Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33617
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor周陽山zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChou, Yangsunen_US
dc.contributor.author蕭瓊英zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsiao, Chiung-Yingen_US
dc.creator蕭瓊英zh_TW
dc.creatorHsiao, Chiung-Yingen_US
dc.date2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-17T09:42:29Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-17T09:42:29Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-17T09:42:29Z-
dc.identifierG0086263009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33617-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description俄羅斯研究所zh_TW
dc.description86263009zh_TW
dc.description91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract無論是沙皇政權或是蘇維埃政權,都會在侵略併吞而來的土地上實行俄化或是蘇維埃化的政策,希望能建立一個大一統的國家,創造一個享有共同文化、共同語言、甚至是有共同認同的民族。但是,1991年蘇聯的解體,不只打破了蘇共創造「蘇維埃民族」的美夢,還證明了蘇聯民族政策的嚴重錯誤。\n 19世紀以前,進入波海地區的俄羅斯人數量並不多。19世紀之後,沙皇政府開始在此區實行大規模的俄化,並開始將大批的俄羅斯人遷移至此。從第一次世界大戰以後到第二次世界大戰這段期間,波海三國享有了一段短暫的獨立國家時期。這個時期,基本上,波海三國對其境內的俄羅斯人是採取尊重的態度。第二次世界大戰爆發,因為德蘇密約的簽訂,使波海三國再次地被蘇聯併吞。史達林佔領波海三國之後,立刻大規模地流放波海三國的人民,並將大批的俄羅斯人引進,使愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞兩國在人口統計學上的俄化情形十分嚴重。\n 1985年戈巴契夫上台以後,波海三國利用改革的機會,追求獨立,最後,以非暴力的方式獲得成功,重建獨立國家。波海三國獨立以後,俄羅斯人的地位有了很大的改變,一下子從優勢的統治地位變成弱勢的少數民族。愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞因為懷疑俄羅斯人的忠誠度以及擔心會被滅族,所以採取了排外的公民權法,使大部分的俄羅斯人都無法獲得公民權。另外,因為大部分的俄羅斯人都不會說愛沙尼亞語或拉脫維亞語,所以不僅在取得公民權上有困難,在經濟與社會處境上也變得比較差。至於俄羅斯人的認同,可以說是複雜的。大多數的俄羅斯人在政治上是對所居住的共和國忠誠,在文化上還是認為自己是屬於俄羅斯文化的一部份。至於立陶宛,賦予境內大部分的俄羅斯人公民權,因此,立陶宛的族群關係較緩和。\n 俄羅斯政府自認為是境外俄羅斯人權益的捍衛者,但是,對於波海三國的少數民族政策所能造成的影響並不大。相反地,西方政府的批評與建議常常能成功地影響波海三國的決策。主要的原因在於波海三國急切地想回歸歐洲、西方政府與組織能提供援助、滿足國家安全需求與歐安組織派遣使節到愛、拉兩國。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractNo matter what it was the Czar’s regime or the Soviet government, it would always implement a policy of Russification or Sovietization on invaded lands, in order to establish a united nation with common culture, shared the same language and national identity. However, since the breaking down of the Soviet Union in 1991, not only the dream of the ‘Soviet People’ broke down, but it also suggested a misleading of ethnic-national policy.\nBefore the 19th century, there were not many Russians in the Baltic area. After the 19th century, the Czar’s regime started to implement the policy of Russification on a large scale, and it also moved many Russians to settle there. During the period of the First World War and the Second World War, the Baltic States had enjoyed a short period as independent nations. In this period, the Baltic States basically treated the Russians within their states with respect. Because Germany and Russia had signed a treaty before the Second World War, therefore, when the war erupted, the Baltic States were once again occupied by the Russia. After Stalin took over the Baltic States, he exiles people from the Baltic States on a large scale, while moving many Russians into these countries. As a result, Estonia and Latvia were seriously Russificated demogranphically.\nIn 1985, Gorbachev gained the power. While the Russia government was reforming its political entity, the Baltic States seized the opportunity to go independent. They successfully gained their independence through non-violent method and rebuild themselves as independent states. Ever since the Baltic States became independent, the status of the Russians within their regions had changed rapidly. The Russians were once the dominant ruling class and suddenly became the ruled minority. Estonia and Latvia are concerned with the issues of royalty of the Russian people, also they were worried that they would become extinct as an ethnic group, therefore, they adopted an exclusive citizenship laws. Because most of the Russians could not speak Estonian and Latvian languages, therefore, they had difficulties to acquire the citizenship and they also did poorly financially and politically within these two nations. As for the notion of the Russian identity, it was a very complicated issue. Most Russians are politically royal to the Republics they reside, but culturally they still considered themselves as part of the Russian culture. In Lithuania, it granted most of the Russians that reside in its nation the citizenship; therefore, the ethnic relationship within the country was less tense comparatively.