Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 持久性與情境性因素對第二語言溝通意願的影響：個案研究
Enduring and Situational Factors that Influence Willingness to Communicate in an L2: A Case Study作者 鄧禮賢
Teng, Li-Hsien貢獻者 余明忠
Yu, Ming-Chung
鄧禮賢
Teng, Li-Hsien關鍵詞 第二語言溝通意願
持久性因素
情境性因素
個案研究
Willingness to communicate
Enduring variables
Situational variables
Case study日期 2020 上傳時間 3-Aug-2020 17:18:11 (UTC+8) 摘要 全球化使英語學習變得愈來愈重要，然而，讓學生在課堂上說英語對語言教師來說仍是件不容易的事。研究顯示與西方的英語學習者相比，亞洲的英語學習者在英語課上較為沉默寡言。過去的研究顯示由於考試導向文化的影響、缺乏信心、在表達意見上過於小心，以及害怕被負面評價等因素，許多亞洲的英語學習者不願意參與課堂討論活動。本研究的目的就是探討某些持久性與情境性因素如何增進一位台灣高中生的第二語言溝通意願。此個案研究中使用量化及質性兩種研究方法，希望透過這兩種研究方法，完整地了解特定持久性因素及情境型因素對受試者溝通意願的影響。研究參與者是一位在新北市私立雙語高中就讀的十二年級高中生。在此研究中，研究者使用動機因子問卷、課堂觀察、學生日誌、一次與受試者教師的半結構式訪談，以及兩次與受試者的半結構式訪談來蒐集資料，研究者透過這些資料分析持久性與情境性因素如何影響受試者的英語溝通意願。結果顯示三項持久性因素，家長參與、非正式語言環境，以及學習者的核心信念都能影響他在不同情境中的英語溝通意願。在家長參與部分，本研究顯示不同方式的家長參與都對學習者的英語溝通意願有益，包含家長在家中與學習者一起看英語影片、與學習者進行英語對話，或是為學習者創造更多使用英語的環境。在非正式語言環境部分，本研究顯示學習者在國外的旅遊，以及與其他英語為母語的線上遊戲玩家間的互動都提供他可以真實地使用英語的機會。在學習者的核心信念部分，本研究顯示學習者的英語學習核心信念會影響他在不同第二語言學習活動中的努力程度。在情境因素部分，本研究結果也顯示三項情境型因素，教師的教學風格與即時行為、班級大小，以及討論主題都會影響學習者的英語溝通意願。在教師的教學風格與即時行為部分，如果一位語言教師使用許多溝通式活動，並在學習者口語上犯錯時，可以即時地給予鼓勵與適度糾正，並不批評學習者的錯誤，這些行為皆可提升學習者的英語溝通意願。在課堂大小部分，對一個語言教師來說，小型的課堂比較容易創造出良好且溫暖的教室氛圍。在討論主題部分，學生自己選擇的主題要比教科書提供的主題要好，本研究顯示學生自己選擇的主題可以提升受試者對於討論的信心與興趣，並且提高受試者的英語溝通意願。基於本研究所得的結果，研究者也提出了針對教學上的應用以及對未來研究的建議。研究者希望這份論文可以對TESOL領域中的研究者及教育者，提供一些關於持久性與情境性因素影響學習者英語溝通意願的一些了解及洞見。
Globalization makes English learning become more and more important. However, language teachers around the world still struggle to get learners to talk in English. Studies show that Asian English learners are more reticent when compared with Western English learners. Previous research shows that because of the influence of examination-oriented culture, lack of confidence, being too cautious at giving opinions, and fear of being negatively evaluated, many Asian English learners are unwilling to participate in discussions. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how certain enduring and situational variables enhanced the willingness to communicate of a high school student in Taiwan. In this case study, both quantitative and qualitative methods were adopted to capture a holistic understanding of how certain enduring factors, and situational factors influence the willingness to communicate of the participant. The participant was a twelfth grader who studied in a private bilingual high school in New Taipei City. In the present study, the motivational factors questionnaire, the class observations, the student’s journals, one semi-structured interview, and two semi-structured interviews were utilized as data for the analyses of the influences of enduring and situational variables that influence the willingness to communicate of the participant.The results suggest that the three enduring factors, parental involvement, informal linguistic environments, and a learner’s core beliefs in L2 learning, can influence his willingness to communicate in different situations. In terms of parental involvement, the present case showed that different forms of parental involvement, including watching English videos with the participant, chatting with the participant in English, and creating opportunities for him to use English authentically, would enhance for his WTC. In terms of informal linguistic environments, the present study showed that the participant’s family trips in foreign countries, and his online-games provided him with good opportunities to use English authentically. In terms of a learner’s core beliefs, the present study showed that the participant’s core beliefs would influence how much efforts he wanted to put into different types of L2 learning activities.The results also suggest that situational variables, such as teachers’ teaching styles and immediacy, class size, and topics, might all influence the participant’s willingness to communicate. In terms of teachers’ teaching styles and immediacy, if a language teacher uses many communicative activities, and they are also warm and encouraging, as well as being non-critical when learners make mistakes, these would raise learners’ WTC. In terms of class size, a small class would be easier for a teacher to create good and warm classroom atmosphere. In terms of topics, students’ self-selected topics are preferable than textbook-assigned topics. The present study showed that students’ self-selected topics raised the participant’s confidence and interest in discussions. And they also raised his WTC. Based on the findings in the present study, pedagogical implications and suggestions were recommended for future research. It is hoped that this thesis can provide some insights into the study of enduring and situational variables that influence the willingness to communicate of English learners for researchers and educators in the field of TESOL.參考文獻 REFERENCESAjzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 311-341.Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the Mind: The Benefits of Bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale, 65(4), 229-235.Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2016). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25-37.Butler, Y. G. (2015). English language education among young learners in East Asia: A review of current research (2004-2014). Language Teaching, 48(3), 303-342.Burgoon, J. K. (1976). Unwillingness-to-communicate scale – Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43(1), 60-69.Cao, Y., & Wei, W. (2019). Willingness to communicate from an English as an international language (EIL) perspective: the case of Macau. System, 87, 102-149.Carroll, JB. (1967). Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annuals, 1(2), 131-151.Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46.Cheng, X. (2000, September). Asian students` reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435-446.de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism-Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163-185.Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.Fink, A. (1995) How to analyze survey data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behaviour. Philippine: Addison-Wesley.Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. Tesol Quarterly, 29(2), 345-373.Glensne, C. (2011) Becoming Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). MA: Pearson Education Inc.Goldberg, L. R. (1992) The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor States. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20-28). St. Nicholas House, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93-105.Huang, I. C. (2016). Everybody learns English, and so do I: The dominance of English and its effects on individuals: What English learning means to college students in Taiwan? English Today, 32(1), 28-34.Huang, Y. (2018). Learner resistance to English-medium instruction practices: a qualitative case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 435-449.Jing, H. (2006). Learner resistance in metacognition training? An exploration of mismatches between learner and teacher agendas. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 95-117.Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.Kang, D. M. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners` willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319-332.Khazaei, Z. M., Zadeh, A. M., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Willingness to communicate in Iranian EFL learners: The effect of class size. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 181-187.Krashen, S. D. (1976). Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 10(2), 157-168.Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Problematizing cultural stereotypes in TESOL. Tesol Quarterly, 37(4), 709-719.Litwin, M. S. (1995) How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners` unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71-86.Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576.MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. SSLA, 23, 369-388.MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 59(4), 589-607.Macintyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students` willingness to communicate. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 81-96.MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26.MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.MacIntyre, P. D., MacKinnon, S. P., & Clement, R. (2009). Embracing affective ambivalence: A research agenda for understanding the interdependent processes of language anxiety and motivation. In P. Cheng and J. X. Yan (Eds.) Cultural Identity and Language Anxiety. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985, November). Willingness to Communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.Mertens, D. M, (2010) Research and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Nematizendah, S., & Wood, D., (2017). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An investigation of affective and cognitive dynamics. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(3), 197-215.Nicol, A. A, & De France, K., (2020). Prejudice, Integrativeness, and Motivation to Learn a Second Language: A Mediation Analysis. Psychological Reports, 123(2), 420-434.Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1996). Communicating across cultures: Social determinants and acculturative consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 28(3), 214-228.Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85.Nuttall, C. (1996) Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan Publishers.Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.Puric, D., Vuksanovic, J., & Chondrogianni, V. (2017). Cognitive advantages of immersion education after 1 year: Effects of amount of exposure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 296-309.Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., Funder, D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 677-718.Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363-381.Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital gameplay on willingness to communicate. Language Learning and Technology, 18(2), 101-123.Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In: Z. Dornyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 Self (pp. 120-143). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Ryan, R., M., & Deci, E., L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Tsui, B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey, & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom (pp. 145-167). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Ushioda, E. (2015). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47-54). St. Nicholas House, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Valdes, G. (1997). Dual-language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 67(3), 391-429.Verspoor, M. (2015). Initial Conditions. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 38-46). St. Nicholas House, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003) A Chinese Conceptualization of Willingness to Communicate in ESL. Language Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.Wolf, J., P. (2013). Exploring and contrasting EFL learners’ perceptions of textbook-assigned and self-selected discussion topics. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 49-66.Wragg, E. (1999) An Introduction to Classroom Observation (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115-137.Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152.Yu, Miao. (2015). An examination of the dynamic feature of WTC through dyadic group interaction. System, 55, 11-20.Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J., F. (2018). To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom. System, 72, 226-239.Zhong, Q. (2013). Understanding Chinese Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in a New Zealand ESL Classroom: A Multiple Case Study Drawing on the Theory of planned Behavior. System, 41, 740-751.Zuengler, J. (1993). Encouraging learners’ conversational participation – The effect of content knowledge. Language Learning, 43(3), 403-432. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
1025510021資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1025510021 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 余明忠 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Yu, Ming-Chung en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鄧禮賢 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Teng, Li-Hsien en_US dc.creator (作者) 鄧禮賢 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Teng, Li-Hsien en_US dc.date (日期) 2020 en_US dc.date.accessioned 3-Aug-2020 17:18:11 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 3-Aug-2020 17:18:11 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Aug-2020 17:18:11 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1025510021 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130891 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 1025510021 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 全球化使英語學習變得愈來愈重要，然而，讓學生在課堂上說英語對語言教師來說仍是件不容易的事。研究顯示與西方的英語學習者相比，亞洲的英語學習者在英語課上較為沉默寡言。過去的研究顯示由於考試導向文化的影響、缺乏信心、在表達意見上過於小心，以及害怕被負面評價等因素，許多亞洲的英語學習者不願意參與課堂討論活動。本研究的目的就是探討某些持久性與情境性因素如何增進一位台灣高中生的第二語言溝通意願。此個案研究中使用量化及質性兩種研究方法，希望透過這兩種研究方法，完整地了解特定持久性因素及情境型因素對受試者溝通意願的影響。研究參與者是一位在新北市私立雙語高中就讀的十二年級高中生。在此研究中，研究者使用動機因子問卷、課堂觀察、學生日誌、一次與受試者教師的半結構式訪談，以及兩次與受試者的半結構式訪談來蒐集資料，研究者透過這些資料分析持久性與情境性因素如何影響受試者的英語溝通意願。結果顯示三項持久性因素，家長參與、非正式語言環境，以及學習者的核心信念都能影響他在不同情境中的英語溝通意願。在家長參與部分，本研究顯示不同方式的家長參與都對學習者的英語溝通意願有益，包含家長在家中與學習者一起看英語影片、與學習者進行英語對話，或是為學習者創造更多使用英語的環境。在非正式語言環境部分，本研究顯示學習者在國外的旅遊，以及與其他英語為母語的線上遊戲玩家間的互動都提供他可以真實地使用英語的機會。在學習者的核心信念部分，本研究顯示學習者的英語學習核心信念會影響他在不同第二語言學習活動中的努力程度。在情境因素部分，本研究結果也顯示三項情境型因素，教師的教學風格與即時行為、班級大小，以及討論主題都會影響學習者的英語溝通意願。在教師的教學風格與即時行為部分，如果一位語言教師使用許多溝通式活動，並在學習者口語上犯錯時，可以即時地給予鼓勵與適度糾正，並不批評學習者的錯誤，這些行為皆可提升學習者的英語溝通意願。在課堂大小部分，對一個語言教師來說，小型的課堂比較容易創造出良好且溫暖的教室氛圍。在討論主題部分，學生自己選擇的主題要比教科書提供的主題要好，本研究顯示學生自己選擇的主題可以提升受試者對於討論的信心與興趣，並且提高受試者的英語溝通意願。基於本研究所得的結果，研究者也提出了針對教學上的應用以及對未來研究的建議。研究者希望這份論文可以對TESOL領域中的研究者及教育者，提供一些關於持久性與情境性因素影響學習者英語溝通意願的一些了解及洞見。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Globalization makes English learning become more and more important. However, language teachers around the world still struggle to get learners to talk in English. Studies show that Asian English learners are more reticent when compared with Western English learners. Previous research shows that because of the influence of examination-oriented culture, lack of confidence, being too cautious at giving opinions, and fear of being negatively evaluated, many Asian English learners are unwilling to participate in discussions. The purpose of the present study was to investigate how certain enduring and situational variables enhanced the willingness to communicate of a high school student in Taiwan. In this case study, both quantitative and qualitative methods were adopted to capture a holistic understanding