北區公私立高中校長策略領導與學校效能之研究

Abstract

本研究旨在瞭解北區公私立高中校長策略領導與學校效能之現況，並分析校長人口變項、教育人員人口變項、學校環境變項在校長策略領導以及學校效能的差異情形，最後探討校長策略領導與學校效能之關係。\n本研究以問卷調查法為主，半結構式訪談為輔。問卷調查法以自編「高中校長策略領導與學校效能調查問卷」（內含學校基本資料、校長策略領導量表與學校效能量表）為工具，並依問卷調查歸納相關的問題，設計並確定訪談大綱，做為訪談的依據，實地訪談公私立高中校長各1位，以確認問卷設計之方向，並藉由整理訪談文字資料、編碼歸類整理，以綜合問卷調查與訪談資料，進行研究結果的分析與討論。修正後問卷以臺北市、臺北縣、基隆市、桃園縣、新竹市、新竹縣之公私立高中教育人員為研究對象，分層隨機抽取30所學校，共發出問卷467份，回收458份，有效問卷458份。所得資料以描述性統計、ｔ考驗、單因子變異數分析與Scheffé事後比較、Pearson’s積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行資料分析。研究結論如下：\n壹、北區公私立高中教育人員知覺校長策略領導與學校效能之現況，屬良好程度。\n貳、在校長人口變項中，校長不同學歷與服務年資在校長策略領導表現無顯著不同，而校長不同性別與不同年齡則有差異，其中以男性優於女性，「36～45歲」優於「46～55歲」及「56歲以上」。\n參、在教育人員人口變項中，不同性別、年齡、年資在校長策略領導表現無顯著不同，不同職務則有差異，以「主任或秘書」及「組長」表現較佳。\n肆、在學校環境變項中不同位置、規模、類別、屬性對校長策略領導之表現均有差異，以「61班以上」、「直轄市」、「私立」、「普通高中」表現佳。\n伍、在校長人口變項中，教育人員對校長不同性別在學校效能覺知上並無差異，而不同學歷、服務年資、年齡有差異，以「36～45歲」、「5年以下」及「31年以上」、「碩士四十學分」及「博士」表現較優。\n陸、在教育人員人口變項中，不同性別在學校效能覺知上並無差異，而不同年齡、年資、職務則有差異，以「56歲以上」及「46-55歲」、「5年以下」及「21-30年」、「主任或秘書」及「組長」表現較優。\n柒、在學校環境變項中，不同位置、規模、類別、屬性對學校效能之表現均有差異，以「41-60班」及「61班以上」、「直轄市」、「私立」、「綜合高中」之表現較佳。\n捌、高中校長策略領導與學校效能之間，有顯著的正相關。\n玖、北區公私立高中校長策略領導對學校效能具有預測力。\n最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為高中校長、教育行政機關、以及未來研究的參考。

This study aims to investigate the current development of the public and personal principal’s strategic leadership and school effectiveness and to analyze the differences in teachers’ and principals’ personal variables and school environmental variables concerning principals’ strategic leadership and school effectiveness in north area. Finally, it explores the relationship between principal’s strategic leadership and school effectiveness.\nThis study employs the research method of questionnaire surveys and semi structured interviews. The survey is used in the study, including the school database, principal’s strategic leadership questionnaire and school effectiveness questionnaire.\nThe frame of the interview questions was designed according to the findings from the questionnaire. Two principals, each from the public and personal senior school, were interviewed to clarify and extend the findings of the survey. Then, the data retrieved from questionnaires and interviews were compiled, categorized, synthesized and analyzed.\nThe revised questionnaires are studied by the teachings who work in the public and personal senior high school of Taipei City, Taipei County, Keelung City, Taoyuan County, Hsinchu City, Hsinchu County. Then, use random sampling way to select thirty senior schools. 467 subjects are randomly selected, 458 questionnaires were returned, and there are 458 questionnaires were valid.\nValid sample data was analyzed and processed using the methods of description statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffé posteriori comparison, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and stepwise multiple regressions.\nFollowing is the summary of the study:\n1. The awareness of the strategic of principals and school effectiveness in north area are in good condition.\n2. In the variable of principals’ personnel, there is no significant difference in the principal’s strategic leadership in terms of principals’ seniority, and educational background. But there are some differences in terms of principals’ gender and age. The male is better than the female, and the age between 36 – 45 years old are better than 46-55 years old and above 56 years old.\n3. In the teaching’s group, there’s no significant difference in the principal’s strategic leadership in terms of gender, age, and seniority. While there are some differences in terms of position. The chief of department, secretaries and section leader are above average.\n4. There are significant differences in the principal’s strategic leadership from schools of different scales. Over 61 classes, in the metropolitan, private owned and ordinary senior high schools got better scores.\n5. There is no significant difference in the principal’s strategic leadership in terms of gender. There are significant differences in terms of principals’ educational background, seniority and age to the school effectiveness, and the age between 36-45 years old, under 5 years experiences, over 31 years experiences, master degree and above got better scores.\n6. In the teaching’s group, there is no significant difference in the recognition of school effectiveness in terms of gender. While there are significant differences in terms of age, seniority, and position. The age between 46-55 years old and above, under 5 years experiences, between 21-30 years experiences, chief of department, secretaries, section leader got better scores.\n7. There are some differences in the school effectiveness from schools of different scales. 41-60 classes and above, in the metropolitan, private owned and compound senior high schools got better scores.\n8. It shows significant positive correlation between principal’s strategic leadership and school effectiveness.\n9. Principal’s strategic leadership of the public and personal senior high schools in north area demonstrates the predictability of the school effectiveness.\nThis study is finalized at proposing practical suggestions based on the findings and conclusions to educational administration authorities, senior high school principals, educators and faculty for further study and reference.