》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     翁秀琪（1992）《大眾傳播理論與實證》 台北：三民書局
     翁秀琪（1997）批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析：宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析 論文發表於1997.6.18中華傳播學會九七年會
     徐火炎（1991）政黨認同與投票抉擇：台灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好與黨派投票行為之分析 《人文及社會科學集刊》，第四卷一期，頁1-57
     徐惠玲（1982）《我國報紙議題設定功能之研究：以六十九年增額中央民意代表選舉政見為例》台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     陳世敏（1992）候選人形象與選民投票行為 《新聞學研究》第四十六集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     陳雅雯（1998.3.21） 誰站在公娼的背後《破報》
     陳韻如（1993）《新聞事件的意義建構與受眾認知關係之研究：從受眾推論看新聞框架之影響》台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     陳靜芬（1997）《一九九六總統大選期間之議題探析--議題設定理論的觀點》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     許禎元（1997）《政治研究方法與統計－SPSS for Windows的實例操作》 台北：五南圖書出版公司
     張卿卿（1998）《政治競選廣告的議題設定與預示效果》 台北：國立政治大學廣告系第六屆廣告與公共關係研討會
     黃淑玲（1998）〈婦運那堪「反反色情」〉《騷動》第五期 1998年3月
     游盈隆（1994）政黨形象、意識型態與台灣選舉變遷 《中央研究院民族研究所集刊第七十八集》
     廖淑伶（1990）《議題設定效果因素之探討：媒介特性、人口變項、傳播行為與大眾媒介議題之關聯性分析—以大台北地區為例》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     劉恩良（1997）媒介對國發會「議題設定」與「引爆」的功能—兼論對大專學生政治態度之影響 《民意研究季刊》201期
     臧國仁（1998）新聞報導與真實建構：新聞框架理論的觀點 論文發表於中華傳播學會1998年會 1998.6.28-6.30
     臧國仁、鍾蔚文（1997） 框架概念與公共關係策略－有關運用媒介框架的探析《廣告學研究》第九集 頁99-128
     蔡美瑛（1995）議題設定理論之發展－從領域遷徙、理論延展到理論整合 《新聞學研究》第五十集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     蔡素蓉（1997）《閱聽人的情態與自我基模對電視新聞訊息處理之影響》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     楊意菁（1997）《民意理論與研究取向—一個微觀鉅觀多元層級觀點的整合》 論文發表於 台北:中華傳播學會97年會
     潘家慶、王石番、謝瀛春、鄭自隆（1995）《台灣地區民眾傳播行為研究》，台北：行政院國科會研究報告
     蕭永勝（1991）《議題設定功能之研究：以第八次國大代表集會為例》台北：私立輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文
     鍾蔚文（1992）《從媒介真實到主觀真實：看新聞，怎麼看？看到什麼》 台北：正中書局
     鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳憶寧、柏松齡、王昭敏（1996） 台大Ａ片事件的多重真實：框架理論的再思 《國立政治大學新聞教育六十週年慶學術研討會》論文集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     蘇蘅（1993）《傳播研究調查法》再版 台北：三民書局
     羅世宏譯（1992）《傳播理論：起源．方法與應用》 台北：時英出版社
     英文部份
     Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman（1974）Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias. Science , 185 pp.1124-1131
     Asp (1983) The Struggle For The Party Agenda,Media Agenda,and Voter Agenda in the 1979 Swedish Election Compaign .Communication Research,10(3), pp.333-355
     Atwood, L. Erwin, Ardyth Sohn and Harold Sohn (1978) Daily newspaper contributions to community discussion, Journalism Quarterly, 55, 570-576.
     Atwood, T. Salwen,M, B., & Anderson,R B.(1985) Media Agenda-setting with environmental issues, Journalism Quarterly, 62, 393-397.
     Becker & Lee & Maxwell McCombs (1978) The role of thepress in determining voter reactions to presidential primaries, Human Communication Research, 4, 301-307.
     Benton, Marc, & P. Jean Frazier (1976) The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of information-holding ,Communication Research. 3, 261-274.
     Bruce Buchanan (1991) Electing a President. Austin, TX: Markle Foundation.
     Chaffee, S ,H & Wilson, D, G(1977) Media Rich, Media Poor: Two Studies of Diversity in Agenda-Setting. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3) pp.466-476
     Choi, H. C. & Becker, S. L.(1987). Media Use, Issue/ Image Discriminations And Voting , Communication Redearch, Vol. 14 , NO.3 : pp.267-291.
     Chung & Tsang（1997）Extending the Concept of Framing:The Discursive Turn Paper Presented to the Conference on “Framing in the New Media Landscape”, The University of South Carolina, Columbus, South Carolina, October 12-14, 1997
     Cohen, David (1975) A report on a non-election agenda setting study Association for Education in Journalism. Ottawa, Canada.
