Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33100
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor馮建三zh_TW
dc.contributor.author蔡莞瑩zh_TW
dc.creator蔡莞瑩zh_TW
dc.date2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T07:30:05Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T07:30:05Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T07:30:05Z-
dc.identifierG0929410131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33100-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description傳播學院碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description92941013zh_TW
dc.description95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究目的在探討台灣商業電視新聞,1996-2006年十年間,受收視率和置入性行銷影響,媒體如何形塑其下工作者,工作者的工作樣貌有什麼樣的轉變,以及如何自處和抵抗。\n\n本研究以深度訪談和個案研究二種方式進行,訪談十位分屬六家衛星新聞台不同階層工作者,研究發現在收視率的部分,媒體從收視率數字開始即以一種近乎暴力的形式控制工作者,並透過採訪會議控制採訪組,收視率會議控制編輯系統和主播,使得其下工作者,從1996年前的政治力操控,轉變為收視率數字控制,精彩和收視數字凌駕一切規範,八卦娛樂和視覺感官化獲勝。\n\n所幸,新聞工作者並不將自己囿於這樣的控制之下,開始有資深工作者努力在收視率之下,開創仍有新聞價值的題材,或者以品牌形象﹑外界力量﹑個人知識﹑影音技巧來抵抗收視率。\n\n置入性行銷部分,因為收入來的最直接,所以媒體的控制往往來自最高階層的壓力,而沒有達到目標值的處罰控制力道往往大於獎勵,但是有不少媒體工作者為了躲避收視率的壓迫,仍然選擇留在置入性行銷的部門之中。\n\n在這樣的控制力之下,媒體人漸漸學會置入性行銷大於一切的原則,不能得罪廣告主,廣告主負面新聞碰不得,不過資深工作者仍沒有放棄,他們發現因為正當性的問題,外界的力量會讓置入性行銷退縮,或者是做到領導品牌,讓廣告主臣服於專業之下,可以爭取到較大的操作空間,至於負面新聞,則可以以模糊原則偷渡。\n\n 收視率和置入性行銷這十年來,讓不少優秀媒體人打退堂鼓,期待從這些資深工作者生存下來的方式之中,為媒體人找到一條在離去與妥協之間的第三條路。\n\n\n關鍵字﹕資深新聞工作者﹑收視率﹑置入行銷﹑市場導向﹑新聞產製﹑控制抵抗zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study is to investigate how audience ratings and placement marketing have influenced the commercial cable news in Taiwan and how news workers are molded by the media from 1996 to 2006.The present study further discusses the transitions of job trend among news workers, as well as how these workers place themselves and make a resistance in the job field.\n\nThe research was conducted by in-depth interviews and case studies.\n\nTen different news workers at different job levels, who belonged to six satellite news stations, were interviewed. From the perspective of viewership, the study indicates that news workers are violently manipulated by media through the ratings.\n\nThe cover groups are restrained by pre-interview meetings; and the editing desks and news anchors are also controlled by meetings for ratings.Replacing the manipulation of political power before 1996, news workers are thus constrained by the ratings. Excitement and ratings figures override all standard norms. Gossip, entertainment and visual stimulations are the key factors.\n\nFortunately, news workers do not wish to constrain themselves under such circumstances.Senior news workers began to seek valuable news topic and intended to resist the ratings by creating a leading image, seeking strength from the external, and increasing individual knowledge and audio-visual techniques.\n\nPlacement marketing, the most direct profits for the media, often generates media control as the pressure from the staff of highest level. When the goal value was not achieved, the controlled strength through punishment was often stronger than rewards.\n\nTo avoid pressure from ratings, many media workers have chosen to stay at the division of placement marketing.Under such controlling force, media people gradually learned a principle that placement marketing is greater than all others.They did not want to offend the advertisement host, nor would they want to cover any negative news against them. \nHowever, senior news workers had not given up.\n\nThey realized the legitimate problems would retreat the placement marketing by means of public strength.It is possible to submit the advertisement host under the achievement of brand leadership.\n\nThus a wider freedom of manipulation could be gained. As for the negative news, it is possible to sneak across blurredly. \n\nWithin the last decade, ratings and placement marketing has discouraged many outstanding media people.The study anticipates to search the survival patterns from these senior workers and a third choice besides leaving and submitting for all media workers.