Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32526
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳彰儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChen, Chang-Yien_US
dc.contributor.author蘇倍儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorSu, Pei Ien_US
dc.creator蘇倍儀zh_TW
dc.creatorSu, Pei Ien_US
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T05:20:11Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T05:20:11Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T05:20:11Z-
dc.identifierG0917520101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32526-
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description心理學研究所zh_TW
dc.description91752010zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究欲瞭解在模擬招募情境中,兩個薪資特徵-「變動薪資比例」\n與「加薪型態」,分別對組織吸引力之影響,並探討此兩組關係中「風險\n知覺」的中介效果與「性格變項(核心自我評價)」的調節效果。本研究\n採2x2 受試者間之實驗設計,所操弄的二個獨變項為:1.變動薪資比例\n(高、低);2.加薪型態(高機率低加薪、低機率高加薪),依變項為整\n體「組織吸引力」及其三個向度(組織正向情感、雇主評價、求職行動\n意圖)。\n 本研究之受試者為139 位大學應屆畢業生,研究結果顯示:「變動薪\n資比例」越高,受試者感受的「風險知覺」越高;但「加薪型態」與受\n試者的「風險知覺」無顯著關係。當受試者的「風險知覺」較高時,其\n組織正向情感、雇主評價則較低;然而,變動薪資比例、加薪型態與組\n織吸引力無顯著關係。雖然核心自我評價並沒有調節「變動薪資比例」\n或「加薪型態」與組織吸引力的關係;可是核心自我評價卻調節「風險\n知覺」與整體組織吸引力與其二個子向度(組織正向情感、求職行動意\n圖)的關係。\n 研究者分別就結果加以討論,提出可能的解釋,並說明本研究之限\n制與貢獻。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an experimental investigation of the influences of type of variable pay ratio and type of pay increases on overall organizational attraction and its three dimensions: affection, intentions toward the company and company prestige. A 2x2 between subjects design was used. Two independent variables were types of variable pay ratio (high/ low) and types of pay increases (high probability, small pay increases/ low probability, large pay increases). The dependent variable was organizational attraction. Risk perception and core self-evaluation were mediating and moderating variable,\nrespectively.\n The sample comprised 139 college students approaching graduation. The results demonstrated that higher variable pay ratio caused higher risk perception but type of pay increases did not. Higher risk perception caused lower affection, company prestige; however, type of variable pay ratio and type of pay increases did not. Core self-evaluation did not mediate the relationship between type of variable pay ratio and risk perception, but it mediated the relationship between risk perception and overall organizational attraction and its two of three dimensions (affection, intentions toward the company). Based on the results, alternative explanation, limits, and\nimplications were discussed.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論..................................................1\n第一節 研究動機與目的........................................1\n第二節 文獻探討..............................................5\n第三節 研究架構與研究假設...................................26 第二章 研究方法.............................................28\n第一節 研究樣本.............................................28\n第二節 研究程序.............................................31\n第三節 變項操弄與測量.......................................36\n第三章 研究結果.............................................44\n第一節 操弄檢核.............................................44\n第二節 隨機分派之檢驗.......................................46\n第三節 信度及相關分析.......................................48\n第四節 研究問題之驗證.......................................51\n第五節 其他結果分析.........................................59\n第四章 綜合討論.............................................64\n第一節 研究摘述.............................................64\n第二節 研究結果討論.........................................67\n第三節 研究限制.............................................71\n第四節 研究貢獻.............................................74\n參考文獻....................................................76\n附錄一 實驗問卷.............................................87\n\n圖目錄\n\n圖1 1□膍s架構圖...........................................26\n圖3 1□痐艀菃痤□欞P整體風險知覺對組織正向情感交互作用圖...62\n圖3-2□痐艀菃痤□欞P整體風險知覺對求職行動意圖交互作用圖...62\n圖3-3□痐艀菃痤□欞P整體風險知覺對整體組織吸引力交互作用圖.63\n\n表目錄\n表2-1 樣本之特性...........................................30\n表2-2 變動薪資比例操弄金額.................................36\n表2-3 加薪型態操弄數額.....................................37\n表2-4 第一部份操弄檢核題...................................38\n表2-5 第二部分操弄檢核題...................................38\n表2-6 組織吸引力量表.......................................40\n表2-7 變動薪資比例之風險知覺測量題目.......................41\n表2-8 加薪型態之風險知覺測量題目...........................41\n表2-9 核心自我評價量表.....................................42\n表2-10 企業屬性偏好測量題目.................................43\n表3-1 加薪型態之操弄檢核t檢定..............................45\n表3-2 變動薪資比例之操弄檢核t檢定..........................45\n表3-3 各變項信度及相關分析.................................49\n表3-4 變動薪資比例與風險知覺迴歸分析表.....................52\n表3-5 變動薪資比例、加薪型態與整體組織吸引力及其各向度之迴歸分析表........................................................54\n表3-6 風險知覺與整體組織吸引力及其各向度之迴歸分析表.......55\n表3-7 變動薪資比例、核心自我評價在VP風險知覺上的二因子變異數分析表........................................................57\n表3-8 核心自我評價、加薪型態在IP風險知覺上的二因子變異數分析表..........................................................58\n表3-9 整體風險知覺、核心自我評價在組織正向情感上的二因子變異數分析表......................................................60\n表3-10 核心自我評價、整體風險知覺在雇主評價上的二因子變異數分析表..........................................................60\n表3-11 核心自我評價、整體風險知覺在求職行動意圖上的二因子變異數分析表......................................................61\n表3-12 核心自我評價、整體風險知覺在整體組織吸引力的二因子變異數分析表......................................................61\n表4-1 研究結果摘述.........................................65zh_TW
dc.format.extent82345 bytes-
dc.format.extent43222 bytes-
dc.format.extent143881 bytes-
dc.format.extent137284 bytes-
dc.format.extent651484 bytes-
dc.format.extent587789 bytes-
dc.format.extent348428 bytes-
dc.format.extent414590 bytes-
dc.format.extent254336 bytes-
dc.format.extent439686 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0917520101en_US
dc.subject變動薪資zh_TW
dc.subject加薪型態zh_TW
dc.subject組織吸引力zh_TW