     Van Dijk, T. A.（1980）Macrostructure .Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
     Van Dijk, T. A.（1988a）News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
     Van Dijk, T. A.（1988b）News As Discourse Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
     Entman, Robert (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm Journal of Communication ,3(3)51-58.
     Eyal,C.H, J.p.Winter & W.F.DeGeorge（1981）The Concept of Time Frame in Agenda-Setting , in F.C Wilhoit&H. de Bock, Mass Communication Review Year Book,Vol.2, Sage
     Fowler ,Roger & Kress (1979) Critical linguistics , in Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunter Kress and Tony Trew(1979) Language and Control. London, Boston and Henley：Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.185-213
     Gaffman, E (1974). Frame Analysis：An Essay On The Organization Of experience. Boston :Northeastern University Press.
     Gamson, W. (1989) News as Framing: American Behavioral Scientist, 33:2, p157-161
     Gamson, W., & Lasch, K.(1983 ) The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy. In S.E. Spiro & E. Yaar(Eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State. NY:Academic Press.
     Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
     Ghanem, Salma & Dixie Evatt (1995) Media coverage and public concern about crime: An exploration of the second dimension of agenda setting. World Association for Public Opinion Research. The Hague, The Netherlands. September, 1995.
     Ghanem, Salma(1996) Media Coverage of Crime and Public Opinion: An Exploration of the Second Level of Agenda Setting. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
     Ghanem(1997) Filling in the Tapestry:The Second Level of Agenda Setting.In McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     Giltlin, T.(1980). The Whole Worlds Is Watching: Mass Media in the making & Unmaking of the new Left .CA: University of California Press
     Giltlin, T.(1984) Making Protest Movements Newsworthy. In Graber, D. A.(ed) Media Power in Politics .Washington D. C. :Congressional Quarterly ,1984
     Goffman（1974）Frame analysis:An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Graber,D.（1972）Personal Qualities In Presidential Images：The Contribution Of The Press . Midwest Journal Of Political Science,16 pp.46-76
     Graber,D.（1982）Linking Mass Media and Public Opinion Studies.A Meta-Research Perspective .Paper Presented at the International Communication Association.
     Hill, D. B.（1985）Viewer Characteristics and Agenda-Setting by Television News .Public Opinion Quarterly ,49, pp.340-350
     Hofstetter,C. R. , Zukin, C. , & Buss, T. F.(1978). Political imagery and information in an age of television, Journalism Quarterly 55, pp.562-569.
     Iyengar,S（1988）New directions of agenda-setting research., Communication Yearbook,11,595-602
     Iyengar & Shanto （1991）Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues.Chicago: The University of Chiacago Press.
     Iyengar,S & Kinder,D.R（1985）Psychological accounts of agenda-setting .In S.
     Kraus & R. M. Perloff(Eds.), Mass media and political thout: An information-processing approach (pp.117-140). Beverly Hills, London:Sage.
     Iyengar. S. & Kinder ,D. R（1987）News that matters :Television and American opinion .Chicago :University of Chicago Press.
     Jack Mcleod & Zhongdang Pan Dianne Rucinski （1995）Levels of Analysis in Public Opinion Research , in Public opinion and the communication of consent, edited by Glasser, T. L& Salmon C. T.New York :The Guilford Press
     James R. Beniger & Jodi A. Gusek （1995） The cognitive revolution in pubic opinion and communication research ,in Public opinion and the communication of consent, edited by Glasser, T. L& Salmon C. T.New York :The Guilford Press
     Jensen, K. B （1986） Making Sense of the News, Aarhus :Aarhus university Press
     King,Pu-Tsung(1994) Issue Agenda In The 1992 Taiwan Legislative Election. Unpoblished Doctoral Dissertation,University of Taxes at Austin,Texes.
     Kosicki,G.M.（1993）Problems and Opportunities in Agenda-Setting research. Journal of Communication,43（2）
     Lars Willnat(1997). Agenda-Setting and Priming :Conceptual links and Difference. In McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     Lau (1986) Political schemata, candidate evaluation , and voting behavior, in Lau & R.R & Sear, D. O. et al. Political Cognition , Ch6 pp.95-126
     Lang, G. E. & K. Lang (1981) Watergate: An Exploration of the Agenda-Building Process, in G. Cleveland Wilhoit & Harrold de Bock(eds.)(1981) , Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 2, Sage, pp.447-468
     Lippmann, Walter (1922) Public Opinion, News York: MacMillan
     Maher, Michael (1995) Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue: A Multimethod Approach," Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
     McLeod, J., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E.,（1974）Another Look at the agenda-setting function of the press . Communication Research, I.(2), pp.131-165
     McQuail,D.&S.Windahl（1981）Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communication, New York:Longman Inc.
