學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 「這是上帝的貓」?:論《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中同伴物種之倫理
"This is God`s Cat"?: On Ethics of Companion Species in Life of Pi
作者 簡滋儀
Chien, Tzu Yi
貢獻者 邱彥彬
Chiou, Yen Bin
簡滋儀
Chien, Tzu Yi
關鍵詞 楊‧馬泰爾
《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》
唐娜‧哈洛威
同伴物種
關係性
成為共在
回視
擬人化
Yann Martel
Life of Pi
Donna Haraway
companion species
relationality
become with
respect
anthropomorphism
日期 2016
上傳時間 2-Aug-2016 15:43:04 (UTC+8)
摘要 本論文旨在重新思考人與動物之間的倫理關係,企圖擺脫西方哲學傳統之下人類中心的立場。透過哈洛威《同伴物種宣言》與《當物種相遇》中同伴物種的概念來閱讀馬泰爾的《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》,這樣的倫理關係得以透過建基於「關係性」上而實現,而非以西方哲學傳統下的人/動物之二元對立為基礎。在這樣的倫理關係中,人與動物在會面時透過「回視」達到溝通。也在會面中,人與動物與彼此「成為共在」,並且共同形塑彼此的主體性。此外,《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中可見擬人化的口吻敘述老虎理查‧帕克的故事,本文將解釋在這種擬人化中可以看見同伴物種倫理的實踐。
本論文由五個章節組成。第一章包含《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》相關評論,並回顧西方哲學傳統之下人與動物的關係。第二章意圖闡明在哈洛威脈絡之中同伴物種的概念,尤其是「關係性」和「成為共在」。透過檢視Pi和理查‧帕克在救生船上的種種細節,本文認為Pi和理查‧帕克的關係可被視為同伴物種的關係。第三章聚焦在「回視」的動作,作為同伴物種間建立雙向溝通的方式。本文也將透過「回視」深入分析Pi和理查‧帕克溝通上的(不)可能性。第四章將《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中兩個版本的故事讀為兩種動物敘事的並置。兩者皆從擬人化的角度去敘事,但是其中一個版本透露出同伴物種倫理的實踐,另一個版本則回歸到傳統人類中心式的解讀。第五章為本文之總結,主張蘊含同伴物種倫理的動物敘事能夠幫助我們理解如何透過關注生活中真實存在的動物去重新思考人與動物之間的關係。
The thesis aims to rethink an ethical relationship between humans and animals that is separated from the anthropocentric stance in the Western philosophical traditions. Reading Yann Martel’s Life of Pi in light of the ethics of companion species in Donna Haraway’s The Companion Manifesto and When Species Meet, I would like to contend that this ethical relationship take shape while it is founded on relationality, instead of the human/animal dichotomy. Acts of respect need to be exerted by human and animal participants when they meet. And in the meeting, they become with each other in the relationship in which their subjectivities are co-constituted by each other. The narrative of Pi living with Richard Parker employs a kind of anthropomorphism endowed with ethics of companion species.
This thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter One is a review of research on criticism of Life of Pi and discussions of human/animal relationships in the Western philosophical framework. Chapter Two aims to elucidate the concepts of companion species in Haraway’s context, including relationality and becoming-with. By examining the details in Pi and Richard Parker’s life on the lifeboat, I argue that they are in a companion-species relationship. Chapter Three focuses on the act of respect, the practice for the companion species to evoke mutual responses. The (im)possible communication between Pi and Richard Parker will be analyzed. Chapter Four reads the two versions of the story of Life of Pi as a juxtaposition of two kinds of animal narratives. Both told from anthropomorphic perspective, the story with the animals is registered with ethics of companion species while the story without animal returns to the traditional anthropocentric interpretation. Finally in Chapter Five, I conclude that animal narrative that is entailed with ethics of companion species enables us to rethink the human/animal relationship by attending to real animals which are physically beside us.
參考文獻 Acampora, Ralph. “Zoos and Eyes: Contesting Captivity and Seeking Successor Practices.” The Animal Ethics Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Susan J. Armstrong and Richard G. Botzler. London: Routledge, 2008. 501-506. Print.
Agamben, Giorgio. The Open. Standford: Standford UP, 2004. Print.
Augustine, St.. “The City of God.” Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 2. Ed. Philip Schaff. Trans. Marcus Dods. New York: Christian Literature Publishing, 1887. New Advent. Ed. Kevin Knight. Web. 27 Apr. 2015. .
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Vol. 2. London: Printed for W. Pickering, 1823. Print.
Coetzee, J. M.. The Lives of the Animals. Ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001. Print.
Cole, Stewart. “Believing in Tigers: Anthropomorphism and Incredulity in Yann Martel’s Life of Pi.” Studies in Canadian Literature/Études en littérature canadienne (SCL/ÉLC) 29.2 (2004): 22-36. Web. 13 May 2016.
Derrida, Jacques. “And Say the Animal Responded,” The Animal That Therefore I am. New York: Fordham UP, 2008. 119-140. Print.
