| dc.contributor.advisor | 藍亭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lane,Tim | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林正福 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lin ,Cheng-Fu | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林正福 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin ,Cheng-Fu | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:15:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:15:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:15:54 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0089551013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33325 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 英國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 89551013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文試圖設計一套讀者如何理解（強納生•史威夫特的）《一個謙遜提議》為諷刺文的認知過程。此認知過程包含兩個步驟：（A）推論出作者是諷刺的，（B）推論出作者意圖諷刺某真人。本論文分三部分來處理（A）與（B）。 第一部分（第2至5章）處理（A），而（A）又可細分為：（a）判斷《謙遜提議》似乎為錯，（b）推論出作者意圖它為錯，（c）推論出作者意圖讀者發現它為錯。然而，（a）阻礙了（b）與接下來的（c），因為《謙遜提議》在讀者眼中是似乎為錯，而非應該為錯。因此，讀者有困難去最終詮釋《謙遜提議》為一諷刺文。然而，當讀者閱畢《謙遜提議》後若能感到極度被娛樂（feels extremely amused），他將比較容易有（b）與（c）的反應，因為他會推論出作者在開玩笑。 第二部分（第6至7章）試圖設計一個娛樂（amusement）的認知理論與一個幽默（humor）的認知理論。我定義「娛樂」為一種情緒，成因是一個人在認知上評價「幽默」為愉悅的。而我定義「幽默」基本上是對失諧（incongruity）的反應。幽默可以是：（1）知覺到失諧；（2）知覺到失諧，並解困之；或（3）知覺到失諧，並求甚解地解困之。 第三部分（第8章）則處理由（A）到（B）的認知過程。讀者於此階段理解到《謙遜提議》裡的虛構第一人稱是一個隱喻，隱喻對象為某個針對愛爾蘭問題提出殘暴荒謬解決辦法的真實權貴。 終其此論文，我試圖拆解作者的《謙遜提議》（為一諷刺文），並藉由讀者的各種可能詮釋（《謙遜提議》是一個好計畫、偽善謊言等等）來重組之。有時，作者已死，而其身分不可辨認。於論文結論，我將運用此（對《謙遜提議》的）詮釋不穩定性，來解釋針對2004年台灣319（槍擊）案反應的意見分歧。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This thesis aims to design a cognitive process of how the reader comprehends Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” as a satire. This cognitive process includes two steps: (A) to infer that the author is satirical, (B) to infer that the author intends to satirize some real person. This thesis is cut into three parts to tackle (A) and (B). The first part (Chapters 2-5) is on (A), and (A) is subdivided into: (a) to judge that AMP1 seems to be false, (b) to infer that the author intends it to be false, (c) to infer that the author intends the reader to find it false. However, (a) impedes (b) and the sequential (c), because AMP is seemingly false, not normatively false, in the eyes of the reader. The reader thus has the difficulty to eventually interpret AMP as a satire. However, when the reader feels extremely amused after reading AMP, he will more easily fulfill (b) and (c), because he will infer that the author is joking. The second part (Chapters 6-7) aims to design a cognitive theory of amusement and that of humor. I define amusement as an emotion, caused by the cognitive appraisal of the humor as pleasant. And I define humor as basically a reaction to incongruity. Humor can be: (1) the perception of incongruity, (2) the perception of incongruity and its resolution, or (3) the perception of incongruity and its resolution with comprehension. The third part (Chapter 8) is on the cognitive process from (A) to (B). The reader in this stage comprehends that the fictional speaker in AMP is a metaphor of some bigwig in reality who proposes an outrageous solution to the Irish problems. Throughout this thesis, I try to demolish the author’s AMP (that it is a satire) and restructure it with the reader’s interpretations (that AMP is a good plan, a hypocritical lie, etc.). Sometimes, the author is dead and his identity is unrecognizable. At the end, I will apply this interpretative instability (to AMP) to the dissension over the Taiwan 319 (gunshot) incident in 2004.------------1 Herein Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” will be referred to as AMP. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter Ⅰ Introduction……………………………………………………………….1Chapter Ⅱ Reader, Text, Author……………………………………………………………….10Chapter Ⅲ Seemingly True and Normatively False……………………………………………………………….18Chapter Ⅳ AMP: Seemingly True and Normatively False……………………………………………………………….31Chapter Ⅴ AMP: Seemingly False……………………………………………………………….39Chapter Ⅵ Amusement……………………………………………………………….64Chapter Ⅶ Humor……………………………………………………………….76Chapter Ⅷ Metaphor……………………………………………………………….90Chapter Ⅸ Conclusion: Mind of Manipulation……………………………………………………………….95Works Cited.……………………………………………….104 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 12996 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 11216 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 14602 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 9606 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 47602 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 29907 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 52631 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 32169 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 80188 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 42489 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 62603 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 22572 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 37417 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 17580 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089551013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 諷刺文 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 幽默 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 娛樂 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 詮釋 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 意圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | satire | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | humor | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | amusement | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | interpretation | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | intention | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 諷刺文理解的認知過程：以史威夫特的《一個謙遜提議》為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The Cognitive Process of Satire Comprehension in Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Works Cited: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Abrams, M. H., et al., eds. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 6th ed. Vol. 1. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Albano, Robert A. Lectures on English Literature. Vol. 3. Taipei: Bookman, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Asch, S. E. “Opinions and Social Pressure.” Scientific American 19 (1955): 31-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Beattie, James. “On Laughter and Ludicrous Composition.” Essays. Edinburgh, Creech, 1776. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Booth, Wayne C. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1974. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chen, Xue-zhi (陳學志). The Cognitive Process of “Humor Comprehension” (「幽默理解」的認知歷程). Diss. Taiwan U, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. “From ‘Hearing the Joke’ to ‘Making the Joke:’ Use the Humor Comprehension to See the Humor Creation” (從「聽笑話」到「鬧笑話」--由幽默理解看幽默創作). Fu Jen Studies: College of Liberal Arts 24 (1995): 240-261. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clore, Gerald L., Norbert Schwarz, and Michael Conway. “Affective Causes and Consequences of Social Information Processing.” Handbook of Social Cognition. Ed. R. S. Wyer and T.K. Srull. Vol. 1. 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: L. Erlbaum, 1994. 323-418. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Craig, Grace J., and Don Baucum. Human Development. 8th ed. New Jersey: Prentice, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Emotions in Social Psychology: Essential Readings Ed. Gerrod Parrott. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | “Fiji Apologised This Week for Killing and Eating a British Missionary 136 Years Ago” RedNova News. 18 Oct. 2003. 2 Mar. 2005 <http://www.rednova.com/ news/display/?id=22625>. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fredrickson, Barbara L. “Cultivating Positive Emotions to Optimize Health and Well-Being.” Prevention & Treatment 3 (2000). 26 April 2004 <http:// www.journals.apa.org/prevention/volume3/pre0030001a.html>. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Frijda, N. H. The Emotions. Cambridge [UK]: Cambridge UP, 1986. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gaunt, Simon. Troubadours and Irony. New York: Cambridge UP, 1989. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ghiselin, M. T. The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: U of California P, 1974. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Griffin, Dustin H. Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: UP of Kentucky, 1994. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hutcheon, Linda. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. New York: Routledge, 1994. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jakobson, R. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mounton and Co, 1956. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jeng, Heng-syung (鄭恆雄). “Linguistic Analysis and Literature Study” (語言分析與文學研究). Wenshan Review 1.2 (1998): 1-33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakoff, G, and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Latta, Robert L. The Basic Humor Process: A Cognitive-shift Theory and the Case against Incongruity. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mead, S. et al. “Balancing Selection at the Prion Protein Gene Consistent with Prehistoric Kurulike Epidemics.” Science (2003). 2 Mar. 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morreall, John. “Humor and Emotion.” The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. Ed. John Morreall. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987. 212-24. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | New, Christopher. Philosophy of Literature: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nokes, David. Jonathan Swift, a Hypocrite Reversed: A Critical Biography. New York: Oxford UP, 1985. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ortony, Andrew, Gerald L. Clore, and Allan Collins. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. New York: Cambridge UP, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Orwell, George. 1984. 1948. The Literature Network. 1 Nov. 2004. <http:// www.online-literature.com/ orwell/1984/5/>. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pratt, Mary Louise. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1977. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rothbart, M. K. “Incongruity, Problem-Solving, and Laughter.” Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. Ed. A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1996. 37-54. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shultz, T. R. “A Cognitive-Developmental Analysis of Humour.” Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. Ed. A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1996. 11-36. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strongman, K. T. The Psychology of Emotion. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Suls. J. “A Two-stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information Processing Analysis.” The Psychology of Humor. Ed. J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee. New York: Academic Press, 1972. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Swift, Jonathan. “A Modest Proposal: For Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland from Being a Burden to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public” 1729. The Art Bin Magazine. 1 Oct. 2003. <http:// art-bin.com/art/omodest.html>. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taylor, Shelley E., L. A. Peplau, and D. O. Sears. Social Psychology. 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Veatch, T. C. “A Theory of Humor.” Humor, the International Journal of Humor Research (1998). 2 April 2004 < http://www.tomveatch.com/else/humor/paper>. | zh_TW |