     McCombs,M.E（1977）The Emergence of American Political Issues:The Agenda-setting Function of the Press. st Paul,Minnesota:West Publishing Co
     McCombs,M.E（1981） The Agenda-setting Approach ,in D.D Nimo&K.R.
     Sanders, The Handbook of Political Communication, Beverly Hills ,London:Sage pp121-140
     McCombs,M.&D.Weaver&E.Einsiedel（1991）Contemporary Public Opinion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associations,Hillsdale,New Jersey
     McCombs,M.E （1992）Explores and surveyors:Expanding strategies for agenda-setting research. .Journalism Quarterly.69(4) p.p813-824
     McCombs,M.E（1995）The media ouside and pictures in our heads:Surveying the
     second dimension of agenda-setting .Manuscript prepared for “ News trends in Comminication” .A conference of the Universita Degli Studi di Roma”La/Saouebza “Rome,Italy.
     McCombs,M.E（1981） The Agenda-Setting Approach. In Nimmo,D.D&Sanders,K.R.,Mass Communication Review Yearbook 2.Newbury Park,CA:Sage, pp.219-224
     McCombs,M.E（1996）The pictures of politics in our heads . Keynote address presented to a National Chengchi University Conference in Taipei, April 28,1996
     McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D.L.(1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36. pp.176-187.
     McCombs,M.E&Evatt,D.（1995）Issue and attributes:Exploring a new dimension in agenda-setting. Manuscript prepares for Communication Y Sociedad,a publication of the University of Navarra in Pamplona,Spain
     McCombs,M.E&L.Maisel-Walters（1976）Agenda-setting:A New Perspective on Mass Commuication,” in Mass Communication Review, 3:3-7
     McCombs,M.E & Shaw（1977） The emerence of American political issues:The agenda-setting function of the press .St. Paul. Minnesota: West Publishing Co..
     McCombs,M.E & Shaw（1993） The evaluation of agenda-setting research:twenty-fuve years in the marketplace of ideas .Journal of Communication.43(2)
     McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Fronteris in Agenda-Setting Theory.London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     McComb, M. E & Weaver, D. H（1973）Voters’ need for orientation and use of mass communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
     Morley, D.（1980）The Nationwilde Audience: Structure and Decording. Brithish Film Institute Television monographs, aa, London :BFI.
     Mullins, L. E.（1977）Ageda-Setting and the Young Voter In Donald L. Shaw and Maxwell E. McCombs(eds.) The Emergence of Amwrican Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of The Press. St Paul. Minnesota: West Publishing Co.
     Nimmo,D.&Savage,R.L.（1976）.Candidates and their images:concepts,methods,and findings.Santa Monica,CA:Goodyear Publishing Company,Inc.,
     Noelle-Neumann, E. & Mathes, R.（1987） The “event as event” and the “event s news”: The significance of “ consonance“ for media effects research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 391-414
     Patterson & McLure（1976）The unseeing Eye:The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York:Putnam
     Reese,S.D.（1991）Setting the media‘s agenda:A power balance perspective. Communication Yearbook,14:pp309-339
     Robinson, M. J., & Sheehan, M,A.（1983）Over the write and on TV: CBS and UPI in compaign ’80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
     Rogers,E.M.,&Dearing,J.M.（1988） Agenda-setting research:Where has it been, where is it go? Communication Yearbook,11:pp555-594
     Rogers,E.M,&Bregman,Dearing.（1993） The anatomy of agenda-setting research .Journal of Communication,43（2）
     Swanson, D. L.（1988） Feeling the elephant:Some observation on agenda-setting reserch. Communication Yearbook ,11, pp.603-619.
     Takeshita(1997) Exploring the Media’s Roles in Defining Reality: From Issue-Agenda Setting. To Attribute-Agenda Setting. In McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory .London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     Takeshita, Toshio & Shunji Mikami (1995). How Did Mass Media Influence the Voters` Choice in the 1993 General Election in Japan?: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Keio Communication Review No. 17,27-41.
     Tankard, J. W. J., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
     Tannen, D.(Ed.) (1993) Framing in Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University. Press Trew.（1979）What The Papers Say: Linguistic Variation And Ideological Difference , in Fowler and others(Eds.) Language And Control, London: Routlege & Kegan Paul
     King,Pu-tsung.（1994）Issue agenda in the 1992 Taiwan legislative election. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation , University of Taxes at Austin Taxes
     Weaver , D.,（1978）Need for orientation,media uses and gratification,and media effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international Communication Association, Chicago.
     Weaver , D., Graber, D. A., McCmbs, M. E., & Eyal ,C . H.（1981）Media Agenda-setting in a president election: Issues , images and interest . New York :Praeger.