\n\n\n\n\nKeywords : senior news workers, ratings, placement marketing, market-driven, news production, controlling resistanceen_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 研究動機與方法-------------------------------------------------- 9\n第一節 研究動機------------------------------------------------------------------------------9\n第二節 研究方法-----------------------------------------------------------------------------13\n 一﹑參與觀察法--------------------------------------------------------------------------------13\n 二﹑深度訪談法--------------------------------------------------------------------------------14\n第二章 文獻探討------------------------------------------------------------------17\n第一節 商業力量與電視新聞--------------------------------------------------------------- 17\n 一﹑收視率的興起------------------------------------------------------------------------------17\n 二﹑收視率與組識目標-----------------------------------------------------------------------18\n 三﹑收視率惡化新聞﹖-----------------------------------------------------------------------18\n 四﹑收視率控制下台灣新聞走向-----------------------------------------------------------20\n 五﹑收視率之影音特性-----------------------------------------------------------------------24\n 六﹑另一種購買—置入性行銷--------------------------------------------------------------24\n第二節 組織權力與規訓----------------------------------------------------------------------26\n 一﹑影響新聞工作者的力量-----------------------------------------------------------------26\n 二﹑古典權力觀的反思 ----------------------------------------------------------------------27\n 三﹑媒體組織內部的權力-------------------------------------------------------------------28\n 四﹑隱藏又流動的權力-----------------------------------------------------------------------29\n 五﹑商業電視台的規訓-----------------------------------------------------------------------30\n第三節 規訓權力的順應或反抗--------------------------------------------------------------32\n 一﹑自我說服與順應--------------------------------------------------------------------------32\n 二﹑正面的抵抗--------------------------------------------------------------------------------33\n 三﹑迂迴的抵抗--------------------------------------------------------------------------------33\n第四節 小結: 更有創意的反抗------------------------------------------------------------36\n第三章 商業時代電視新聞人工作樣貌-------------------------------------37\n第一節 1996年前的電視新聞人-----------------------------------------------------------37\n 一﹑政治力主導新聞-------------------------------------------------------------------------37\n 二﹑重視官方消息----------------------------------------------------------------------------37\n 三﹑衛星開放轉趨多元重視平衡---------------------------------------------------------38\n第二節 1996年後的電視新聞人-----------------------------------------------------------39\n 一﹑娛樂與社會新聞萌芽-------------------------------------------------------------------40\n 二﹑八卦化從娛樂新聞開始----------------------------------------------------------------41\n 三﹑收視率取代新聞規範成為準則------------------------------------------------------41\n 四﹑視覺感官化包裝-------------------------------------------------------------------------45\n 五﹑置入性行銷成為霸王稿----------------------------------------------------------------46\n第三節 1996年後新聞工作者的標準線-------------------------------------------------47\n 一﹑初期仍重視新聞原則-------------------------------------------------------------------47\n 二﹑精彩度漸重於新聞原則----------------------------------------------------------------48\n 三﹑抄報紙取代消息來源 -----------------------------------------------------------------48\n 四﹑不傷害人命為原則----------------------------------------------------------------------49\n 五﹑不被告被抗議被罰就好----------------------------------------------------------------50\n 六﹑置入性行銷廣告主最大----------------------------------------------------------------50\n第四章 權力規訓形塑商業時代電視新聞產製----------------------------53\n第一節 收視率影響新聞產製-------------------------------------------------------------53\n 一﹑收視率數字即是控制------------------------------------------------------------------53\n 二﹑透過科層組織的控制------------------------------------------------------------------56\n 三﹑無形的紀律控制-------------------------------------------------------------------------59\n 四﹑審查制度的控制-------------------------------------------------------------------------63\n第二節 置入性行銷影響新聞產製--------------------------------------- ---------------65\n 