學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 由多面向觀點探討理性思考與感性人格的關係
A Study on The Relationship of Rational Thinking And Affective Personality Traits: From A Multidimensional Perspective
作者 汪慧瑜
Wang, Hui Yu
貢獻者 詹志禹
Jason Chan, C.
汪慧瑜
Wang, Hui Yu
關鍵詞 多面向
理性思考
感性人格特質
批判思考
情緒化
人際敏感
情感表達
美感傾向
Multidimensional
Rational thinking
Affective personality traits
critical thinking
emotionality
日期 1995
上傳時間 28-Apr-2016 15:26:39 (UTC+8)
摘要   本研究視理性思考與感性人格特質為多面向的結構,探討理性思考與感性人格特質各面向間的關係,並研究個人的性別、學科背景是否與其理性思考及感性人格特質有關。
  The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship of rational thinking, consisted of critical thinking dimension and creative thinking dimension, and affective personality traits, consisted of four positive dimensions and one negative dimension, from a multidimensional perspective, and to examine if one`s sex and major would have influence on his/her rational thinking and affective personality traits. Tests were administered to 386 college students, evaluating their levels of critical thinking, creative thinking, interpersonal sensitivity, aesthetic orientation, emotioanl expressivity, empathy and emotionality. Findings suggest that: (1) Subjects scoring high on Rational thinking have significant high scores in positive dimensions of affective personality traits, but it seems that rational thinking is not related to the negative dimension of affective personality traits. (2) There is no significant sex difference in rational thinking, meanwhile in affective personality traits, female score obviously higher in aesthetic orientation, empathy, and emotionality, and there is no significant sex difference in emotional expressivity, but male score higher in interpersonal sensitivity. (3) Students in different majors don`t have significant differences in their critical thinking, creative thinking, and rational thinking abilities, but students majoring art and literature surely score higher in emotionality and aesthetic orientation dimensions than students majoring nature science or other subjects.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育學系
82152008
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002778
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 詹志禹zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Jason Chan, C.en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 汪慧瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Hui Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 汪慧瑜zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Hui Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 1995en_US
dc.date.accessioned 28-Apr-2016 15:26:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-Apr-2016 15:26:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Apr-2016 15:26:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) B2002002778en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87678-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 82152008zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   本研究視理性思考與感性人格特質為多面向的結構,探討理性思考與感性人格特質各面向間的關係,並研究個人的性別、學科背景是否與其理性思考及感性人格特質有關。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   The objectives of this study were to explore the relationship of rational thinking, consisted of critical thinking dimension and creative thinking dimension, and affective personality traits, consisted of four positive dimensions and one negative dimension, from a multidimensional perspective, and to examine if one`s sex and major would have influence on his/her rational thinking and affective personality traits. Tests were administered to 386 college students, evaluating their levels of critical thinking, creative thinking, interpersonal sensitivity, aesthetic orientation, emotioanl expressivity, empathy and emotionality. Findings suggest that: (1) Subjects scoring high on Rational thinking have significant high scores in positive dimensions of affective personality traits, but it seems that rational thinking is not related to the negative dimension of affective personality traits. (2) There is no significant sex difference in rational thinking, meanwhile in affective personality traits, female score obviously higher in aesthetic orientation, empathy, and emotionality, and there is no significant sex difference in emotional expressivity, but male score higher in interpersonal sensitivity. (3) Students in different majors don`t have significant differences in their critical thinking, creative thinking, and rational thinking abilities, but students majoring art and literature surely score higher in emotionality and aesthetic orientation dimensions than students majoring nature science or other subjects.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭
     論文摘要
     目錄
     圖表目錄
     第一章 緒論-----1
       第一節 研究動機與目的-----1
       第二節 重要名詞之概念界定及其操作型測量-----8
     第二章 文獻探討-----11
       第一節 『理性』概念之探討-----11
       第二節 『感性』概念之探討-----40
       第三節 有關創造思考、批判思考及感性人格的關係之實證研究-----62
       第四節 性別、學科背景對理性思考及感性人格之影響-----66
     第三章 研究問題與假設-----85
     第四章 研究方法-----87
       第一節 研究對象-----87
       第二節 研究工具-----87
       第三節 前導研究-----96
       第四節 研究程序-----103
       第五節 資料處理-----104
     第五章 研究結果-----106
       第一節 理性思考各面向與感性人格各面向之間的關係-----106
       第二節 性別與學科背景變項在理性思考與感性人格上的差異-----108
     第六章 討論與建議-----113
       第一節 結果討論-----113
       第二節 本研究對教育的意義及建議-----120
       第三節 研究限制-----125
       第四節 對未來研究的建議-----126
     參考書目-----128
     附錄-----146
       附錄一 高層次思考、人格及興趣測驗-----146
     
     圖表目錄
     圖目錄
     圖1-1:理性與感性的性別差異刻板印象漫畫
     圖2-1:Popper的「科學知識增長圖」
     圖2-2:Kuhn的「科學革命過程圖」
     圖2-3:Norris & Ennis的「批判思考過程圖」
     圖2-4:Norris & Ennis的「批判、創造和良好思考的關係圖」
     圖2-5:Swarts & Perkins的「思考領域圖」
     圖2-6:李雄揮的「移情作用理論圖」
     圖2-7:Keefe的「同理心技巧行為圖」
     
     表目錄
     表2-1:Moshman的「演繹理性發展過程表」
     表2-2:Moshman的「歸納理性發展過程表」
     表2-3:有關性別與創造思考的實證研究一覽表
     表2-4:有關性別與批判思考的實證研究一覽表
     表2-5:有關學科領域與批判思考的實證研究一覽表
     表2-6:有關性別與感性各面向的實證研究一覽表
     表2-7:Petty & Cacioppo的「心情與說服過程模式表」
     表4-1:受試樣本分佈表
     表4-2:感性人格量表的信度及試題分析表
     表4-3:感性人格各面向之間的關係表
     表4-4:前導研究樣本分佈表
     表4-5:評分員劃記結果表
     表4-6:評分員的評分一致性表
     表4-7:兩位評分者評閱創造思考之相關表
     表4-8:兩位評分者評閱創造思考之t檢定表
     表5-1:理性思考各面向與感性人格各面向之間的相關矩陣
     表5-2:先放性別因子的二因子(學院別*性別)多變量變異數分析摘要表
     表5-3:先放學院別因子的二因子(性別*學院別)多變量變異數分析摘要表
     表5-4:不同性別學院別的理性思考及感性人格的原始平均數及標準差
     表5-5:學科領域在「人際敏感」及「情緒化」面向上的變異數差異事後比較表
zh_TW
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002778en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 多面向zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 理性思考zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 感性人格特質zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 批判思考zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情緒化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人際敏感zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情感表達zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美感傾向zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Multidimensionalen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rational thinkingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Affective personality traitsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) critical thinkingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) emotionalityen_US
dc.title (題名) 由多面向觀點探討理性思考與感性人格的關係zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on The Relationship of Rational Thinking And Affective Personality Traits: From A Multidimensional Perspectiveen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US