     Winter, J. P. (1981) Contingent Conditions in the Agenda_setting by Television News.. Public Opinion Quartely Vol.49:340-350
     Wyer , R. S. J., & Strull,T.K. (1981) Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna（Eds.）, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Higgns & King (1981) Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information-Processing consequence of individual and context variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom(Eds.) Personality ,cognition and social interaction . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Weiss,H.J（1992）Public issue and argumentation structures:An approach to the study of the contents of media agenda-setting. Communication Yearbook,15
     Zucker, H, G.（1978）The variable nature of news media influence In B, D. Rubin(Ed.), Communication Yearbook,2
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞學系
85451016
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001587
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 金溥聰zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor King, Pu Tsungen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳芸芸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tracy Chenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳芸芸zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Tracyen_US
dc.date (日期) 1998en_US
dc.date.accessioned 20-Apr-2016 14:23:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-Apr-2016 14:23:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-Apr-2016 14:23:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002001587en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85667-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 85451016zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 　　本論文是台灣地區首篇以「議題設定理論第二層次」中的「媒介議題屬性設定效果」為主旨的實證研究。論文以「台北市公娼存廢議題」做為分析個案，目的在於驗證「媒介設定公娼議題的第二層次效果」。研究方法係以報紙內容分析與民意調查兩種方式，檢驗報紙所強調報導的屬性，是否也是民眾腦海中比較凸顯的屬性。研究結果證實了媒介的議題屬性設定效果。其他主要發現如下：zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 致謝-----1
     論文摘要-----3
     目次-----4
     圖表目次-----7
     第一章　緒論-----9
     　　第一節　研究動機與目的-----9
     　　第二節　論文大綱-----13
     第二章　文獻探討-----14
     　　第一節　理論源起及對傳播研究的意義-----15
     　　第二節　議題設定的效果層次-----17
     　　第三節　議題設定理論研究的發展-----18
     　　　　壹、媒介議題、公眾議題與政策議題-----19
     　　　　貳、議題設定理論的整合與擴展-----19
     　　第四節　議題設定理論的第二層次-----21
     　　　　壹、議題設定理論第二層次的基本概念-----21
     　　　　貳、第二層次與其他相關理論的結合-----25
     　　　　參、與第二層次理論相關之文獻與研究證據-----39
     　　　　肆、小結-----53
     　　第五節　研究問題與研究架構-----57
     第三章　研究方法-----64
     　　第一節　公娼議題新聞內容分析-----64
     　　　　壹、媒介文本資料蒐集-----64
     　　　　貳、登錄類目-----65
     　　第二節　民意調查-----71
     　　　　壹、抽樣方式與調查方式-----71
     　　　　貳、問卷內容及變項-----73
     　　　　參、樣本檢定-----74
     　　第三節　統計分析方法-----77
     第四章　報紙議題屬性分析-----78
     　　第一節　整體新聞資料描述-----78
     　　第二節　報紙整體公娼議題報導分析-----79
     　　第三節　各報公娼議題報導屬性分析-----83
     第五章　選民認知的議題屬性-----88
     　　第一節　受訪者資料概述-----88
     　　　　壹、人口變項-----88
     　　　　貳、媒介使用行為-----91
     　　第二節　民眾對公娼議題的認知-----94
     　　　　壹、民眾對於廢娼政策的立場-----94
     　　　　貳、受訪者對於公娼議題屬性的認知-----95
     第六章　第二層次議題設定效果-----100
     　　　　第一節　第二層次議題設定效果分析-----100
     　　　　第二節　第二層次效果影響因素分析-----104
     第七章　結論與建議-----107
     　　第一節　研究發現-----108
     　　　　壹、媒介所強調的公娼議題屬性-----108
     　　　　貳、公眾所認知的公娼議題屬性-----109
     　　　　參、媒介的第二層次議題設定效果-----111
     　　　　肆、影響媒介第二層次議題設定效果的因素-----112
     　　第二節　研究限制及未來研究建議-----114
     參考書目-----119
     附錄一　台北市公娼事件大事紀-----128
     附錄二　報紙議題內容分析編碼資料-----131
     　　　　報紙公娼議題內容分析登錄表-----135
     　　　　報紙公娼議題內容分析編碼說明-----136
     附錄三　公娼議題民意調查資料-----139
     　　　　公娼議題民意調查問卷-----139
     　　　　公娼議題民意調查受訪者認知觀點說明-----148
     
     圖表目次
     圖目次
     圖2-1：議題設定的兩種層次以及三種效果-----23
     圖2-2：McCombs對於新聞框架的分類-----35
     圖2-3：新聞框架的面向-----54
     圖2-4：議題設定第二層次的核心概念-----55
     圖2-5：研究架構圖-----63
     圖4-1：整體報紙公娼議題報導屬性次數分配圖-----82
