學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 那是你的職責: 從《黛安莎的作為》中翻轉維多利亞時期的性別規範
“That's Your Duty”: Transgressing Victorian Gender Norms in Charlotte P. Gilman's What Diantha Did作者 陳君慧
Chen, Jiun-Huei貢獻者 陳音頤
Chen, Eva Y.I.
陳君慧
Chen, Jiun-Huei關鍵詞 夏洛特.吉爾曼
性別規範
家庭
家庭天使
Charlotte Gilman
Gender norms
Victorian era
The Angel in the House日期 2024 上傳時間 1-Mar-2024 12:42:43 (UTC+8) 摘要 夏洛特.吉爾曼的作品《黛安莎的作為》中討論黛安莎如何勇於脫離家庭的禁錮並追尋自我實現，但家庭之於女性的意義與家族男性成員的觀點卻甚少被提及。本論文旨在剖析19世紀末和20世紀初的家庭概念如何成為女性的束縛，並從男性視角分析為何家族男性聽聞女性在經濟方面獨立與自我成長感到恐慌，進而雙邊放下己見和睦共處。 本論文分為兩大主軸，前三章主要提及黛安莎在自我實現與社會期待的理想女性中斡旋，其中以西蒙.波娃的《第二性》、考文垂.派特摩的《家庭天使》輔佐說明社會已經為女性制定框架，強調黛安莎面臨的困境，以及邁入職場後與其他婦女組成學習型互助社團，幫助彼此共同成長。最後兩章以男性家庭成員的視角與社會賦予男性的責任分析為何男主角羅斯屢屢抨擊黛安莎在職場上的成就，在旁人的勸說下，羅斯放下偏見與黛安莎重歸於好。吉爾曼也在文中翻轉了過往維多利亞時期女性居家、男性剛強的形象，也旨在呼籲讀者以包容的視角看待兩性特質。
What Diantha Did (1910) mainly narrates how Diantha frees herself from the domestic confinement, and achieves her ambition. Nonetheless, the significance of domestic spaces to women and the objection from male family members are rarely discussed. The main purpose of my thesis are going to discuss two things; one is exploring how the domestic concept in late 19th century to early 20th century become the prison for women. The other is the rationale behind men’s insecurity about women’s economic independence would be discussed in the thesis. The thesis can be divided into two sections. The first half mentions how Diantha deals with the struggle between her own ideals and the social expectations to be a good wife at home. I would exemplify Diantha’s struggle while facing the social frame for women to be submissive from Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex and Coventry Patmore’s Angel in the House. Also, Diantha and Isabel challenge the good wives’ norms in Orchardina, forming the clubs to help women to improve themselves and having professions. I would analyze from men’s perspectives and social expectations to men to explain why Ross ignores Diantha’s success in her workplace. In the end, Diantha and Ross reconcile with each other and embrace the harmony by their neighbor’s persuasion. Gilman transgresses the Victorian gender norms that women should be fragile and men should be tough in the text, advocating her readers to be more inclusive in terms of gender traits.參考文獻 Allingham, Merryn. “Women in Victorian England”. https://merrynallingham.com/19th-century/women-in-victorian-england/ Barrett, Kara J “Victorian women and their working roles” State University of New York, Buffalo State College, MA Thesis. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&conteMay 2013. Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex. Vintage Books, 1929. Digby, Anne. “Victorian Values and Women in Public and Private.” Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 78, 1989, pp. 195-215. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4031/78p195.pdf. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. The Man-Made World: Or Our Androcentric Culture. Project Gutenberg, 1911. —. The Home: Its Work and Influence. McClure, Phillips, 1903. —. What Diantha Did. United Kingdom Library, 1910. —. Women and Economics. Espiros World’s Classics, 1900. Hill, Mary A. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Feminist’s Struggle with Womanhood.” The Massachusetts Review, vol. 21, no. 3, 1980, pp. 503–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25089070. Accessed 6 Feb. 2023. Hoffman, Joan M. “‘She Loves with Love That Cannot Tire’: The Image of the Angel in the House across Cultures and across Time.” Pacific Coast Philology, vol. 42, no. 2, 2007, pp. 264–71. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474238. Accessed 9 Oct. 2023. Holmes, Marbeth. “Circumcision of the Female Intellect: 19th Century Women Who Opposed Scholarly Education.” Forum on Public Policy, Nash Community College, 2017, pp. 1-13. Accessed 24 Sep, 2023. Keynes, Milton. “A Woman’s Place.” Space, Place and Gender, University of Minnesota Press, 1984, pp 191-211. Kimmel, Michael S. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. Oxford University Press, 2006. Kuhl, Sarah. “The Angel in the House and Fallen Women: Assigning Women their Places in Victorian Society”. University of Oxford, United Kingdom, 2012 https://open.conted.ox.ac.uk/sites/open. Levitas, Ruth. “‘Who Holds the House?’ Domestic Labour in the Work of Bellamy, Gilman and Morris." Utopian Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 1995, pp. 65–84. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20719365. Accessed 17 Sep. 2023. McGeevor, Sophie. “What 19th Century Women Really Did.” Cambridge Group for History of Population and Social Culture, University of Cambridge, 2014. Morantz, Regina Markell. “Making Women Modern: Middle Class Women and Health Reform in 19th Century America.” Journal of Social History, vol. 10, no. 4, 1977, pp. 490–507. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3786765. O’Donnell, Margaret G. “A Reply to ‘Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Reassessing Her Significance for Feminism and Social Economics.’” Review of Social Economy, vol. 54, no. 3, 1996, pp. 337–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/29769855. Accessed 4 Feb. 2023. Patmore, Coventry. The Angel in the House. University of St. Michael’s College, 1854. Internet Archive, London. Peiss, Kathy. "Going Public: Women in Nineteenth-Century Cultural History." American Literary History, vol. 3, no. 4, 1991, pp. 817–28. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/489891. Accessed 13 Sep. 2023. Reichardt, Ulf, and Sabine Sielke. “What Does Man Want? The Recent Debates on Manhood and Masculinities.” Amerikastudien American Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, 1998, pp. 563–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41157417. Accessed 10 Nov. 2023. Rich, Charlotte J. “An ‘Absent Mother’: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Mag-Marjorie and the Politics of Maternal Responsibility” Charlotte Perkins Gilman: New Texts, The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 2011. pp.85-99. Rosenberg, Charles E. “Sexuality, Class and Role in 19th-Century America.” American Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, 1973, pp. 131–53. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2711594. Accessed 3 Oct. 2023. Rupp, Leila J. “Reflections on Twentieth-Century American Women’s History.” Reviews in American History, vol. 9, no. 2, 1981, pp. 275–84. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2701999. Accessed 2 Nov. 2023. Sabanci, Gamze. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Re-Creation of Masculinity”, Journal of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, International University of Sarajevo, Fall 2009. Showalter, Elaine. “Killing the Angel in the House: The Autonomy of Women Writers.” The Antioch Review, vol. 50, no. 1/2, 1992, pp. 207–20. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/4612511. Accessed 12 July 2023. Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. “The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth-Century America.” Signs, vol. 1, no. 1, 1975, pp. 1–29. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172964. Accessed 3 Feb. 2023. Sulistini, Dewi Rigen. “Diantha’s Struggles in Pursuing Women’s Emancipation in Gilman’s What Diantha Did”, State University of Yogyakarta, MA Thesis. 2014. “The Emergence of ‘Women’s Sphere.” United States History Organization, Independence Hall Association, www.ushistory.org/us/25e.asp. Accessed 29 Jan. 2023. Woolf, Virginia. “Professions for Women.” The Death of the Moth and Other Essays, National Society for Women’s Service. London, 21 Jan, 1931. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
110551016資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551016 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳音頤 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Eva Y.I. en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳君慧 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen, Jiun-Huei en_US dc.creator (作者) 陳君慧 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chen, Jiun-Huei en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2024 12:42:43 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Mar-2024 12:42:43 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2024 12:42:43 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0110551016 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150137 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 英國語文學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110551016 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 夏洛特.吉爾曼的作品《黛安莎的作為》中討論黛安莎如何勇於脫離家庭的禁錮並追尋自我實現，但家庭之於女性的意義與家族男性成員的觀點卻甚少被提及。本論文旨在剖析19世紀末和20世紀初的家庭概念如何成為女性的束縛，並從男性視角分析為何家族男性聽聞女性在經濟方面獨立與自我成長感到恐慌，進而雙邊放下己見和睦共處。 本論文分為兩大主軸，前三章主要提及黛安莎在自我實現與社會期待的理想女性中斡旋，其中以西蒙.波娃的《第二性》、考文垂.派特摩的《家庭天使》輔佐說明社會已經為女性制定框架，強調黛安莎面臨的困境，以及邁入職場後與其他婦女組成學習型互助社團，幫助彼此共同成長。最後兩章以男性家庭成員的視角與社會賦予男性的責任分析為何男主角羅斯屢屢抨擊黛安莎在職場上的成就，在旁人的勸說下，羅斯放下偏見與黛安莎重歸於好。吉爾曼也在文中翻轉了過往維多利亞時期女性居家、男性剛強的形象，也旨在呼籲讀者以包容的視角看待兩性特質。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) What Diantha Did (1910) mainly narrates how Diantha frees herself from the domestic confinement, and achieves her ambition. Nonetheless, the significance of domestic spaces to women and the objection from male family members are rarely discussed. The main purpose of my thesis are going to discuss two things; one is exploring how the domestic concept in late 19th century to early 20th century become the prison for women. The other is the rationale behind men’s insecurity about women’s economic independence would be discussed in the thesis. The thesis can be divided into two sections. The first half mentions how Diantha deals with the struggle between her own ideals and the social expectations to be a good wife at home. I would exemplify Diantha’s struggle while facing the social frame for women to be submissive from Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex and Coventry Patmore’s Angel in the House. Also, Diantha and Isabel challenge the good wives’ norms in Orchardina, forming the clubs to help women to improve themselves and having professions. I would analyze from men’s perspectives and social expectations to men to explain why Ross ignores Diantha’s success in her workplace. In the end, Diantha and Ross reconcile with each other and embrace the harmony by their neighbor’s persuasion. Gilman transgresses the Victorian gender norms that women should be fragile and men should be tough in the text, advocating her readers to be more inclusive in terms of gender traits. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgement ii Chinese Abstract iii English Abstract iv Chapter I: Introduction 1 Chapter II Diantha’s Ambition and Her Struggle 13 Chapter III The Best Place for Women is not Home 22 Chapter IV I am Going to Leave Home and Work 30 Chapter V Men’s Insecurity about Diantha’s Working 39 Chapter VI Strike a Balance between Ross’s Anxiety and Diantha’s Work 45 Conclusion 51 Works Cited 54 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2191452 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110551016 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 夏洛特.吉爾曼 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別規範 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭天使 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Charlotte Gilman en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Gender norms en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Victorian era en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Angel in the House en_US dc.title (題名) 那是你的職責: 從《黛安莎的作為》中翻轉維多利亞時期的性別規範 zh_TW dc.title (題名) “That's Your Duty”: Transgressing Victorian Gender Norms in Charlotte P. Gilman's What Diantha Did en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allingham, Merryn. “Women in Victorian England”. https://merrynallingham.com/19th-century/women-in-victorian-england/ Barrett, Kara J “Victorian women and their working roles” State University of New York, Buffalo State College, MA Thesis. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&conteMay 2013. Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex. Vintage Books, 1929. Digby, Anne. “Victorian Values and Women in Public and Private.” Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 78, 1989, pp. 195-215. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/4031/78p195.pdf. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. The Man-Made World: Or Our Androcentric Culture. Project Gutenberg, 1911. —. The Home: Its Work and Influence. McClure, Phillips, 1903. —. What Diantha Did. United Kingdom Library, 1910. —. Women and Economics. Espiros World’s Classics, 1900. Hill, Mary A. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Feminist’s Struggle with Womanhood.” The Massachusetts Review, vol. 21, no. 3, 1980, pp. 503–26. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25089070. Accessed 6 Feb. 2023. Hoffman, Joan M. “‘She Loves with Love That Cannot Tire’: The Image of the Angel in the House across Cultures and across Time.” Pacific Coast Philology, vol. 42, no. 2, 2007, pp. 264–71. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474238. Accessed 9 Oct. 2023. Holmes, Marbeth. “Circumcision of the Female Intellect: 19th Century Women Who Opposed Scholarly Education.” Forum on Public Policy, Nash Community College, 2017, pp. 1-13. Accessed 24 Sep, 2023. Keynes, Milton. “A Woman’s Place.” Space, Place and Gender, University of Minnesota Press, 1984, pp 191-211. Kimmel, Michael S. Manhood in America: A Cultural History. Oxford University Press, 2006. Kuhl, Sarah. “The Angel in the House and Fallen Women: Assigning Women their Places in Victorian Society”. University of Oxford, United Kingdom, 2012 https://open.conted.ox.ac.uk/sites/open. Levitas, Ruth. “‘Who Holds the House?’ Domestic Labour in the Work of Bellamy, Gilman and Morris." Utopian Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 1995, pp. 65–84. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20719365. Accessed 17 Sep. 2023. McGeevor, Sophie. “What 19th Century Women Really Did.” Cambridge Group for History of Population and Social Culture, University of Cambridge, 2014. Morantz, Regina Markell. “Making Women Modern: Middle Class Women and Health Reform in 19th Century America.” Journal of Social History, vol. 10, no. 4, 1977, pp. 490–507. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3786765. O’Donnell, Margaret G. “A Reply to ‘Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Reassessing Her Significance for Feminism and Social Economics.’” Review of Social Economy, vol. 54, no. 3, 1996, pp. 337–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/29769855. Accessed 4 Feb. 2023. Patmore, Coventry. The Angel in the House. University of St. Michael’s College, 1854. Internet Archive, London. Peiss, Kathy. "Going Public: Women in Nineteenth-Century Cultural History." American Literary History, vol. 3, no. 4, 1991, pp. 817–28. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/489891. Accessed 13 Sep. 2023. Reichardt, Ulf, and Sabine Sielke. “What Does Man Want? The Recent Debates on Manhood and Masculinities.” Amerikastudien American Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, 1998, pp. 563–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41157417. Accessed 10 Nov. 2023. Rich, Charlotte J. “An ‘Absent Mother’: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Mag-Marjorie and the Politics of Maternal Responsibility” Charlotte Perkins Gilman: New Texts, The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, 2011. pp.85-99. Rosenberg, Charles E. “Sexuality, Class and Role in 19th-Century America.” American Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, 1973, pp. 131–53. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2711594. Accessed 3 Oct. 2023. Rupp, Leila J. “Reflections on Twentieth-Century American Women’s History.” Reviews in American History, vol. 9, no. 2, 1981, pp. 275–84. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2701999. Accessed 2 Nov. 2023. Sabanci, Gamze. “Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Re-Creation of Masculinity”, Journal of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, International University of Sarajevo, Fall 2009. Showalter, Elaine. “Killing the Angel in the House: The Autonomy of Women Writers.” The Antioch Review, vol. 50, no. 1/2, 1992, pp. 207–20. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/4612511. Accessed 12 July 2023. Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. “The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth-Century America.” Signs, vol. 1, no. 1, 1975, pp. 1–29. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172964. Accessed 3 Feb. 2023. Sulistini, Dewi Rigen. “Diantha’s Struggles in Pursuing Women’s Emancipation in Gilman’s What Diantha Did”, State University of Yogyakarta, MA Thesis. 2014. “The Emergence of ‘Women’s Sphere.” United States History Organization, Independence Hall Association, www.ushistory.org/us/25e.asp. Accessed 29 Jan. 2023. Woolf, Virginia. “Professions for Women.” The Death of the Moth and Other Essays, National Society for Women’s Service. London, 21 Jan, 1931. zh_TW
