學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 丹‧布朗小說《達文西密碼》中的權力、抵抗與越界
Power, Resistance, and Boundary Crossing in Dan Brown`s The Da Vinci Code
作者 黃耀弘
Huang,Yao-Hung
貢獻者 羅狼仁<br>林茂松
Phillips,Brian David<br>Lin,Maosung
黃耀弘
Huang,Yao-Hung
關鍵詞 達文西密碼
丹布朗
傅科
權力
慾望
克莉斯提娃
抵抗
越界
The Da Vinci Code
Dan Brown
Foucault
Power
Desire
Kristeva
Resistance
Bounary corssing
日期 2006
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 《達文西密碼》這部作品在成為最暢銷的小說後,吸引了世界上許多各式各樣不同的讀者。然而在暢銷市場之外,這部作品卻被許多評論家認為是一部扭曲史實的作品;幾乎所有的評論家都一致認為這是一部充滿歷史錯誤與邏輯矛盾的創作。不過令人訝異的是,幾乎沒有任何評論家是從文學理論批評的角度來檢視這份虛擬的小說創作。 因此,本文除盡可能檢視過去所有探討及批評《達文西密碼》的文章外,筆者將探討文中引含的兩種能量:權力與抵抗。這兩種力量其實在此書中一直是兩股此起彼落的流動能量,筆者將採取文學理論的角度去探索此書裡的權力與抵抗互動脈絡;而且,在這之後,筆者會試著從理論面向,深入檢視造成《達文西密碼》一書全球風潮之因。
本論文將分作四個章節,在首章中,我會回顧其他批評及評論家對《達文西密碼》一書的見解,第二章則是對應用於此書中的文學理論的鋪陳及探討,第三
章則是則分別討論傅科 (Michael Foucault) 的權力、克里多娃 (Julia Kristeav) 的母性抵抗,以及以瑟 (Wolfgang Iser) 的越界 (Boundary crossing ) 理論,如何運作在《達文西密碼》一書當中。最末章的總結則點出此本小說其實不僅僅
是許多評論家眼中的一本充滿不實與問題的作品;相反的,它不但揭露出權力及抵抗兩種能量的運作和依存關係,而且也解釋了這本書造成閱讀風潮的原因,也就是讀者心中的那份永不滿足的失落。
Having been one of the most popular recent works of fiction, The Da Vinci Code has attracted readers throughout the world. Yet, many critics have commented that The Da Vinci code is a work full of historical mistakes. Almost no critic analyzes the reason for its success from a theoretical perspective.
The novel enchants readers because it suggests the unexpected ways that the meaning of the sacred feminine has been repressed throughout history. As the reader decodes the clues that are hidden throughout the novel, an undiscovered history is suggested: the myth of the Holy Grail. In The Da Vinci Code, the Holy Grail stands for Mary Magdalene, who carried and conceived Jesus Christ’s child. In the novel Mary carries a significant symbolic meaning because she is portrayed as the wife of Jesus as well as the mother of His daughter. This stunning premise is responsible for making The Da Vinci Code not only popular, but also very controversial. Critics vary in their reaction to the ‘subversive’ ideas in The Da Vinci Code, but there are two predominant kinds of reaction to the novel. The first type reflects the view that The Da Vinci Code is a popular work that encourages feminine, independent thinking that works in opposition to conventional and social power. The second views it as a fictitious work fraught with historical inaccuracies. Generally speaking, both types mention the issues of power and resistance in The Da Vinci Code.
This thesis consists of four chapters that focus respectively on the search for power, feminine resistance, and boundary crossing narrative techniques. Chapter one introduces how critics analyze their conventional elements. In the second chapter, I intend to employ Michael Foucault, Julia Kristeva, and Wolfgang Iser’s theories in an analysis of The Da Vinci Code. In the third chapter, I will employ textual evidence to support my theoretical analysis. In the conclusion of my thesis, I will claim that only through the dialectic oscillation between transgression and law can the individual escape the symbolic control and discover resistance. Furthermore, the narrative technique of boundary crossing is the key that has made the book a runaway success throughout the world and that also renders the reader eager to explore their own world further. Finally I reach the conclusion that The Da Vinci Code is not merely a work full of errors and conspiracies, but also a novel that exposes the violence, resistance and sense of loss in contemporary society.
參考文獻 Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Farrar,Straus, and Giroux,1975.
Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theories and Practice. Sage Publications, 2000.
Bethune, Brian. “Cracking The Da VinCi Code.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 36-39.
Bernhauer, J. Michel Foucault’s Force of Flight: Toward an Ethics for Thought. London: Humanities Press International, 1990.
Bock, Darrell L. Breaking The Da Vinci Code. Thomas Nelson, 2004.
Braidotti, R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Trans. Elizabeth Guild, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
Brooker, Peter. A Concise Glossary of Cultural Theory. Arnold, 1999.
Brown, Dan. The Da Vinci Code. Doubleday. 2003.
Burstein, Dan. Et al. Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004.
De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Diemert, Brain. “Pursuit of Justice: Graham Greene’s Refiguring of the Detective Story in It’s a Battlefild.” Paper on Language and Literature 30 (1994): 285- 297.
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.
Easthope, Antony. Literature into Cultural Studies. London and New York, 1991.
Eco, Umberto. Foucault’s Pendulum. Ballantine Books, 1990.
Ehrman, Bart D. Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code. Oxford University Press, 2004.
Foucault, M. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books,1979.
- - -. History of Sexuality. Pantheon Books, 1984.
Gramsci, A. Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1968.
Hull, Richard. “The Purloined Letter: Poe’s Detective Story V.S. Panoptic Foucauldian Theory.” Style, 1990.