     圖4-2：整體報紙公娼議題報導屬性比例分配圖-----82
     圖4-3：中時、聯合及自由時報公娼議題報導屬性比例分配圖-----87
     圖5-1：台北市民最常閱讀的前五名報紙-----93
     圖5-2：受訪者對公娼存廢政策的立場-----94
     圖5-3：全體受訪者對公娼議題的屬性認知-----96
     
     表目次
     表2-1：議題設定第二層次相關文獻中所分析之屬性-----52
     表3-1：電話訪問記錄-----73
     表3-2：樣本與母體的性別Z檢定結果表-----76
     表4-1：整體報紙公娼議題報導屬性統計表-----83
     表4-2：中國時報公娼議題報導屬性統計表-----84
     表4-3：聯合報公娼議題報導屬性統計表-----85
     表4-4：自由時報公娼議題報導屬性統計表-----86
     表5-1：受訪者性別分佈-----89
     表5-2：受訪者年齡分佈-----89
     表5-3：受訪者教育程度分佈-----90
     表5-4：受訪者省籍分佈-----90
     表5-5：受訪者政黨傾向-----90
     表5-6：每週收看電視新聞的頻率-----91
     表5-7：每週閱讀報紙的頻率-----91
     表5-8：那你都是看什麼報紙比較多-----92
     表5-9：全體受訪者對公娼議題的屬性認知-----95
     表5-10：那你為什麼會支持，台北市政府廢除公娼的政策-----97
     表5-11：那你為什麼不支持，台北市政府廢除公娼的政策-----98
     表5-12：無明顯立場受訪者所想到的公娼議題屬性-----99
     表6-1：全體受訪者對公娼議題的屬性認知與報紙屬性相關程度表-----101
     表6-2：各報讀者對公娼議題的屬性認知與報紙屬性相關程度表-----103
     表6-3：不同次群體受訪者的報紙屬性設定效果檢驗-----107		zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001587en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 議題設定zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公娼zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公娼存廢議題zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 屬性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 形象zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 第二層次zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) agenda-settingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) attributesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) imageen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) second dimensionen_US
dc.title (題名) 議題設定理論第二層次探析－以台北市公娼存廢議題為例zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份
     王石番（1991）《傳播內容分析法－理論與實證》 台北：幼獅文化事業
     牟迎馨（1997）《新聞跨媒體影響力之探析－以晚報與無線電視晚間新聞為例》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     行政院主計處（1998.10）《中華民國台灣地區人力資源統計月報》第300期
     台北：行政院主計處出版
     吳統雄（1995）傳播與投票行為：「選民結構」與「形象投票」新理論建構 《政治大學新聞教育六十週年學術研討會論文集》 台北：國立政治大學新聞學系
     金溥聰（1997）報紙的形象設定效果研究：以83年台北市市長選舉為例《新聞學研究》第五十五集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     金溥聰（1998）一九九六總統候選人形象分析 收錄於金溥聰（1998）主編《總統選舉與新聞報導》台北：國立政治大學新聞學系
     金溥聰（1998）選戰與候選人形象 台北：國立政治大學廣告系第六屆廣告與公共關係學術研討會
     林清山（1992）《心理與教育統計學》台北：東華書局
     胡晉翔（1994），《消息來源策略對社會運動的影響：框架理論的觀點》，台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
     胡淑裕（1985）《大眾傳播媒介塑造政治人物形象之研究---孫運璿、林洋港、李登輝之個案分析》 台北：中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     李天任 藍莘等譯（1995）《大眾媒體研究》
     李茂政（1981）《台灣地區新聞媒介議題設定功能研究》台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     李慧馨（1998）《框架害怕犯罪》論文發表於中華傳播學會1998年會 1998.6.28-6.30
     李郁青（1996）《媒介議題設定效果的第二面向：候選人形象設定效果研究》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     林芳玫（1995）師大強暴「疑」案報紙報導之分析：誰是加害者？誰是受害者？ 《新聞學研究》第五十一集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     林芳玫（1998）當代台灣婦運的認同政治︰以公娼存廢爭議為例《中外文學》第27卷第1期 1998年6月號
     林珍良（1994）《新聞言說結構對資訊處理策略影響之研究》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     高振盛（1991）《電視廣告議題設定效果之初探》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     翁秀琪（1992）《大眾傳播理論與實證》 台北：三民書局
     翁秀琪（1997）批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析：宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析 論文發表於1997.6.18中華傳播學會九七年會
     徐火炎（1991）政黨認同與投票抉擇：台灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好與黨派投票行為之分析 《人文及社會科學集刊》，第四卷一期，頁1-57
     徐惠玲（1982）《我國報紙議題設定功能之研究：以六十九年增額中央民意代表選舉政見為例》台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     陳世敏（1992）候選人形象與選民投票行為 《新聞學研究》第四十六集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     陳雅雯（1998.3.21） 誰站在公娼的背後《破報》
     陳韻如（1993）《新聞事件的意義建構與受眾認知關係之研究：從受眾推論看新聞框架之影響》台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     陳靜芬（1997）《一九九六總統大選期間之議題探析--議題設定理論的觀點》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     許禎元（1997）《政治研究方法與統計－SPSS for Windows的實例操作》 台北：五南圖書出版公司
