Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35712
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蕭乃沂zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHsiao,Naiyien_US
dc.contributor.author陳韋聿zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen,Wei -Yuen_US
dc.creator陳韋聿zh_TW
dc.creatorChen,Wei -Yuen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-18T07:49:10Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-18T07:49:10Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-18T07:49:10Z-
dc.identifierG0922560051en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35712-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description公共行政研究所zh_TW
dc.description92256005zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract長久以來,電子化政府與公民信任之間的因果關係,一直為學者所爭論。眾多研究顯示電子化政府有助於促進公民信任感;然而,目前公民對現有電子化政府服務、電子參與滿意度偏低,且台灣社會資本逐步流失,不免令人質疑電子化政府建立公民信任感的有效性。然而,近年電子治理的提出,眾人期待實現審慎思辨的民主,顯現運用資訊通信科技讓更多公民參與決策過程的重要性。因而引起作者在電子治理對公民信任影響上研究的興趣。\r\n本文認為電子化政府可以促進公民對政府的信任,但前提是這項機制必須值得信賴,否則將出現反效果。故作者從電子治理中的電子參與著手,探討其對公民信任的影響。主要研究方法為文獻回顧及深度訪談,其中訪談對象為十四位具我國電子參與經驗者,運用質性研究分析訪談資料,輔以文獻檢閱釐清電子參與與公民信任之間的影響路徑與因素包括三種類型:1.使用電子參與後,其正面影響因素提升公民對政府的信任感;2.使用電子參與後,其負面影響因素降低公民的內在政治效能感,進而削弱對政府的信任感;3.公民對政府的低度信任,降低使用電子參與的意願與行為。\r\n訪談分析顯示公民對政府的信任和政府電子參與機制的信任感不足,且兩者相互影響。受訪者對政府的信任感比對政府網站和電子參與機制的信任感低,而電子參與經驗豐富者,較不信任電子參與機制;電子參與經驗淺者,較信任電子參與機制。若以電子參與的三種類型觀之,公民對電子資訊提供較為滿意、電子諮詢次之,雖然我國尚未設置電子決策制定,但是多數受訪者對此機制運作表示質疑。\r\n我國電子參與仍在持續推動中,政府應該正視公民信任的重要性,以及電子參與與公民信任之間的負面影響因素,著重在:資訊的深度與多元性、資訊透明度、資訊品質、搜尋系統的設計完善、回應性、使用者的代表性、論壇引導話題、資訊安全與互動性的維護,並消弭數位落差、避免資訊超載等情況,以營造公民進行電子參與的環境與設備,使其有足夠誘因使用,期許我國電子參與推行順利。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe casual relationship between e-government and citizen trust(in government) has been argued by scholars. Research has shown that e-government may improve citizen trust, but citizens are not satisfied with e-services and e-participation nowadays. When social capital in Taiwan is flowing away, people tend to suspect the effectiveness of e-government in establishing citizen trust. However, citizens still expect deliberative democracy while e-governance comes to reality recently. It means that the importance of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can enrich the process of decision-making for citizen participation. That’s the reason why the author attempts to explore the effect of e-participation on citizen trust.\r\nThe evidence support that e-government can improve citizen trust in government. The premise, nevertheless, is its mechanism has gained fundamental trust; otherwise, negative effects will come out. The main research methods include literature review and in-depth interview. There are 14 interviewees with experience of e-participation in Taiwan. In addition, the author used qualitative method to analyze interview data. Besides, using literature to induce three types of effects paths and causes between e-participation and citizen trust. Firstly, after using e-participation, its positive factors improve citizen trust in government. Secondly, after using e-participation, its negative factors lower internal efficacy of citizen and then weaken their trust in government. Thirdly, the low trust in government will weaken willingness and behavior of e-participation.\r\nInterview results indicate the lack of citizen trust in government and e-participation, and both also connect each other. Interviewees’ trust in government is lower than their trust in government web sites and e-participation. Citizens with rich experience of e-participation show lower trust in e-participation. On the other hand, those with poor experience of e-participation have more trust in e-participation. If we observe three types of e-participation, citizens are more satisfied with e-information than e-consultation. Although e-decision-making has not been realized in Taiwan, many interviewees suspect this mechanism.\r\n The governments in Taiwan keep pushing e-participation. They should know the importance of citizen trust and the negative factors between e-participation and citizen trust revealed in the study. Particularly, governments should focus on depth and diverse information, transparency, quality of information, friendly use of search engine, responsiveness, and representative. They should also properly manage topics of e-forum, information safety, interactivity; eliminate digital divide and avoid information overload. Government should strive for good environment and facilitate citizen usage of e-participation. Our e-participation will succeed while government has good inducement to encourage citizen.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 □□□ 1\r\n第一節 □研究背景 1\r\n第二節 □研究動機與目的 2\r\n第三節 □研究範圍與流程 3\r\n第貳章 □暰m回顧 5\r\n第一節 □電子參與的意涵 5\r\n第二節 □公民信任的意涵 9\r\n第三節 □電子參與與公民信任的關係 10\r\n第四節 台灣電子參與現況 17\r\n第三章□研究方法 20\r\n第一節□研究架構 20\r\n第二節 質性研究方法 21\r\n第三節 研究對象與訪談提綱 25\r\n第四章□X談分析 38\r\n第一節 電子參與對公民信任的正面影響與因素 38\r\n第二節 電子參與對公民信任的負面影響與因素 49\r\n第三節 公民信任對電子參與的負面影響與因素 71\r\n第四節 影響電子參與及公民信任的其他因素 78\r\n第五章 結論與建議 85\r\n第一節 綜合討論 85\r\n第二節 政策建議 96\r\n第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 98\r\n參考書目 100\r\n附錄一 訪談紀錄 108zh_TW