of how certain enduring factors, and situational factors influence the willingness to communicate of the participant. The participant was a twelfth grader who studied in a private bilingual high school in New Taipei City. In the present study, the motivational factors questionnaire, the class observations, the student’s journals, one semi-structured interview, and two semi-structured interviews were utilized as data for the analyses of the influences of enduring and situational variables that influence the willingness to communicate of the participant.The results suggest that the three enduring factors, parental involvement, informal linguistic environments, and a learner’s core beliefs in L2 learning, can influence his willingness to communicate in different situations. In terms of parental involvement, the present case showed that different forms of parental involvement, including watching English videos with the participant, chatting with the participant in English, and creating opportunities for him to use English authentically, would enhance for his WTC. In terms of informal linguistic environments, the present study showed that the participant’s family trips in foreign countries, and his online-games provided him with good opportunities to use English authentically. In terms of a learner’s core beliefs, the present study showed that the participant’s core beliefs would influence how much efforts he wanted to put into different types of L2 learning activities.The results also suggest that situational variables, such as teachers’ teaching styles and immediacy, class size, and topics, might all influence the participant’s willingness to communicate. In terms of teachers’ teaching styles and immediacy, if a language teacher uses many communicative activities, and they are also warm and encouraging, as well as being non-critical when learners make mistakes, these would raise learners’ WTC. In terms of class size, a small class would be easier for a teacher to create good and warm classroom atmosphere. In terms of topics, students’ self-selected topics are preferable than textbook-assigned topics. The present study showed that students’ self-selected topics raised the participant’s confidence and interest in discussions. And they also raised his WTC. Based on the findings in the present study, pedagogical implications and suggestions were recommended for future research. It is hoped that this thesis can provide some insights into the study of enduring and situational variables that influence the willingness to communicate of English learners for researchers and educators in the field of TESOL. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents TABLE OF CONTENTSAcknowledgements iiiTable of Contents ivChinese Abstract xiEnglish Abstract xiiiChapter One: Introduction 11.0 Background of the Study 11.1 Statement of Problem 21.2 Purpose of the Study 41.3 Significance of the Study 4Chapter Two: Literature Review 72.0 Introduction 72.1 The Theory of Willingness to Communicate 72.1.1 The Origin of Willingness to Communicate 72.1.2 Willingness to Communicate and the Heuristic Model 82.1.2.1 Enduring Variables Investigated in the Study 92.1.2.1 Situational Variables in the Heuristic Model 112.2 Situational Variables Investigated in the Present Study 132.2.1 Situational Cues 132.2.1.1 Interlocutors 132.2.1.2 Classroom Atmosphere 142.2.1.3 Tasks 142.2.2 Situational Characteristics 152.2.2.1 Task-Confidence 152.2.2.2 Task-Interest 162.2.2.3 Task-Usefulness 162.3 Related Empirical Studies on Willingness to Communicate 162.4 Research Gap 202.5 Research Questions 21Chapter Three: Methodology 233.0 Introduction 233.1 The Participant 243.2 The Context 253.3 Data Collection 263.3.1 Motivational Factors Questionnaire 263.3.1.1 Reliability 273.3.1.2 Validity 293.3.2 Class observation and Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories 303.3.3 Student Journals 313.3.4 Semi-Structured Interview with the ESL Teacher 313.3.5 Semi-Structured Interviews with the Participant 313.4 Data Analysis 323.4.1 Coding Scheme of Enduring Variables that Influence WTC 323.4.1.1 Intergroup Climate 323.4.1.2 Social Situation 323.4.1.3 Intergroup Attitudes 333.4.2 Coding Scheme of Situational Variables that Influence WTC 333.4.2.1 Situation Cues 343.4.2.2 Situation Characteristics 36Chapter Four: Results 374.0 Introduction 374.1 Class Participation and Academic Performance 374.2 Enduring Variables 424.2.1 Intergroup Climate 424.2.1.1 Perceptual and Affective Correlates 424.2.1.2 Structural Characteristics of the Community 444.2.2 Social Situation 474.2.2.1 Most Willing to Communicate Situations 474.2.2.2 Least Willing to Communicate Situations 554.2.3 Intergroup Attitudes 564.2.3.1 Integrativeness 564.2.3.2 Fear of Assimilation 584.2.3.3 Motivation to Learn the L2 594.3 Situational Variables 624.3.1 Situation Cues 624.3.1.1 Interlocutors 624.3.1.2 Classroom Atmosphere 634.3.1.3 Task 664.3.2 Situation Characteristics 674.3.2.1 Task-Confidence & Task-Interest 674.3.2.2 Task-Usefulness 68Chapter Five: Discussion 715.0 Introduction 715.1 Themes of the Enduring Variables 715.1.1 Parental Involvement 725.1.2 Informal Linguistic Environment 735.1.3 Learner`s Core Beliefs 745.1.4 Summary of the Enduring Variables 765.2 Themes of the Situational Variables 765.2.1 Teaching Style and Teacher Immediacy 775.2.2 Class Size 785.2.3 Topics 795.2.4 Summary of the Situational Variables 79Chapter Six: Conclusions and Implications 816.0 Introduction 816.1 Summary of the Major Findings 816.2 Pedagogical Implications 846.3 Contribution of the Study 866.4 Limitations and Future Suggestions 87References 89Appendixes 97Appendix 1: Motivational Factors Questionnaire 97Appendix 2: Semi-structured Interview Questions with the Participant 101Appendix 3: Semi-structured Interview Questions with the ESL Teacher 103 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1436904 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1025510021 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 第二語言溝通意願 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 持久性因素 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情境性因素 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 個案研究 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Willingness to communicate en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Enduring variables en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Situational variables en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Case study en_US dc.title (題名) 持久性與情境性因素對第二語言溝通意願的影響：個案研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Enduring and Situational Factors that Influence Willingness to Communicate in an L2: A Case Study en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) REFERENCESAjzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 311-341.Bialystok, E. (2011). Reshaping the Mind: The Benefits of Bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology-Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale, 65(4), 229-235.Buckingham, L., & Alpaslan, R. S. (2016). Promoting speaking proficiency and willingness to communicate in Turkish young learners of English through asynchronous computer-mediated practice. System, 65, 25-37.Butler, Y. G. (2015). English language education among young learners in East Asia: A review of current research (2004-2014). Language Teaching, 48(3), 303-342.Burgoon, J. K. (1976). Unwillingness-to-communicate scale – Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43(1), 60-69.Cao, Y., & Wei, W. (2019). Willingness to communicate from an English as an international language (EIL) perspective: the case of Macau. System, 87, 102-149.Carroll, JB. (1967). Foreign language proficiency levels attained by language majors near graduation from college. Foreign Language Annuals, 1(2), 131-151.Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46.Cheng, X. (2000, September). Asian students` reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435-446.de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism-Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2013). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163-185.Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication self-confidence, motivation, shyness and teacher immediacy among Iranian English-major undergraduates: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 140-147.Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1-22.Fink, A. (1995) How to analyze survey data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behaviour. Philippine: Addison-Wesley.Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. Tesol Quarterly, 29(2), 345-373.Glensne, C. (2011) Becoming Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). MA: Pearson Education Inc.Goldberg, L. R. (1992) The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor States. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20-28). St. Nicholas House, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93-105.Huang, I. C. (2016). Everybody learns English, and so do I: The dominance of English and its effects on individuals: What English learning means to college students in Taiwan? English Today, 32(1), 28-34.Huang, Y. (2018). Learner resistance to English-medium instruction practices: a qualitative case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 435-449.Jing, H. (2006). Learner resistance in metacognition training? An exploration of mismatches between learner and teacher agendas. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 95-117.Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.Kang, D. M. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners` willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319-332.Khazaei, Z. M., Zadeh, A. M., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Willingness to communicate in Iranian EFL learners: The effect of class size. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 181-187.Krashen, S. D. (1976). Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 10(2), 157-168.Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Problematizing cultural stereotypes in TESOL. Tesol Quarterly, 37(4), 709-719.Litwin, M. S. (1995) How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners` unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71-86.Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564-576.MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. SSLA, 23, 369-388.MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 59(4), 589-607.Macintyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students` willingness to communicate. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 81-96.MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3-26.MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in an L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562.MacIntyre, P. D., MacKinnon, S. P., & Clement, R. (2009). Embracing affective ambivalence: A research agenda for understanding the interdependent processes of language anxiety and motivation. In P. Cheng and J. X. Yan (Eds.) Cultural Identity and Language Anxiety. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press.McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985, November). Willingness to Communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.Mertens, D. M, (2010) Research and evaluation in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Nematizendah, S., & Wood, D., (2017). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An investigation of affective and cognitive dynamics. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(3), 197-215.Nicol, A. A, & De France, K., (2020). Prejudice, Integrativeness, and Motivation to Learn a Second Language: A Mediation Analysis. Psychological Reports, 123(2), 420-434.Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1996). Communicating across cultures: Social determinants and acculturative consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 28(3), 214-228.Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85.Nuttall, C. (1996) Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan Publishers.Peng, J. E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876.Puric, D., Vuksanovic, J., & Chondrogianni, V. (2017). Cognitive advantages of immersion education after 1 year: Effects of amount of exposure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 296-309.Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., Funder, D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 677-718.Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363-381.Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2014). Can I say something? The effects of digital gameplay on willingness to communicate. Language Learning and Technology, 18(2), 101-123.Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In: Z. Dornyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 Self (pp. 120-143). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Ryan, R., M., & Deci, E., L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Tsui, B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey, & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom (pp. 145-167). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Ushioda, E. (2015). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47-54). St. Nicholas House, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Valdes, G. (1997). Dual-language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 67(3), 391-429.Verspoor, M. (2015). Initial Conditions. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 38-46). St. Nicholas House, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Wen, W. P., & Clément, R. (2003) A Chinese Conceptualization of Willingness to Communicate in ESL. Language Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.Wolf, J., P. (2013). Exploring and contrasting EFL learners’ perceptions of textbook-assigned and self-selected discussion topics. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 49-66.Wragg, E. (1999) An Introduction to Classroom Observation (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66.Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115-137.Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152.Yu, Miao. (2015). An examination of the dynamic feature of WTC through dyadic group interaction. System, 55, 11-20.Zhang, J., Beckmann, N., & Beckmann, J., F. (2018). To talk or not to talk: A review of situational antecedents of willingness to communicate in the second language classroom. System, 72, 226-239.Zhong, Q. (2013). Understanding Chinese Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in a New Zealand ESL Classroom: A Multiple Case Study Drawing on the Theory of planned Behavior. System, 41, 740-751.Zuengler, J. (1993). Encouraging learners’ conversational participation – The effect of content knowledge. Language Learning, 43(3), 403-432. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/NCCU202001076 en_US
