1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 「辯」「証」之中－ 論法斯塔夫在«亨利四世(上)(下)部»裡對謠言、驗證與懷疑論的操控
Falstaff’s Rejection Justified－ Rumor, Verification and Skepticism in Shakespeare’s 1 and 2 Henry IV
作者 趙麗婷
Chao, Li Ting
貢獻者 施堂模
Sellari, Thomas John
趙麗婷
Chao, Li Ting
關鍵詞 懷疑論
莎士比亞
亨利四世
法斯塔夫
謠言
不確定性
驗證
Skepticism
Shakespeare
Henry IV
Falstaff
Rumor
Uncertainty
Verification
日期 2016
上傳時間 22-Aug-2016 10:38:25 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文旨在探討法斯塔夫如何運用謠言虛實參半的特性, 將其中謠言中的不確定性轉化為對驗證方法的質疑。藉由探討文藝復興戲劇如何利用不確定性展現懷疑論者對既定概念的挑戰與啟發, 轉向分析法斯塔夫如何利用同樣模式對既定觀念展現反思。另一方面, 此種不確定性卻也可能被濫用。如同法斯塔夫嘗試藉由各種驗證方式(如邏輯、證據)支持自利的觀點, 此種濫用驗證的傾向最終將導致如同懷疑論般質疑驗證是否必定導向真理的疑問。並以此觀點嘗試解釋為何驅逐法斯塔夫是必要的。
Although critics for centuries attempt to offer a unified view to describe Falstaff’s nature as benign or vicious, some critics seem to fall short of evaluations to consider Falstaff’s motivations when they interpret Falstaff’s behavior along with his words. Critics such as Nicolas Rowe (1709) and Samuel Johnson (1787) have evaluated Falstaff’s character relevant to specific aspects of his behavior－such as Falstaff’s charm, wit or offenses－to justify that Falstaff is more mirthful than immoral. However, those lines of thought would remain contentious if we are not aware of the motivations when Falstaff exhibits dubious actions and beliefs. Even if recent critics appear to relate to Falstaff’s motivations to justify their evaluations of Falstaff’s character, they oftentimes focus more on Falstaff’s individual demeanor than the guiding principles behind.

The failure to perceive the principles that guide Falstaff’s behavior is significant because it would affect the way we should plausibly understand Falstaff’s nature, his behavior, and eventually his rejection. Since these issues are largely connected, to misconstrue one or more of these issues would render our evaluations problematic.Naturally enough, we should best identify Falstaff’s underlying principles before determining whether Falstaff’s rejection is justifiable or not.

In this regard, I argue for self-interest to be Falstaff’s inherent principle. Because of his expedient frame of mind to misuse verification systematically to justify dubious self-interest, Falstaff is detrimental both to our methodologies to verify and the conception of truth. Moreover, this inherent principle seems to be what Harry Frankfurt (2005) demonstrates to be the origin of skepticism, the distrust that we could obtain neither the methods nor the capabilities to perceive truth (64). This
expedient frame of mind renders Falstaff the agent who fosters skepticism throughout 1 and 2 Henry IV, and justifies why Falstaff’s rejection is legitimate.
參考文獻 Abrams, Richard. “Rumor’s Reign in 2 Henry IV: The Scope of a Personification.” English Literary Renaissance 16.3 (Autumn 1986): 467-495. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 100. Detroit: Gale, 2006. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420073531&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=90292b9edef43f2971eb3b0705419fe7>.
Avery, Joshua. “Falstaff`s conscience and protestant thought in Shakespeare’s second Henriad.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 65.2 (2013): 79. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Battenhouse, Roy. “Falstaff as Parodist and Perhaps Holy Fool.” PMLA 90.1 (1975): 41. Jstor. Web. 8 April, 2015. .
Bell, Robert H.. Shakespeare’s Great Stage of Fools. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 35. Palgrave Connect. Web. 8 April, 2015. < http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/10.1057/9780230337725 >.
Berger Jr, Harry. “Sneak’s Noise or Rumor and Detextualization in 2 Henry IV.” Kenyon Review 6 (1984): 63-67. EBSCOhost. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=7107037&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live>.