dc.format.extent326203 bytes-
dc.format.extent329886 bytes-
dc.format.extent66359 bytes-
dc.format.extent331390 bytes-
dc.format.extent900837 bytes-
dc.format.extent359664 bytes-
dc.format.extent616733 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922560051en_US
dc.subject電子參與zh_TW
dc.subject公民信任zh_TW
dc.subject電子諮詢zh_TW
dc.subject電子資訊提供zh_TW
dc.subject電子決策制定zh_TW
dc.subjecte-participationen_US
dc.subjectcitizen trusten_US
dc.subjecte-consultationen_US
dc.subjecte-informationen_US
dc.subjecte-decision-makingen_US
dc.title電子參與對公民信任之影響zh_TW
dc.titleExploring the Effect of e-Participation on Citizen Trusten_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、 中文書目zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中國時報市政組(2005.10.27)。〈挨批單位:引用非抄襲〉,《中時電子報》,2005.11.18檢索,http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content/0,3546,11050601+112005102700281,00.html。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference內政部網站,http://www.moi.gov.tw,2005/10瀏覽。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王仕圖、吳慧敏(2005)。〈深度訪談與案例演練〉。齊力、林本炫編。《質性研究方法與資料分析》,頁91-116。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王佳煌(2002)。〈電子化政府與電子民主:以台北市政府為例〉。《國政研究報告》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference北投文化基金會網站。新聞稿---「北投老街區的明天 創造我們想要的生活環境」公民共識會議即將於北投舉行,2005.5.12檢索, http://www.ptcf.org.tw/ptcf2/modules/myproject/case.php?cat_id=32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江明修、陳敦源、黃東益、莊國榮、蕭乃沂(2005)。《運用資訊通信科技實現「全民參政理想」之規劃與研究》。台北:九十三年度財團法人資訊工業策進會委託研究案。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱邦賢(2005.5.26)。英要指紋、眼球虹彩 也有爭議-歐盟各國因應反恐 捺指紋已是趨勢 但統一標準還在紙上作業。聯合報/A4版/要聞。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱道凱譯(2000)。《網路商機:如何經營虛擬社群?》(Hagel J. & Arthur G.。臺北市:麥田出版股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院研究發展考核委員會。民眾對電子化政府相關議題的看法民意調查。2005.10.26檢索,http://enable.rdec.gov.tw/template/1099015759/20041029100919_96.pdf。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳定(1999.8.1-2000.7.31)。《電子化政府與公民信任關係之研究》,行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳芝儀、廖梅花譯(2002)。《質性研究入門 紮根理論研究方法》(Strauss A. & Corbin J.)。濤石文化事業有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李宗勳(2006)。(2006.1.7),〈資訊業務委外的機會與挑戰-協力治理關點〉,「數位治理:機會與挑戰圓桌論壇」。台北:政治大學公共行政系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李德財(2005)。〈換發身份證與全民指紋資料庫之疑慮〉,《蕃薯藤新聞》, 2005.5.25檢索,http://news.yam.com/yam/politics/200505/20050525168243.html。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李宛蓉譯(2004)。《信任》(Fukuyama, F.)。臺北縣:立緒文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何家欣(2003)。《網路使用者對於網路隱私權的選擇態度衡量》,彰化縣:大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何全德、王國政(2006)。(2006.1.7),〈數位落差政策的省思與談文〉,「數位治理:機會與挑戰圓桌論壇」。台北:政治大學公共行政系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference尚榮安譯(2001)。《個案研究》(Yin, R. K.)。台北縣:弘智文化事業有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林純如(2003)。《電子化政府公共服務評估之探討》,台北:國立政治大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林昆練(2005)。〈新聞局停止置入性行銷〉,《動腦雜誌》,第351 輯,2006.1.14檢索,http://www.cyberone.com.tw/ItemDetailPage/MainContent/05MediaContent.asp?MMMediaType=BrainMG&offset=12&MMContentNoID=19481。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡龍騰(2005.5.20)。〈Can public trust be really improved by governmental performance? A preliminary analysis of polls in United States〉,「公共服務績效與公民信任—理論與實務的創新學術研討會」。台中市:東海大學公共行政學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡幼慧(1996)。〈焦點團體法〉。胡幼慧主編。《質性研究 理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,頁223-237。高雄:巨流圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐宗國譯(1997)。《質性研究概論》(Strauss & Corbin)。台北市:巨流圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐宗國(1996)。〈紮根理論研究法--淵源、原則、技術與涵義〉。胡幼慧主編,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北市:巨流圖書有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許嘉文(2003)。《電子化政府入口網站服務功能之研究-從民眾使用觀點出發》,高雄:中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許立一(2003)。