1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Communication
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 宗教媒介化與迷因——以內容分析法探討Instagram「truetruefunny」、「meme_of_church」粉專的基督教迷因
Mediatization of Religion through Memes: A Content Analysis of Christian Memes on Instagram Pages “truetruefunny”and “meme_of_church”
作者 王曉帖
貢獻者 韓義興
王曉帖
關鍵詞 宗教媒介化
迷因
聯想主題分析
心理抗拒理論
內容分析
religious mediatization
memes
fantasy theme analysis
psychological reactance theory
content analysis
日期 2024
上傳時間 4-Sep-2024 15:04:04 (UTC+8)
摘要 隨著網路科技的進步，社群媒體被廣泛使用，基督教也進入了網路世界，透過新媒體和社群媒體平台來傳播其宗教價值觀及教義內容，達成善用媒體實踐信仰傳播的目標。台灣的基督教教會紛紛投入資源與人力至社群媒體經營上，以跟上年輕世代基督徒的步伐。社群媒體上的基督教粉絲專頁，如Facebook、Instagram，推出的內容多元，其中有一種特立獨行的內容看似與基督教形象格格不入，但卻大受年輕世代基督徒歡迎，即基督教的迷因化貼文。這類型的貼文與一般提供正面訊息的基督教內容貼文不同，主要透過迷因形式，結合文字來表達基督徒一些真實的日常狀態、諷刺教會文化、或惡搞聖經內容等。因此，本研究透過宗教媒介視角，並以聯想主題分析及心理抗拒理論為研究取徑，探討基督教迷因內容如何影響基督徒閱聽眾。台灣目前尚未有以宗教媒介化作為理論基礎研究基督教迷因的研究，相關文獻亦不多。本研究利用內容分析法，對「truetruefunny」及「meme_of_church」兩個基督教迷因粉專的迷因貼文進行分析，探討此類迷因貼文的具體呈現形式與主題。 本研究結果發現，基督教迷因貼文多以靜態圖片呈現，素材來源多樣，文案以簡短為主，並廣泛使用#hashtag。此兩者粉專的聯想主題以「教會文化、生活」和「基督徒個人靈命」為主，「惡趣味」主題在按讚數上表現最佳，而「教會文化、生活」主題則在留言數上表現最佳。基督教迷因粉專如「truetruefunny」和「meme_of_church」透過幽默和諷刺的方式，在社群媒體上傳播信仰信息，成功引起年輕世代共鳴，並顯示出取代傳統宗教傳播方式的潛力，透過迷因此媒介展示了宗教媒介化理論中的「遷就」、「延伸」、「取代」和「交融」特性。最後，本研究也探討了基督教迷因聯想主題與閱聽眾心理抗拒之關聯性。不同聯想主題在減緩心理抗拒方面效果顯著，其中「基督教教義」和「公共議題」在多方面效果顯著，顯示出基督教迷因在減少心理抵抗和提升互動性方面具有潛力。
With the advancement of internet technology, social media has become widely used, and Christianity has also entered the online world. By utilizing new media and social media platforms, it aims to propagate its religious values and doctrines, achieving the goal of effectively spreading faith through media. Churches in Taiwan have invested resources and manpower into social media management to keep up with the pace of younger generations of Christians. Christian fan pages on social media, such as Facebook and Instagram, offer diverse content. Among these, a unique type of content that seems to contradict the typical Christian image but is highly popular among young Christians is Christian meme posts. Unlike typical Christian content posts that provide positive messages, these meme posts primarily use meme formats, combining images and text to express Christians' real daily states, satirize church culture, or parody biblical content. This study adopts the perspective of religious mediatization and employs associative theme analysis and psychological reactance theory as research approaches to explore how Christian meme content affects Christian audiences. Currently, there is a lack of studies in Taiwan that use religious mediatization theory as a basis to examine Christian memes, and related literature is scarce. This study employs content analysis to examine the meme posts of two Christian meme fan pages, "truetruefunny" and "meme_of_church," analyzing the specific forms and themes of these meme posts. The study results reveal that Christian meme posts mainly consist of static images, have diverse sources, and feature short text, often using #hashtags extensively. The fantasy themes of these two fan pages primarily include "Church Culture and Life" and "Personal Spiritual Growth," with "Dark Humor" themes performing best in terms of likes, while "Church Culture and Life" themes excel in comment counts. Christian meme fan pages like "truetruefunny" and "meme_of_church" use humor and satire to convey faith messages on social media, successfully resonating with younger generations and demonstrating the potential to replace traditional religious communication methods. These memes exemplify the characteristics of "accommodation," "extension," "replacement," and "fusion" in religious mediatization theory. Lastly, this study also explores the relationship between Christian meme fantasy themes and audience psychological reactance. Different fantasy themes significantly reduce psychological reactance, with "Christian Norms" and "Public Issues" showing significant effects in various aspects, indicating the potential of Christian memes to reduce psychological resistance and enhance interaction.