\nRussian government always views itself as the protector of the rights of its people that reside in other countries. However, this does not affect the policies regarding the minority in the Baltic States. On the other hand, the criticism and suggestions from the western governments can often affect the process of the policy-making in the Baltic States. The main reason is that the Baltic States are eager to return to Europe, and they can acquire aids from the western governments and organizations, securing their nations. Another reason is Estonia and Latvia hopefully get rid of the representatives from OSCE as soon as possible.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents內 容 目 錄\n\n第一章 緒論•••••••••••••••••••••1\n第一節 研究動機與目的••••••••••••••3\n第二節 研究方法與限制••••••••••••••4\n第三節 研究範圍與架構••••••••••••••5\n第四節 文獻分析•••••••••••••••••6\n第五節 名詞解釋•••••••••••••••••10\n第二章 蘇聯解體前波海三國境內的俄羅斯人及其處境•••13\n第一節 帝俄與蘇聯的民族政策•••••••••••15\n第二節 1940年以前波海三國與俄羅斯的關係•••••27\n第三節 1940年到1985年波海三國與蘇聯的關係••••37\n第四節 小結•••••••••••••••••••59\n第三章 蘇聯解體與波海三國的獨立運動•••••••••61\n第一節 戈巴契夫改革與波海三國的民族問題•••••63\n第二節 立陶宛的獨立運動•••••••••••••72\n第三節 愛沙尼亞的獨立運動••••••••••••77\n第四節 拉脫維亞的獨立運動••••••••••••82\n第五節 小結•••••••••••••••••••85\n第四章 波海三國獨立後的俄羅斯人處境•••••••••87\n第一節 政治地位與公民身份••••••••••••89\n第二節 經濟與社會處境••••••••••••••103\n第三節 語言與文化氛圍••••••••••••••118\n第四節 民族與國家認同••••••••••••••126\n第五節 小結•••••••••••••••••••135\n第五章 國際反應與波海三國各國的回應態度•••••••137\n第一節 俄國的態度••••••••••••••••139\n第二節 歐盟的態度••••••••••••••••143\n第三節 小結•••••••••••••••••••149\n第六章 結論•••••••••••••••••••••151\n參考文獻•••••••••••••••••••••••157\n附錄•••••••••••••••••••••••••165\n 附錄一:蘇聯各加盟共和國中,俄羅斯人所佔的比••••167\n 附錄二:波海三國與俄羅斯的位置圖••••••••••168\n附錄三:波羅的海三國概況••••••••••••••169\n附錄四:三國重要城市位置圖•••••••••••••171\n附錄五:蘇聯、俄羅斯聯邦與波海三國的國旗與國徽•••173\n\n表 目 錄\n表1-1 「離散民族」的一般特點和各共和國境內俄羅斯人的情況••••••••••••••••••••••• 12\n表2-1 蘇聯各共和國內本地人(indigenous)與俄羅斯人(Russians)組成的比例••••••••••••••••••• 25\n表2-2 波海三國,1989年各國境內主要民族的數量;1930年代、1959年、1970年、1979年、1989年各國主要民族在全國人口中所佔的比例以及1959年到1989年該比例的變化。•••••••••••••••••••••••39\n表2-3 1930年-1980年波海三國共黨規模與三國本國人在黨中所佔的比例••••••••••••••••••••••43\n表2-4 波海三國1950-1979年人口的增加••••••••••46\n表2-5 波海三國1939-1980年全國總人口數與本國族人所佔的比例••••••••••••••••••••••••46\n表2-6 波海三國人民以俄文為第二語言的比例••••••••48\n表2-7 1945-55年波海三國人口的改變•••••••••••54\n表2-8 蘇聯和波海三國的出生率和死亡率,1940-1980年•••55\n表4-1 2000年愛沙尼亞境內各族群擁有公民權的人數比例••••••••••••••••••••••••94\n表4-2 拉脫維亞境內各族群中公民與非公民的人數與比例(1994年1月) •••••••••••••••••••••••96\n表4-3 波海三國公民權法的比較••••••••••••••102\n表4-4 愛沙尼亞淨移民人數(1985-1994年) •••••••••106\n表4-5 愛沙尼亞境內主要民族組成狀況與比例變化(1989年與2000年) •••••••••••••••••••••••108\n表4-6 拉脫維亞境內族群比例的消長(1989年與2000年) •••110\n表4-7 立陶宛境內族群組成情況比較••••••••••••111\n表4-8本地人口與俄化人口的勞動市場參與率與失業率••••••••••••••••••••••••113\n表4-9 在過去一年當中(1994),波海三國中本國人與俄羅斯家庭收支狀況••••••••••••••••••••••114\n表4-10 累計的社會排斥指數(Additive Index of Social Exclusion)••••••••••••••••••••116\n表 4-11 愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞兩國境內,俄語人口(主要是俄羅斯人)在蘇聯解體前(1990年6-8月)、後(1992年),國家認同的比較•••••••••••••••••••••••128\n表4-12 波海三國境內俄羅斯人對俄羅斯政府及其所居住的政府的評價•••••••••••••••••••••••129\n表 4-13 境外俄羅斯人可能產生的認同•••••••••••132\n\n圖 目 錄\n\n圖2-1 愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞境內俄羅斯人大量聚集居住的區域••• •••••••••••••••••••••••• 57\n圖3-1 1989年4月、9月及1990年5月愛沙尼亞人與非愛沙尼亞人對「愛沙尼亞自蘇聯完全獨立出來」的支持度調查••••••••••••••••••••••••78\n圖4-1 波海三國境內俄羅斯人的居住年數(1993年末所做的調查) •••••••••••••••••••••••105\n圖4-2 自愛沙尼亞移民到俄羅斯的人數(1990-1992) •••••107\n圖4-3 拉脫維亞移民狀況(1961年-1992年)••••••••109\n圖4-4 自拉脫維亞移民到俄羅斯的人數(1990-1992) •••••109\n圖4-5 自立陶宛移民到俄羅斯的人數(1990-1992) ••••••110\n圖4-6 1989年與2000年拉脫維亞境內各民族會脫維亞語的比例•••••••••••••••••••••••124\n圖4-7 波海三國的地方自治•••••••••••••••131zh_TW
dc.format.extent13584 bytes-
dc.format.extent17991 bytes-
dc.format.extent22350 bytes-
dc.format.extent21733 bytes-
dc.format.extent41376 bytes-
dc.format.extent276592 bytes-
dc.format.extent95634 bytes-
dc.format.extent337321 bytes-
dc.format.extent389646 bytes-
dc.format.extent19558 bytes-
