Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34731
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor楊建成zh_TW
dc.contributor.author吳佩凌zh_TW
dc.creator吳佩凌zh_TW
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T03:01:59Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T03:01:59Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T03:01:59Z-
dc.identifierG0872555012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34731-
dc.description博士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description87255501zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract過去有關最適所得稅理論、所得稅逃漏問題、以及政府最適稽查策略的研究文獻,主要多建立在政府與納稅人間存在著資訊不對稱的假設下。本文將此處所謂資訊不對稱,區分為兩種類別的問題:第一種類別是指政府對納稅人獲取所得的能力與勞動供給皆無法得知,但卻可以在無需花費任何成本的情況下,完全掌握到納稅人的所得水準。第二個類別則是指政府不僅無法掌握納稅人的能力與勞動供給,也必須透過查核方能掌握到納稅人的所得水準,而查核工作通常必須付出稽查成本。\n本文主要的研究目的,在探討前述第二種類別的資訊不對稱問題\n,如何影響最適所得稅理論、政府稽查策略、以及納稅人逃漏行為等。至於研究架構則分為兩大部分,第一部份是將第二種類別的資訊不對稱問題納入最適所得稅的研究之中。我們主要的重點在於探討當稽查機率並非政府事前政策變數,且政府的稽查策略與納稅人的逃漏稅行為是互為影響時,最適所得稅理論的分析結論,究竟如何改變。第二部分則是探討實務上常見的兩階段查核方式,對政府稽查策略與納稅人申報行為的影響,並比較其與直接隨機查核策略的差異。在此所謂的兩階段查核,是指政府在第一階段先根據以往稽查經驗,分析具逃漏稅傾向者的所得來源或特徵,並藉此建立篩選標準,以對納稅人進行選案分析,俾篩選出具有較高傾向可能從事特定逃漏稅行為的納稅人。其次,再從第一階段篩選出的納稅人,以不同機率或查核方式來進行第二階段的隨機查核。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………. 1\n 1. 文獻回顧 …………………………………….. 1\n 2. 研究目的與方法 …………………………….. 5\n 參考文獻 …………………………………………. 6\n\n第二章 不對稱資訊下最適所得稅之研究 ………………. 9\n1. 前言 …………………………………….……. 9\n 1.1 文獻回顧 ………………..………………. 9\n 1.2 研究目的與方法 ………..……………….12\n 1.2.1 研究目的 …………..……………..12\n 1.2.2 研究方法 …………..……………..14\n 2. 外生所得下之最適所得稅分析 …………..….15\n 2.1 基本假設 ……………………………….15\n 2.2 完全訊息下之最適所得稅分析 ……….18\n 2.3 不具有完全訊息下之最適所得稅分析\n -預告稽查機率 ……………………..19\n 2.4 不具有完全訊息下之最適所得稅分析\n -未預告稽查機率 …………………..23\n 2.4.1 均衡稽查率與均衡逃漏率分析 ..25\n 2.4.2 最適均衡分析 …………………..29\n 2.5 外生性罰款之模型分析 ………………...37\n\n\n 2.6 結語 …………………………………….45\n3. 內生所得下之最適所得稅分析 …………..47\n 3.1 基本假設 ……………………………..47\n 3.2 預告稽查機率下之最適所得稅分析 ..52\n 3.3 未預告稽查機率下之最適所得稅分析 60\n 3.3.1 高能力者可能偽裝為低能力者 .60\n 3.3.2 高能力者不會偽裝為低能力者 .71\n 3.4 結語 ……………………………………82\n 附錄 ……………………………………….83\n 參考文獻 …………………………………..100\n\n第三章 兩階段查核下逃漏稅行為之分析 ………………102\n1. 前言 ………………………………………….102\n2. 基本假設 …………………………………….106\n3. Nash均衡解之求導 …………………………111\n4. 均衡查核率與均衡逃漏率之分析 ………….119\n5. 兩階段查核與單一階段查核策略之比較 ….126\n6. 結語 ………………………………………….135\n附錄 ……………………………………………...136\n參考文獻 ……………………………………….140\n\n第四章 結論 ………………………………………………143\n 參考文獻 ………………………………………..145zh_TW
dc.format.extent52238 bytes-
dc.format.extent95023 bytes-
dc.format.extent50433 bytes-
dc.format.extent63799 bytes-
dc.format.extent94584 bytes-
dc.format.extent1288944 bytes-
dc.format.extent761347 bytes-
dc.format.extent61555 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0872555012en_US
dc.subject資訊不對稱zh_TW
dc.subject最適所得稅zh_TW
dc.subject兩階段查核策略zh_TW
dc.subject租稅逃漏zh_TW
dc.title不對稱資訊下最適所得稅與租稅逃漏及查核策略之研究zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAllingham, M.G., and A. Sandomo, 1972, IncomeTax Evasion: a Theoretical Analysis, Journal of Public Economics 1, 323-338.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBoadway, R. and M. Keen, 1993, Public Goods, Self-selection and Optimal Income Taxation, International Economic Review 34, 463-478.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBorder, K. and J. Sobel, 1987, Samurai Account: A Theory of Auditing and Plunder, Review of Economic Studies 54, 525-540.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChander, P. and L. Wilde, 1998, A Characterization of Optimal Income Tax Enforcement, Review of Economic Studies 65, 165-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChu, C.Y., 1990, Plea bargaining with the IRS, Journal of Public Economics 41, 319-333.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCowell, F. A., 1985, The Economic Analysis of Tax Evasion, Bulletin of Economic Research 37, 163-193.