學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及個人社會認知能力對語句處理的影響
The Influence of Emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and Individual Social Cognitive Ability on Sentence Processing作者 許涴筑
Hsu, Wan-Chu貢獻者 賴瑶鍈
Lai, Yao-Ying
許涴筑
Hsu, Wan-Chu關鍵詞 語句處理
情緒詞類
人稱指涉
社會認知能力
語言即時理解
Sentence processing
Emotional word type
Personal reference
Social cognitive ability
Real-time language comprehension日期 2024 上傳時間 6-八月-2024 14:00:33 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究旨在探討語句的處理是否會因不同的情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及社會認知能力的個體差異而產生影響。過去有諸多探討情緒語言的心理與神經語言學實驗，但大多是在單詞層級。本研究針對句子層級，檢視語言理解者如何處理文句語境中的情緒詞。情緒詞彙可分二類：情緒標籤詞 (emotion-label words)，詞彙語意直接指涉特定情緒，像是「快樂的」、「悲傷的」；情緒負載詞 (emotion-laden words) ，在詞語字面意義之上隱含情緒意涵，像是「光明的」、「灰暗的」。而情緒與他人或自身相關，在語言中透過與之搭配的人稱指涉詞來表述 (self- vs. other-relevant)；以不同人稱觀點來表述是否會影響情緒語言的處理仍未知。此外，過去文獻指出社會認知能力會影響個人情緒訊息的接收及語句內容的處理，故此研究也檢視此個體差異因素如何左右情緒語言的處理歷程。 本研究包含兩項前測實驗及一項主要實驗。前測一為線上問卷，請臺灣華語母語者將形容詞歸類至情緒標籤或情緒負載詞，用來建構主實驗的刺激材料句。前測二為自然通順程度的評分問卷，確保各條件語句對母語者來說皆自然通順且無顯著差異。主實驗為自訂步調閱讀任務，以閱讀時長 (reading times, RTs) 推測理解歷程、並以自閉症量表指數衡量個人社會認知能力。實驗結果顯示，情緒詞類及社會認知能力的個體差異對句子的即時處理皆產生顯著影響。語句中情緒標籤詞的閱讀時間長於情緒負載詞，可能是由於閱讀文句語境中的情緒標籤詞時，理解者除了建構整體句意表徵，還須處理額外的情緒意涵，因此引起較長的閱讀時間；反之，人們在文句語境中可能較容易忽略情緒負載詞隱含的情緒意涵，僅處理字面層次的意義。此外，社會認知能力較低者閱讀語句時的時間較長（與社會認知能力較高者相比），顯示了情緒語句處理上的困難；推測與整合語句內容（包含情緒詞及人稱指涉）的速度較慢、及忖度他人/自身心理狀態的能力較弱有關。或者，也可能是由於社會認知能力較低者閱讀態度較為謹慎造成。另一方面，人稱指涉的效果在實驗檢視的關鍵情緒詞區未達顯著，顯示了此因素對情緒語句的處理歷程沒有影響。 本研究將情緒詞帶入語句中，觀察在不同人稱指涉下、不同社會認知能力者的閱讀理解歷程，補充了在語句層次處理情緒語言的實驗結果，同時揭示社會認知個體差異的影響，予現有之理論提供實證回饋。未來研究或許可進一步探討情緒語言與人稱指涉的交互作用，以及多方探討語句中情緒訊息的處理。
The present study aims to investigate the real-time comprehension of emotional sentences, by manipulating emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and social cognitive ability (SCA). While previous experimental studies have demonstrated an effect of emotional word type on processing at the lexical level, the current study targets the processing of emotional word type at the sentential level. Emotional words can be categorized into two types: emotion-label words that refer to emotional states (e.g., happy, sad), and emotion-laden words that imply certain emotion alongside their semantic denotation (e.g., bright, dark). Meanwhile, emotional words typically predicate individuals, related to others or ourselves. It remains unclear if taking different perspectives to comprehend emotional word types would factor into processing. Additionally, previous work has suggested that individual SCA affects the perception of emotional words and sentence processing. I therefore examine if the processing of emotional sentences modulated by emotional word types would vary with this individual difference. The present thesis comprises two norming studies and the main self-paced reading experiment. Norming Study 1 was an online questionnaire that asked native speakers of Taiwanese Mandarin to categorize adjectives into different Word Types. The categorized words were then used to construct experimental sentences. Norming Study 2 assessed the naturalness of experimental sentences in an online questionnaire to ensure the feasible stimuli. The ensuing main experiment adopted a self-paced reading task with a moving-window paradigm to measure reading times (RTs) to probe realtime processing; the participants took the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) as a measurement of individual SCA. Results showed a significant effect of emotional Word Type, such that sentences with emotion-laden words had shorter RTs than the counterparts with emotion-label words. I posited that in comprehending sentences containing emotion-label words, participants were tasked not only with constructing semantic representations but also with integrating emotional properties into the sentences. On the contrary, in sentences containing emotion-laden words, people may overlook the underlying emotional properties and focus solely on processing the literal meanings. Additionally, the effect of individual SCA was also significant, indicating longer RTs for those with lower SCA. This phenomenon is potentially influenced by Personal Reference and emotional Word Type. More crucially, the weaker ability to integrate sentence contents and empathize with or reflect on others’ and one’s own mind states may also contribute to this effect. Alternatively, it could be because people with lower SCA are more careful readers. However, the main effect of Personal Reference did not reach significance in the target emotion-word region examined in the experiment, indicating that Personal Reference does not influence the processing of emotional sentences. This research integrates emotional words into sentences to observe the processes of reading comprehension from different perspectives and with different levels of SCA, advancing our understanding of emotion language processing. Future study could further clarify the interaction between emotional expressions and personal reference, delving deeper into the processing of sentences containing emotional information.參考文獻 Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). The dual process theory of autism. Thinking, Reasoning, and Decision Making in Autism, p. 13-38. Routledge. Au-Yeung, S., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in autism spectrum disorder: an eye-movement study. Autism Research, 8, 749-760. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1490 Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(00)80010-5 Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34(1), 74-183. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471 Barzy, M., Filik, R., Williams, D., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Emotional processing of ironic versus literal criticism in autistic and nonautistic adults: evidence from eye-tracking. Autism Research, 13, 563-578. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2272 Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., &Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Berlingeri, M., Crepaldi, D., Roberti, R., Scialfa, G., Luzzatti, C., & Paulesu, E. (2008). Nouns and verbs in the brain: Grammatical class and task specific effects as revealed by fMRI. Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(4), 528-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701674943 Bouranta, N., Chitiris, L., & Paravantis, J. (2009). The relationship between internal and external service quality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110910948297 Bromberek-Dyzman, K., Vasileanu, M., & BąK, H. (2021). Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English and Romanian-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(5), 1161-1182. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920987306 Brosnan, M., & Ashwin, C. (2023). Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum. Autism, 27(5), 1245-1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132437 Brosnan, M., Lewton, M., & Ashwin, C. (2016). Reasoning on the autism spectrum: A dual process theory account. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2115-2125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4 Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspective: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Association for Psychological Science, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02249.x Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one, 5(6), e10729.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41 (1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1 Chen, Y., Zhong, Y. P., Zhou, H. B., Zhang, S. M., Tan, Q. B., & Fan, W. (2014). Evidence for implicit self‑positivity bias: an event‑related brain potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 232. 985-994. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3810-z Child, S., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2019). Remember they were emotional - Effects of emotional qualifiers during sentence processing. Open Psychology, 1(1), 119- 131. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0009 Cho, S. L., Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (2013). Taiwan corpora of Chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data-a study on the norm of Chinese emotional words. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 493-523. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00774-9 Chou, L. C., Pan, Y. L., & Lee, C. L. (2020). Emotion anticipation induces emotion effects in neutral words during sentence reading: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 1294-1308.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00835-z Courchesne, E., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Press, G. A., Hesselink, J. R., & Jernigan, T. L. (2013). Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism. Autism (pp. 197-202). Routledge. Davis, M. & Whalen, P. J. (2001). The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry, 6, 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858-1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006 Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., & Binder, J. R. (2006). FMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.278 Fields, E. C. & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It’s all about you: an ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 62(1), 562-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003 Gaigg, S. B., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Free recall and forgetting of emotionally arousing words in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2336-2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.008 Gaigg, S. B. & Bowler, D. M. (2009). Brief report: attenuated emotional suppression of the attentional blink in autism spectrum disorder: another non-social abnormality? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 39, 1211-1217.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0719-2 Hampson, D. R., & Blatt, G. J. (2015). Autism spectrum disorders and neuropathology of the cerebellum. Frontiers in neuroscience, 9, 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00420 Happé, F. (2003). Theory of mind and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.008 Hardie, A (2012) CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (3), 380–409. https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0004 Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., Ethofer, T., & Pauli, P. (2011a). His or mine? The time course of self-other discrimination in emotion processing. Social Neuroscience. 6(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.523543 Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011b). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653-661.https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq082 Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 813-839. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957 Ho, S. M., Mak, C. W., Yeung, D., Duan, W., Tang, S., Yeung, J. C., & Ching, R. (2015). Emotional valence, arousal, and threat ratings of 160 Chinese words among adolescents. PloS one, 10(7), e0132294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132294 Hsu, S. H., & Huang, K. C. (2001). Effects of minimal legible size characters on Chinese word recognition. Visible language, 35(2). Icht, M., Zukerman, G., Ben‐Itzchak, E., & Ben‐David, B. M. (2021). Keep it simple: Identification of basic versus complex emotions in spoken language in individuals with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability: A meta‐analysis study. Autism Research, 14(9), 1948-1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2551 Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., & King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. The American journal of psychology, 121(1), 83-103.https://doi.org/10.2307/20445445 Jiang, Z. Q., Li, W. H., Liu, Y., Luo, Y. J., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2014). When affective word valence meets linguistic polarity: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 28, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.11.001 Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 Kana, R. K., Patriquin, M. A., Black, B. S., Channell, M. M., & Wicker, B. (2016). Altered medial frontal and superior temporal response to implicit processing of emotions in autism. Autism Research, 9, 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1496 Kana, R. K., Sartin, E. B., Stevens Jr., C., Deshpande, H. D., Klein, C., Klinger, M. R., & Klinger, L. G. (2017). Neural networks underlying language and social cognition during self-other processing in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia. 102, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.008 Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2015). The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology. 128 (3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0323 Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2016). Emotion word processing: effects of word type and valence in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 45, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9357-3 Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & cognition, 31(8), 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800 Knickerbocker, F., Johnson, R. L., Starr, E. L., Hall, A. M., Preti, D. M., Slate, S. R., & Altarriba, J. (2019). The time course of processing emotion-laden words during sentence reading: evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica. 192, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.008 Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657 Lai, V. T., Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Feel between the lines: implied emotion in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 27 (8). https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00798 Lai, Y. Y., & Lai, H. L. (2023). Impact of social cognitive propensity on the processing of nontransparent sentential meaning. Journal of Pragmatics. 205, 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.014 Lai, Y. Y., Sakai, H., & Makuuchi, M. (2023). Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style. Cerebral Cortex, 33(18), 10013-10027. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad261 Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: importance of word arousal.Emotion. 8 (4), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445 Lartseva, A., Dijkstra, T., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2015). Emotional language processing in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00991 Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920-933. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532 Lau, Y. P., Gau, S. F., Chiu, Y. N., Wu, Y. Y., Chou, W. J., Liu, S. K., & Chou, M. C. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Research in Developmental Disabilities. 34(1), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.005 Lee S. Y. M. (2015). A linguistic analysis of implicit emotions. In Lu, Q. & Gao, H. H. (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 185–194). Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_19 Lee, Y. U., Yang, M. J., Lai, T. J., Chiu, N. M., & Chau, T. T. (2000). Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 23, 688- 694. Lenth, R. (2024). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.10.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Lewton, M., Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). Syllogistic reasoning reveals reduced bias in people with higher autistic-like traits from the general population. Autism, 23 (5), 1311e1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318808779 Liu, J., Fan, L., Tian, L., Li, C., & Feng, W. (2022). The neural mechanisms of Explicit and implicit processing of Chinese emotion-label and emotion-laden words: evidence from emotional categorisation and emotional Stroop tasks. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2093389 Lombardo, M. V., Barnes, J. L., Wheelwright, S. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self referential cognition and empathy in autism. PLoS ONE, 2, e883. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000883 Lüdtke, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137 Lundström, S., Chang, Z., Råstam, M., Gillberg, C., Larsson, H., Anckarsäter, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2012). Autism spectrum disorders and autistic like traits: similar etiology in the extreme end and the normal variation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(1), 46-52. http://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.144 Miri Ashtiani, S. N., & Daliri, M. R. (2023). Identification of cognitive load-dependent activation patterns using working memory task-based fMRI at various levels of difficulty. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16476. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43837-w Mizuno, A., Liu, Y., Williams, D. L., Keller, T. A., Minshew, N. J., & Just, M. A. (2011). The neural basis of deictic shifting in linguistic perspective-taking in high functioning autism. Brain, 134(8), 2422-2435. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr151 Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 324-346. Pavlenko, A. (2008). Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 147–164.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003283 Pessoa, L. (2023). The entangled brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 35(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01908 Pratto, F., & John, O. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61, 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380 Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5 R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Rosling, H., Rosling, O., & Rönnlund, A. R. (2018). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World--And Why Things Are Better Than You Think. Flatiron Books. Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 536-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462 Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714 Ruzich, E., Allison, C., Smith, P., Watson, P., Auyeung, B., Ring, H., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Molecular Autism, 6, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-6-2 Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28 Schmahmann, J. D., & Sherman, J. C. (1998). The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain: a journal of neurology, 121(4), 561-579.https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.561 Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. Research Methods in Linguistics, 27-50. Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027209 Shi, H., Li, Y., & Sui, X. (2022). Effects of emotional word types: behavioral and neural evidence for discrimination between emotion-label and emotion-laden words. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(12), 2696-2707. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02696 Siciliano L., & Clausi, S. (2020). Implicit vs. explicit emotion processing in autism spectrum disorders: an opinion on the role of the cerebellum. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (96). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00096 Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. (2023). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version 1.3-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex. Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1),131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 Soares, A. P., Macedo, J., Oliveira, H. M., Lages, A., Hernández-Cabrera, J., & Pinheiro,A. P. (2019). Self-reference is a fast-acting automatic mechanism on emotional word processing: evidence from a masked priming affective categorisation task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 317-325.https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1599003 Song, D., Wen, H., & Dong, Y. (2023). Affective Norms for Chinese Words of Typical Life Scenes Rated by Older Adults (ANCO). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(4), 1115-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09948-1 Štajner, S., Yaneva, V., Mitkov, R., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2017). Effects of lexical properties on viewing time per word in autistic and neurotypical readers. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 271-281. https://aclanthology.org/W17-5030 Sylvester, T., Liebig, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2021). Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults. Scientific Reports. 11(945). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1 Tager‐Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, 1, 335-364. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939345 Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 110, 67– 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67 Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95 (1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36 van Berkum, J. J. (2020). Inclusive affective neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1665191 Wang, X., Shangguan, C., & Lu, J. (2019). Time course of emotion effects during emotion-label and emotion-laden word processing. Neuroscience Letters, 699, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.028 Was, C. A., & Hamrick, P. (2021). What did they mean by that? Young adults' interpretations of 105 common emojis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655297 Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Jentzsch, I., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2008). Changes in the relationship between self‐reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X248689 Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr Xu, X., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2022). Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 26-41. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01607-4 Yao, Z., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words. Behavior Research Method, 49(4), 1374-1385. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2 Yee, L. T. (2017). Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong. PloS one, 12(3), e0174569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174569 Yu, B. & Cao, H. (1992). A new exploration on the effect of stroke-number in the identification of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 120-126. Yu, L. C., Lee, L. H., Hao, S., Wang, J., He, Y., Hu, J., Lai, K. R., & Zhang, X. (2016). Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, 540-545. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1066 Zhang, M., Piñango, M. M., & Deo, A. (2022). Word-meaning variation in English have-sentences: the impact of cognitive versus social factors on individuals' linguistic context-sensitivity. Language, 98(1), 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0088 Zhang, J., Wu, C., Meng, Y., & Meng, Y. (2017). Different neural correlates of emotion label words and emotion-laden words: an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00455 Zhang, J., Wu, C., Yuan, Z., & Meng, Y. (2019). Differentiating emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in emotion conflict: an ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 237, 2423-2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05600-4 Zhu, L., Wang, C. X., He, J. C., Chen, X. J., Guo, Y. X., & Lu, F. (2008). The effect of font, stroke and contrast on the reading speed of Chinese characters. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 10(2), 96-99. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
110555006資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110555006 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 賴瑶鍈 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lai, Yao-Ying en_US dc.contributor.author (作者) 許涴筑 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Hsu, Wan-Chu en_US dc.creator (作者) 許涴筑 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Wan-Chu en_US dc.date (日期) 2024 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-八月-2024 14:00:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-八月-2024 14:00:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-八月-2024 14:00:33 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0110555006 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152967 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 110555006 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討語句的處理是否會因不同的情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及社會認知能力的個體差異而產生影響。過去有諸多探討情緒語言的心理與神經語言學實驗，但大多是在單詞層級。本研究針對句子層級，檢視語言理解者如何處理文句語境中的情緒詞。情緒詞彙可分二類：情緒標籤詞 (emotion-label words)，詞彙語意直接指涉特定情緒，像是「快樂的」、「悲傷的」；情緒負載詞 (emotion-laden words) ，在詞語字面意義之上隱含情緒意涵，像是「光明的」、「灰暗的」。而情緒與他人或自身相關，在語言中透過與之搭配的人稱指涉詞來表述 (self- vs. other-relevant)；以不同人稱觀點來表述是否會影響情緒語言的處理仍未知。此外，過去文獻指出社會認知能力會影響個人情緒訊息的接收及語句內容的處理，故此研究也檢視此個體差異因素如何左右情緒語言的處理歷程。 本研究包含兩項前測實驗及一項主要實驗。前測一為線上問卷，請臺灣華語母語者將形容詞歸類至情緒標籤或情緒負載詞，用來建構主實驗的刺激材料句。前測二為自然通順程度的評分問卷，確保各條件語句對母語者來說皆自然通順且無顯著差異。主實驗為自訂步調閱讀任務，以閱讀時長 (reading times, RTs) 推測理解歷程、並以自閉症量表指數衡量個人社會認知能力。實驗結果顯示，情緒詞類及社會認知能力的個體差異對句子的即時處理皆產生顯著影響。語句中情緒標籤詞的閱讀時間長於情緒負載詞，可能是由於閱讀文句語境中的情緒標籤詞時，理解者除了建構整體句意表徵，還須處理額外的情緒意涵，因此引起較長的閱讀時間；反之，人們在文句語境中可能較容易忽略情緒負載詞隱含的情緒意涵，僅處理字面層次的意義。此外，社會認知能力較低者閱讀語句時的時間較長（與社會認知能力較高者相比），顯示了情緒語句處理上的困難；推測與整合語句內容（包含情緒詞及人稱指涉）的速度較慢、及忖度他人/自身心理狀態的能力較弱有關。或者，也可能是由於社會認知能力較低者閱讀態度較為謹慎造成。另一方面，人稱指涉的效果在實驗檢視的關鍵情緒詞區未達顯著，顯示了此因素對情緒語句的處理歷程沒有影響。 本研究將情緒詞帶入語句中，觀察在不同人稱指涉下、不同社會認知能力者的閱讀理解歷程，補充了在語句層次處理情緒語言的實驗結果，同時揭示社會認知個體差異的影響，予現有之理論提供實證回饋。未來研究或許可進一步探討情緒語言與人稱指涉的交互作用，以及多方探討語句中情緒訊息的處理。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The present study aims to investigate the real-time comprehension of emotional sentences, by manipulating emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and social cognitive ability (SCA). While previous experimental studies have demonstrated an effect of emotional word type on processing at the lexical level, the current study targets the processing of emotional word type at the sentential level. Emotional words can be categorized into two types: emotion-label words that refer to emotional states (e.g., happy, sad), and emotion-laden words that imply certain emotion alongside their semantic denotation (e.g., bright, dark). Meanwhile, emotional words typically predicate individuals, related to others or ourselves. It remains unclear if taking different perspectives to comprehend emotional word types would factor into processing. Additionally, previous work has suggested that individual SCA affects the perception of emotional words and sentence processing. I therefore examine if the processing of emotional sentences modulated by emotional word types would vary with this individual difference. The present thesis comprises two norming studies and the main self-paced reading experiment. Norming Study 1 was an online questionnaire that asked native speakers of Taiwanese Mandarin to categorize adjectives into different Word Types. The categorized words were then used to construct experimental sentences. Norming Study 2 assessed the naturalness of experimental sentences in an online questionnaire to ensure the feasible stimuli. The ensuing main experiment adopted a self-paced reading task with a moving-window paradigm to measure reading times (RTs) to probe realtime processing; the participants took the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) as a measurement of individual SCA. Results showed a significant effect of emotional Word Type, such that sentences with emotion-laden words had shorter RTs than the counterparts with emotion-label words. I posited that in comprehending sentences containing emotion-label words, participants were tasked not only with constructing semantic representations but also with integrating emotional properties into the sentences. On the contrary, in sentences containing emotion-laden words, people may overlook the underlying emotional properties and focus solely on processing the literal meanings. Additionally, the effect of individual SCA was also significant, indicating longer RTs for those with lower SCA. This phenomenon is potentially influenced by Personal Reference and emotional Word Type. More crucially, the weaker ability to integrate sentence contents and empathize with or reflect on others’ and one’s own mind states may also contribute to this effect. Alternatively, it could be because people with lower SCA are more careful readers. However, the main effect of Personal Reference did not reach significance in the target emotion-word region examined in the experiment, indicating that Personal Reference does not influence the processing of emotional sentences. This research integrates emotional words into sentences to observe the processes of reading comprehension from different perspectives and with different levels of SCA, advancing our understanding of emotion language processing. Future study could further clarify the interaction between emotional expressions and personal reference, delving deeper into the processing of sentences containing emotional information. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 誌謝 i 摘要 ii Abstract iv Abbreviation List x Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Purpose 1 1.2 Research Questions 5 1.3 Structure of This Thesis 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 6 2.1 Emotional vs. Neutral (Non-emotional) Information 6 2.2 Effects of Valence in Emotion 8 2.2.1 Negativity Bias 8 2.2.2 Positivity Bias 10 2.3 Effects of Arousal in Emotion 12 2.4 Emotional Word Type: Emotion-label vs. Emotion-laden 14 2.5 Emotional Effects in Sentence Processing 18 2.6 The Processing of Personal Reference and Emotion 21 2.7 The Processing of Emotion and Individual Differences in Social Cognitive Ability 24 2.7.1 Atypical Processing of Emotion 25 2.7.2 Explicit and Implicit processing of emotion 26 2.7.3 Processing of Self-Relevant Personal Reference 28 Chapter 3 The Current Study: Hypotheses and Predictions 31 Chapter 4 Norming Studies 37 4.1 Norming Study 1—Word Type Categorization 37 4.1.1 Method 37 4.1.2 Results 43 4.1.3 Discussion 47 4.2 Norming Study 2—Naturalness-Rating Questionnaire for Sentences 48 4.2.1 Method 48 4.2.2 Results 53 Chapter 5 Self-Paced Reading Experiment 55 5.1 Method 55 5.1.1 Materials 55 5.1.2 Participants 56 5.1.3 Procedure 57 5.1.4 Data Analysis 59 5.2 Results 60 5.3 Discussion 64 Chapter 6 Discussion & Conclusion 67 References 73 Appendix 87 A. Norming Study 1: Properties of the critical adjectives 87 Negative Label Words 87 Negative Laden Words 88 Positive Label Words 89 Positive Laden Words 90 Neutral Words 91 B. Self-Paced Reading Experiment: Descriptive statistics of RTs (ms) for each condition in Window3 (Personal Reference), 4 (Personal Reference + 1), 5 (Word Type), and 8 (sentence-final position) 92 Window3 (Personal Reference) 92 Window4 (Personal Reference + 1) 93 Window5 (Word Type) 94 Window8 (sentence-final position) 95 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2449723 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110555006 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語句處理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 情緒詞類 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人稱指涉 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會認知能力 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語言即時理解 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sentence processing en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Emotional word type en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Personal reference en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social cognitive ability en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Real-time language comprehension en_US dc.title (題名) 情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及個人社會認知能力對語句處理的影響 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Influence of Emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and Individual Social Cognitive Ability on Sentence Processing en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). The dual process theory of autism. Thinking, Reasoning, and Decision Making in Autism, p. 13-38. Routledge. Au-Yeung, S., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in autism spectrum disorder: an eye-movement study. Autism Research, 8, 749-760. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1490 Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(00)80010-5 Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34(1), 74-183. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471 Barzy, M., Filik, R., Williams, D., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Emotional processing of ironic versus literal criticism in autistic and nonautistic adults: evidence from eye-tracking. Autism Research, 13, 563-578. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2272 Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., &Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Berlingeri, M., Crepaldi, D., Roberti, R., Scialfa, G., Luzzatti, C., & Paulesu, E. (2008). Nouns and verbs in the brain: Grammatical class and task specific effects as revealed by fMRI. Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(4), 528-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701674943 Bouranta, N., Chitiris, L., & Paravantis, J. (2009). The relationship between internal and external service quality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110910948297 Bromberek-Dyzman, K., Vasileanu, M., & BąK, H. (2021). Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English and Romanian-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(5), 1161-1182. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920987306 Brosnan, M., & Ashwin, C. (2023). Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum. Autism, 27(5), 1245-1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132437 Brosnan, M., Lewton, M., & Ashwin, C. (2016). Reasoning on the autism spectrum: A dual process theory account. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2115-2125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4 Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspective: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Association for Psychological Science, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02249.x Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one, 5(6), e10729.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41 (1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1 Chen, Y., Zhong, Y. P., Zhou, H. B., Zhang, S. M., Tan, Q. B., & Fan, W. (2014). Evidence for implicit self‑positivity bias: an event‑related brain potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 232. 985-994. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3810-z Child, S., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2019). Remember they were emotional - Effects of emotional qualifiers during sentence processing. Open Psychology, 1(1), 119- 131. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0009 Cho, S. L., Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (2013). Taiwan corpora of Chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data-a study on the norm of Chinese emotional words. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 493-523. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00774-9 Chou, L. C., Pan, Y. L., & Lee, C. L. (2020). Emotion anticipation induces emotion effects in neutral words during sentence reading: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 1294-1308.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00835-z Courchesne, E., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Press, G. A., Hesselink, J. R., & Jernigan, T. L. (2013). Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism. Autism (pp. 197-202). Routledge. Davis, M. & Whalen, P. J. (2001). The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry, 6, 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858-1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006 Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., & Binder, J. R. (2006). FMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 278-297. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.278 Fields, E. C. & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It’s all about you: an ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 62(1), 562-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003 Gaigg, S. B., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Free recall and forgetting of emotionally arousing words in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2336-2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.008 Gaigg, S. B. & Bowler, D. M. (2009). Brief report: attenuated emotional suppression of the attentional blink in autism spectrum disorder: another non-social abnormality? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 39, 1211-1217.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0719-2 Hampson, D. R., & Blatt, G. J. (2015). Autism spectrum disorders and neuropathology of the cerebellum. Frontiers in neuroscience, 9, 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00420 Happé, F. (2003). Theory of mind and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.008 Hardie, A (2012) CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (3), 380–409. https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0004 Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., Ethofer, T., & Pauli, P. (2011a). His or mine? The time course of self-other discrimination in emotion processing. Social Neuroscience. 6(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.523543 Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011b). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653-661.https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq082 Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 813-839. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957 Ho, S. M., Mak, C. W., Yeung, D., Duan, W., Tang, S., Yeung, J. C., & Ching, R. (2015). Emotional valence, arousal, and threat ratings of 160 Chinese words among adolescents. PloS one, 10(7), e0132294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132294 Hsu, S. H., & Huang, K. C. (2001). Effects of minimal legible size characters on Chinese word recognition. Visible language, 35(2). Icht, M., Zukerman, G., Ben‐Itzchak, E., & Ben‐David, B. M. (2021). Keep it simple: Identification of basic versus complex emotions in spoken language in individuals with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability: A meta‐analysis study. Autism Research, 14(9), 1948-1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2551 Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., & King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. The American journal of psychology, 121(1), 83-103.https://doi.org/10.2307/20445445 Jiang, Z. Q., Li, W. H., Liu, Y., Luo, Y. J., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2014). When affective word valence meets linguistic polarity: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 28, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.11.001 Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 Kana, R. K., Patriquin, M. A., Black, B. S., Channell, M. M., & Wicker, B. (2016). Altered medial frontal and superior temporal response to implicit processing of emotions in autism. Autism Research, 9, 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1496 Kana, R. K., Sartin, E. B., Stevens Jr., C., Deshpande, H. D., Klein, C., Klinger, M. R., & Klinger, L. G. (2017). Neural networks underlying language and social cognition during self-other processing in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia. 102, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.008 Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2015). The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology. 128 (3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0323 Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2016). Emotion word processing: effects of word type and valence in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 45, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9357-3 Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & cognition, 31(8), 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800 Knickerbocker, F., Johnson, R. L., Starr, E. L., Hall, A. M., Preti, D. M., Slate, S. R., & Altarriba, J. (2019). The time course of processing emotion-laden words during sentence reading: evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica. 192, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.008 Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657 Lai, V. T., Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Feel between the lines: implied emotion in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 27 (8). https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00798 Lai, Y. Y., & Lai, H. L. (2023). Impact of social cognitive propensity on the processing of nontransparent sentential meaning. Journal of Pragmatics. 205, 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.014 Lai, Y. Y., Sakai, H., & Makuuchi, M. (2023). Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style. Cerebral Cortex, 33(18), 10013-10027. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad261 Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: importance of word arousal.Emotion. 8 (4), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445 Lartseva, A., Dijkstra, T., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2015). Emotional language processing in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00991 Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920-933. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532 Lau, Y. P., Gau, S. F., Chiu, Y. N., Wu, Y. Y., Chou, W. J., Liu, S. K., & Chou, M. C. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Research in Developmental Disabilities. 34(1), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.005 Lee S. Y. M. (2015). A linguistic analysis of implicit emotions. In Lu, Q. & Gao, H. H. (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 185–194). Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_19 Lee, Y. U., Yang, M. J., Lai, T. J., Chiu, N. M., & Chau, T. T. (2000). Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 23, 688- 694. Lenth, R. (2024). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.10.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Lewton, M., Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). Syllogistic reasoning reveals reduced bias in people with higher autistic-like traits from the general population. Autism, 23 (5), 1311e1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318808779 Liu, J., Fan, L., Tian, L., Li, C., & Feng, W. (2022). The neural mechanisms of Explicit and implicit processing of Chinese emotion-label and emotion-laden words: evidence from emotional categorisation and emotional Stroop tasks. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2093389 Lombardo, M. V., Barnes, J. L., Wheelwright, S. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self referential cognition and empathy in autism. PLoS ONE, 2, e883. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000883 Lüdtke, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137 Lundström, S., Chang, Z., Råstam, M., Gillberg, C., Larsson, H., Anckarsäter, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2012). Autism spectrum disorders and autistic like traits: similar etiology in the extreme end and the normal variation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(1), 46-52. http://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.144 Miri Ashtiani, S. N., & Daliri, M. R. (2023). Identification of cognitive load-dependent activation patterns using working memory task-based fMRI at various levels of difficulty. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16476. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43837-w Mizuno, A., Liu, Y., Williams, D. L., Keller, T. A., Minshew, N. J., & Just, M. A. (2011). The neural basis of deictic shifting in linguistic perspective-taking in high functioning autism. Brain, 134(8), 2422-2435. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr151 Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 324-346. Pavlenko, A. (2008). Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 147–164.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003283 Pessoa, L. (2023). The entangled brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 35(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01908 Pratto, F., & John, O. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61, 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380 Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5 R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Rosling, H., Rosling, O., & Rönnlund, A. R. (2018). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World--And Why Things Are Better Than You Think. Flatiron Books. Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 536-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462 Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714 Ruzich, E., Allison, C., Smith, P., Watson, P., Auyeung, B., Ring, H., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Molecular Autism, 6, 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-6-2 Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28 Schmahmann, J. D., & Sherman, J. C. (1998). The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain: a journal of neurology, 121(4), 561-579.https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.561 Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. Research Methods in Linguistics, 27-50. Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027209 Shi, H., Li, Y., & Sui, X. (2022). Effects of emotional word types: behavioral and neural evidence for discrimination between emotion-label and emotion-laden words. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(12), 2696-2707. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02696 Siciliano L., & Clausi, S. (2020). Implicit vs. explicit emotion processing in autism spectrum disorders: an opinion on the role of the cerebellum. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (96). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00096 Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. (2023). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version 1.3-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex. Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1),131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 Soares, A. P., Macedo, J., Oliveira, H. M., Lages, A., Hernández-Cabrera, J., & Pinheiro,A. P. (2019). Self-reference is a fast-acting automatic mechanism on emotional word processing: evidence from a masked priming affective categorisation task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 317-325.https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1599003 Song, D., Wen, H., & Dong, Y. (2023). Affective Norms for Chinese Words of Typical Life Scenes Rated by Older Adults (ANCO). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(4), 1115-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09948-1 Štajner, S., Yaneva, V., Mitkov, R., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2017). Effects of lexical properties on viewing time per word in autistic and neurotypical readers. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 271-281. https://aclanthology.org/W17-5030 Sylvester, T., Liebig, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2021). Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults. Scientific Reports. 11(945). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1 Tager‐Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, 1, 335-364. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939345 Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 110, 67– 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67 Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95 (1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36 van Berkum, J. J. (2020). Inclusive affective neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1665191 Wang, X., Shangguan, C., & Lu, J. (2019). Time course of emotion effects during emotion-label and emotion-laden word processing. Neuroscience Letters, 699, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.028 Was, C. A., & Hamrick, P. (2021). What did they mean by that? Young adults' interpretations of 105 common emojis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655297 Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Jentzsch, I., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2008). Changes in the relationship between self‐reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X248689 Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr Xu, X., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2022). Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 26-41. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01607-4 Yao, Z., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words. Behavior Research Method, 49(4), 1374-1385. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2 Yee, L. T. (2017). Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong. PloS one, 12(3), e0174569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174569 Yu, B. & Cao, H. (1992). A new exploration on the effect of stroke-number in the identification of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 120-126. Yu, L. C., Lee, L. H., Hao, S., Wang, J., He, Y., Hu, J., Lai, K. R., & Zhang, X. (2016). Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, 540-545. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1066 Zhang, M., Piñango, M. M., & Deo, A. (2022). Word-meaning variation in English have-sentences: the impact of cognitive versus social factors on individuals' linguistic context-sensitivity. Language, 98(1), 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0088 Zhang, J., Wu, C., Meng, Y., & Meng, Y. (2017). Different neural correlates of emotion label words and emotion-laden words: an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00455 Zhang, J., Wu, C., Yuan, Z., & Meng, Y. (2019). Differentiating emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in emotion conflict: an ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 237, 2423-2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05600-4 Zhu, L., Wang, C. X., He, J. C., Chen, X. J., Guo, Y. X., & Lu, F. (2008). The effect of font, stroke and contrast on the reading speed of Chinese characters. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 10(2), 96-99. zh_TW