dc.format.extent35909 bytes-
dc.format.extent612460 bytes-
dc.format.extent751781 bytes-
dc.format.extent69598 bytes-
dc.format.extent960211 bytes-
dc.format.extent333636 bytes-
dc.format.extent787013 bytes-
dc.format.extent368535 bytes-
dc.format.extent608679 bytes-
dc.format.extent506221 bytes-
dc.format.extent154405 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086263009en_US
dc.subject波海三國zh_TW
dc.subject愛沙尼亞zh_TW
dc.subject拉脫維亞zh_TW
dc.subject立陶宛zh_TW
dc.subject蘇維埃化zh_TW
dc.subject俄化zh_TW
dc.subject境外俄羅斯人zh_TW
dc.subject俄羅斯少數民族zh_TW
dc.subject公民權zh_TW
dc.subject民族認同zh_TW
dc.subjectBaltic Statesen_US
dc.subjectEstoniaen_US
dc.subjectLatviaen_US
dc.subjectLithuaniaen_US
dc.subjectSovietizationen_US
dc.subjectRussificationen_US
dc.subjectRussian Abroaden_US
dc.subjectRussian Minorityen_US
dc.subjectRussian Diasporaen_US
dc.subjectCitizenshipen_US
dc.subjectNational Identityen_US
dc.title波羅的海三國中俄羅斯人地位的轉變─蘇聯解體前後的比較分析zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference書籍:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尹慶耀,蘇維埃帝國的消亡,五南圖書出版有限公司,民國83年5月,初版一刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李邁先,俄國史(上卷),國立編譯館出版,正中書局發行,民國84年初版九刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊默夫,紅色鋼人—史大林,克寧出版社,1991年8月,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡百銓譯,俄羅斯、蘇聯與其後的歷史,國立編譯館,民國84年10月初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference期刊:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLubomyr Hajda著,吳之敏譯,「戈巴契夫面臨民族問題」,東方雜誌,復刊第22卷,第7期,民國78年1月1日,頁59-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李玉珍,「蘇聯民族政策之探討」,問題與研究,第23卷,第7期,頁92-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周慶生,一種立法模式兩種政治結果─魁北克與愛沙尼亞語言立法比較,世界民族,1999年第2期,頁21至31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference茅慧青,「波羅的海三國獨立經過」,問題與研究,第31卷,第6期,民國81年6月,頁79-91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳治世,「論蘇聯民族政策」,國立政治大學學報第十四期,民國55年12月14日,頁217-245。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薩公強,「從決策過程剖析戈巴契夫失敗的原因」,共黨問題研究,第20卷,第7期,民國83年,頁90-98。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第4期(民國79年1月),頁89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第5期(民國79年2月)頁91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第9期(民國79年6月)頁4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第9期(民國79年6月)頁84zh_TW
dc.relation.reference博碩士論文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference呂岳憲,波羅的海三國獨立運動之研究—由國際法理論探討。淡江大學俄羅斯研究所,民83年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡漢平,列寧主義民族問題之研究,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民國78年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳振華,蘇聯民族問題之研究,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民80年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃榮河,列寧的民族自決理論與實踐,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民國78年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference書籍:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAzrael, Jeremy R., ed. Soviet Nationality Policies and Practices. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChinn, Jeff & Robert Kaiser. Russians as New Minority— Enthnicity and Nationalism in the Soviet Successor States. Westview Press, Inc., Adivision of HarperCollins Publisher, Inc., 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClemen, Jr. Walter C., Baltic Independence and Russian Empire. Macmillan Academic and Professional Ltd., 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDreifelds, Juris. Latvia in Transition. Cambridge University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEdited by Bremmer, Ian, and Ray Taras. New States, New Politics: Building the Post-Soviet Nations. Cambridge University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHiden, John, and Partick Salmon. The Baltic Nations and Europe— Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in the Twentieth Century. Longman, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIwaskiw, Walter R., ed. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—Country Studies. Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1996zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKarklins, Rasma, Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy: The Collapse of the USSR and Latvia. The John Hopkins University Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKolarz, Walter. Russia and Her Colonies. New York : F. A. Praeger, 1952.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKolstoe, Paul. Russians in the Former Soviet Republics. Indiana University Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaitin, David D. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Cornell University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLejiņš, Atis, and Daina Bleiere, ed. The Baltic States: Search For Security. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLieven, Anatol. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLinz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. Problem of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMisiunas, Romuald J. & Rein Taagepera. The Baltic States— Years of Dependence 1940-1990. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNørgaard, Ole. The Baltic States after Independence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaun, Toivo U. Estonia and The Estonians. Hoover Institution Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShlapentokh, Vladimir, Munir Sendich, and Emil Payin, ed. The New Russian Diaspora: Russian Minorites in the Former Soviet Republics. M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Graham, ed. The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States, 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman, 1996. (A)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Graham, The Baltic States: The National self-Determination of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. New York: St. Martin’s press, 1996. (B)zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThaden, Edward C., ed. Russification in the Baltic Provinces and Finland, 1855-1914. Princeton University Press, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTrapans, Jan Arveds., ed. Toward Independence: The Baltic Popular Movements. Westview Press, Inc., 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference期刊:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAasland, Aadne, & Tone Fløtten. “Ethnic and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 53, No. 7 (2000), pp.1023-1049.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAasland, Aadne. “Citizenship Status and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (Spring 2002), pp.57-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAasland, Aadne. “The Russian Population in Latvia: An Integrated Minority?.” The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1994), pp.233-260.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarrington, Lowell. “The Domestic and International Consequence of Citizenship in the Soviet Successor States.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 47, No. 2 (1995), pp.731-763.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBilinsky, Yaroslav. “The Rulers and the Ruled,” Problems of Communism, Vol. 16. No. 5.(Sept.-Oct., 1967), p.17zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrubaker, W. Rogers. “Citizenship Struggles in Soviet Successor States.” International Migration Review, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Summer 1992),, pp.269-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDunlop, John B. “Will the Russian Return from the Near Abroad?.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1994), pp.204-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDunlop, John B. “Will a Large-Scale Migration of Russians to the Russian Republic Take Place Over the Current Decade?.,” International Migration Review, Vol. XXVII, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp.605-629.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvans, Geoffrey. “Ethnic Schism and the Consolidation of Post-Communist Democracies - The Case of Estonia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1 (1998), pp.57-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarris, Chauncy D. ”The New Russian Minorities: A Statistical Overview.