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCremer, H. and F. Gahvari, 1995, Tax evasion and the Optimal General Income Tax, Journal of Public Economics 60, 235-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCremer, H., M. Marchand, and P. Pestieau, 1990, Evading, Auditing and Taxing : The Equity-Compliance Tradeoff, Journal of Pubic Economics 43,67-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEdgeworth, F.Y., 1897, The pure theory of taxation, Economic Journal 7, 46-70,226-238 and 550-571(reprinted in Edgeworth, 1925).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEdgeworth, F.Y., 1925, Papers Relating to Political Economy, Volume II, Royal Economic Society, Macmillan, London.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGraetz, M., J. Reinganum, and L. Wilde, 1986, The Tax Compliance Game: Toward an Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2, 1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKhalil, F., 1997, Auding without Commitment, Rand Journal of Economics 28, 629-640.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMirrless, J. A., 1971, An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation, Review of Economic Studies 28, 175-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMookherjee, D. and I. P. L. Png, 1989, Optimal Auditing, Insurance and Redistribution, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 399-415.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParson, D., 1996, Imperfect ‘Tagging’ in Social Insurance Programs,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRedistribution, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 399-415.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReinganum, J. F. and L. L. Wilde, 1985, Income Tax Compliance in a Principal-Agent Framework, Journal of Pubic Economics 26, 1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReinganum, J. F. and L. L. Wilde, 1986, Equilibrium Verification and Reporting Policies in a Model of Tax Compliance, International Economics Review 27, 739-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSanchez, I. and J. Sobel, 1993, Hierarchical Design and Enforcement of Income Tax Policies, Journal of Pubic Economics 50, 345-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScotchmer, S., 1987, Audit Classes and Tax Enforcement Policy, American Economic Review 77,129-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSeade, J., 1977, On the Shape of Optimal Tax Schedules, Journal of Pubic Economics 7, 203-236.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSrinivasan, T. N., 1973, Tax Evasion: a Model, Journal of Public Economics 2, 339-346.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStiglitz, J. E., 1987, Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and New New Welfare Economics, in: Auerbach, A. and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Volume II, North-Holland, Amsterdam 991-1042.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTax Enforcement, Review of Economic Studies 65, 165-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTownsend, R. M., 1979, Optimal Contract and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification, Journal of Economic Theory 21, 265-293.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUeng, K.L. and C.C. Yang, 2001, Plea bargaining with the IRS : Extension and Further Results, Journal of Public Economics 81, 83-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceYitzhaki, S., 1974, A Note on Income Tax Evasion: a Theoretical Analysis, Journal of Public Economics 3, 201-202.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
55501201.pdf51.01 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501202.pdf92.8 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501203.pdf49.25 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501204.pdf62.3 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501205.pdf92.37 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501206.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501207.pdf743.5 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
55501208.pdf60.11 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.