Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34551
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor楊婉瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳惠鈴zh_TW
dc.creator陳惠鈴zh_TW
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-19T07:36:13Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-19T07:36:13Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-19T07:36:13Z-
dc.identifierG0922520291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34551-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description政治研究所zh_TW
dc.description92252029zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究主要目的在探討女性獨立選民的社會背景特徵,以及她們和國民黨、民進黨之間的連結關係,透過TEDS 2004年總統面訪調查的資料,及焦體團體訪談的資料,來分析她們對兩大政黨的印象。\n 在調查資料方面,分別透過女性獨立選民和男性獨立選民、女性非獨立選民的比較,發現女性獨立選民在個人社會背景、情境、政治涉入等因素,與後兩者有顯著的差異。其中,在年齡方面和過往的研究有稍許的出入,不同於生命週期理論所預期的,隨著年齡的增長政黨認同愈趨強烈,年齡愈長的女性反而易成為獨立選民,這或許跟她們長久以來經歷一連串的政治動亂,導致她們愈遠離政治有關;另在教育方面,過往的研究也都指出獨立選民的教育程度是較低的,而本文發現女性獨立選民雖然教育程度偏低,但高教育程度的比例卻有增加的趨勢,這顯然與教育的普及化,提升了整體選民教育水準不無關係。\n 整體而言,女性獨立選民的特徵為年齡在60歲以上及40~49歲者、中低教育程度者、居住在北部地區、職業為家管、低收入家庭者、已婚、低政治涉入者。\n 在焦點團體方面,女性獨立選民受到不同的教育、情境、政治涉入等變數的影響,其對國、民兩黨產生不同的政黨形象認知差異。女性獨立選民對兩黨形象的正面評價多於負面評價,這或許可從女性強調人際關係的連結、與歸屬感的角度解釋,所以在態度上對政黨的評價,會來得比較正面。整體而言,女性獨立選對政黨整體性的形象內涵建立在對社會大環境變動的關懷上,更確切地說是建立在兩黨相互比較的基礎上而來。\n 相較於以往有關選民對政黨形象的研究指出,大部份的選民對國、民兩黨在政治性立場上(如統獨議題、兩岸關係等)的差異有清楚的印象,但從焦點團體訪談中,發現女性獨立選民甚少從政治性的角度來描繪兩黨的形象,這似乎某種程度上可說明女性獨立選民是較遠離政治的,不習慣或不喜歡以意識形態或抽象觀念的途徑來理解政黨,而是連結到與生命經驗關懷相關的層面,關注的是一般社會性面向的議題(如民生經濟、教育問題等),而這些往往較能誘發她們對政治討論的興趣。\n 最後,本文認為調查研究和焦點團體研究的方法是相輔相成的,透過調查資料的分析,瞭解女性獨立選民的特質及對政黨的一般印象,而焦點團體研究在這基礎之上,將訪談的結果用以補充、或解釋一些量化資料所無法得知道的政黨形象內涵。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents目次 i\n表次 iii\n圖次 v\n第一章 緒論 1\n 第一節 研究動機 1\n 第二節 研究重要性 2\n 第三節 研究問題 4\n 第四節 章節安排 5\n第二章 理論基礎與文獻回顧 6\n 第一節 獨立選民的研究 6\n 第二節 政黨形象的研究 15\n第三章 研究方法 24\n 第一節 研究方法 24\n 第二節 資料蒐集與資料處理 28\n 第三節 研究方向 32\n第四章 女性獨立選民的基本特質 40\n 第一節 研究現象—誰是女性獨立選民? 40\n 第二節 女性獨立選民的政治涉入程度 53\n 第三節 女性獨立選民對政黨的喜歡程度與政黨形象之印象 58\n第五章 女性獨立選民眼中的政黨形象 70\n 第一節 女性獨立選民對政黨的整體性印象 71\n 第二節 教育程度和情境因素對政黨形象認知的影響 76\n 第三節 政治涉入程度因素對政黨形象認知的影響 85\n 第四節 控制教育情境和政治涉入程度因素對政黨形象認知的影響 93\n第六章 結論 99\n 第一節 女性獨立選民的特質 99\n 第二節 女性獨立選民對政黨形象的認知 101\n 第三節 綜合討論 105\n 第四節 檢討與建議 109\n參考文獻 113\n 一、中文參考書目 113\n 二、英文參考書目 116\n附錄 123\n 附錄一 國內獨立選民研究相關文獻及其研究結果 123\n 附錄二 訪談前問卷 125\n 附錄三 訪談問卷 127\n 附錄四 女性獨立選民背景分析一覽表 129zh_TW
dc.format.extent138253 bytes-
dc.format.extent140181 bytes-
dc.format.extent162114 bytes-
dc.format.extent231771 bytes-
dc.format.extent264621 bytes-
dc.format.extent477595 bytes-
dc.format.extent309112 bytes-
dc.format.extent411208 bytes-
dc.format.extent255773 bytes-
dc.format.extent240779 bytes-
dc.format.extent373411 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922520291en_US
dc.subject獨立選民zh_TW
dc.subject女性獨立選民zh_TW
dc.subject政黨形象zh_TW
dc.subject焦點團體zh_TW
dc.subject政治涉入zh_TW
dc.title女性獨立選民的政黨形象研究zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王甫昌zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 「族群意識、民族主義與政黨支持:一九九○年代台灣的族群政zh_TW
dc.relation.reference治」,台灣社會學研究,2期,頁1-45。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王柏燿zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 「經濟評估與投票提擇:以2001年立委選舉為例」,選舉研究,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11卷1期,頁171-195。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王興中zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 「政黨形象與選舉行為」,東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱曉玉zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 「獨立選民投票行為之研究:二○○○年與二○○四年總統選舉之分析zh_TW
dc.relation.reference與比較」,銘傳大學公共管理與社區發展研究所碩士在職專班論zh_TW
dc.relation.reference文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何思因、吳釗燮zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 「台灣政黨體系之下政黨認同的測量方法」,選舉研究,3卷1期,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference頁1-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳乃德zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 「家庭社會化和意識型態:台灣選民政黨認同的世代差異」,台灣zh_TW
dc.relation.reference社會學研究,3期,頁53-85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李大正、楊靜利zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 「台灣婦女勞動參與類型與歷程之變遷」,人口學刊,28期,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference頁109-134。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李寬芳、鄭俊昇zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 「獨立選民性質之研究—『積極獨立選民』與『消極獨立選民』的zh_TW
dc.relation.reference區隔與投票行為研究」,2000年選舉研究學術研討會論文集,地zh_TW
dc.relation.reference點:國立政治大學,時間:2000年10月21-22日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周雅容zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 「焦點團體法在調查研究上的應用」,調查研究,3期,頁51-73。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林佳瑩、徐富珍(校定)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 研究方法:基礎理論與技巧,Earl Babbie原著,台北:雙葉書廊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐火炎zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 「政黨認同與投票抉擇:台灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好、與黨派zh_TW
dc.relation.reference投票行為之分析」,人文及社會科學集刊,4卷1期,頁1-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁秀琪、孫秀蕙zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 「性別政治?-從民國八十二年台灣地區縣、市長選舉看性別、傳zh_TW
dc.relation.reference播與政治行為」,新聞學研究,51期,頁87-111。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張嘉倫zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 「2002年北、高市長選舉中獨立選民的投票抉擇研究」,國立中正zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大學政治學系暨研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊天憐zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 「我國獨立選民的發展與變遷(1989~1999)」,國立政治大學政zh_TW
dc.relation.reference治學系碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許文賓zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 「誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?以2001年台灣地區選民政黨認同的zh_TW
dc.relation.reference決定因素為例」,國立中正大學政治學系暨研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭琮淵zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 「國民黨與民進黨政黨形象之跨時性分析:以三次總統大選選後調zh_TW
dc.relation.reference查為例」,東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳文俊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 「台灣地區學生的政治文化-中、大學生的政治態度與台灣民主化zh_TW
dc.relation.reference的前景」,國立中山大學社會科學季刊,1卷3期,頁23-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳明通zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 「民進黨的政黨形象~一項縱時性的觀察」,台灣政治學會第五屆zh_TW
dc.relation.reference學術研討會論文,地點:東吳大學,時間:1998年12月12-13日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游清鑫zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 「政黨認同與政黨形象:面訪與焦體團體訪談的結合」,選舉研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究,9卷2期,頁83-115。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游盈隆zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 「政黨形象、意識型態與台灣選舉變遷」,中央研究院民族學研究zh_TW
