學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 掙脫框架的主體:愛特伍《證詞》中難以規訓的身體、團結和抵抗
Becoming a Different Subject: Undisciplined Bodies, Solidarity and Resistance in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments作者 蔡錦萱
Tsai, Chin-Hsuan貢獻者 邱彥彬
Chiou, Yen-Bin
蔡錦萱
Tsai, Chin-Hsuan關鍵詞 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍
《證詞》
米歇爾‧傅柯
權力技術
抵抗
團結
建 立關係
Margaret Atwood
The Testaments
Michel Foucault
Discipline
Resistance
Solidarity
Bonds日期 2023 上傳時間 2-Aug-2023 14:01:39 (UTC+8) 摘要 在《使女的故事》中，主角奧芙弗雷德作為使女的掙扎是學者討論和關注的焦點，而在其續集《證詞》中，瑪格麗特‧愛特伍娓娓道來其餘高階級女性的痛苦和困境，像是嬤嬤和大主教之女兒。本文藉由米歇爾‧傅柯的權力理論為基礎，以分析《證詞》中的基列國是如何以權力技術（disciplinary techniques）治理而帶給主角們痛苦。而後本文也將透過理論所述之權力和抵抗去探討書中團結和抵抗的重要性。在愛特伍的反烏托邦世界中，權力透過各種權力技術實施和治理而有效地塑造和管理基列國人的行為，例如個體化（individualization）和規範化（normalization）。儘管權力技術有效且高效，但主角們仍舊先後以個人和群體之方式反抗基列國政權。憑藉建立關係、團結和團隊合作，主角們終能抵抗個體化及規範化並脫離基列國的統治。
In The Handmaid’s Tale, Offred’s struggles as a handmaid are the locus of discussion and attention, while in The Testaments, the plight of the Aunts and the Commander’s daughter are unveiled. The Testaments provides a whole picture depicting the suffering of the high-ranking women who speak to Atwood’s political concerns and demonstrate their methods to overcome obstacles. This thesis explores the governing techniques that bring the female protagonists struggles and suffering. It also examines the importance of solidarity and resistance to injustice and status quo in Atwood’s work with Foucault’s theory of power and resistance. In Atwood’s dystopian world, the operation and effectiveness of power are secured by various disciplinary techniques such as individualization and normalization to shape and manage Gileadeans’ behavior. Despite the effectiveness and efficiency of disciplinary techniques, the female protagonists carry out counter-conduct to resist the regime individually and collectively. With their bonds, solidarity, and teamwork, the female protagonists facilitate their liberation from Gilead’s domination.參考文獻 Atwood, Margaret. Second Words: Selected Critical Prose 1960–1982. House of Anansi Press, 1982.---. The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland&Stewart, 1985.---. The Testaments. Anchor Books, 2019.Conboy, Sheila. “Scripted, Conscripted, and Circumscribed: Body Language in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Anxious Power: Reading, Writing, and Ambivalence in Narrative by Women, edited by Carol J. Singley, State University of New York Press, 1993, pp. 349–362.David, Hogsette. “Controlling Women’s Voices in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by David E. Nelson, Greenhaven Press, Detroit, MI, 2012, pp. 98–112.Davidson, Arnold I. “In Praise of Counter-Conduct.” History of the Human Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4, 2011, pp. 25–41., https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111411625.Dreyfus, Hubert L., et al. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press, 2007.Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 1975. Translated by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Anchor Publishing, 1995.---. Foucault Live: (Interviews, 1961-1984). Edited by Sylvère Lotringer, Semiotext(e), 1996.---. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France 1977-1978. 1977-1978. Edited by Arnold Davidson and Michel Senellart. Translated by Graham Burchell, Picador USA, 2009.---. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. 1976. Translated by Robert Hurley, Vintage Books, 1990.---. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 4, 1982, pp. 777–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197. Accessed 26 Sep. 2022.Fraser, Nancy. “Michel Foucault: A ‘Young Conservative’?” Ethics, vol. 96, no. 1, 1985, pp. 165–84. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381333. Accessed 29 Mar. 2023.Freibert, Lucy M. “Control and Creativity: The Politics of Risk in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Critical Essays on Margaret Atwood, edited by Judith McCombs, G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 280–291.Gheorghiu, Oana Celia, and Michaela Praisler. “Rewriting Politics, or the Emerging Fourth Wave of Feminism in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 28 May 2020, pp. 87–96., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.87-96.Heller, Kevin Jon. “Power, Subjectification and Resistance in Foucault.” SubStance, vol. 25, no. 1, 1996, pp. 78–110. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3685230. Accessed 29 Mar. 2023.Howells, Coral Ann., editor. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Feldman Kołodziejuk, Ewelina. “Mothers, Daughters, Sisters: The Intergenerational Transmission of Womanhood in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, pp. 67–85., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.67-85.Kuznetski, Julia. “Disempowerment and Bodily Agency in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments and The Handmaid’s Tale TV Series.” The European Legacy, vol. 26, no. 3-4, 9 Mar. 2021, pp. 287–302., https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2021.1898108.Labudová, Katarína. “Testimonies in The Testaments by Margaret Atwood: Images of Food in Gilead.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, pp. 97–110., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.97-110.May, Todd. The Philosophy of Foucault. Routledge, 2006.Nealon, Jeffrey T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford University Press, 2007.Neuman, Shirley. “‘Just a Backlash’: Margaret Atwood, Feminism, and The Handmaid’s Tale.” Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by J. Brooks Bouson, Salem Press, 2010, pp. 138–152.Pickett, Brent L. “Foucault and the Politics of Resistance.” Polity, vol. 28, no. 4, 1996, pp. 445–66. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3235341. Accessed 26 Sep. 2022.Rigney, Barbara Hill. Margaret Atwood: Women Writers. Macmillan Press, 1987.Rubenstein, Roberta. “Nature and Nurture in Dystopia: The Handmaid’s Tale.” Margaret Atwood: Vision and Forms, edited by Kathryn Van Spanckeren and Jan Castro Garden, Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, pp. 101–112.Staels, Hilde. “Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: Resistance Through Narrating.” Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by J. Bouson, Salem Press, 2010, pp. 227–245. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
110551003資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551003 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 邱彥彬 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chiou, Yen-Bin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡錦萱 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tsai, Chin-Hsuan en_US dc.creator (作者) 蔡錦萱 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Chin-Hsuan en_US dc.date (日期) 2023 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Aug-2023 14:01:39 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Aug-2023 14:01:39 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Aug-2023 14:01:39 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110551003 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146558 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110551003 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在《使女的故事》中，主角奧芙弗雷德作為使女的掙扎是學者討論和關注的焦點，而在其續集《證詞》中，瑪格麗特‧愛特伍娓娓道來其餘高階級女性的痛苦和困境，像是嬤嬤和大主教之女兒。本文藉由米歇爾‧傅柯的權力理論為基礎，以分析《證詞》中的基列國是如何以權力技術（disciplinary techniques）治理而帶給主角們痛苦。而後本文也將透過理論所述之權力和抵抗去探討書中團結和抵抗的重要性。在愛特伍的反烏托邦世界中，權力透過各種權力技術實施和治理而有效地塑造和管理基列國人的行為，例如個體化（individualization）和規範化（normalization）。儘管權力技術有效且高效，但主角們仍舊先後以個人和群體之方式反抗基列國政權。憑藉建立關係、團結和團隊合作，主角們終能抵抗個體化及規範化並脫離基列國的統治。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In The Handmaid’s Tale, Offred’s struggles as a handmaid are the locus of discussion and attention, while in The Testaments, the plight of the Aunts and the Commander’s daughter are unveiled. The Testaments provides a whole picture depicting the suffering of the high-ranking women who speak to Atwood’s political concerns and demonstrate their methods to overcome obstacles. This thesis explores the governing techniques that bring the female protagonists struggles and suffering. It also examines the importance of solidarity and resistance to injustice and status quo in Atwood’s work with Foucault’s theory of power and resistance. In Atwood’s dystopian world, the operation and effectiveness of power are secured by various disciplinary techniques such as individualization and normalization to shape and manage Gileadeans’ behavior. Despite the effectiveness and efficiency of disciplinary techniques, the female protagonists carry out counter-conduct to resist the regime individually and collectively. With their bonds, solidarity, and teamwork, the female protagonists facilitate their liberation from Gilead’s domination. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgements iiiChinese Abstract vEnglish Abstract viIntroduction 1Background 1Literature Review 2Problem Statement 6Hypotheses 8Methodology 11Structure of the Thesis 14Chapter One: Gilead’s Disciplinary Power 19Foucault’s Observation and Theory 19The Disciplinary Society in Gilead 21Disciplinary Techniques Employed in Gilead 22Chapter Two: Power as a Double-edged Sword 34Aunt Lydia’s Power Network 35From the Ideal to the Rebellion: Aunt Lydia’s Transition 40Aunt Lydia’s Network of Resistance 45Chapter Three: The Establishment and Resistance of an Ideal Gileadean Subject 52Becoming an Ideal Gileadean: Agnes’s Upbringing as Individualization 53From a Believer to a Fighter: Agnes’s Transition 62Becoming a Different Subject: Agnes’s Counter-conduct 63Chapter Four: Strength of the Undisciplined Bodies 73Daisy as an Untamed Body and Her Strength 74Hierarchy of Different Purpose: In Gileadean Network and the Network of Resistance 78Resistance through Teamwork, Solidarity, and Bonding 82Conclusion 90Works Cited 96 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1066228 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551003 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 瑪格麗特‧愛特伍 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 《證詞》 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 米歇爾‧傅柯 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 權力技術 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 抵抗 