〈後現代性與公共對話的窘境:地方政府促進公民參與的策略〉。《國政研究報告》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹淑文(2001)。《我國電子化政府民眾滿意度之研究─以台北市政府網站為例》,台北市:台北大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference項靖(2006.1.7)。〈數位落差政策的省思〉,「數位治理:機會與挑戰圓桌論壇」。台北:政治大學公共行政系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盛治仁(2003),〈台灣民眾民主價值和政治信任感〉。《選舉研究》,10(1)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳俊明、黃東益、陳敦源(2005.5.20)。〈電子化政府與公民信任:一個探索性的台灣個案研究〉,「公共服務績效與公民信任—理論與實務的創新學術研討會」。台中市:東海大學公共行政學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳欽春(2004)。《民主治理與社會資本:台灣地區公民信任實證研究》。台北:台北大學公共行政暨政策學系博士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂(2001)。〈資訊與民主:台灣立法機關網站政治溝通功能之評估〉,《理論與政策》,15(3),19-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳敦源、黃東益、蕭乃沂(2004)。〈電子化參與:公共政策過程中的網路公民參與〉,《研考雙月刊》,28(4),36-51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳敦源(2005)。《民主與官僚:新制度論的觀點》。台北縣:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳秀瑄(2003)。《正面和負面政治廣告對政治知識、政治犬儒主義與政治效能感、投票行為的影響:以2002年台北市長選舉為例》,台北縣:輔仁大學大眾傳播所碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南圖書出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳昊麟(2001)。〈社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹〉,《勤益學報》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張嘉彬(2004)。〈從資訊超載現象探討圖書館所應扮演之角色〉,《中國圖書館學會會報》,72, 53-67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張志偉譯(2000)。《網路民主》(Morris D.)。臺北市:商周出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference梁德馨(2004)。《台閩地區數位落差調查報告》,行政院發展考核委員會委託研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃朝盟、王俊元、許耿明(2004)。〈數位民主之實踐與挑戰-網路電子投票之析探〉。《研考雙月刊》,28(4),67-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃紀(2001)。《2001年台灣選舉與民主化調查研究》(TEDS 2001)。台北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃佳珊(2005)。《台灣縣市政府機關數位化落差成因與對策之研究》,台北:世新大學行政管理學系碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃孝如譯(2004)。《我們為什麼不再信任》(Onora O’Neill)。台北市:早安財經文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference董娟娟(2005.5.20)。〈從監視社會理論看公民信任〉,「公共服務績效與公民信任—理論與實務的創新學術研討會」。台中市:東海大學公共行政學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉光慈(1999)。《電子化政府資訊安全管理之研究-以中央健康保險局為例》,台北:國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴豪君、廖書賢(2004)。〈電子化民主法治規劃芻議〉。《研考雙月刊》,28(4),78-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝培仁(2002)。《電子化政府便民應用服務民眾滿意度之研究-以電子化政府入口網站為例》。台北:國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭乃沂(2004)。〈公民關係管理與政策問題建構:以民意電子信箱為起點〉。《國家政策季刊》,155-174。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅晉(2004.12)。〈網際審議式民主之實現與現實:以我國地方政府網際網際公共論壇為例〉。《行政暨政策學報》,39,105-142。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、 英文書目zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES(2005/10/27).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://lacity.org/clk/councilagendas/clkcouncilagendas333047_10262005.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCerritos City web site(2005/10/27).zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.ci.cerritos.ca.us/citygov/meetagenda.html.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarter L. & F. Belanger.(2005).Utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal,15,5-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceClift,S. L.(2004).E-GOVERNMENT AND DEMOCRACY- Representation and Engagement in the Information Age ,Retrieved May 3,2005,from http://www.publicus.net/articles/cliftegovdemocracy.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCamp, L. J.(2003).Design for Trust.In Rino Falcone(Ed.),Trust, Reputation and Security: Theories and Practice. Berlin : Springer-Verlang.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceE-Government Handbook(2005). Retrieved May 12,2005, from http://www.cdt.org/egov/handbook.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlobal Internet Policy Initiative(GIPI).(2003.2.3).Privacy and E-Government: Privacy Impact Assessments and Privacy Commissioners –Two Mechanisms for Protecting Privacy to Promote Citizen Trust Online, Post to http://www.internetpolicy.net/practices/030501pia.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolzer, M.& S.Kim. (2003).Digital Government Governance in Municipalities Worldwide- An Assessment of Municipal Web Sites throughout the World, The E-Governance Institute/ National Center for Public Productivity Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Campus at Newark, Global e-Policy e-Government Institute Sungkyunkwan University, Retrieved May ,2005, from http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~egovinst/Website/summary.htm.