——. “The Animal That Therefore I am (More to Follow),” The Animal That Therefore I am. New York: Fordham UP, 2008. 1-51. Print.
Descartes, René. Philosophical Essays and Correspondence. Ed. Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000. Print.
Dywer, June. “Yann Martel’s Life of Pi and the Evolution of the Shipwreck Narrative.” Modern Language Studies 35.2 (2005):9-21. Web. 30 May 2016.
Haraway, Donna J.. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm P, 2003. Print.
——. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. Print.
Have you ever heard of speciesism?. Oakland, CA: Animal Ethics, Inc., 2016. Web. 27 May 2016.
Hilbert, David. “Comments on ‘Anthropomorphism.’” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 69. 2/3 (1993): 123-127. Web. 30 May 2016.
“Intersectionality: A Tool for Gender and Economic Justice,” Women’s Rights and Economic Change 9 (August 2004): n. pag. Web. 13 May 2016.
Jamieson, Dale. “Against Zoos.” The Animal Ethics Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Susan J. Armstrong and Richard G. Botzler. London: Routledge, 2008. 507-512. Print.
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Ed. Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind. Trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.
Martel, Yann. Life of Pi. Boston: Mariner Books, 1998. Print.
Mensch, James R.. Embodiments: From the Body to the Body Politic. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2009. Print.
Regan, Tom. “Sentience and Rights.” Animals, Ethics and Trade: The Challenge of Animal Sentience. Ed. Jacky Turner and Joyce D’Silva. London: Earthscan, 2006. 79-86. Print.
Smuts, Barbara. “Reflections.” The Animal Ethics Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Susan J. Armstrong and Richard G. Botzler. London: Routledge, 2008. 84-87. Print.
Stebbins, Sarah. “Anthropomorphism.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 69. 2/3 (1993): 113-122. Web. 30 May 2016.
Stratton, Florence. “‘Hollow at the Core’: Deconstructing Yann Martel’s Life of Pi.” Studies in Canadian Literature/Études en littérature canadienne (SCL/ÉLC) 29.2 (2004): 5-21. Web. 13 May 2016.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
101551001
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1015510011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邱彥彬zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chiou, Yen Binen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 簡滋儀zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chien, Tzu Yien_US
dc.creator (作者) 簡滋儀zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chien, Tzu Yien_US
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Aug-2016 15:43:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Aug-2016 15:43:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Aug-2016 15:43:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1015510011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99512-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 101551001zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文旨在重新思考人與動物之間的倫理關係,企圖擺脫西方哲學傳統之下人類中心的立場。透過哈洛威《同伴物種宣言》與《當物種相遇》中同伴物種的概念來閱讀馬泰爾的《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》,這樣的倫理關係得以透過建基於「關係性」上而實現,而非以西方哲學傳統下的人/動物之二元對立為基礎。在這樣的倫理關係中,人與動物在會面時透過「回視」達到溝通。也在會面中,人與動物與彼此「成為共在」,並且共同形塑彼此的主體性。此外,《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中可見擬人化的口吻敘述老虎理查‧帕克的故事,本文將解釋在這種擬人化中可以看見同伴物種倫理的實踐。
本論文由五個章節組成。第一章包含《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》相關評論,並回顧西方哲學傳統之下人與動物的關係。第二章意圖闡明在哈洛威脈絡之中同伴物種的概念,尤其是「關係性」和「成為共在」。透過檢視Pi和理查‧帕克在救生船上的種種細節,本文認為Pi和理查‧帕克的關係可被視為同伴物種的關係。第三章聚焦在「回視」的動作,作為同伴物種間建立雙向溝通的方式。本文也將透過「回視」深入分析Pi和理查‧帕克溝通上的(不)可能性。第四章將《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中兩個版本的故事讀為兩種動物敘事的並置。兩者皆從擬人化的角度去敘事,但是其中一個版本透露出同伴物種倫理的實踐,另一個版本則回歸到傳統人類中心式的解讀。第五章為本文之總結,主張蘊含同伴物種倫理的動物敘事能夠幫助我們理解如何透過關注生活中真實存在的動物去重新思考人與動物之間的關係。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The thesis aims to rethink an ethical relationship between humans and animals that is separated from the anthropocentric stance in the Western philosophical traditions. Reading Yann Martel’s Life of Pi in light of the ethics of companion species in Donna Haraway’s The Companion Manifesto and When Species Meet, I would like to contend that this ethical relationship take shape while it is founded on relationality, instead of the human/animal dichotomy. Acts of respect need to be exerted by human and animal participants when they meet. And in the meeting, they become with each other in the relationship in which their subjectivities are co-constituted by each other. The narrative of Pi living with Richard Parker employs a kind of anthropomorphism endowed with ethics of companion species.
This thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter One is a review of research on criticism of Life of Pi and discussions of human/animal relationships in the Western philosophical framework. Chapter Two aims to elucidate the concepts of companion species in Haraway’s context, including relationality and becoming-with. By examining the details in Pi and Richard Parker’s life on the lifeboat, I argue that they are in a companion-species relationship. Chapter Three focuses on the act of respect, the practice for the companion species to evoke mutual responses. The (im)possible communication between Pi and Richard Parker will be analyzed. Chapter Four reads the two versions of the story of Life of Pi as a juxtaposition of two kinds of animal narratives. Both told from anthropomorphic perspective, the story with the animals is registered with ethics of companion species while the story without animal returns to the traditional anthropocentric interpretation. Finally in Chapter Five, I conclude that animal narrative that is entailed with ethics of companion species enables us to rethink the human/animal relationship by attending to real animals which are physically beside us.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgements iii
Chinese Abstract vii
English Abstract ix
Chapter
1. Introduction 1
Literature Review 5
Methodology 13
Chapter Organization 15
2. In the Same Boat: Companion Species and Life of Pi 19
Seeing Real Animals 21
Relationality 25
Historical Specificity 33
Becoming with the Tiger 38
3. The Greatest Show on Earth: The Act of Respect 51
Looking back again at Companion and Species 54
The Act of Respect 58
4. The Better Story: Anthropomorphism and Companion Species 73
Two Kinds of Anthropomorphism 75
The Second Story 80
The First Story, or the Better Story 81
5. Conclusion 87
Works Cited 91
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1056775 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1015510011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 楊‧馬泰爾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 唐娜‧哈洛威zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 同伴物種zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關係性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 成為共在zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 回視zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 擬人化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Yann Martelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Life of Pien_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Donna Harawayen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) companion speciesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) relationalityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) become withen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) respecten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) anthropomorphismen_US
dc.title (題名) 「這是上帝的貓」?:論《少年Pi的奇幻漂流》中同伴物種之倫理zh_TW
dc.title (題名) "This is God`s Cat"?: On Ethics of Companion Species in Life of Pizh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Acampora, Ralph. “Zoos and Eyes: Contesting Captivity and Seeking Successor Practices.” The Animal Ethics Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Susan J. Armstrong and Richard G. Botzler. London: Routledge, 2008. 501-506. Print.
Agamben, Giorgio. The Open. Standford: Standford UP, 2004. Print.
Augustine, St.. “The City of God.” Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 2. Ed. Philip Schaff. Trans. Marcus Dods. New York: Christian Literature Publishing, 1887. New Advent. Ed. Kevin Knight. Web. 27 Apr. 2015. .
Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Vol. 2. London: Printed for W. Pickering, 1823. Print.
Coetzee, J. M.. The Lives of the Animals. Ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001. Print.
Cole, Stewart. “Believing in Tigers: Anthropomorphism and Incredulity in Yann Martel’s Life of Pi.” Studies in Canadian Literature/Études en littérature canadienne (SCL/ÉLC) 29.2 (2004): 22-36. Web. 13 May 2016.
Derrida, Jacques. “And Say the Animal Responded,” The Animal That Therefore I am. New York: Fordham UP, 2008. 119-140. Print.
——. “The Animal That Therefore I am (More to Follow),” The Animal That Therefore I am. New York: Fordham UP, 2008. 1-51. Print.
Descartes, René. Philosophical Essays and Correspondence. Ed. Roger Ariew. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000. Print.
Dywer, June. “Yann Martel’s Life of Pi and the Evolution of the Shipwreck Narrative.” Modern Language Studies 35.2 (2005):9-21. Web. 30 May 2016.
Haraway, Donna J.. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm P, 2003. Print.
——. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. Print.
Have you ever heard of speciesism?. Oakland, CA: Animal Ethics, Inc., 2016. Web. 27 May 2016.
Hilbert, David. “Comments on ‘Anthropomorphism.’” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 69. 2/3 (1993): 123-127. Web. 30 May 2016.
“Intersectionality: A Tool for Gender and Economic Justice,” Women’s Rights and Economic Change 9 (August 2004): n. pag. Web. 13 May 2016.
Jamieson, Dale. “Against Zoos.” The Animal Ethics Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Susan J. Armstrong and Richard G. Botzler. London: Routledge, 2008. 507-512. Print.
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Ed. Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind. Trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.
Martel, Yann. Life of Pi. Boston: Mariner Books, 1998. Print.
Mensch, James R.. Embodiments: From the Body to the Body Politic. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2009. Print.
Regan, Tom. “Sentience and Rights.” Animals, Ethics and Trade: The Challenge of Animal Sentience. Ed. Jacky Turner and Joyce D’Silva. London: Earthscan, 2006. 79-86. Print.
Smuts, Barbara. “Reflections.” The Animal Ethics Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Susan J. Armstrong and Richard G. Botzler. London: Routledge, 2008. 84-87. Print.
Stebbins, Sarah. “Anthropomorphism.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 69. 2/3 (1993): 113-122. Web. 30 May 2016.
Stratton, Florence. “‘Hollow at the Core’: Deconstructing Yann Martel’s Life of Pi.” Studies in Canadian Literature/Études en littérature canadienne (SCL/ÉLC) 29.2 (2004): 5-21. Web. 13 May 2016.
zh_TW