dc.relation.reference所季刊,78期,頁61-99。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉義周zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 「台灣選民政黨形象的世代差異」,選舉研究,1卷1期,頁53-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference73。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 「政黨民主與台灣民主化」,台灣民主季刊,1卷1期,頁41-63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃秀端zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 「政治知識之認知與性別差異」,東吳政治學報,5期,頁27-50。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 「候選人形象、候選人情感溫度計、與總統選民投票行為」,台灣zh_TW
dc.relation.reference民主季刊,2卷4期:1-30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃秀端、趙湘瓊zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 「台灣婦女近十年來政治態度的變遷:民國七十二年至八十一zh_TW
dc.relation.reference年」, 問題與研究,35卷10期,頁71-95。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference葉銘元zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 「我國獨立選民之研究」,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廖庭慧zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 「政治專家與生手在投票取向上的差異:以一九九六年及二千年總zh_TW
dc.relation.reference統大選為例」,東吳大學政治學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference歐陽晟zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 「台灣民主轉型政黨競爭型態社會基礎(1986-1992)」,國立台灣zh_TW
dc.relation.reference大學政治學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭夙芬zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 「台灣民眾眼中的政黨—一個焦點團體研究法應用實例之初探」,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference選舉研究,11卷2期,頁185-216。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 「焦點團體研究法的理論與應用」,選舉研究,12卷1期,頁211- 239。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇建州、梁世武、蔡佩芳zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 「『選民獨立性指標』與『獨立選民』之研究:以TEDS2002之台北zh_TW
dc.relation.reference市資料為例」,「2002年台灣選舉與民主化調查」國際學術研究會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference論文集。地點:國立政治大學,時間:2003年11月1-2日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference嚴祥鸞zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 「台灣勞動市場性別化分工的解析:1951-1994」,勞資關係論zh_TW
dc.relation.reference叢,5期,頁147-176。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAbramson, Paul R.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1976 “Generational Change and the Decline of Partyzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIdentification in America: 1952-1974.” Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Science Review, 70(2): 469-478.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAiji, Tanaka and Martin, Sherryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 “The New Independent Voter and the Evolvingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJapanese Party System.” Asian Perspective, 27(3):zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaumer, Donald C. and Gold, Howard J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 “Party Images and the American Electorate.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmerican Politics Quarterly, 23(1): 33-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBendyna, Mary E. and Celinda C. Lakezh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 “Gender and Voting in the 1992 Presidentialzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElection.” In Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomaszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Clyde Wilcox, eds., The Year of the Woman:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMyths and Realities, pp.237-55. Boulder, CO:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWestview.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurden, Barry C. and Steven, Greenezh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 “Party Attachments and State Election Laws.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Research Quarterly, 53: 57-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurnham, Walter Deanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1970 Critical Elections and the Mainspring of Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitics. New York: W. W. Norton.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurns, Nacy, Kay L. Schlozman and Sidney Verbazh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 “The Public Consequences of Private Inequality:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFamily Life and Citizen Participation.” Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Science Review, 91(2): 373-389.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCacioppo John and Gary Berntsonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 “Realtionship Between Attitudes and Evaluativezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpace: A Critical Review of the Separability ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePositive and Negative Substrates.” Psychologicalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBulletin, 115: 401-423.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCameron, David R.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1972 “Stability and Change in Patterns of Frenchzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePartisanship.” Public Opinion Quarterly,36: 19-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampbell, Angus and Warren E. Millerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1957 “The Motivational Basis of Straight and Splitzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTicket Voting.” American Political Sciencezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReview, 51: 293-312.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokeszh_TW