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLocal E-democracy National Project (2005), Retrieved Dec. 2005, from http://www.e-democracy.gov.uk/glossary.htm?mode=2&var_az=e.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSakowicz , M.(2005).How to Evaluate E-Government? Different Methodologies and Methods, Retrieved March,2005, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN009486.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTsekos,T. & V.Peristeras.(2003.4).E-governance as a public policy framework,Paper present at the 11th NISPAcee Conference Enhancing the Capacity to Governance. Bucharest, Romania.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoon, M. J.(2003).Can IT Help Government to Restore Public Trust?:Declining Public Trust and Potential Prospects of IT in the Public Sector, Paper present at the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences : Hawaii,USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorrell, M. E.(2003).Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy, Public Opinion Quarterly,67,589-602.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorthrup , T.A. & S. J.Thorson. (2002).The Web of Governance and Democratic Accountability ,Paper present at the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences : Hawaii,USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParent M., C. A. Vandebeek, & A. C. Gemino.(2004).Building Citizen Trust through e-Government, Paper present at the 37th Hawaii International Conference. Hawaii,USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRiley, T. B. & C. G.Riley, (2003),E-GOVERNANCE to E-DEMOCRACY: EXAMINING THE EVOLUTION , INTERNATIONAL TRACKING SURVEY REPORT ‘03 NUMBER FIVE.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRao, M.(2003).E-Governance Technologies and Issues:Opportunities and Challenges in India, Retrieved 1 Dec, 2005, from unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/ public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN003826.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRose G., M.Warkentin, D. Gefen & P.Pavlou. (2003).The Role and System Characteristics of Internet-Voting in the Republic of South Africa: Looking Inside a Multi-cultural,Nascent Democracy, Paper present at the 11th Annual CCRIS meeting: Seattle,USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStolfo S. J., E.Johnson, T.Pavlicic & S.Jan.(2002).Citizen’s Attitudes about Privacy While Accessing Government and Private Websites: Results of an Online Study. NSF Digital Government program SGER grant, number 0140304-0027078000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Working Group on E-government in the Developing World(2002).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoadmap for E-government in the Developing World-10 Questions E-GOVERNMENT Leaders Should Ask Themselves, Pacific Council on International Policy.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTolbert, C. & K.Mossberger. (2003).The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government, Retrieved January 8,2005, from http://www.digitalgovernment.org/dgrc/dgo2003/cdrom/PAPERS/citsgovt/tolbert.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited Nations (2003).UN Global E-government Survey.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUnited Nations (2004). Towards Access for Opportunity, Global E-government Readiness Report.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVenkatesh V. & F.D.Davis. (2000).A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science , 46(2), 186–204.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWelch,E. W. & C. C.Hinnant.(2003). Internet Use, Transparency, and Interactivity Effects on Trust in Government , Paper present at the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences : Hawaii,USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWelch, E. W., C. C. Hinnant & M. J.Moon. (2005).Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15:371-391.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
56005101.pdf318.56 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56005102.pdf322.15 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56005103.pdf64.8 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56005104.pdf323.62 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56005105.pdf879.72 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
56005106.pdf351.23 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.