1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 商學院
  3. 資訊管理學系
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35276
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor諶家蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorSeng, Jia Langen_US
dc.contributor.author林政宏zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLin, Cheng Hungen_US
dc.creator林政宏zh_TW
dc.creatorLin, Cheng Hungen_US
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T06:36:58Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T06:36:58Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T06:36:58Z-
dc.identifierG0923560241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35276-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description資訊管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description92356024zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract在企業對企業電子商務整合中，資料之間異質性以及系統間的互通性是最重要的議題之一。在整合過程中，我們必須考慮網路協定的整合、交易伙伴的整合、商業流程的整合以及商業文件的整合。一個電子商務標準通常會定義這些範圍，但是，電子商務標準都是定義語法部份而較少定義語意部份。在企業對企業電子商務整合過程當中，我們應該調解在商業訊息、商業字彙及資料字典中的語意衝突。\n本體論是語意網的關鍵技術，本體論可以呈現出一個領域中語意，並且能夠推論。我們使用本體論的技術解決企業對企業電子商務整合的問題。我們提出了一個以本體論為基礎的方法來分析並研發一個企業對企業電子商務整合應用。透過使用企業對企業電子商務的本體，我們希望可以能夠了解及重覆使用企業對企業電子商務領域的知識。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractHeterogeneity and interoperability are the main issues in B2B integration. We have to consider the integration of different exchange protocols, trading partners, business processes, and business documents. A B2B standard usually specifies those integration dimensions. However, B2B standards are syntactic rather than semantic. B2B integration should conciliate the semantic conflicts between business messages, vocabularies, and data dictionary.\nOntology is the key technology enables Semantic Web. Ontology can reason easier and represent the semantic of a domain. We believe that using ontology technology can solve the B2B integration issues. We propose an ontology-based approach to analyze and develop B2B integration model. By using the B2B ontologies, we hope to reuse and understand the domain knowledge.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsList of Tables III\nList of Figures IV\nChapter 1 Introduction 1\n1.1 Research Motivation 1\n1.2 Research Issue 2\n1.3 Research Objective 3\n1.4 Research Flow 3\n1.5 Organization of the Thesis 4\nChapter 2 Literature Review 6\n2.1 B2B Integration 6\n2.1.1 Introduction 6\n2.1.2 ebXML 8\n2.1.3 RosettaNet 12\n2.1.4 Open Issues 14\n2.2 Semantic Web and Ontology 15\n2.2.1 Introduction 15\n2.2.2 Ontology Languages 17\n2.3 Ontology Application in e-Commerce 20\n2.3.1 Ontology and e-Commerce 20\n2.3.2 Semantic B2B Integration 25\n2.3.3 Semantic Web enabled Web Service (SWWS) 26\n2.3.4 Domain Ontology Management Environment (DOME) 27\n2.3.5 Ontology with ebXML and RosettaNet 28\n2.3.6 Discussion 32\nChapter 3 Research Method 37\n3.1 A Ontology-Based Method 37\n3.2 Business Process Modeling – UML-based 38\n3.2.1 UML 38\n3.3 Ontology Modeling Heuristics 46\n3.5 The Merge, Representation and Testing of Ontologies 60\n3.6 Discussion 63\nChapter 4 Research Prototype and Implementation 66\n4.1 Prototype Platform and Architecture 66\n4.2 Prototype Design and Functions 67\n4.2.1 DTD Importer 68\n4.2.2 Ontology Editor 70\n4.2.3 Ontology Display 74\n4.3 Research Implementation: Case Study – RosettaNet 74\n4.4 Research Implementation: Case Study – ebXML 89\n4.5 Discussion 92\nChapter 5 Research Discussions and Limitations 93\n5.1 Research Implications 93\n5.2 Research Limitations 95\nChapter 6 Conclusions and Future Research 96\n6.1 Summary 96\n6.2 Future Research Directions 96\nReferences 98\nAppendix A: XML DTD Example 101\nAppendix B: Business Process Specification Schema Example 106\nAppendix C: Process Ontology Template 108zh_TW
dc.format.extent49535 bytes-
dc.format.extent69122 bytes-
dc.format.extent80985 bytes-
dc.format.extent93132 bytes-
dc.format.extent54240 bytes-
dc.format.extent694886 bytes-
dc.format.extent417664 bytes-
dc.format.extent1039826 bytes-
dc.format.extent48344 bytes-
dc.format.extent41624 bytes-
dc.format.extent53211 bytes-
dc.format.extent205622 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923560241en_US
dc.subject企業對企業電子商務整合zh_TW
dc.subject商業流程zh_TW
dc.subject本體論zh_TW
dc.subject語意網zh_TW
dc.subjectB2B Integrationen_US
dc.subjectBusiness Processen_US
dc.subjectOntologyen_US
dc.subjectSemantic Weben_US
dc.title以本體論輔助之企業對企業電子商務之整合應用zh_TW
dc.titleAn Ontology Application in B2B Integrationen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference1. Baclawski, K., Kokar, M.K., Kogut, P.A., Hart, L., Smith, J., Letkowski, J., and Emery, P., “Extending the Unified Modeling Language for ontology development”, Software and Systems Modeling, 1:2, pp 142-156, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2. Berners-Lee, T., “Keynote Speech of Semantic Web- XML 2000”, http://www.w3.org/2000/Talks/1206-xml2k-tbl/, 2000zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., “The Semantic Web”, Scientific American, May 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4. Bussler, C., “Semantic B2B integration”, ACM SIGMOD Record, 30:2, pp 625, June 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5. Bussler, C., “Modeling and Executing Semantic B2B Integration”, Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering: Engineering E-Commerce/E-Business Systems, pp 69-74, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6. Carlson, D., Modeling XML Application with UML, Addison-Wesley, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7. Bussler, C., Fensel, D., Maedche, A., “A Conceptual Architecture for Semantic Web Enabled Web Services”, ACM SIGMOD Record, 31:4, December 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8. Cranefield, S., ”Networked Knowledge Representation and Exchange using UML and RDF”, Journal of Digital Information, 1:8, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9. Cranefield, S., ”UML and the Semantic Web”, Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium, pp 113-130, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10. Cranefield, S., and