dc.relation.reference1960 The American Voter. Chicago: The University ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarroll, Susan J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1989 “Gender Politics and the Socializing Impact of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWomen’s Movement.” In Roberta S. Sigel, ed.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Learning in Adulthood, pp: 306-339.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChaney, Carole Kennedy, R. Michael Aluarezand and Jonathan Naglerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 “Explaining the Gender Gap in U.S. Presidentialzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElections, 1982-1992.” Political Researchzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceQuarterly, 51(2): 311-390zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceConverse, Philip E.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1962 “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAttitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(4): 578-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference599.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1966 “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAttitudes.” In Augus Campbell, Philip E.Converse,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWarren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes, eds.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceElections and the Political Order. New York: Johnzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWiley and Sons, INC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1969 “Of Time and Partisan Stability.” Comparativezh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Studies, 2: 139-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceConway, Margaret M.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 Political Participation in the United States.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWashington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceConway, Margaret M., Gertrude A. Steuernagel and David W. Ahernzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 Women and Political Participation. Washington. DC:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCongressional Quarterly Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCraig, Stephen.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1985 “The Decline of Partisanship in the United States:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceA Reexamination of the Neutrality Hypothesis.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Behavior, 7: 57-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDelli Carpini, Michael X. and Scott Keeterzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 What Americans Know about Politics and Why Itzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMatters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDe Vries, Walter and Lance Tarrance, Jr.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1972 The Tickets-Spliter: A New Force in Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitics. Grand Rapid,Michigan: Illiam B. Eerdmanszh_TW
dc.relation.referencePublishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDennis, Jackzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1988a “Political Independence in American, Part I: Onzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeing an Independent Partisan Supporter.”Britishzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal of Political Science, 18(1): 77-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1988b “Political Independence in American, Part II:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTowards a Theory.” British Journal of Politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScience, 18(2): 197-219.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 “The Study of Electoral Behavior.” In Williamzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCrotty, ed., Political science: Looking to thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeture, Volume Three, Political Behavior.Evanston,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIL: Northwestern University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEagly, Alice and Shelly Chaikenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 The Psychology of Attitudes. New York: Harcourtzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrace Jovanovich.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEldersveld, Samuel J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1952 “The Independent Vote: Measurement,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCharacteristics, and Implications for Partyzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStrategy.” American Political Science Review, 46:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference732-753.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFlanigan, William H. and Nancy H. Zingalezh_TW
dc.relation.reference1988 Political Behavior of the American Electorate.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDubuque, Jowa: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilligans, Carol A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1982 In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvardzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreene, Steven and Laurel Elderzh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 “Gender and the Psychological Structure ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePartisanship.” Women & Politics, 22(1): 63-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJennings, M. Kent and Richard G. Niemizh_TW
dc.relation.reference1981 Generations and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princetonzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKeith E. Bruce, David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye and Raymond E. Wolfingerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1992 The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKelley, Anne E., William E. Hulbary and Lewis Bowmanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 “Gender, Partisanship, and Background Explainzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDifferences in Grass-roots Party Activists’zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Attitudes.” In Lois Lovelace Duke, ed.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWomen in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders? pp. 67-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference78. New Jersey: Clemson University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKey, V. O., Jr.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1966 The Responsible Electorate: Rationality inzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePresidential Voting, 1963-1960. Cambridge:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity of Harvard Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnodel, J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 “The Design and Analysis of Focus Group Studies: Azh_TW