一﹑免於收視壓迫的誘惑------------------------------------------------------------------65\n 二﹑懲罰控制力大於獎勵控制------------------------------------------------------------68\n 三﹑來自最高階層的壓力------------------------------------------------------------------68\n第五章 資深工作者的處境分析-----------------------------------------------71\n第一節 自我說服的過程--------------------------------------------------------------------71\n 一﹑收視也算市場與娛樂的功能---------------------------------------------------------71\n 二﹑生存﹑大環境只能這樣-----------------------------------------------------------------72\n 三﹑各方勢力壓迫更勝置入行銷---------------------------------------------------------72\n第二節 收視率控制下的堅持--------------------------------------------------------------72\n 一﹑收視率不只一種樣貌-------------------------------------------------------------------73\n 二﹑高收視率新聞可被取代的時機------------------------------------------------------74\n 三﹑收視率仍有待開發地-------------------------------------------------------------------74\n第三節 收視率控制下的抵抗--------------------------------------------------------------75\n 一﹑用品牌形象抵抗-------------------------------------------------------------------------75\n 二﹑藉外界力量抵抗-------------------------------------------------------------------------76\n 三﹑個人知識抵抗----------------------------------------------------------------------------79\n 四﹑影音技巧抵抗----------------------------------------------------------------------------80\n 五﹑消極抵抗-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------81\n第四節 置入性行銷的堅持與抵抗-------------------------------------------------------81\n 一﹑外界力量牽制----------------------------------------------------------------------------81\n 二﹑領導品牌贏得堅持----------------------------------------------------------------------82\n 三﹑模糊焦點偷渡----------------------------------------------------------------------------83\n第六章 研究結論與建議--------------------------------------------------------85\n第一節 主要論証與研究結果--------------------------------------------------------------85\n 一﹑1996-2006年電視新聞人工作樣貌--------------------------------------------------85\n 二﹑權力規訓如何型塑商業時代電視新聞--------------------------------------------86\n 三﹑資深電視新聞工作者的處境分析---------------------------------------------------88\n第二節 研究貢獻------------------------------------------------------------------------------90\n第三節 研究限制與建議--------------------------------------------------------------------91\n\n參考書目----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------93\n中文部分-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------93\n英文部分-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------93\n\n附表一-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------97\n附表二-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------97\n訪談大網--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------102zh_TW
dc.format.extent61935 bytes-
dc.format.extent98987 bytes-
dc.format.extent84669 bytes-
dc.format.extent85793 bytes-
dc.format.extent233709 bytes-
dc.format.extent270050 bytes-
dc.format.extent249814 bytes-
dc.format.extent216525 bytes-
dc.format.extent209350 bytes-
dc.format.extent162439 bytes-
dc.format.extent122155 bytes-
dc.format.extent129712 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929410131en_US
dc.subject資深新聞工作者zh_TW
dc.subject收視率zh_TW
dc.subject置入行銷zh_TW
dc.subject市場導向zh_TW
dc.subject新聞產製zh_TW
dc.subject控制抵抗zh_TW
dc.title資深新聞工作者的處境分析zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王泰俐(2004)。<電視新聞節目「感官主義」之初探研究>,《新聞學研究》81:1-41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference目擊者編輯部(2006)。<置入性行銷腐蝕專業>,《目擊者》,51:8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference艾 瑾(1999)。<從硬梆梆,血淋淋到軟綿綿>,《新聞鏡》,555:29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何榮幸(1997)。<主播是人家給的,不必視為生涯規畫>,《目擊者》,試刊號:35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳佩玲(2006)。《記者如何突破市場導向與新聞自主的衝突》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂惠敏(2005)。《專業取勝?商業至上?電視台高層對新聞主播角色認知與決策初探》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李秀珠(2002)。<上行順服取得策略:檢視部屬對上司之溝通策略及影響因素>,《新聞學研究》,67:18-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李秀珠、江靜之(1998)。<市場競爭與節目多樣性之研究>,《廣播與電視》,3(3):21-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李岳勳(2001)。