Purvis, M., “UML as an Ontology Modelling Language”, In Proceedings of 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence on Workshop on Intelligent Information Integration, 1999zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11. Cut, Z., Jones, D., and O`Brien, P., “Semantic B2B Integration: Issues in Ontology-based Approaches”, ACM SIGMOD Record, 31:1, pp 43-48, March 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12. DAML+OIL Language, http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13. Ding, Y., Fensel, D., Klein, M., Omelayenko, B., and Schulten, E., “The Role of Ontologies in eCommerce”, in Handbook on Ontologies, Staab S. and Studer R. (ed.), Springer, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14. ebXML, http://www.ebxml.org/, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15. ebXML Technical Architecture Specification, http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebTA.pdf, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16. Falkovych, K., Sabou, M., and Stuckenschmidt, H., “UML for the Semantic Web:Transformation-Based Approaches”, Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web, pp 92-106, 2003zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17. Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., Devedzic, V., and Damjanovic, V., “Converting UML to OWL Ontologies”, Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters, pp 488-489, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18. Gruber, T. R., “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”. Knowledge Acquisition., 5:2, pp 199-220,1993zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19. Hofreiter, B.,and Hurmer, C., “B2B Integration – Aligning ebXML and Ontology Approaches”, Proceedings of the First EurAsian Conference on Information and Communication Technology, pp 339-349, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20. Klein, M., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D., and Fensel, D., “Ontology versioning and change detection on the web”, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, pp 197-212, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21. Kogut P., Cranefield S., Hart L, Dutra M., Baclawski K., Kokar M.,and Smith J., “UML for Ontology Development”, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17:1, pp 61-64, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22. Liang, C.P., “Development of Electronic Commerce Standard”, http://taiweb.compaq.com.tw/cmain/news/d_file.asp, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23. Medjahed, B., Benatallah, B., Bouguettaya, A., Ngu, A.H.H, and Elmagarmid, A.K., “Business-to-business interactions: issues and enabling technologies”, The VLDB Journal, 12:1, pp 59-85, 2003zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24. OASIS Consortium, http://www.oasis-open.org, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25. Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org, 2003zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26. Omelayenko, B., “Preliminary Ontology Modeling for B2B Content Integration”, Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp 7-13, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27. Omelayenko, B., ”RDFT: A Mapping Meta-Ontology for Business Integration” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic for the Semantic Web at the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 77-84, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28. Omelayenko, B., and Fensel, D., “An Analysis of B2B Catalogue Integration problems: Content and Document Integration”, Proceedings of the International conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp 945-952, 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29. Omelayenko, B., Fensel, D., Bussler, C., “Mapping Technology for Enterprise Integration”, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pp 419-424, 20zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30. Pedrinaci C., Bernaras A., Smithers T., Aguado J., and Cendoya M., ”A Framework for Ontology Reuse and Persistence Integrating UML and Sesame”, Proceedings of CAEPIA, pp 37-46, 2003zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31. Resource Description Framework (RDF), http://www.w3c.org/RDF/, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32. RosettaNet Consortium, http://www.rosettanet.org/, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33. Stojanovic L., Maedche A., Motik B., and Stojanovic N., “User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management”, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, pp 285-300, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference34. Trastour, D., Preist, C., and Coleman, D., ”Using Semantic Web Technology to Enhance Current Business-to-Business Integration Approaches”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, pp 222-231, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference35. Web Ontology Language, http://www.w3c.org/2004/OWL/, 2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference36. World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3c.org, 2004zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
56024101.pdf48.37 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024102.pdf67.5 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024103.pdf79.09 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024104.pdf90.95 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024105.pdf52.97 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024106.pdf678.6 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024107.pdf407.88 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024108.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024109.pdf47.21 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024110.pdf40.65 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024111.pdf51.96 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56024112.pdf200.8 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.