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1993), pp.1-27zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarris, Chauncy D. “Ethnic Tensions in the Successor Republics in 1993 and Early 1994.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1994), pp.185-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHass, Alin. “Non-Violence in Ethnic Relations in Estonia.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXVII, No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp.47-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHenning, Detlef. “Foreign-Language Teaching in the Baltic Republics in the Past and Present.” European Education, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Fall 1994), p.49-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJärve, Priit. “Two Waves of Language Laws in the Baltic states: Change of Rationale?.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (Spring 2002), pp.78-110zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKirch, Aksel, Marika Kirch and Tarmo Tuisk. “Russians in the Baltic States: To Be or Not To Be?.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (Summer 1993), pp.173-188.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKolstø, Pål. “The New Russian Diaspora – an Identity of Its Own? Possible Identity Trajectories for Russians in the Former Soviet Republic.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 13 (July, 1996), pp.609-639.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaley, William. “Does Russia Speak for Baltic Russians?.” The World Today, Vol. 51. No.1 (January, 1995), pp.4-6.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePark, Andrus. “Ethnicity and Independence: The Casa of Estonia in Comparative Perspective.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1 (1994), pp.69-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaun, Toivo U. “Estonia in the 1990S.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXII, No. 1 (Spring 2001), pp.19-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRaun, Toivo U. “Post-Soviet Estonia, 1991-1993.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 1 (Spring 1994), pp.73-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRose, Richard. “Economic Conditions of Nationalities in the Baltics.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 36, No. 8 (1995), pp.475-495.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRudenshiold, Eric. “Ethnic Dimensions in Contemporary Latvian Politics: Focusing Forces for Change.” Soviet Studies, Vol. 44, No. 4 (1992), pp.609-639.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchafer, Robert B. and Elisabeth A. Schafer. “Latvia in Transition: A Study of Change in a Former Republic of the USSR.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (Summer 1993), pp.161-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSenn, Alfred Erich. “Lithuania’s First Two Years of Independence.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 1 (Spring 1994), pp.81-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Graham. “Transnational Politics and the Politics of the Russian Diaspora.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol.22, No.3 (May 1999), pp.500-523.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVihalemm, Triin. “Group Identity Formation Processes Among Russian- Speaking Settlers of Estonia: A linguistic Perspective.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXX, No. 1 (Spring 1999), pp.18-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZvinkliene, Alina. “The Creation of a National State: the case of inter-ethnic marriage in Lithuania.” Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, Vol. 5. No. 6. (1996), pp.111-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“War of Nerves”, Time Weekly, (New York: The Time Inc. April 2, 1990) , pp.18-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference報紙:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Gorbachev Warns Lithuanians of Tragedy over Separatism.” China Post, Taipei, January 12, 1990, p1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Nationalists in Estonia, Latvia Sweep to victory.” China Post, March 20, 1990. p1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Lithuania Asks Gorbachev Not to Take New Measures.” China Post, Taipei, April 11, 1990, p.