Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132538


Title: 導入IAS 40對審計公費之影響
The Effect of IAS 40 on Audit Fees
Authors: 林嬋娟
Lin, Chan-Jane
王炫斌
Wang, Hsuan-Pin
Contributors: 會計評論
Keywords: 投資性不動產 ; 外部鑑價 ; 公允價值模式 ; 審計公費 
 Investment property ; External appraisal ; Fair value model ; Audit fees
Date: 2019-07
Issue Date: 2020-11-13 10:21:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 國際會計準則第40號「投資性不動產」(簡稱IAS 40)允許企業在投資性不動產之會計處理方面有兩個選擇:(1)關於後續衡量基礎,企業可選擇公允價值模式或成本模式;(2)關於公允價值之依據來源,企業可選擇外部鑑價或企業內部自行評估。本研究以我國導入IAS 40為例,探討前述雙重選擇對於會計師公費之影響。本研究實證結果發現,當企業以成本模式作為後續衡量基礎時,採用外部鑑價有助於減緩審計公費增漲之幅度或使審計公費呈現相對減少之趨勢。惟企業若選擇外部鑑價時,採用公允價值模式並未顯著增加審計公費。本研究實證結果對我國非金融資產導入公允價值會計對審計公費之影響提供初步證據。
International Accounting Standard 40 (IAS 40) permits firms to have dual choices about the accounting for investment property: (1) For measurement subsequent to initial recognition, firms can choose between a fair value model and a cost model; (2) For fair value determination, firms can choose to employ external appraisers or determine the values themselves. Using Taiwanese data, this study examines the effect of the above choices on audit fees after the adoption of IAS 40. The empirical results show that the audit fees of firms using cost model exhibit a relative decrease or smaller increase if they hire external appraisers, while the audit fees of firms employing external appraisers are not significantly increased if they choose a fair value model. This paper provides preliminary evidence as to the effect on audit fees of implementing fair value accounting for nonfinancial assets.
Relation: 會計評論, 69, 43-82
Data Type: article
DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.201907_(69).0002 
Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2.pdf1155KbAdobe PDF30View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing