| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝瑤玲<br>陳音頤 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsieh, Yau-ling<br>Chen, Yin-i | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 梁曉菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Liang, Hsiao-ching | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 梁曉菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Liang, Hsiao-ching | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:20:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:20:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:20:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0915510081 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33347 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 英國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 915510081 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 阿蘭達蒂•羅依的第一部長篇小說(也是目前唯一一部)《微物之神》迄今已出版了八年之久。由於書中所觸及到的議題繁多，包括印度賤民階級所受到的不平等待遇，施加在婦女身上的肉體與精神上的暴力，或是在全球化下地方文化的邊緣化，所以至今仍贏得許多不同領域的研究者的關注。有些研究者將這本小說視為一個表現後殖民時期印度社會的文本；有些則將其視為將正規英文轉化為實驗性語言的絕佳典範；另外有些則將其視為一本宣揚女性權利的小說。 以上這些議題我在這本論文中或多或少都有所涉及，並以「純潔」典範的角度來探討。這裡所謂的「純潔」典範，指的是一種只接受特定受認可特質，並排斥任何在認可範圍外的存在，具將其視為「不潔」的系統。因此在文中「純潔」一字的指涉範圍含括衛生方面的乾淨，儀式上的潔淨，以至於在種族以及文化意含中的純淨。在第一章中，我會對文本做一個背景知識的介紹。在第二章，我將表明羅伊在小說中刻意破壞「大論述」的目的，並說明羅伊行文中表現出「大故事」的單薄度，以及這些大故事如何造成弱勢主體的隱没。在第三章中，討論將延伸到維魯沙這個角色上。首先我會解釋及解讀他賤民身份所被賦與的本質，接下來我會分析他所帶有的「不潔」意涵是如何及為什麼使他成為是代罪羔羊。在第四章中，我同樣的運用「純潔」與「不潔」間的對立關係來解讀小說中女性角色的處境。如同維魯沙一般，瑞海兒與阿慕也同樣在「純潔」符碼的宰制之下。它的標準支配了女性以及母性的合宜行止的內含。這些女性主角們也因此受限於「純潔」意涵的羅網之中。最後，我會在第五章中回頭總結前面幾章所提到的議題。此外，我會對於羅伊小說內容中所反映出來的當代印度社會與歷史的角度做一些討論，因為這點曾經引起爭議，並以此做為這本論文的尾聲。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Arundhati Roy’s prestigious first novel (and maybe the only novel), The God of Small Things, has already come out for eight years. It contains such exuberance of topics, such as the inequality towards the untouchables, the physical and mental violence abuse upon woman, or the marginalization of the local culture under the influences of globalization, that it has earned the attention of many researchers from different fields even till now. Some of researchers consider the text as a fiction which presents postcolonial India, others find the book as a perfect demonstration of how proper English is transformed into a more experimental form; still others treat the novel as an assertion of female rights. In this thesis, I more or less touch all of the above topics, and investigate them in the light of “the model of purity,” the system which only recognizes the approved essence and wipes off anything that is not. Thus in this thesis the term purity refers to concepts of the hygienic purity, ritual purity, and also the purity in the ethnic and cultural aspect. I will give background knowledge to the book in Chapter One. Then, in Chapter Two I declare Roy’s intention to mime the grand narrative in her novel, and how Roy’s writing lays bare the fragility of The Great Stories and how they work to ensure the invisibility of the minor subjects. In Chapter Three, I extend my discussion to the character Velutha. Firstly I explain and interpret his essence by his untouchable background; then I will analyze how and why his impure essence makes him a victim of others’ irrational malice. In Chapter Four, I also apply the opposition of purity and impurity to read the situation of the female characters in the novel. Like Velutha, the heroines Rahel and Ammu are also under surveillance of the purity code. The criterion of purity dictates not only the context of decent womanhood but also motherhood. The female protagonists are thus caught in the inescapable network of purity. Finally, I will have a retrospective look on my thesis in Chapter Five. Apart from this, I will have a brief discussion about the social reality reflected in Roy’s text as this issue once brought about controversy. This small debate will serve as my finale. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments...........................................iiiChinese abstract..........................................ivEnglish Abstract..........................................vChapter I. Introduction..................................1 II. What Myth Are We Living in?..................17 III. Velutha the Obscure: the Man Who Left No Footprints.......................42 IV. The Hidden Myth of the Dirty Goddess.........69 V. Conclusions...................................97Works Cited...............................................103 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 48228 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 14804 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 14114 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 14886 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 90527 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 20932 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 80392 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 148013 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 92366 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 91579 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 30841 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 40775 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915510081 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 阿蘭達蒂•羅依 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 《微物之神》 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 李歐塔 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 大論述 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 克莉斯蒂娃 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 《恐怖的力量》 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 賤斥 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 賤民 