---. “The Prince’s Dog: Falstaff and the Perils of Speech-Prefixity.” Shakespeare’s Quarterly 49.1 (1998): 40-41. Jstor. Web. 4 Aug. 2015. .
Berry, Edward J. “The Rejection Scene in 2 Henry IV.” Studies in English Literature 17.2 (1977): 201, 218. EBSCOhost. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=4724612&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live>.
Bradley, A. C.. Oxford Lectures on Poetry. Macmillan: London, 1909. 268-273. Questia Online Library, 2011. Web. 10 Sep. 2011. < https://www.questia.com/read/6193142/oxford-lectures-on-poetry>.
Blinde, Loren M.. “Rumored History in Shakespeare’s 2 Henry IV.” English Literary Renaissance 38 (2008): 34-54.
Caldwell, Ellen M. “‘Banish all the wor(l)d’: Falstaff`s iconoclastic threat to kingship in I Henry IV.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 59.4 (2007): 219. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA170507857&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=35dff89e8b843225ab32c8d6ab4fa906>.
Crawford, Nicholas. “The Discourse of Dilution in 2 Henry IV.” Renaissance Papers (2002): pars. 24-27. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 100. Detroit: Gale, 2006. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420073536&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=f142a3a5427483fb59f4a1bc8723fb79 >.
Davies, Michael. “Falstaff`s Lateness: Calvinism and the Protestant Hero in ‘Henry IV.’” Jstor. 56.225 (2005): 351-354. Web. 8 April 2014. .
Dean, Paul. “Shakespeare’s True Counterfeit: Henry IV Part 1.” Use of English 63.2 (2012): pars 4, 8-9. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420117978&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=285e89cc4936d5639f56e5b5ae164799F>.
Dobski, Bernard J. “Friendship and Love of Honor: The Education of Henry V.” Souls with Longing. Ed. Bernard J. Dobski and Dustin A. Gish. Lanham: Lexington, 2011. Par. 8. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 157. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, 2014. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Evans, G. Blakemore. The Riverside Shakespeare. New York: Houghton Mifflin,1997. 894, 903. Print.
Evans, Meredith. “Rumor, the Breath of Kings, and the Body of Law in 2 Henry IV.” Shakespeare Quarterly 60.1 (Spring 2009): pars. 1-5, 16. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 136. Detroit: Gale, 2011. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420102644&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=3b2a855eacd93cf451c12c9b30fae2ce>.
Eppich-Harris, Marcia. “Resurrect your darlings: Falstaff`s Death(s), Resurrection(s), and Lasting Influence.” Shakespeare Newsletter Spring 2014: par. 3. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Fike, Matthew. “DIVES AND LAZARUS IN THE HENRIAD.” Renascence 55.4 (2003): 279-282, 288-289. EBSCOhost. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Frankfurt, Harry G.. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005. 1-67. Print.
Fujita, Minoru. “Royal Procession in Henry IV.” Pageantry and Spectacle in Shakespeare. Tokyo: The Renaissance Institute, 1982. Pars. 49-52. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 86. Detroit: Gale, 2005. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420063648&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=5671a2049d9a736f8f44994a46cf8f39 >.
Grady, Hugh. “Falstaff: Subjectivity between the Carnival and the Aesthetic.” The Modern Language Review 96.3 (2001): 612. Jstor. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Greenfield, Thelma N.. “Falstaff: Shakespeare’s Cosmic (Comic) Representation.” Acting Funny: Comic Theory and Practice in Shakespeare’s Plays. Ed. Frances Teague. London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1994. 142, 150. Print.
Grossman, Marc. “The Adolescent and the Strangest Fellow: Comic and Morally Serious Perspectives in 1 Henry IV.” Essays in Literature 23.2 (1995): pars. 41-48. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420067063&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=41deb53db332ca9017a997d88664eb87>.
Hamlin , William M. “Introduction: Engaging Doubt.” Tragedy and Scepticism in Shakespeare’s England. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 1-12. Ingram MyiLibrary. Web. 4 April 2014. .
Hardie, Philip. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 1-4, 22-23, 490-491, 502, 506-507. Print.