dc.relation.referencePractical Approach.” In David L. Morgan, ed.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSuccessful Focus Group, pp. 35-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLin, Chiung Chuzh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 “Party Image and Taiwan’s Electorate,1992~2000.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaper presented at the 2nd conference of thezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEuropean Association of Taiwan Studies, 1-2 Aprilzh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005, Rhur-University, Bochum, Germany.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManheim, Jarol B. Richard C. Rich,Lars Willnat and Craig L. Brianszh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 Empirical Political Analysis: Research Methods inzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Science. 5thed.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMatthews, Donald R. and James W. Prothrozh_TW
dc.relation.reference1964 “Southern Images of Political Parties: An Analysiszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof White and Negro Attitudes.” The Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitics, 26(1): 82-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1966 “The Concept of Party Image and its Importance forzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe Southern Electorate.” In M. Kent Jennings andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceL. Harmon Zeigler eds., The Electoral Process.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcGlen, Nancy E.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1980 “The Impact of Parenthood on Politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParticipation.” The Western Political Quarterly,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33(3): 297-313.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeisel, John.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1973 “Party Images in Canada: A Report on Work inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceProgress.” In Working Papers on Canadianzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitics, enlarged ed., Montreal: McGill-Queen’szh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMerton, R. K., Patricia L. Kendall and Allbert E. Gollinzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1990 The Focused Interview: A Manual of Problems andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceProcedures. 2nd ed., New York: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeyer, Allanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1962 “The independent Voter.” In William McPhee andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilliam Glaser, eds., Public Opinion andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCongressional Elections. New York: Free Press ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlencoe.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiller, Arthur H. and Martin P. Wattenbergzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1983 “Measuring Party Identification: Independent or Nozh_TW
dc.relation.referencePartisan Preference?” American Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Science, 27(1): 106-121.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNie, Norman, Sidney Verba and John Petrocikzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1976 The Changing American Voter. Cambridge: Harvardzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorrander, Barbarazh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 “The Independent Gap and the Gender Gap.” Thezh_TW
dc.relation.referencePublic Opinion Quarterly, 61(3): 464-476.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePatterson, Dennis and Misa Nishikawazh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 “Political interest or Interest in Politics?zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGender and Party Support in Postwar Japan.” Womenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference& Politics, 24(2): 1-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePomper, Gerald M.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1975 Voter’s Choice. New York: Harper and Row.Sanders,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArthur.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1988 “The Meaning of Party Images.” The Westernzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Quarterly, 14(3): 583-599.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTrilling, Richard J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1976 Party Image and Electoral Behavior. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWattenberg, Martin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1986 The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1984. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeber, Douglas Leezh_TW
dc.relation.reference1974 An Empirical-Normative Revaluation of the Americanzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIndependent Voter: 1952-1968. Ph. D. Dissertation ,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiami University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeisberg, Herbert F.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1980 “A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Partyzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIdentification.” Political Behavior, 2(1): 33-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeisberg, Herbert F.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1987 “The Demographics of a New Voting Gap Maritalzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDifferences in American Voting.” The Publiczh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOpinion Quarterly, 51(3): 335-343.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
52029101.pdf135.01 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029102.pdf136.9 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029103.pdf158.31 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029104.pdf226.34 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029105.pdf258.42 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029106.pdf466.4 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029107.pdf301.87 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029108.pdf401.57 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029109.pdf249.78 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029110.pdf235.14 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
52029111.pdf364.66 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.