《台灣地區報社結構與組織目標之關係》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李金銓(1981)。《大眾傳播理論》。台北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李筱雯(2004)。《好新聞?好生意?-台灣報業生產政治的轉變》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林昆練(2005)。<新聞局停止置入性行銷>,《動腦雜誌》,第351輯。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林韋任(2003)。《收視率控制與電視工作者的抗爭—以TVBS報導老少配和薛楷莉案為例》。台灣大學新研所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林添貴譯(2000 )。《MBA當家-企業化經營下報業的改變》。台北:正中書局。(原書 Doug Underwood[2000]。 When MBAs Rule The Newsroom。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱家宜(2000)。<吳宗憲現象變成新新聞現象>,《目擊者》,19:17。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姜雪影譯(1994)。《製作新聞》。台北:遠流。(原書Roshco, B。[1957]。 Newsmaking。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪瓊娟(1993)。<電視節目廣告化初探>,《廣播與電視》,1(3):123-136。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡適芳(2000)。<節目評價的觀眾調查>,《收視率透視》,中國廣播電視出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐如林(2002)。<這種言論自由,不要也罷!>,《目擊者》,26:13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張文強(2002)。<媒介組織內部權力運作與新聞工作自主:封建采邑內的權力控制與反抗>,《新聞學研究》,73:29-61。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張依雯(1999)。<三立頻道家族之經營策略初探>,《新聞學研究》,61:179-222。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張依雯(2000)。《解構台灣地區電視經營生態與收視之關連》。政治大學新研所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張錦華(2000)。<好廣告與好節目雙贏電視生態戰略>,《動腦雜誌》,286期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張耀仁(2001)。《市場導向新聞學之研究:以台灣無線電視台之晚間娛樂新聞為例》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許聖梅(1999)。《挑戰不可能-再造中視》。台北:遠流出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳 昕(2000)。《電視社會及娛樂新聞報導及收視率的研究》。中山大學傳管所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳孝凡(1999a)。<鄭淑敏:把AC尼爾森收視調查趕出台灣>,中國時報,1999。11。30,26版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳彥龍(2001)。《電視媒介與台灣民主化:民視個案研究》。中山大學政治所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳雪慧(1993)。《台灣報社的生產政治:一個腦力勞動控制的研究》。台大社會學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳順孝(2003)。《新聞控制與反控制》。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳嘉彰(2001)。《打破收視率的迷思》。財團法人國定政策基金會研究報告,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳劍志(1998)。<食人魚,傳聲筒還是狗仔隊>,《目擊者》,3:78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸燕玲(2002)。《從名門正派到明教教徒?-台灣壹週刊新聞工作者調適與認同》。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陶芳芳(1999) 。《從政治控制到市場機制:台灣報業發行之變遷》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference喻靖媛(1994)。《記者與消息來源互動關係與新聞處理方式關連性研究》。台北:政大新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference湯允一等譯(2003)。《媒體/社會-產業。形象與閱聽大眾》。台北:學富文化。(原書 David Croteau,William Hoynes[2000]。 Media / Society)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference舒嘉興(2001)。《新聞缷妝:布爾迪厄新聞場域理論》。台北:桂冠出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮建三、程宗明譯(1998)。《傳播政治經濟學-再思考再更新》。台北:五南。(原書 Mosco, Vincent。[1996] 。The Political Economy of Communication。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃新生(1994)。《電視新聞》。 台北:遠流出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊大春(1995)。《傅科》。台北:生智。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊順美(2002)。《市場導向與媒體組織結構下的新聞專業-以台灣無線三台晚間娛樂新聞為例》。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉子佳(2006)。<媒體三月瘋媽祖>,《目擊者》,51:23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉廣海(1992)。《收視率的三角習題》。台北:正中書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉北成、楊遠嬰譯(1992)。《規訓與懲罰︰監獄的誕生》。台北︰桂冠。(原書 Foucault M。 [1977]。 Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison 。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉幼琍(1997)。《多頻道電視與觀眾:九o年代的電視媒體與閱聽什收視行為研究》。台北:時英。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉旭峰(2006)。《收視率萬歲--誰在看電視?》。台北:印刻出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘邦順譯(1999)。《組織傳播學》。台北:風雲論壇。(原書 Andrews, P。 H。 & Herschel, R。 T。[1995]。 Organizational communication: Empowerment in a technological society。)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡念中(民88)。<提昇電視新聞節目品質-電視社會新聞羶色腥現象之探討>,《廣播與電視》,14:167-187。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference墨 非(2006)。<買廣告換記者>,《目擊者》,51:34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭濤譯(2000)。<論述的秩序>,許寶強、袁偉(選編)《語言與翻譯的政治》。