     張卿卿（1998）《政治競選廣告的議題設定與預示效果》 台北：國立政治大學廣告系第六屆廣告與公共關係研討會
     黃淑玲（1998）〈婦運那堪「反反色情」〉《騷動》第五期 1998年3月
     游盈隆（1994）政黨形象、意識型態與台灣選舉變遷 《中央研究院民族研究所集刊第七十八集》
     廖淑伶（1990）《議題設定效果因素之探討：媒介特性、人口變項、傳播行為與大眾媒介議題之關聯性分析—以大台北地區為例》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     劉恩良（1997）媒介對國發會「議題設定」與「引爆」的功能—兼論對大專學生政治態度之影響 《民意研究季刊》201期
     臧國仁（1998）新聞報導與真實建構：新聞框架理論的觀點 論文發表於中華傳播學會1998年會 1998.6.28-6.30
     臧國仁、鍾蔚文（1997） 框架概念與公共關係策略－有關運用媒介框架的探析《廣告學研究》第九集 頁99-128
     蔡美瑛（1995）議題設定理論之發展－從領域遷徙、理論延展到理論整合 《新聞學研究》第五十集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     蔡素蓉（1997）《閱聽人的情態與自我基模對電視新聞訊息處理之影響》 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
     楊意菁（1997）《民意理論與研究取向—一個微觀鉅觀多元層級觀點的整合》 論文發表於 台北:中華傳播學會97年會
     潘家慶、王石番、謝瀛春、鄭自隆（1995）《台灣地區民眾傳播行為研究》，台北：行政院國科會研究報告
     蕭永勝（1991）《議題設定功能之研究：以第八次國大代表集會為例》台北：私立輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文
     鍾蔚文（1992）《從媒介真實到主觀真實：看新聞，怎麼看？看到什麼》 台北：正中書局
     鍾蔚文、臧國仁、陳憶寧、柏松齡、王昭敏（1996） 台大Ａ片事件的多重真實：框架理論的再思 《國立政治大學新聞教育六十週年慶學術研討會》論文集 台北：國立政治大學新聞研究所
     蘇蘅（1993）《傳播研究調查法》再版 台北：三民書局
     羅世宏譯（1992）《傳播理論：起源．方法與應用》 台北：時英出版社
     英文部份
     Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman（1974）Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and bias. Science , 185 pp.1124-1131
     Asp (1983) The Struggle For The Party Agenda,Media Agenda,and Voter Agenda in the 1979 Swedish Election Compaign .Communication Research,10(3), pp.333-355
     Atwood, L. Erwin, Ardyth Sohn and Harold Sohn (1978) Daily newspaper contributions to community discussion, Journalism Quarterly, 55, 570-576.
     Atwood, T. Salwen,M, B., & Anderson,R B.(1985) Media Agenda-setting with environmental issues, Journalism Quarterly, 62, 393-397.
     Becker & Lee & Maxwell McCombs (1978) The role of thepress in determining voter reactions to presidential primaries, Human Communication Research, 4, 301-307.
     Benton, Marc, & P. Jean Frazier (1976) The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of information-holding ,Communication Research. 3, 261-274.
     Bruce Buchanan (1991) Electing a President. Austin, TX: Markle Foundation.
     Chaffee, S ,H & Wilson, D, G(1977) Media Rich, Media Poor: Two Studies of Diversity in Agenda-Setting. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3) pp.466-476
     Choi, H. C. & Becker, S. L.(1987). Media Use, Issue/ Image Discriminations And Voting , Communication Redearch, Vol. 14 , NO.3 : pp.267-291.
     Chung & Tsang（1997）Extending the Concept of Framing:The Discursive Turn Paper Presented to the Conference on “Framing in the New Media Landscape”, The University of South Carolina, Columbus, South Carolina, October 12-14, 1997
     Cohen, David (1975) A report on a non-election agenda setting study Association for Education in Journalism. Ottawa, Canada.
     Van Dijk, T. A.（1980）Macrostructure .Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
     Van Dijk, T. A.（1988a）News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
     Van Dijk, T. A.（1988b）News As Discourse Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum
     Entman, Robert (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm Journal of Communication ,3(3)51-58.
     Eyal,C.H, J.p.Winter & W.F.DeGeorge（1981）The Concept of Time Frame in Agenda-Setting , in F.C Wilhoit&H. de Bock, Mass Communication Review Year Book,Vol.2, Sage
     Fowler ,Roger & Kress (1979) Critical linguistics , in Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunter Kress and Tony Trew(1979) Language and Control. London, Boston and Henley：Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp.185-213
     Gaffman, E (1974). Frame Analysis：An Essay On The Organization Of experience. Boston :Northeastern University Press.