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Moscow Cuts Oil, Reduces Natural Gas to Lithuania.” China Post, Taipei, April 20, 1990, p.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Three Baltic Republics Recreate Baltic Council.” China Post, Taipei, May, 13, 1990, P.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Moscow Says Blockade Fully Lifted Against Lithuania.” China Post, Taipei, July, 4, 1990, P.2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、網路資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Republic of Latvia Law on Citizenship 1994,” 拉脫維亞公民權法網址http://www.uta.edu/cpsees/latcit.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference“Russian Communities in Estonia”, http://www.einst.ee/society/russian_communities.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991年12月5日通過的立陶宛公民權法,全文內容可參閱網址:http://www.tm.lt/Litlex/Eng/Frames/Laws/Documents/55.HTM, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995年愛沙尼亞語言法的全文,全文內容可參閱網址:http://www.riga.lv/minelres/NationalLegislation/Estonia/Estonia_Language_English.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrian E. Moffitt, “Russian Minorities and Citizenship Laws in the Baltics,” http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/9058/intr2.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年4月28日zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrazina Miniotate著,林哲夫譯,《立陶宛的非暴力抗爭》http://www.geocities.com/tranps2000/book004/LIc03.htm 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMart Rannut, “Estonian Language Syrategy in Progress”, http://www.linguapax.org/congres/taller/taller3/article22_ang.html 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOligerts Eglitis著,林哲夫譯,《拉脫維亞的非暴力抗》 http://www.geocities.com/tranps2000/book003/LAc02.htm 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRob Zagman, “Conflict Prevention in the Baltic States: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania,” (Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues, 1999, vii + 71 pp. ISBN 3-932635-08-6) http://www.ecmi.de/doc/download/monograph_1.pdf, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference立陶宛資料統計機關,網址:http://www.std.lt/web/main.php 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference拉脫維亞統計機關,網址:http://www.csb.lv/ 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference愛沙尼亞統計機關,網址:http://www.stat.ee/ 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
26300901.pdf13.27 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300902.pdf17.57 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300903.pdf21.83 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300904.pdf21.22 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300905.pdf40.41 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300906.pdf270.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300907.pdf93.39 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300908.pdf329.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300909.pdf380.51 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300910.pdf19.1 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
26300911.pdf35.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a01.pdf598.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a02.pdf734.16 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a03.pdf67.97 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a04.pdf937.71 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a05.pdf325.82 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a06.pdf768.57 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a07.pdf359.9 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a08.pdf594.41 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009a09.pdf494.36 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
263009b01.pdf150.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.