Hawkins, Sherman H. “Virtue and Kingship in Shakespeare`s Henry IV.” English Literary Renaissance 5.3 (1975): pars. 27-28. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Dana Ramel Barnes. Vol. 39. Detroit: Gale, 1998. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Hudson, H. N. “Shakespeare`s Characters.” Shakespeare: His Life, Art, and Characters. H. N. Hudson. Vol. 1. Ginn & Company, 1872. par. 2. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Laurie Lanzen Harris. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1984. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420018448&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=a0c61c2094288363ae472945d6fe18dd>.
Johnson, Samuel. “General Observations on The Plays of Shakespeare.” 1787. Dr. Johnson’s Works. New York : AMS Press, 1970. 163-166. Print.
Kastan, David Scott. King Henry IV Part I. London: Thomson Learning, 2002. 235. Print.
Kingsley-Smith, Jane. “Historical-Pastoral Exile in Henry IV Parts One and Two.” Shakespeare’s Drama of Exile. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. 82, 94-95. Print.
Klein, Peter, “Skepticism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 2015. Web. 20 June 2015. < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/skepticism/>.
Knowles, Richard. “Unquiet and the Double Plot of 2 Henry IV.” Associate University Press, 2004. ProQuest Information & Learning Company. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Kruegel, Mary Flavia. An Ideological Analysis of Honor in William Shakespeare’s Richard II, I and II Henry IV, and Henry V. Diss. St. Louis University, 1962. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1962. 210-211. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Web. 26 Mar. 2014. < http://search.proquest.com/docview/288309445?accountid=10067>.
Levenson, Jill L. “Shakespeare’s Falstaff: The Cause That Wit Is in Other Men.” University of Toronto Quarterly 74.2 (2005): pars. 1-9. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420080530&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=80fcc3f599dd470ee56496cd8c9366b9>.
Linton, Joan Pong. “The Passing of Falstaff: Rethinking History, Refiguring the Sacred.” Shakespeare and Religion. Ed. Ken Jackson and Arthur F. Marotti. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 2011. Pars.1-3. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 157. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, 2014. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420117983&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=4be888d6bf0ac2f1a80c7c14ef386f70 >.
Manley, Frank. “The Unity of Betrayal in II Henry IV.” Studies in the Literary Imagination 5.1 (Apr. 1972): par. 4. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 119. Detroit: Gale, 2009. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420089292&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=c6d39b67ebe9a7db370e4d29b391de5e>.
Montagu, Elizabeth. “Shakespeare’s Genius.” 1769. William Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Brian Vickers. Boston : Routledge, 1995. Vol. 5. 331-335. Print.
Morgann, Maurice. “An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff.” 1777. Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. D. Nichol Smith. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963: pars. 1-11. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Nellis, Jennifer. The Prince’s Misleader: The Role of Falstaff in the Henry IV Plays. Diss. Stony Brook U, 2013. Ann Arbor: UMI, 2013. 1. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. < http://search.proquest.com/docview/1497967243?accountid=10067>.
Prior, E. Moody. “Comic Theory and the Rejection of Falstaff.” Modern Critical Interpretations: William Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 2. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House P, 1987. 68-69. Print.
Rowe, Nicholas. “Some Account of the Life, etc., of Mr. William Shakespeare.” 1709. Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. D. Nichol Smith. 2nd ed. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1963. 122. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Laurie Lanzen Harris. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1984. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “nominalism.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Online. Encyclopædia Britiannica Inc., 2016: pars. 3. Web. 31 Jan. 2016..
“rumour, n.” Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press, June 2015. Web. 25 Aug. 2015. .
Sprague, Arthur Colby. “Gadshill Revisisted.” Shakespeare Quarterly 4.2 (1953): 134-135. Jstor. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://www.jstor.org/stable/2866167>.
Stack, Richard. “An Examination of an Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff.” Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage: 1774-1801. Ed. Brian Vickers. Vol. 6. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. Pars. 1-4. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Laurie Lanzen Harris. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1984. Literature Resource Center.Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Taylor, Mark. “Henry IV and Proleptic Mimesis.” Shakespeare`s Imitations. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002: par. 73. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420067018&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=4b2b26cd293e5738eefbc45367a49b7d>.
