| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳振寬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chen, Zhen Kuan | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 張國雄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Dennis Zhang, Guo Xiong | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 張國雄 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Dennis Zhang, Guo Xiong | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 1994 | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 1993 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 29-Apr-2016 15:08:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 29-Apr-2016 15:08:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 29-Apr-2016 15:08:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | B2002003739 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88196 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 英國語文學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | G795409 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 基於憲法的保障以及選民的負託，立法委員得以在會期內，就政府施政得失要求官員答詢解釋。而立委由於來自不同的社會、政治背景，自然各有其獨特的質詢方式。因此，國會實為「中斷言談」(Interruption)之研究提供一適切領域。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | With a mandate by the Constitution and the electorate, lawmakers can inquire the government officials` explanations for policies within the parliamentary sessions, tt is only natural that lawmakers coming from diverse social and political realms may show distinct styles of questioning. Thus, parliament does offer a fit province for interruption analysis. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements-----iii Chinese Abstract-----vii English Abstract-----viii TABLE OF CONTENTS-----iv Chapter 1. Introduction-----1 The Problem and Purpose-----1 Review of Previous Researches-----3 Turn-Taking System-----3 Definition of Interruption-----8 Significance of Interruption-----17 2. Background-----25 Taiwan`s Recent History of Political Development-----25 Ethnic Differences-----29 Aborigine-----30 Taiwanese-----30 Hakka-----31 Mainland Chinese-----32 Party Politics-----32 The Nationalist Party (Kuomintang)-----33 Democratic Progressive Party-----34 Chinese New Party-----36 Official Ranking-----37 3. Methodology-----41 The Power Semantics-----42 Legislature: The Legislative Yuan-----43 Organization of the Legislature-----44 The Questioning System-----45 Party Identity-----49 Official Ranking-----51 Ethnic Identity-----52 The Data-----54 The Procedures-----55 The Hypotheses-----57 4. Results and Discussion-----60 General Discussion-----60 The Effects of Party Identity-----62 The Effects of Ethnic Differences-----65 The Effects of Official Ranking-----70 5. Conclusion-----79 The Status of CPI-----80 The Validity of the Data-----81 The Selection of the Variables-----83 Further Directions-----85 Appendixes A. Transcription Symbols-----86 B. Name List of the Officials-----87 C. Exchanges of Interruptions Between Lawmakers and Officials in Each Dyad-----89 Works Cited----100 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003739 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 中斷言談 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 質詢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 權力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 黨派 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 種族 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 官階 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | interruption | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | question | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | power | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | party | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ethnicity | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ranking | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 闡釋臺灣國會「中斷質詢」的社會政治因素 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Sociopolitical Determinants in Interpreting Taiwan`s Parliamentary Interruption | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en_US |