     Gamson, W. (1989) News as Framing: American Behavioral Scientist, 33:2, p157-161
     Gamson, W., & Lasch, K.(1983 ) The Political Culture of Social Welfare Policy. In S.E. Spiro & E. Yaar(Eds.), Evaluating the Welfare State. NY:Academic Press.
     Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
     Ghanem, Salma & Dixie Evatt (1995) Media coverage and public concern about crime: An exploration of the second dimension of agenda setting. World Association for Public Opinion Research. The Hague, The Netherlands. September, 1995.
     Ghanem, Salma(1996) Media Coverage of Crime and Public Opinion: An Exploration of the Second Level of Agenda Setting. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
     Ghanem(1997) Filling in the Tapestry:The Second Level of Agenda Setting.In McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     Giltlin, T.(1980). The Whole Worlds Is Watching: Mass Media in the making & Unmaking of the new Left .CA: University of California Press
     Giltlin, T.(1984) Making Protest Movements Newsworthy. In Graber, D. A.(ed) Media Power in Politics .Washington D. C. :Congressional Quarterly ,1984
     Goffman（1974）Frame analysis:An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     Graber,D.（1972）Personal Qualities In Presidential Images：The Contribution Of The Press . Midwest Journal Of Political Science,16 pp.46-76
     Graber,D.（1982）Linking Mass Media and Public Opinion Studies.A Meta-Research Perspective .Paper Presented at the International Communication Association.
     Hill, D. B.（1985）Viewer Characteristics and Agenda-Setting by Television News .Public Opinion Quarterly ,49, pp.340-350
     Hofstetter,C. R. , Zukin, C. , & Buss, T. F.(1978). Political imagery and information in an age of television, Journalism Quarterly 55, pp.562-569.
     Iyengar,S（1988）New directions of agenda-setting research., Communication Yearbook,11,595-602
     Iyengar & Shanto （1991）Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues.Chicago: The University of Chiacago Press.
     Iyengar,S & Kinder,D.R（1985）Psychological accounts of agenda-setting .In S.
     Kraus & R. M. Perloff(Eds.), Mass media and political thout: An information-processing approach (pp.117-140). Beverly Hills, London:Sage.
     Iyengar. S. & Kinder ,D. R（1987）News that matters :Television and American opinion .Chicago :University of Chicago Press.
     Jack Mcleod & Zhongdang Pan Dianne Rucinski （1995）Levels of Analysis in Public Opinion Research , in Public opinion and the communication of consent, edited by Glasser, T. L& Salmon C. T.New York :The Guilford Press
     James R. Beniger & Jodi A. Gusek （1995） The cognitive revolution in pubic opinion and communication research ,in Public opinion and the communication of consent, edited by Glasser, T. L& Salmon C. T.New York :The Guilford Press
     Jensen, K. B （1986） Making Sense of the News, Aarhus :Aarhus university Press
     King,Pu-Tsung(1994) Issue Agenda In The 1992 Taiwan Legislative Election. Unpoblished Doctoral Dissertation,University of Taxes at Austin,Texes.
     Kosicki,G.M.（1993）Problems and Opportunities in Agenda-Setting research. Journal of Communication,43（2）
     Lars Willnat(1997). Agenda-Setting and Priming :Conceptual links and Difference. In McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     Lau (1986) Political schemata, candidate evaluation , and voting behavior, in Lau & R.R & Sear, D. O. et al. Political Cognition , Ch6 pp.95-126
     Lang, G. E. & K. Lang (1981) Watergate: An Exploration of the Agenda-Building Process, in G. Cleveland Wilhoit & Harrold de Bock(eds.)(1981) , Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 2, Sage, pp.447-468
     Lippmann, Walter (1922) Public Opinion, News York: MacMillan
     Maher, Michael (1995) Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue: A Multimethod Approach," Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
     McLeod, J., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E.,（1974）Another Look at the agenda-setting function of the press . Communication Research, I.(2), pp.131-165
     McQuail,D.&S.Windahl（1981）Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communication, New York:Longman Inc.
     McCombs,M.E（1977）The Emergence of American Political Issues:The Agenda-setting Function of the Press. st Paul,Minnesota:West Publishing Co
     McCombs,M.E（1981） The Agenda-setting Approach ,in D.D Nimo&K.R.
     Sanders, The Handbook of Political Communication, Beverly Hills ,London:Sage pp121-140
     McCombs,M.&D.Weaver&E.Einsiedel（1991）Contemporary Public Opinion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associations,Hillsdale,New Jersey
     McCombs,M.E （1992）Explores and surveyors:Expanding strategies for agenda-setting research. .Journalism Quarterly.69(4) p.p813-824
     McCombs,M.E（1995）The media ouside and pictures in our heads:Surveying the
     second dimension of agenda-setting .Manuscript prepared for “ News trends in Comminication” .A conference of the Universita Degli Studi di Roma”La/Saouebza “Rome,Italy.