Tiffany, Grace. “Falstaff`s Iconoclasm.” Shakespeare Newsletter Spring-Summer 2008: 31. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
---. “Rank, Insults, and Weaponry in Shakespeare`s Second Tetralogy.” Papers on Language & Literature 47.3 (2011): pars. 1-2. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Toliver, Harold. “Workable Fictions in the Henry IV Plays.” University of Toronto Quarterly 53.1 (1983): pars. 6, 44. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Tromly, Fred. “Henry IV, Part One: `Deep Defiance` and the Rebel Prince.” Fathers and Sons in Shakespeare: The Debt Never Promised. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. pars. 2-4, 33, 42. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 146. Detroit: Gale, 2012. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420110032&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=bc62f26ec31f5cca9fad954428117d61>.
Weil, Herbert. “Montaigne and Falstaff.” Shakespeare Newsletter 58.2 (2008): pars. 1-4. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA202704597&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=11db16361d05d9cb5982056a1435673b>.
Wiegandt,Kai. “‘Rumour is a pipe’: Rumour, Fame and Sound in the Second Part of Henry IV.” Shakespeare Seminar Online. Deutsche Shakespeare-Gesellschaft, 5 Aug. 2007. Web. 29 May 2013. .
---. Studies in Performance and Early Modern Drama: Crowd and Rumour in Shakespeare. Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group, 2012. 1-7, 143-156, 157-160, 165-169. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 11 April 2015.
Wilson, John Dover. The Fortunes of Falstaff. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1964. 15-35, 93-110. Print.
Womersley, David. “Why Is Falstaff Fat?” The Review of English Studies 47:185 (1996): 1-2. Jstor. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
98551007
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0985510072
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 施堂模zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Sellari, Thomas Johnen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 趙麗婷zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chao, Li Tingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 趙麗婷zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chao, Li Tingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 22-Aug-2016 10:38:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 22-Aug-2016 10:38:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 22-Aug-2016 10:38:25 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0985510072en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100440-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98551007zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文旨在探討法斯塔夫如何運用謠言虛實參半的特性, 將其中謠言中的不確定性轉化為對驗證方法的質疑。藉由探討文藝復興戲劇如何利用不確定性展現懷疑論者對既定概念的挑戰與啟發, 轉向分析法斯塔夫如何利用同樣模式對既定觀念展現反思。另一方面, 此種不確定性卻也可能被濫用。如同法斯塔夫嘗試藉由各種驗證方式(如邏輯、證據)支持自利的觀點, 此種濫用驗證的傾向最終將導致如同懷疑論般質疑驗證是否必定導向真理的疑問。並以此觀點嘗試解釋為何驅逐法斯塔夫是必要的。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Although critics for centuries attempt to offer a unified view to describe Falstaff’s nature as benign or vicious, some critics seem to fall short of evaluations to consider Falstaff’s motivations when they interpret Falstaff’s behavior along with his words. Critics such as Nicolas Rowe (1709) and Samuel Johnson (1787) have evaluated Falstaff’s character relevant to specific aspects of his behavior－such as Falstaff’s charm, wit or offenses－to justify that Falstaff is more mirthful than immoral. However, those lines of thought would remain contentious if we are not aware of the motivations when Falstaff exhibits dubious actions and beliefs. Even if recent critics appear to relate to Falstaff’s motivations to justify their evaluations of Falstaff’s character, they oftentimes focus more on Falstaff’s individual demeanor than the guiding principles behind.

The failure to perceive the principles that guide Falstaff’s behavior is significant because it would affect the way we should plausibly understand Falstaff’s nature, his behavior, and eventually his rejection. Since these issues are largely connected, to misconstrue one or more of these issues would render our evaluations problematic.Naturally enough, we should best identify Falstaff’s underlying principles before determining whether Falstaff’s rejection is justifiable or not.