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 團結 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 建 立關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Margaret Atwood en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Testaments en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Michel Foucault en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Discipline en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resistance en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Solidarity en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bonds en_US dc.title (題名) 掙脫框架的主體:愛特伍《證詞》中難以規訓的身體、團結和抵抗 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Becoming a Different Subject: Undisciplined Bodies, Solidarity and Resistance in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Atwood, Margaret. Second Words: Selected Critical Prose 1960–1982. House of Anansi Press, 1982.---. The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland&Stewart, 1985.---. The Testaments. Anchor Books, 2019.Conboy, Sheila. “Scripted, Conscripted, and Circumscribed: Body Language in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Anxious Power: Reading, Writing, and Ambivalence in Narrative by Women, edited by Carol J. Singley, State University of New York Press, 1993, pp. 349–362.David, Hogsette. “Controlling Women’s Voices in The Handmaid’s Tale.” Women’s Issues in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by David E. Nelson, Greenhaven Press, Detroit, MI, 2012, pp. 98–112.Davidson, Arnold I. “In Praise of Counter-Conduct.” History of the Human Sciences, vol. 24, no. 4, 2011, pp. 25–41., https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111411625.Dreyfus, Hubert L., et al. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press, 2007.Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 1975. Translated by Alan Sheridan, Vintage Anchor Publishing, 1995.---. Foucault Live: (Interviews, 1961-1984). Edited by Sylvère Lotringer, Semiotext(e), 1996.---. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France 1977-1978. 1977-1978. Edited by Arnold Davidson and Michel Senellart. Translated by Graham Burchell, Picador USA, 2009.---. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. 1976. Translated by Robert Hurley, Vintage Books, 1990.---. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 4, 1982, pp. 777–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197. Accessed 26 Sep. 2022.Fraser, Nancy. “Michel Foucault: A ‘Young Conservative’?” Ethics, vol. 96, no. 1, 1985, pp. 165–84. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381333. Accessed 29 Mar. 2023.Freibert, Lucy M. “Control and Creativity: The Politics of Risk in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.” Critical Essays on Margaret Atwood, edited by Judith McCombs, G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 280–291.Gheorghiu, Oana Celia, and Michaela Praisler. “Rewriting Politics, or the Emerging Fourth Wave of Feminism in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 28 May 2020, pp. 87–96., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.87-96.Heller, Kevin Jon. “Power, Subjectification and Resistance in Foucault.” SubStance, vol. 25, no. 1, 1996, pp. 78–110. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3685230. Accessed 29 Mar. 2023.Howells, Coral Ann., editor. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Feldman Kołodziejuk, Ewelina. “Mothers, Daughters, Sisters: The Intergenerational Transmission of Womanhood in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, pp. 67–85., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.67-85.Kuznetski, Julia. “Disempowerment and Bodily Agency in Margaret Atwood’s The Testaments and The Handmaid’s Tale TV Series.” The European Legacy, vol. 26, no. 3-4, 9 Mar. 2021, pp. 287–302., https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2021.1898108.Labudová, Katarína. “Testimonies in The Testaments by Margaret Atwood: Images of Food in Gilead.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, vol. 17, no. 1, 2020, pp. 97–110., https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.17.1.97-110.May, Todd. The Philosophy of Foucault. Routledge, 2006.Nealon, Jeffrey T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford University Press, 2007.Neuman, Shirley. “‘Just a Backlash’: Margaret Atwood, Feminism, and The Handmaid’s Tale.” Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by J. Brooks Bouson, Salem Press, 2010, pp. 138–152.Pickett, Brent L. “Foucault and the Politics of Resistance.” Polity, vol. 28, no. 4, 1996, pp. 445–66. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3235341. Accessed 26 Sep. 2022.Rigney, Barbara Hill. Margaret Atwood: Women Writers. Macmillan Press, 1987.Rubenstein, Roberta. “Nature and Nurture in Dystopia: The Handmaid’s Tale.” Margaret Atwood: Vision and Forms, edited by Kathryn Van Spanckeren and Jan Castro Garden, Southern Illinois University Press, 1988, pp. 101–112.Staels, Hilde. “Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: Resistance Through Narrating.” Critical Insights: The Handmaid’s Tale, edited by J. Bouson, Salem Press, 2010, pp. 227–245. zh_TW