     McCombs,M.E（1981） The Agenda-Setting Approach. In Nimmo,D.D&Sanders,K.R.,Mass Communication Review Yearbook 2.Newbury Park,CA:Sage, pp.219-224
     McCombs,M.E（1996）The pictures of politics in our heads . Keynote address presented to a National Chengchi University Conference in Taipei, April 28,1996
     McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D.L.(1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36. pp.176-187.
     McCombs,M.E&Evatt,D.（1995）Issue and attributes:Exploring a new dimension in agenda-setting. Manuscript prepares for Communication Y Sociedad,a publication of the University of Navarra in Pamplona,Spain
     McCombs,M.E&L.Maisel-Walters（1976）Agenda-setting:A New Perspective on Mass Commuication,” in Mass Communication Review, 3:3-7
     McCombs,M.E & Shaw（1977） The emerence of American political issues:The agenda-setting function of the press .St. Paul. Minnesota: West Publishing Co..
     McCombs,M.E & Shaw（1993） The evaluation of agenda-setting research:twenty-fuve years in the marketplace of ideas .Journal of Communication.43(2)
     McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Fronteris in Agenda-Setting Theory.London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     McComb, M. E & Weaver, D. H（1973）Voters’ need for orientation and use of mass communication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal.
     Morley, D.（1980）The Nationwilde Audience: Structure and Decording. Brithish Film Institute Television monographs, aa, London :BFI.
     Mullins, L. E.（1977）Ageda-Setting and the Young Voter In Donald L. Shaw and Maxwell E. McCombs(eds.) The Emergence of Amwrican Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of The Press. St Paul. Minnesota: West Publishing Co.
     Nimmo,D.&Savage,R.L.（1976）.Candidates and their images:concepts,methods,and findings.Santa Monica,CA:Goodyear Publishing Company,Inc.,
     Noelle-Neumann, E. & Mathes, R.（1987） The “event as event” and the “event s news”: The significance of “ consonance“ for media effects research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 391-414
     Patterson & McLure（1976）The unseeing Eye:The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York:Putnam
     Reese,S.D.（1991）Setting the media‘s agenda:A power balance perspective. Communication Yearbook,14:pp309-339
     Robinson, M. J., & Sheehan, M,A.（1983）Over the write and on TV: CBS and UPI in compaign ’80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
     Rogers,E.M.,&Dearing,J.M.（1988） Agenda-setting research:Where has it been, where is it go? Communication Yearbook,11:pp555-594
     Rogers,E.M,&Bregman,Dearing.（1993） The anatomy of agenda-setting research .Journal of Communication,43（2）
     Swanson, D. L.（1988） Feeling the elephant:Some observation on agenda-setting reserch. Communication Yearbook ,11, pp.603-619.
     Takeshita(1997) Exploring the Media’s Roles in Defining Reality: From Issue-Agenda Setting. To Attribute-Agenda Setting. In McCombs, M.E&Shaw ,D.l . Weaver, D. H（1997）Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory .London :Lawrence Erlbaum Association ,Publishers
     Takeshita, Toshio & Shunji Mikami (1995). How Did Mass Media Influence the Voters` Choice in the 1993 General Election in Japan?: A Study of Agenda-Setting, Keio Communication Review No. 17,27-41.
     Tankard, J. W. J., Hendrickson, L., Silberman, J., Bliss, K., & Ghanem, S. (1991). Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
     Tannen, D.(Ed.) (1993) Framing in Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University. Press Trew.（1979）What The Papers Say: Linguistic Variation And Ideological Difference , in Fowler and others(Eds.) Language And Control, London: Routlege & Kegan Paul
     King,Pu-tsung.（1994）Issue agenda in the 1992 Taiwan legislative election. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation , University of Taxes at Austin Taxes
     Weaver , D.,（1978）Need for orientation,media uses and gratification,and media effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international Communication Association, Chicago.
     Weaver , D., Graber, D. A., McCmbs, M. E., & Eyal ,C . H.（1981）Media Agenda-setting in a president election: Issues , images and interest . New York :Praeger.
     Winter, J. P. (1981) Contingent Conditions in the Agenda_setting by Television News.. Public Opinion Quartely Vol.49:340-350
     Wyer , R. S. J., & Strull,T.K. (1981) Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna（Eds.）, Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Higgns & King (1981) Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information-Processing consequence of individual and context variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom(Eds.) Personality ,cognition and social interaction . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     Weiss,H.J（1992）Public issue and argumentation structures:An approach to the study of the contents of media agenda-setting. Communication Yearbook,15
     Zucker, H, G.（1978）The variable nature of news media influence In B, D. Rubin(Ed.), Communication Yearbook,2		zh_TW