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Arundhati Roy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | The God of Small Things | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Jean-François Lyotard | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | grand narrative | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Julia Kristeva | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Powers of Horror | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | abject | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | the untouchables | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 重訪偉大故事:《微物之神》中的純潔神話 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Revisiting Great Stories: the Myth of Purity in The God of Small Things | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Adhikari, Madhumalati. “Enclosure and Freedom: Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Things.” Explorations : Arundhati Roy`s the God of small things. Ed. Indira | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bhatt and Indira Nityanandam. New Delhi: Creative Books, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ahmad, Aijaz. “Reading Arundhati Roy Politically.” Frontline. 8 Aug. 1997: 103-9. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alexander, K. C. “The Neo-Christian of Kerala.” The Untouchables in Contemporary | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | India. Ed. J. Michael Mahar. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 1972. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allen, Michael, and S. N. Mukherjee. Women in India and Nepal. Canberra: AMU | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Printing for the South Asian History, 1982. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: The University of Texas Press, 1981. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. Trans. Jonathan Cape Ltd. New York: Hill and Wang, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1972. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bataille, Georges. The Accursed Share: An Essay on General Economy. Trans. La part | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | maudite. Vol. 2. New York: Zone Books, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blodgett, Harriet. “Mimesis and Metaphor: Food Imagery in Twentieth-Century | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Women’s Writing.” Language & Literature. 40.3(2004): 260-96. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bose, Brinda. “In Desire and in Death: Eroticism as Politics in Arundhati Roy’s The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | God of Small Things.” Ariel: A Review of International English Literature. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29.2(1998): 59-72. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brah, Avtar. Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carroll, David. “Narrative, Heterogeneity, and the Question of the Political: Bakhtin | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and Lyotard”. Ed. Murray Krieger, The Aims of Representation: Subject/Text/History. Stanford: Stanford Up. 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chandra, Amit. “The Construction of the Indian Novel in English.” The Picador book | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of Modern Indian Literature. London: Macmillan, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dasan, M. “Arundhati Hits the Socio-Political Ball.” The Critical Studies of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Ed. Jaydipshinh Dodiya and Joya | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Charkravarty. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 1999. P. 26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dhruvarajan, Vanaja. Hindu Women and The Power of Ideology. Massachusetts: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bergin & Garvey Publishers, 1989. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dinnerstein, Dorothy. The Mermaid and The Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Human Malasaise. New York: Harper & Row, 1976. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London: Routledge, 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dumont, Louis. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Trans. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mark Sainsbury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Friedman, Susan Stanford. Mappings: Feminism and the Cultural Geographies of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Encounter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. “Feminism, State Fictions and Violence: Gender, Geopolitics and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Transnationalism.” Communal/ Plural: Journal of Transnational & | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crosscultural Studies. 9.1(2001):111-29. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fromm, Erich. Man for himself: An Enquiry into the Psychology of Ethics. London: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Routledge, 1990. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Frumkes, Lewis Burke. Writer. 111.11(1998): 23-4. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gedalof, Irene. Against Purity: Rethinking Identity with Indian and Western Feminism. London: Routledge, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gilbert, Sandra and Susan Gubar. The Mad Woman in the Attic. New Haven: Yale | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University Press, 1979. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harriet, Blodgett. “Mimesis and Metaphor: Food Imagery in Twentieth-Century | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Women’s Writing.” Language & Literature. 