In this regard, I argue for self-interest to be Falstaff’s inherent principle. Because of his expedient frame of mind to misuse verification systematically to justify dubious self-interest, Falstaff is detrimental both to our methodologies to verify and the conception of truth. Moreover, this inherent principle seems to be what Harry Frankfurt (2005) demonstrates to be the origin of skepticism, the distrust that we could obtain neither the methods nor the capabilities to perceive truth (64). This
expedient frame of mind renders Falstaff the agent who fosters skepticism throughout 1 and 2 Henry IV, and justifies why Falstaff’s rejection is legitimate.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter
1. Introduction 1
The Guiding Problems
Literature Review 3
Originality 16
Chapter Design 18
2. Rumor, its Salient Features and Falstaff 21
3. Uncertainty and Skeptic Deliberations－Falstaff as a Skeptic in Practice 34
4. Self-doubt on Display－Falstaff’s Questioning on Honor 62
5. Falstaff as the Origin of Skepticism: a Rejection Justified 67
Works Cited 84		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 707825 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0985510072en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 懷疑論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 莎士比亞zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 亨利四世zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 法斯塔夫zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 謠言zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 不確定性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 驗證zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Skepticismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Shakespeareen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Henry IVen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Falstaffen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rumoren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Uncertaintyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Verificationen_US
dc.title (題名) 「辯」「証」之中－ 論法斯塔夫在«亨利四世(上)(下)部»裡對謠言、驗證與懷疑論的操控zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Falstaff’s Rejection Justified－ Rumor, Verification and Skepticism in Shakespeare’s 1 and 2 Henry IVen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Abrams, Richard. “Rumor’s Reign in 2 Henry IV: The Scope of a Personification.” English Literary Renaissance 16.3 (Autumn 1986): 467-495. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 100. Detroit: Gale, 2006. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420073531&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=90292b9edef43f2971eb3b0705419fe7>.
Avery, Joshua. “Falstaff`s conscience and protestant thought in Shakespeare’s second Henriad.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 65.2 (2013): 79. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Battenhouse, Roy. “Falstaff as Parodist and Perhaps Holy Fool.” PMLA 90.1 (1975): 41. Jstor. Web. 8 April, 2015. .
Bell, Robert H.. Shakespeare’s Great Stage of Fools. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 35. Palgrave Connect. Web. 8 April, 2015. < http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/10.1057/9780230337725 >.
Berger Jr, Harry. “Sneak’s Noise or Rumor and Detextualization in 2 Henry IV.” Kenyon Review 6 (1984): 63-67. EBSCOhost. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=7107037&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live>.
---. “The Prince’s Dog: Falstaff and the Perils of Speech-Prefixity.” Shakespeare’s Quarterly 49.1 (1998): 40-41. Jstor. Web. 4 Aug. 2015. .
Berry, Edward J. “The Rejection Scene in 2 Henry IV.” Studies in English Literature 17.2 (1977): 201, 218. EBSCOhost. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=4724612&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live>.
Bradley, A. C.. Oxford Lectures on Poetry. Macmillan: London, 1909. 268-273. Questia Online Library, 2011. Web. 10 Sep. 2011. < https://www.questia.com/read/6193142/oxford-lectures-on-poetry>.
Blinde, Loren M.. “Rumored History in Shakespeare’s 2 Henry IV.” English Literary Renaissance 38 (2008): 34-54.
Caldwell, Ellen M. “‘Banish all the wor(l)d’: Falstaff`s iconoclastic threat to kingship in I Henry IV.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 59.4 (2007): 219. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA170507857&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=35dff89e8b843225ab32c8d6ab4fa906>.
Crawford, Nicholas. “The Discourse of Dilution in 2 Henry IV.” Renaissance Papers (2002): pars. 24-27. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 100. Detroit: Gale, 2006. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420073536&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=f142a3a5427483fb59f4a1bc8723fb79 >.
Davies, Michael. “Falstaff`s Lateness: Calvinism and the Protestant Hero in ‘Henry IV.’” Jstor. 56.225 (2005): 351-354. Web. 8 April 2014. .
Dean, Paul. “Shakespeare’s True Counterfeit: Henry IV Part 1.” Use of English 63.2 (2012): pars 4, 8-9. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420117978&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=285e89cc4936d5639f56e5b5ae164799F>.
Dobski, Bernard J. “Friendship and Love of Honor: The Education of Henry V.” Souls with Longing. Ed. Bernard J. Dobski and Dustin A. Gish. Lanham: Lexington, 2011. Par. 8. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 157. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, 2014. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Evans, G. Blakemore. The Riverside Shakespeare. New York: Houghton Mifflin,1997. 894, 903. Print.