dc.subject風險知覺zh_TW
dc.subject核心自我評價zh_TW
dc.subjectvariable payen_US
dc.subjectpay increases tyepeen_US
dc.subjectorganizational attractionen_US
dc.subjectrisk perceptionen_US
dc.subjectcore self-evaluationen_US
dc.title在招募情境中變動薪資比例、加薪型態對組織吸引力之影響-風險知覺之中介效果zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference汪銘生,陳碧珍(民92)。風險資訊整合模式與風險知覺之研究-以石化業為例。管理學報,20, 251-287。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference社會新鮮人與企業雇用意向大調查(民93)。泛亞人力銀行。(無日期)。取自:http://www.9999.com.tw/PJ/act/p930405/money.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference李玟玲(民92)。己婚婦女安全性行為及其相關因素探討。高雄醫學大學護理學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳雪菁(民91)。探討乳癌高危險群婦女之風險認知及心理困擾。國立臺北醫學大學護理學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張春興(民85)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曹國雄(民89)。變動式薪資對薪資滿足的影響。中原學報,28,1-11。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾明遜(民73)。淺談鄰避設施的風險知覺。人與地,12,36-40。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃堅厚(民68)。國小及國中學生內外控信念之研究。教育心理學報,12,1-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳璧婉、陳雁齡(民87)。台南市國中學生焦慮、自尊心、內外控信念和生活壓力之相關研究。台南師院學生學刊,19,39-59。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳俊州(民91)。應徵者特性對工作選擇行為之影響:以階段性縮減探討兩階段決策。台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許雅棣(民90)。主管領導型態、員工性格特質、組織激勵制度與員工工作績效之相關性--以保險業務員為例。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫弘岳(民90)。企業商品形象、公民形象與信譽對組織人才吸引力之影響:以民營商業銀行為實證對象。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference企業吹加薪風 平均調幅3%至5%(民93,5月,31日)。經濟日報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴靜瑩(民87)。國中生A行行為組型、內外控性格特質與生活適應之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顏麗真(民91)。人力資源管理制度對組織人才吸引力之影響:交互作用之探討。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇義祥、胡國強(民89)。個人成熟度及內外控取向的調節作用對領導型態與工作績效之研究—以中華電信公司專戶服務部門為例。管理評論,19,89-111。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇美鳳(民89)。國小六年級學童自卑感與成就動機之關係。台中師範學院國民教育系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N., & Cable, D. M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology. 16, 219-237.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndrisani, P. J., & Nestel, G.(1976). Internal-external control as a contributor and outcome of work experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 156-165.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBalkin, D. B., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2002). Explaining the gender effects on faculty pay increases. Group & Organization Management, 27, 352-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Joyce: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward unifying theory behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarber, A. E., & Bretz, R. D. (2000) Compensation, attraction, and retention. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspective. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual , strategic , and considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBauer, T., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1996). Green career choices: The influence of ecological stance on recruiting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 445-458.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders. New York, International Universities Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBelcher, J. G. (1996).How to design & implement a results- oriented variable pay system. New York: Amacom.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBelcher, J. G. (1994). Gainsharing and variable pay: The state of the art. Compensation & Benefits review. 50-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlackaby, D., Booth, A.L., & Frank, J. (2005). Outside offers and the gender pay gap: Empirical evidence from the UK academic labour market. The Economic Journal, 115, 81-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlock, J., & Robins, R. W. (1993). A longitudinal study of consistency and change in self-esteem from early adolescence to early adulthood. Child Development, 64, 909-923.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBretz, R. D., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42, 561-581.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrissett, M., & Nowicki, S. Jr.(1973). Internal versus external of reinforcement and reaction to frustration. Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology, 25, 35-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, D. (2002). Bonus and variable pay: Lessons from the U.K. Compensation & Benefits Review, 34, 24-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, I. D., & Groeger, J. A.(1988). Risk perception and decision taking during the transition between novice and experienced driver status. Ergonomics, 31, 585-597.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294-311.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCober, R. T., Brown, D. J., Levy, P. E., Cober, A. B., & Keeping, L. M. (2003). Organizational web sites: Web site content and style as determinants of organizational attraction. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 158-169.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCollins, J. L. (1982). Self-efficacy and ability in achievement behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceConstans, J. I. (2001). Worry propensity and the perception of risk. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 721-729.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoopersmith, S. (1967). The Antecedents of Self-esteem. San Francisco, Freeman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCumming, C. M. (1989). Total compensation: An approach to pay structure design. Compensation and Benefit Review, 37-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCvektovich, G., & Earle, T. C. (1992). Environmental hazards and the public. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavid, P.,Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E. (1998). The effect of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 200-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeery, H. A.(1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30, 225-236.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDodgson, P. G., & Wood, J. V. (2000). Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weakness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 178-197.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDonaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceErez, A., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1270-1279.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFacione, N. (2002) Perception risk of breast cancer. Cancer Practice, 10, 256-262.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFischhoff, B., Watson, S., & Hope, C. (1984). Defining risk. Policy Sciences, 17, 123-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceForgas, J. P. (1989). Mood effects on decision-making strategies. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 197-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreeman, S. (2001). Upping the stakes. People Management, 7, 24-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 414-427.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGerhart, B., & Milkovich, G. T. (1990). Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 663-691.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGerhart, B., & Milkovich, G. T. (1989). Salaries, salary growth, and promotions of men and women in a large, private firm. In R. Michael & B. O’Farrell( Eds.), Pay equity: Empirical inquiries(pp23-43). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254-280.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHampson, S. E., Severson, H. H., Burns, W. J., Slovic, P., & Fisher, K. J. (2001). Risk perception, personality factors and alcohol use among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 167-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarris, M. M., Gilbreath, B., & Sunday, J. A. (2002). Why are women paid less than men, but given higher raises? Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 499-514.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarris, M. M., Gilbreath, B., & Sunday, J. A. (1998). A longitudinal examination of a merit pay system: Relationships among performance ratings, merit increase, and total pay increases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 825-831.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life span perspective. In Stenberg, R. J., & Kolligan, J. Jr (Eds). Competence Considered. New Haven, Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeneman, R. L. (1990). Merit pay research. Research in Personnel and Human Resource. I. G. F. K. Rowland. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 203-263.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeneman, H. G., & Judge, T. A. (2000).Compensation attitudes. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart(Eds.), Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHerman, R. E. & Gioia, J. L. (2000). How to become an employer of choice. Winchester, Virginia: Oak hill Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHighhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986-1001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoltgrave, D. & Weber, E. (1993). Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. Risk Analysis, 13, 553-558.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJudge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem, gerneralized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability- with job satisfaction and job performance : A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJudge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003) The core self-evaluationscale : Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303-331.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJudge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfation: The mediation role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJudge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJudge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfation: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJoe, V. C. (1971). Review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable. Psychological Reports, 28, 619-640.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLakhani, H. (1988). The effect of pay and retention bonuses on quit rates in the U.S.A.Army. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41, 430-438zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLauiola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2000). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 215-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLiu, X., Kurita, H., Uchiyama, M., Okawa, M., Liu, L., & Ma, D. (2000). Life events, locus of control, and behavioral problems among Chinese aldosecents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1565-1577.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLocke, E. A., McClear, K., & Knight, D. (1996). Self-esteem and work. International Review of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 11, 1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeller, L., Sarin, R. K., & Weber, M. (1986). Empirical investigation of some properties of the perceived riskiness of gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 38, 114-130.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuhn, K. M., & Yockey, M. D. (2003). Variable pay as risky choice: Determinants of the relative attractiveness of incentive plans. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 90, 323-341.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeichenbaum, D. H. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York, Plenum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiceli, M. P., & Lane, M. C.(1991).Antecedents of Pay Satisfaction: A Review and Extension. In Rowland, K. M. & Ferris, G. R. (Eds), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 9,235-309. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilech, D., Glencross, D., & Hartley, L. (1989). Skill acquistion by young drivers: Perceiving, interpreting and responding to the driving environment(Report NO. MR4). Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMilkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (1999). Compensation. New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMitchell, T. R., Smyser, G. M., & Weed, S. E.(1975). Locus of control, supervision and work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 623-631.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMitra, A., Gupta, N. & Jenkins, D. (1997). A dropo in the ducket: When is a pay raise a pay raise? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 117-137.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoe, D.(1986). Young drivers: Relation between perived and real ability. Behavioural Studies (Report STF63 A92002). SINTEF Samferdeslsteknikk, Trondheim. (In Norwegian).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO`Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People of organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOrmel, J., & Wohlfarth, T. (1991). How neuroticism, long-term difficulties, and life situation change influence psychological distress: A longitudinal model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 744-755.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRosenbloom, T.(2003). Risk evaluation and risky behavior of high and low sensation seekers. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 375-386.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRotter, J. B.(1971).External control & internal control. Psychology Today,June,37-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRotter, J. B.(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, Job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd Ed.). PaloAlta, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRynes, S. L. (1987).Compensation strategies for recruiting. Topics in Total Compensation, 2, 185-196.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRynes, S. L., Schwab, D. P., & Heneman, H. G. (1983). The role of pay and market pay variability in job application decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31,.353-364.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchuster, J. R., & Zingheim, P. K.(1992). The new pay. New York: Lexington Book.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., Mitra, A., Lockhart, D. E., & Bowler, M. (2003). Reactions to merit pay increases: A longitudinal test of a signal sensitivity perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 538-544.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpector, P. E., (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee`s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 484.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTang, T. L. P. (1991). The effects of self-esteem, task label, and performance feedback on task liking and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 567-572.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTurban, D. B., Lau, C. M., Neo, H. Y., Chow, I. H. S., & Si, S. X. (2001). Organizational attractiveness of firms in the People’s Republic of China: A person-organization fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 194-206.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTurban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTurban, D. B., Eyring, A. R., & Campion, J. E. (1993) Job attributes: Preferences compared with reasons given for accepting and rejecting job offers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 71-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTurban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184-193.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUlleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41, 427-443.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWatson, D. (2000). Mood and Temperament. New York, Guilford.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWiggins, J. S. (1996). The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilson, T., & Altmansberger, H. N. (2003). Taking variable pay to a new Level. Workspan, 46, 44-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWiseman, R. M. ,Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Fugate, M. (2000). Rethinking compensation risk. In Rynes, S. L.& Gerhart, B.(Eds. ), Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceXie, X. F., & Wang, X. T. (2003). Risk perception and risky choices: Situational, informational and dispositional effects. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 117-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYates, J. F., & Stone, E. (1992). The risk construct. In J.F.Yates(Eds.), Risk-taking behavior, 1-25. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
52010101.pdf80.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010102.pdf42.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010103.pdf140.51 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010104.pdf134.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010105.pdf636.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010106.pdf574.01 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010107.pdf340.26 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010108.pdf404.87 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010109.pdf248.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52010110.pdf429.38 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.