40.3(2004): 260-96. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jessica, Benjamin. The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Domination. New York: Pantheon Books, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jung, C. G. “A Psychological Approach to the Dogma of the Trinity.” Psychology and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Religion: West and East. New York: Pantheon Books, 1958. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kristeva, Julia. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. “Stabat Mater.” The Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York : Columbia University Press, 1986. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Columbia University Press, 1982. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kumar, Sujith Chandra. “Facts and Fictions.” The Week. 26 Oct. 1997: 43. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Layoun, Mary. “Woman, Nation, and Narration in Midnight`s Children: The Scopic | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | and the Civic.” Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | FeministPractices. Ed. Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. Georges Van Den | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. The Postmodern Condition. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minnesapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lyotard, Jean-François, and Jean-Loup Thébaud. Just Gaming. Trans. Wlad Godzich. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marquand, Robert. “India`s Arundhati Roy: Novelist Turned Social Activist.” | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Christian Science Monitor. 91.133 (1999):7. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mead, Margaret. Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World. New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | York: W. Morrow, 1949. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mee, Jon. “After midnight: the Indian Novel in English of the 80s and 90s.” The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Postcolonial Studies. 1.1(1998): 127-41. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mullaney, Julie. The God of Small Things: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continum, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Narula, Smita. Broken People: Caste Violence Against India`s "Untouchables." New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | York: Human Rights Watch, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Highlights of the | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Report of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for the Years 1994-95 & 1995-96. New Delhi: Government of India, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nishant, Shulin. “Arundhati Roy`s The God of Small Things.” Contemporary | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Postcolonial and Post Imperial Literature in English. June. 2001. National | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University of Singapore. 6 Apr. 2005 <http://www.scholars.nus.edu.sg/landow/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | post/India/roy/nishant1.html#colonialism>. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Omvedt, Gail. “Rural Women and the Family in an Era of Liberalization: India in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Comparative Asian Perspective.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29.4(1997): 33-44. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pauline, Rolend. Caste in Contemporary India: Beyond Organic Solidarity. Menlo | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Park: Benjamin/ Cummings Publisher, 1978. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prasad, Amar Nath. “Arundhati Roy: A Novelist of New Style.” The Critical Studies | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Ed. Jaydipsinh Dodiya and Joya Chakravarty. Delhi: Atlantic Publisher, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rao, Ranga. “The Book(er) of the Year.” The Hindu Magazine 16 Nov. 1997. XIII. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rich, Adrienne. Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | York: W. W. Norton, 1986. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roy, Arundhati. “Come September.” Frontline 12 Oct. 2002 <http://www.hinduonnet. com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=20021011003106500.htm&date=fl1920/&prd=fline&>. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ---. The God of Small Things. New York: HarperPerennial, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thormann, Janet. “The Ethical Subject of The God of Small Things.” Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society. 8.2 (2003): 299-308. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Trinh, T. Minh-ha. Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Updike, John. “Mother Tongues: Subduing the Language of the Colonizer.” The New | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yorker. 23-30 June. 1997: 156-61. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wibur, Alix. “Interview: Arundhati Roy, For Me Language Is a Skin on My Thought.” The Week. 15.45(1997): 46. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wood, James. “The Noisy Pluralism of Indian Fiction: An Indelicate Balance.” The New Republic. 217.26(1997): 32-7. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wyatt, Andreww K. J. “Dalit Christians and Identity Politics in India.” Bullentin of Concerned Asian Scholars. 30.4(1998): 16-23. | zh_TW |