Evans, Meredith. “Rumor, the Breath of Kings, and the Body of Law in 2 Henry IV.” Shakespeare Quarterly 60.1 (Spring 2009): pars. 1-5, 16. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 136. Detroit: Gale, 2011. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420102644&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=3b2a855eacd93cf451c12c9b30fae2ce>.
Eppich-Harris, Marcia. “Resurrect your darlings: Falstaff`s Death(s), Resurrection(s), and Lasting Influence.” Shakespeare Newsletter Spring 2014: par. 3. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Fike, Matthew. “DIVES AND LAZARUS IN THE HENRIAD.” Renascence 55.4 (2003): 279-282, 288-289. EBSCOhost. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Frankfurt, Harry G.. On Bullshit. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005. 1-67. Print.
Fujita, Minoru. “Royal Procession in Henry IV.” Pageantry and Spectacle in Shakespeare. Tokyo: The Renaissance Institute, 1982. Pars. 49-52. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 86. Detroit: Gale, 2005. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420063648&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=5671a2049d9a736f8f44994a46cf8f39 >.
Grady, Hugh. “Falstaff: Subjectivity between the Carnival and the Aesthetic.” The Modern Language Review 96.3 (2001): 612. Jstor. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Greenfield, Thelma N.. “Falstaff: Shakespeare’s Cosmic (Comic) Representation.” Acting Funny: Comic Theory and Practice in Shakespeare’s Plays. Ed. Frances Teague. London and Toronto: Associated University Presses, 1994. 142, 150. Print.
Grossman, Marc. “The Adolescent and the Strangest Fellow: Comic and Morally Serious Perspectives in 1 Henry IV.” Essays in Literature 23.2 (1995): pars. 41-48. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420067063&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=41deb53db332ca9017a997d88664eb87>.
Hamlin , William M. “Introduction: Engaging Doubt.” Tragedy and Scepticism in Shakespeare’s England. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 1-12. Ingram MyiLibrary. Web. 4 April 2014. .
Hardie, Philip. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 1-4, 22-23, 490-491, 502, 506-507. Print.
Hawkins, Sherman H. “Virtue and Kingship in Shakespeare`s Henry IV.” English Literary Renaissance 5.3 (1975): pars. 27-28. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Dana Ramel Barnes. Vol. 39. Detroit: Gale, 1998. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Hudson, H. N. “Shakespeare`s Characters.” Shakespeare: His Life, Art, and Characters. H. N. Hudson. Vol. 1. Ginn & Company, 1872. par. 2. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Laurie Lanzen Harris. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1984. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420018448&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=a0c61c2094288363ae472945d6fe18dd>.
Johnson, Samuel. “General Observations on The Plays of Shakespeare.” 1787. Dr. Johnson’s Works. New York : AMS Press, 1970. 163-166. Print.
Kastan, David Scott. King Henry IV Part I. London: Thomson Learning, 2002. 235. Print.
Kingsley-Smith, Jane. “Historical-Pastoral Exile in Henry IV Parts One and Two.” Shakespeare’s Drama of Exile. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. 82, 94-95. Print.
Klein, Peter, “Skepticism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 2015. Web. 20 June 2015. < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/skepticism/>.
Knowles, Richard. “Unquiet and the Double Plot of 2 Henry IV.” Associate University Press, 2004. ProQuest Information & Learning Company. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Kruegel, Mary Flavia. An Ideological Analysis of Honor in William Shakespeare’s Richard II, I and II Henry IV, and Henry V. Diss. St. Louis University, 1962. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1962. 210-211. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Web. 26 Mar. 2014. < http://search.proquest.com/docview/288309445?accountid=10067>.
Levenson, Jill L. “Shakespeare’s Falstaff: The Cause That Wit Is in Other Men.” University of Toronto Quarterly 74.2 (2005): pars. 1-9. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420080530&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=80fcc3f599dd470ee56496cd8c9366b9>.