參考文獻 中文文獻 王石番（1991）。〈內容分析：社會科學的研究方法〉。台灣學生書局。 王佳煌（2002）。〈資訊科技與宗教：迷你的社會學想像〉，《新世紀宗教研究》，1（1）。 吳幼婷（2007）。〈台灣基督教網路宗教研究之初探〉，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士學位論文。 吳素柔（1996）。〈壓迫與反抗：台灣同志團體出版品的語藝分析〉，輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士學位論文。 何玖隣（2016）。〈宗教型非營利組織運用新媒體行銷之研究—以中華基督教新生命小組教會為例〉，中國文化大學商學院國際企業管理學系碩士學位論文。 沈孟湄（2013）。〈從宗教與媒體的互動檢視台灣宗教傳播之發展〉，《新聞學研究》117，179-213。 林以理（2020）。〈社群媒體與教會：台灣基督教長老教會相關臉書粉絲專頁之研究〉，台灣神學研究學院道學碩士論文。 林主榮（2005）。〈基督教宗教網站網站溝通效果指標研究〉，國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。 林瑋嬪（2018）。〈媒介宗教：音樂、影像、物與新媒體〉。台北市，國立台灣大學出版中心。 林靜伶（2000）。〈 語藝批評——理論與實踐〉， 台北市，五南。 莊佳穎（2020）。〈「讓世界看見台灣」？「2017 台北世大運」論述中的自我與他者〉，《臺灣國際研究季刊》，16（3），107-153。 黃葳威（2008）。〈數位傳播與資訊文化〉， 台北市，威士曼文化。 曹開明、黃鈴媚、劉大華（2017）。〈數位語藝批評與文本探勘工具-以反核臉書粉絲團形塑幻想主題為例〉，《資訊社會研究》，32，9-49。 張露心（2020）。〈說服的傳播─ 菸品容器圖文警示之視覺語藝策略〉，《藝見學刊》，20，59-73。 陳佳靖（2002）。〈網路情色的符號地景：一個從語藝分析出發的觀點〉，《資訊社會研究》，3，25-62。 黃孟瑾（2017）。〈論網路模因與翻譯：以網路流行語與網路圖片為例〉，國立台灣師範大學翻譯研究所碩士學位論文。 黃啟鈞、曹開明（2020）。〈網路論述 [陳沂辱罵國軍事件] 的幻想主題分析〉，《國防大學政治作戰學院》，116，41-86。 黃鷰淳（2018）。〈太陽花運動中佔領議場組織新聞稿的語藝批評〉，《中國行政評論》，24（3），1-36。 葉子毓（2019）。〈惡搞與抵抗：政治型網路迷因的內容初探研究〉，世新大學新聞傳播學院碩士學位論文。 葉恩來（2017）。〈台灣基督教界利用影像媒體建構宣教策略之研究－以利河伯聖教會之應用〉，台灣浸會神學院道學碩士學位論文。 劉玉惠（1994）。〈聖界與凡界：慈濟論述之幻想主題分析〉，輔仁大學大眾傳播學系碩士學位論文。 劉慧雯（2017）。〈建構「倫理閲聽人」：試論社群媒體使用者的理論意涵〉，《新聞學研究》，131，87-125。 盧玉玲（1999）。〈網際網路與基督教傳播機構的跨媒體結合─從整合行銷傳播的角度探討〉，國立政治大學廣播電視學系碩士學位論文。 蘇蘅（2019）。〈傳播研究方法新論〉。台北市，雙葉書廊。 竇東徽（2013）。〈社會心理學視角下的網路迷因〉，《北京示範大學學報：社會科學版》，6，38-48。 英文文獻 Abelman, R., & Hoover, S. M. (Eds.). (1990). Religious television: Controversies and conclusions. Greenwood Publishing Group. Ammerman, N. T. (2007). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. Oxford University Press. Anderson, M., & Rainie, L. (2018). The Impact of Digital Technology on Society. Pew Research Center. Aunger, R. (2013). The electric meme: A new theory of how we think. Simon & Schuster. Álvarez, A. (2004). Memetics: An evolutionary theory of cultural transmission. Sorites, 15, 24-28. Bauckhage, C. (2011, January). Insights into Internet Memes [Conference session] [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221298121_Insights_into_Internet_Memes Babbie, E. (1998). The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Publishing. Barnes, S. (2020). Social Media and the Transformation of Interaction in Society. Academic Press. Benoit, W., Klyyukovski, A., Mchale, J., & Airne, D. (2001). A fantasy theme analysis of political cartoons on the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr affair. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(4), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180128097 Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press. Blackmore, S. J. (2000). The meme machine. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138 Bormann, E. G., Koester, J., & Bennett, J. (1978). Political cartoons and salient rhetorical fantasies: An empirical analysis of the '76 presidential campaign. Communication Monographs, 45(4), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757809375977 Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press. Brodie, R. (2011). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. Hay House. Campbell, E. B., Torpey, J., & Turner, B. S. (2015). Religion and the occupy Wall Street movement. Critical Research on Religion, 3(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303215593151 Campbell, H. (2010). When religion meets new media. Routledge. Campbell, H. A., Joiner L., & Lawrence S. (2018). Responding to the Meme-ing of the Religious Other. Responding to the Meme-ing of the Religious Other, 41(2), 27-42. Chadee, D. (2011). Toward freedom: Reactance theory revisited. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology,13–43. Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389. https://doi.org/10.1086/208782 Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019 Data Reportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Taiwan. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-taiwan. Davison, P. (2012). The Language of Internet Memes. In Mandiberg, M (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120-136). United States: New York University Press. Davies, P. (2018). Christian Education: Teaching and Learning in the Church. Zondervan. Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, USA. De Vries, H., & Weber, S. (2001). Religion and media. Stanford University Press. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815 Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678 Finkelstein, R. (2008). A memetics compendium. Robotic Technology Inc (Briefing Report). Foss, S. K. (2004). Fantasy-theme criticism. Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice, 109-148. Foss, S. K. (2017). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press. Foster, B. J. (2014). It's all in a meme: A content analysis of memes posted to 2012 presidential election Facebook pages. University of Arkansas ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage Publications. Günter, T. (2016). The mediatization of religion – as temptation, seduction, and illusion. Media, culture & society, 38(1), 37-47. Hepp, A. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediation of everything’. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113501148 Heylighen, F. (1999). The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. The Evolution of Complexity, 8, 17-44. Hjarvard, S. (2004) ‘From Bricks to Bytes: The Mediatization of a Global Toy Industry’, in I. Bondebjerg & P. Golding (eds.) European Culture and the Media. Bristol: Intellect. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 6, 9-26. Hjarvard, S. (2012). Three forms of mediatized religion. Mediatization and religion: Nordic perspectives, 21-44. Hoover, S. M., & Lundby, K. (1997). Rethinking media, religion, and culture. SAGE. Hopp, T. (2015). The effect of numeracy on the relationship between state reactance and message evaluations. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089855 Hosseini, S. H. (2008). Religion and media, religious media, or media religion: Theoretical studies. Journal of Media and Religion, 7(1-2), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348420701838350 Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. NYU Press. Johnson, R. (2017). Pastoral Care in the Modern Church. Baker Academic. Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of `mediatization' as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665070030030103 Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Taiwan. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-taiwan Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x Macnamara, J. R. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1-34. Martino, L. M. (2016). The mediatization of religion: When faith rocks. Routledge. Martino, L. M. (2020). Mediatization of religion: Three dimensions from a Latin American/Brazilian perspective. Religions, 11(10), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100482 Meikle, G. (2016). Social media: Communication, sharing and visibility. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Miller, T. (2019). The Role of Worship in the Christian Church. Abingdon Press. Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory - 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9 Nord, D. P. (2004). Faith in reading: religious publishing and the birth of mass media in America. Oxford University Press on Demand. Page, J. T., Duffy, M., Frisby, C., & Perreault, G. (2016). Richard Sherman speaks and almost breaks the internet: Race, media, and Football1. Howard Journal of Communications, 27(3), 270-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2016.1176969 Perreault, G., & Ferrucci, P. (2019). Punishing Brady, redeeming Brady: A fantasy theme analysis of memes from the 2015 Deflategate controversy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27(3), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1610761 Perreault, M. F., & Perreault, G. (2019). Symbolic convergence in the 2015 Duggar scandal crisis communication. Journal of Media and Religion, 18(3), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2019.1678945 Pew Research Center. (2023). State of the News Media. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/journalism-media/ Quick, B. L., & Bates, B. R. (2010). The use of gain- or loss-frame messages and efficacy appeals to dissuade excessive alcohol consumption among college students: A test of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 15(6), 603-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.499593 Quick, B. L., & Kim, D. K. (2009). Examining reactance and reactance restoration with South Korean adolescents: A test of psychological reactance within a collectivist culture. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346797 Quick, B. L., Scott, A. M., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2011). A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 660-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551989 Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696 Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x Shawchuck, N., Kotler, P., Wrenn, B., & Rath, G. (1992). Marketing for congregations: Choosing to serve people more effectively. Abingdon Press. Shields, D. C., & Preston, C. T. (1985). Fantasy theme analysis in competitive rhetorical criticism. National Forensic Journal, 3(2), 102-115. Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013 Smith, J. (2020). Building Community in the Digital Age: Church and Social Media. Routledge. Tan, D. (2021). Digital Memes, Fair Use, and the First Amendment. J. Internet L., 24, 1-26. Thomson, T. J., Perreault, G., & Duffy, M. (2018). Politicians, photographers, and a Pope: How state-controlled and independent media covered Francis’s 2015 Cuba visit. Journalism Studies, 19(9), 1313-1330. Witt, P. L., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of Facework and immediacy on students' perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Education, 60(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.507820 Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1970). Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028620 Xu, J., & Wu, Y. (2017). Countering reactance in crisis communication: Incorporating positive emotions via social media. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(3), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417702475
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
109464058
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464058
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 韓義興zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王曉帖zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王曉帖zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2024en_US
dc.date.accessioned 4-Sep-2024 15:04:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 4-Sep-2024 15:04:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Sep-2024 15:04:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0109464058en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153400-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 109464058zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著網路科技的進步，社群媒體被廣泛使用，基督教也進入了網路世界，透過新媒體和社群媒體平台來傳播其宗教價值觀及教義內容，達成善用媒體實踐信仰傳播的目標。台灣的基督教教會紛紛投入資源與人力至社群媒體經營上，以跟上年輕世代基督徒的步伐。社群媒體上的基督教粉絲專頁，如Facebook、Instagram，推出的內容多元，其中有一種特立獨行的內容看似與基督教形象格格不入，但卻大受年輕世代基督徒歡迎，即基督教的迷因化貼文。這類型的貼文與一般提供正面訊息的基督教內容貼文不同，主要透過迷因形式，結合文字來表達基督徒一些真實的日常狀態、諷刺教會文化、或惡搞聖經內容等。因此，本研究透過宗教媒介視角，並以聯想主題分析及心理抗拒理論為研究取徑，探討基督教迷因內容如何影響基督徒閱聽眾。台灣目前尚未有以宗教媒介化作為理論基礎研究基督教迷因的研究，相關文獻亦不多。本研究利用內容分析法，對「truetruefunny」及「meme_of_church」兩個基督教迷因粉專的迷因貼文進行分析，探討此類迷因貼文的具體呈現形式與主題。 本研究結果發現，基督教迷因貼文多以靜態圖片呈現，素材來源多樣，文案以簡短為主，並廣泛使用#hashtag。此兩者粉專的聯想主題以「教會文化、生活」和「基督徒個人靈命」為主，「惡趣味」主題在按讚數上表現最佳，而「教會文化、生活」主題則在留言數上表現最佳。基督教迷因粉專如「truetruefunny」和「meme_of_church」透過幽默和諷刺的方式，在社群媒體上傳播信仰信息，成功引起年輕世代共鳴，並顯示出取代傳統宗教傳播方式的潛力，透過迷因此媒介展示了宗教媒介化理論中的「遷就」、「延伸」、「取代」和「交融」特性。最後，本研究也探討了基督教迷因聯想主題與閱聽眾心理抗拒之關聯性。不同聯想主題在減緩心理抗拒方面效果顯著，其中「基督教教義」和「公共議題」在多方面效果顯著，顯示出基督教迷因在減少心理抵抗和提升互動性方面具有潛力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) With the advancement of internet technology, social media has become widely used, and Christianity has also entered the online world. By utilizing new media and social media platforms, it aims to propagate its religious values and doctrines, achieving the goal of effectively spreading faith through media. Churches in Taiwan have invested resources and manpower into social media management to keep up with the pace of younger generations of Christians. Christian fan pages on social media, such as Facebook and Instagram, offer diverse content. Among these, a unique type of content that seems to contradict the typical Christian image but is highly popular among young Christians is Christian meme posts. Unlike typical Christian content posts that provide positive messages, these meme posts primarily use meme formats, combining images and text to express Christians' real daily states, satirize church culture, or parody biblical content. This study adopts the perspective of religious mediatization and employs associative theme analysis and psychological reactance theory as research approaches to explore how Christian meme content affects Christian audiences. Currently, there is a lack of studies in Taiwan that use religious mediatization theory as a basis to examine Christian memes, and related literature is scarce. This study employs content analysis to examine the meme posts of two Christian meme fan pages, "truetruefunny" and "meme_of_church," analyzing the specific forms and themes of these meme posts. The study results reveal that Christian meme posts mainly consist of static images, have diverse sources, and feature short text, often using #hashtags extensively. The fantasy themes of these two fan pages primarily include "Church Culture and Life" and "Personal Spiritual Growth," with "Dark Humor" themes performing best in terms of likes, while "Church Culture and Life" themes excel in comment counts. Christian meme fan pages like "truetruefunny" and "meme_of_church" use humor and satire to convey faith messages on social media, successfully resonating with younger generations and demonstrating the potential to replace traditional religious communication methods. These memes exemplify the characteristics of "accommodation," "extension," "replacement," and "fusion" in religious mediatization theory. Lastly, this study also explores the relationship between Christian meme fantasy themes and audience psychological reactance. Different fantasy themes significantly reduce psychological reactance, with "Christian Norms" and "Public Issues" showing significant effects in various aspects, indicating the potential of Christian memes to reduce psychological resistance and enhance interaction.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 i 目錄 iii 表目錄 iv 圖目錄 v 第一章 緒論 6 第一節 研究背景 6 第二節 研究動機與目的 9 第三節 研究問題 11 第四節 研究貢獻 11 第二章 文獻回顧 13 第一節 宗教媒介化 13 第二節 迷因 18 第三節 符號聚合理論 24 第四節 心理抗拒理論 27 第三章 研究方法 30 第一節 研究對象與樣本 30 第二節 類目建構 32 第四章 研究結果與資料分析 41 第一節 內容分析樣本結構 41 第二節 研究問題分析 43 第五章 研究結論 61 第一節 研究結果與討論 61 第二節 研究貢獻 81 第三節 研究限制與未來方向 83 參考文獻 85 中文文獻 85 英文文獻 87 附錄一、編碼表 93zh_TW
dc.format.extent 22581753 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109464058en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 宗教媒介化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 迷因zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 聯想主題分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 心理抗拒理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 內容分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) religious mediatizationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) memesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) fantasy theme analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) psychological reactance theoryen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) content analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 宗教媒介化與迷因——以內容分析法探討Instagram「truetruefunny」、「meme_of_church」粉專的基督教迷因zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Mediatization of Religion through Memes: A Content Analysis of Christian Memes on Instagram Pages “truetruefunny”and “meme_of_church”en_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻 王石番（1991）。〈內容分析：社會科學的研究方法〉。台灣學生書局。 王佳煌（2002）。〈資訊科技與宗教：迷你的社會學想像〉，《新世紀宗教研究》，1（1）。 吳幼婷（2007）。〈台灣基督教網路宗教研究之初探〉，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士學位論文。 吳素柔（1996）。〈壓迫與反抗：台灣同志團體出版品的語藝分析〉，輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士學位論文。 何玖隣（2016）。〈宗教型非營利組織運用新媒體行銷之研究—以中華基督教新生命小組教會為例〉，中國文化大學商學院國際企業管理學系碩士學位論文。 沈孟湄（2013）。〈從宗教與媒體的互動檢視台灣宗教傳播之發展〉，《新聞學研究》117，179-213。 林以理（2020）。〈社群媒體與教會：台灣基督教長老教會相關臉書粉絲專頁之研究〉，台灣神學研究學院道學碩士論文。 林主榮（2005）。〈基督教宗教網站網站溝通效果指標研究〉，國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。 林瑋嬪（2018）。〈媒介宗教：音樂、影像、物與新媒體〉。台北市，國立台灣大學出版中心。 林靜伶（2000）。〈 語藝批評——理論與實踐〉， 台北市，五南。 莊佳穎（2020）。〈「讓世界看見台灣」？「2017 台北世大運」論述中的自我與他者〉，《臺灣國際研究季刊》，16（3），107-153。 黃葳威（2008）。〈數位傳播與資訊文化〉， 台北市，威士曼文化。 曹開明、黃鈴媚、劉大華（2017）。〈數位語藝批評與文本探勘工具-以反核臉書粉絲團形塑幻想主題為例〉，《資訊社會研究》，32，9-49。 張露心（2020）。〈說服的傳播─ 菸品容器圖文警示之視覺語藝策略〉，《藝見學刊》，20，59-73。 陳佳靖（2002）。〈網路情色的符號地景：一個從語藝分析出發的觀點〉，《資訊社會研究》，3，25-62。 黃孟瑾（2017）。〈論網路模因與翻譯：以網路流行語與網路圖片為例〉，國立台灣師範大學翻譯研究所碩士學位論文。 黃啟鈞、曹開明（2020）。〈網路論述 [陳沂辱罵國軍事件] 的幻想主題分析〉，《國防大學政治作戰學院》，116，41-86。 黃鷰淳（2018）。〈太陽花運動中佔領議場組織新聞稿的語藝批評〉，《中國行政評論》，24（3），1-36。 葉子毓（2019）。〈惡搞與抵抗：政治型網路迷因的內容初探研究〉，世新大學新聞傳播學院碩士學位論文。 葉恩來（2017）。〈台灣基督教界利用影像媒體建構宣教策略之研究－以利河伯聖教會之應用〉，台灣浸會神學院道學碩士學位論文。 劉玉惠（1994）。〈聖界與凡界：慈濟論述之幻想主題分析〉，輔仁大學大眾傳播學系碩士學位論文。 劉慧雯（2017）。〈建構「倫理閲聽人」：試論社群媒體使用者的理論意涵〉，《新聞學研究》，131，87-125。 盧玉玲（1999）。〈網際網路與基督教傳播機構的跨媒體結合─從整合行銷傳播的角度探討〉，國立政治大學廣播電視學系碩士學位論文。 蘇蘅（2019）。〈傳播研究方法新論〉。台北市，雙葉書廊。 竇東徽（2013）。〈社會心理學視角下的網路迷因〉，《北京示範大學學報：社會科學版》，6，38-48。 英文文獻 Abelman, R., & Hoover, S. M. (Eds.). (1990). Religious television: Controversies and conclusions. Greenwood Publishing Group. Ammerman, N. T. (2007). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. Oxford University Press. Anderson, M., & Rainie, L. (2018). The Impact of Digital Technology on Society. Pew Research Center. Aunger, R. (2013). The electric meme: A new theory of how we think. Simon & Schuster. Álvarez, A. (2004). Memetics: An evolutionary theory of cultural transmission. Sorites, 15, 24-28. Bauckhage, C. (2011, January). Insights into Internet Memes [Conference session] [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221298121_Insights_into_Internet_Memes Babbie, E. (1998). The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Publishing. Barnes, S. (2020). Social Media and the Transformation of Interaction in Society. Academic Press. Benoit, W., Klyyukovski, A., Mchale, J., & Airne, D. (2001). A fantasy theme analysis of political cartoons on the Clinton-Lewinsky-Starr affair. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(4), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180128097 Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press. Blackmore, S. J. (2000). The meme machine. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138 Bormann, E. G., Koester, J., & Bennett, J. (1978). Political cartoons and salient rhetorical fantasies: An empirical analysis of the '76 presidential campaign. Communication Monographs, 45(4), 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757809375977 Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press. Brodie, R. (2011). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. Hay House. Campbell, E. B., Torpey, J., & Turner, B. S. (2015). Religion and the occupy Wall Street movement. Critical Research on Religion, 3(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303215593151 Campbell, H. (2010). When religion meets new media. Routledge. Campbell, H. A., Joiner L., & Lawrence S. (2018). Responding to the Meme-ing of the Religious Other. Responding to the Meme-ing of the Religious Other, 41(2), 27-42. Chadee, D. (2011). Toward freedom: Reactance theory revisited. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology,13–43. Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389. https://doi.org/10.1086/208782 Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019 Data Reportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Taiwan. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-taiwan. Davison, P. (2012). The Language of Internet Memes. In Mandiberg, M (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120-136). United States: New York University Press. Davies, P. (2018). Christian Education: Teaching and Learning in the Church. Zondervan. Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, USA. De Vries, H., & Weber, S. (2001). Religion and media. Stanford University Press. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815 Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678 Finkelstein, R. (2008). A memetics compendium. Robotic Technology Inc (Briefing Report). Foss, S. K. (2004). Fantasy-theme criticism. Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice, 109-148. Foss, S. K. (2017). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press. Foster, B. J. (2014). It's all in a meme: A content analysis of memes posted to 2012 presidential election Facebook pages. University of Arkansas ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage Publications. Günter, T. (2016). The mediatization of religion – as temptation, seduction, and illusion. Media, culture & society, 38(1), 37-47. Hepp, A. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediation of everything’. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113501148 Heylighen, F. (1999). The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution. The Evolution of Complexity, 8, 17-44. Hjarvard, S. (2004) ‘From Bricks to Bytes: The Mediatization of a Global Toy Industry’, in I. Bondebjerg & P. Golding (eds.) European Culture and the Media. Bristol: Intellect. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 6, 9-26. Hjarvard, S. (2012). Three forms of mediatized religion. Mediatization and religion: Nordic perspectives, 21-44. Hoover, S. M., & Lundby, K. (1997). Rethinking media, religion, and culture. SAGE. Hopp, T. (2015). The effect of numeracy on the relationship between state reactance and message evaluations. Communication Research Reports, 32(4), 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089855 Hosseini, S. H. (2008). Religion and media, religious media, or media religion: Theoretical studies. Journal of Media and Religion, 7(1-2), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348420701838350 Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. NYU Press. Johnson, R. (2017). Pastoral Care in the Modern Church. Baker Academic. Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of `mediatization' as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665070030030103 Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Taiwan. DataReportal – Global Digital Insights. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-taiwan Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x Macnamara, J. R. (2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1-34. Martino, L. M. (2016). The mediatization of religion: When faith rocks. Routledge. Martino, L. M. (2020). Mediatization of religion: Three dimensions from a Latin American/Brazilian perspective. Religions, 11(10), 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100482 Meikle, G. (2016). Social media: Communication, sharing and visibility. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Miller, T. (2019). The Role of Worship in the Christian Church. Abingdon Press. Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory - 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.9 Nord, D. P. (2004). Faith in reading: religious publishing and the birth of mass media in America. Oxford University Press on Demand. Page, J. T., Duffy, M., Frisby, C., & Perreault, G. (2016). Richard Sherman speaks and almost breaks the internet: Race, media, and Football1. Howard Journal of Communications, 27(3), 270-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2016.1176969 Perreault, G., & Ferrucci, P. (2019). Punishing Brady, redeeming Brady: A fantasy theme analysis of memes from the 2015 Deflategate controversy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27(3), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1610761 Perreault, M. F., & Perreault, G. (2019). Symbolic convergence in the 2015 Duggar scandal crisis communication. Journal of Media and Religion, 18(3), 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2019.1678945 Pew Research Center. (2023). State of the News Media. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/journalism-media/ Quick, B. L., & Bates, B. R. (2010). The use of gain- or loss-frame messages and efficacy appeals to dissuade excessive alcohol consumption among college students: A test of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 15(6), 603-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.499593 Quick, B. L., & Kim, D. K. (2009). Examining reactance and reactance restoration with South Korean adolescents: A test of psychological reactance within a collectivist culture. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209346797 Quick, B. L., Scott, A. M., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2011). A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 660-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551989 Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696 Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x Shawchuck, N., Kotler, P., Wrenn, B., & Rath, G. (1992). Marketing for congregations: Choosing to serve people more effectively. Abingdon Press. Shields, D. C., & Preston, C. T. (1985). Fantasy theme analysis in competitive rhetorical criticism. National Forensic Journal, 3(2), 102-115. Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013 Smith, J. (2020). Building Community in the Digital Age: Church and Social Media. Routledge. Tan, D. (2021). Digital Memes, Fair Use, and the First Amendment. J. Internet L., 24, 1-26. Thomson, T. J., Perreault, G., & Duffy, M. (2018). Politicians, photographers, and a Pope: How state-controlled and independent media covered Francis’s 2015 Cuba visit. Journalism Studies, 19(9), 1313-1330. Witt, P. L., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of Facework and immediacy on students' perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Education, 60(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.507820 Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1970). Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028620 Xu, J., & Wu, Y. (2017). Countering reactance in crisis communication: Incorporating positive emotions via social media. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(3), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417702475zh_TW