香港︰牛津大學出版社。(原書 Foucault, M。 [1981]。 The order of discourse。)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴育賢等譯(1994)。《文化、社會與媒體:批判性觀點》。台北:遠流(原書 Gurevitch, M。[1982]。 Culture, society and the media。)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛承雄(1987)。《媒介支配—多讀台灣的電視新聞》。台大社會研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇 蘅(2002)。《競爭時代的報紙:理論與實務》。台北:時英出社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇善村(1995)。《報社組織控制之研究》。國立交通大學傳播科技研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇鑰機(1997)。<完全市場導向新聞學:蘋果日報個案研究>,陳韜文等人(編),《大眾傳播與市場經濟》,頁215-233。香港:鑪峰學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeloff, N. (1976). Freedom Under Foot : The Battle over the Closed Shop in British Journalism. London, Temple Smith.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBorden, L. S.(2000). A Model for Evaluating Journalist Resistance to Business Constraints. Journal of Mass Media Ethics,15(3):149-166.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBreed, W. (1955). Social control in the news roon. Social Forces, 33: 323-325.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrookes, R.(2000). Tabloidization, media panics, and mad cow Disease. In C. Sparks and F. Tulloch, (Eds.),Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards(pp.195-209), Lanham,MD. :Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDimmick, J. W.(1979). The Gate Keeper: Media Organization As Political Coalitions. Communication Research, 6(2):203-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEdwards, R. (1979). Contested Terrain. New York :basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEngwall,Lars (1978). Newspaper Adaptation to a Changing Social Environment:a Case Study of Organizational Drift as Response to Resource Dependence. European Journal of Communication. Vol.1,327-341.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFoucault, M. (1980a).Power/Knowledge:selected interviews and other writing:1972-1974(Gordon,Ed.)Brighton:Harvester Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGitlin, Todd.(1985). Inside Prime Time. New york:Pantheon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJames G. Webster (2000). Rating Analysis:The Theory and Practice of Audience Research. Mahwah,New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKim,Bong-Hyun (1995). The Effectiveness of Camouflaged Advertising Format on Audiences with Special Focus on Advertising, dissertation. University of Alabama:Tuscaloosa.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcManus,J . H .(1994). Market-driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Newburyzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePark, CA:Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRyan, B. (1991). Making Capital from Culture: The Coperate From of Capitalist Cultural Production. Berin : Walter de Gruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShoemaker, P. J. & Reese, S. D.(1996). Mediation the message. N.Y.:Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmart, B. (1983). Foucault, Marxism and Critique . London : Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTunstall , J.(1971). Journalists at Work. London:Constable.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
41013101.pdf60.48 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013102.pdf96.67 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013103.pdf82.68 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013104.pdf83.78 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013105.pdf228.23 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013106.pdf263.72 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013107.pdf243.96 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013108.pdf211.45 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013109.pdf204.44 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013110.pdf158.63 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013111.pdf119.29 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
41013112.pdf126.67 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.