Linton, Joan Pong. “The Passing of Falstaff: Rethinking History, Refiguring the Sacred.” Shakespeare and Religion. Ed. Ken Jackson and Arthur F. Marotti. Notre Dame: U of Notre Dame P, 2011. Pars.1-3. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 157. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, 2014. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420117983&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=4be888d6bf0ac2f1a80c7c14ef386f70 >.
Manley, Frank. “The Unity of Betrayal in II Henry IV.” Studies in the Literary Imagination 5.1 (Apr. 1972): par. 4. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 119. Detroit: Gale, 2009. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420089292&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=c6d39b67ebe9a7db370e4d29b391de5e>.
Montagu, Elizabeth. “Shakespeare’s Genius.” 1769. William Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage. Ed. Brian Vickers. Boston : Routledge, 1995. Vol. 5. 331-335. Print.
Morgann, Maurice. “An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff.” 1777. Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. D. Nichol Smith. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963: pars. 1-11. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Nellis, Jennifer. The Prince’s Misleader: The Role of Falstaff in the Henry IV Plays. Diss. Stony Brook U, 2013. Ann Arbor: UMI, 2013. 1. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. < http://search.proquest.com/docview/1497967243?accountid=10067>.
Prior, E. Moody. “Comic Theory and the Rejection of Falstaff.” Modern Critical Interpretations: William Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 2. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House P, 1987. 68-69. Print.
Rowe, Nicholas. “Some Account of the Life, etc., of Mr. William Shakespeare.” 1709. Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. D. Nichol Smith. 2nd ed. Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1963. 122. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Laurie Lanzen Harris. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1984. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “nominalism.” Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Online. Encyclopædia Britiannica Inc., 2016: pars. 3. Web. 31 Jan. 2016..
“rumour, n.” Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press, June 2015. Web. 25 Aug. 2015. .
Sprague, Arthur Colby. “Gadshill Revisisted.” Shakespeare Quarterly 4.2 (1953): 134-135. Jstor. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://www.jstor.org/stable/2866167>.
Stack, Richard. “An Examination of an Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff.” Shakespeare, the Critical Heritage: 1774-1801. Ed. Brian Vickers. Vol. 6. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. Pars. 1-4. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Laurie Lanzen Harris. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 1984. Literature Resource Center.Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Taylor, Mark. “Henry IV and Proleptic Mimesis.” Shakespeare`s Imitations. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2002: par. 73. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420067018&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=4b2b26cd293e5738eefbc45367a49b7d>.
Tiffany, Grace. “Falstaff`s Iconoclasm.” Shakespeare Newsletter Spring-Summer 2008: 31. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
---. “Rank, Insults, and Weaponry in Shakespeare`s Second Tetralogy.” Papers on Language & Literature 47.3 (2011): pars. 1-2. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Toliver, Harold. “Workable Fictions in the Henry IV Plays.” University of Toronto Quarterly 53.1 (1983): pars. 6, 44. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .
Tromly, Fred. “Henry IV, Part One: `Deep Defiance` and the Rebel Prince.” Fathers and Sons in Shakespeare: The Debt Never Promised. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. pars. 2-4, 33, 42. Rpt. in Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 146. Detroit: Gale, 2012. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CH1420110032&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=bc62f26ec31f5cca9fad954428117d61>.
Weil, Herbert. “Montaigne and Falstaff.” Shakespeare Newsletter 58.2 (2008): pars. 1-4. Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. < http://go.galegroup.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA202704597&v=2.1&u=nccu&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&asid=11db16361d05d9cb5982056a1435673b>.
Wiegandt,Kai. “‘Rumour is a pipe’: Rumour, Fame and Sound in the Second Part of Henry IV.” Shakespeare Seminar Online. Deutsche Shakespeare-Gesellschaft, 5 Aug. 2007. Web. 29 May 2013. .
---. Studies in Performance and Early Modern Drama: Crowd and Rumour in Shakespeare. Abingdon, Oxon, GBR: Ashgate Publishing Group, 2012. 1-7, 143-156, 157-160, 165-169. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 11 April 2015.
Wilson, John Dover. The Fortunes of Falstaff. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1964. 15-35, 93-110. Print.
Womersley, David. “Why Is Falstaff Fat?” The Review of English Studies 47:185 (1996): 1-2. Jstor. Web. 8 Apr. 2015. .		zh_TW