雙向度社會計量地位分類方法之比較--以國小學生為例

Abstract

本研究主要在探討Peery (1979)、Coie、Coppotelli和Dodge (1982)、Newcomb 和 Bukowski （ 1983 ）與 Coie 和 Dodge （ 1988 ）等四種雙向度社會計量地位分類方 法的優劣。 研究中以 154 位三、五年級的小學生為樣本，進行四個月的長期研究，分析四 種類模式在各類別的分配情形，考驗各模式分類結果的鑑別效果及時間穩定性。結果顯示這 四種模式都有分類架構上的缺失， 其中 Newcomb 和 Bukowski （ 1983 ）與 Coie 和 Dodge （ 1988 ）模式是較佳的分類方法；另外研究者也針對此二種模式提出若干修正，提 供實際運用的參考。

The purpose of this study was to investigate advantages and disadvanage of four two-dimensional classified system of sociometric status had proposed by Peery (1979), Coie, Coppotelli and Dodge (1982), Newcomb and Bukowski (1983) and Coie and Dodge (1988). 154 third- and fifth-grade children served as subjects at three time-intervals during four monthes. It explored the discriminant validity and tenporal stability of four classified models. The results indicated that none of these was a cerfect classified scheme, so we proposed some modifications. The models of Newcomb and Bukowski (1983) and Coie and Dodge (1988) were the better choices.