Hall, S. “For All on White: Metaphor of Transformation.” Critical Dialogue in Cultural Studies, London: Routlefge, 1996.
Iser, Wolfgang. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: John Hopkins Up, 1993.
Kantrowitz Barbara, et al. “The Bible’s Lost Stories.” Newsweek 142 (2003): 48-56
Klinghoffer, David. “Religious Fiction.” National Review 55 (2003): 48-49
Kristeva, J. “Stabat Mater.” Tales of Love. Trans., Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
- - -. The Kristeva Reader. ed. Tori Moi. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
- - -. Tales of Love. Trans. Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
- - -. Desire in Language: The Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Léon
Roudiez. Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon Roudiez. New York, Columbia University Press, London, Basil Blackwell, 1980.
- - -. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York : Columbia University Press, 1982.
- - -. Revolutionary in Poetic Language. Trans. Margaret Waller. Columbia University Press, 1984.
Kulman, Linda, Jay Tolson, and Katy Kelly. “Jesus in America: Behind the Wild Success of a Theological Thriller Lies a Centuries-old Urge to Rapture the Original Jesus.” US. News & World Report 135 (2003).
Lacy, Norris J. “The Da Vinci Code: Dan Brown and the Grail that Never was.” Arthuriana 14 (2004): 81-93.
Linhart, Robert. The Assembly Line. Trans. Margaret Crosland, London: John Calder, 1981.
Macherey, Pierre. “A Theory of Literary Production.” Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed., Bob Ashley, Leicester University Press: London and Washington, 1997.
Makinen, Merja. Feminist Popular Fiction. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
McCormick, Patrick “Painted out the Picture: Part of the Best-selling Appeal of The
Da Vinci Code is a Conspiracy that Has Kept Women from Taking Their Rightful Place in the Church.” U.S. the Catholic 68(2003): 36-39.
McNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender, and the Self. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992.
McGuigan, J. Cultural Populism. London: Routledge, 1992.
McHale, Brain. Postmodernist Fiction. New York: Methuen, 1987.
Moretti, Franco. “Clues.” Signs Taken for Wonders: Essay in the Sociology if Literary Forms. Trans., Susan Fischer, David Forgacs, David Miller.Verso, 1988.
Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.
Nealon, Jeffery T. “Work of the Detective, Work of the Writer.” Detecting Texts. Ed., Patricia Mervale, Susan Elizabeth. PENN, 1999.
Newman, Sharan. The Real History Behind The Da Vinci Code. Berkley Books, 2005.
O’Grady, Kathleen. “An Interview with Kristeva.” Parallax 8 (1998):5-16.
Oliver, Kelly. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-bind. Indiana University, 1993.
Parry, Alan. “Deconstruction and Theory Revisited: Including the Excluded.” Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 20-24 August 1999. 1-51.
Pederson-Krag, Geralding “Detective Stories and the Primal Scene.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 13 (1949):203-14.
Putnam, Bill, and John Edwin Wood. “Unravelling The Da Vinci Code: Bill Putman and John Edwin Wood Peel Away the Evidence to Find an Extraordinary Hoax at the Heart of Dan Brown’s Best Selling Novel.” History Today 55 (2005):18-20.
Rolvsjord, Randi. “Music as a Poetic Language.” Online. Internet. 11 May. 2006.
Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy Retrieved. May 14, 2006.
<http://www.voices.no/mainissues/mi40004000138.html>
Sauer, Geoffrey. “Review of Foucault’s Pendulum.” Online. Internet. 12 Feb. 1990. The Modern World. Nov 20, 2003.
<http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_humanitas90.html>
Schor, N. “Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault, and Social difference.” Men in Feminism. Ed., A. Jardine and Paul Smith, New York : Routledge, 1989.
Seltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell Up, 1984.
Sheridan, Alan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. Tavistock, 1980.
Smart, Barry. Michel Foucault. Tavistock, 1985.
Smith, Philip. Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.
Spanos, William V. Repetitions: The Postmodernism Occasion in Literature and Culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1987.
Swope, Richard. “Approaching the Threshold(s) in Postmodernism Detective fiction : Hawthrone’s ‘Wakefild’ and Other Missing Persons.” Critique 39 (1998): 207-228.
Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.
Wiliams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
William, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1976.
Wilson, Robert Anton. “Mary Mary, Quite Contrary.” Online. Internet. 16 Sep. 2004. Conspiracy Coincidence & Code. <http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:z6fTFkGUdM4J:maybelogic.org/coincidancecode/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D2+Roberto+Anton+Wilson,+The+Widow%27s+Son,+Magdalene&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24>
- - -. The Widow’s Son. New Falcon Publications, 2004.
Wilson-Smith, Anthony, “God and those Details.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 4.
Zizek, Slavoj. “Two Ways to Avoid the Real of Desire.” Looking Away: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Trough Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
92551003
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925510031
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 羅狼仁<br>林茂松zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Phillips,Brian David<br>Lin,Maosungen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃耀弘zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huang,Yao-Hungen_US
dc.creator (作者) 黃耀弘zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huang,Yao-Hungen_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0925510031en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33354-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92551003zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 《達文西密碼》這部作品在成為最暢銷的小說後,吸引了世界上許多各式各樣不同的讀者。然而在暢銷市場之外,這部作品卻被許多評論家認為是一部扭曲史實的作品;幾乎所有的評論家都一致認為這是一部充滿歷史錯誤與邏輯矛盾的創作。不過令人訝異的是,幾乎沒有任何評論家是從文學理論批評的角度來檢視這份虛擬的小說創作。 因此,本文除盡可能檢視過去所有探討及批評《達文西密碼》的文章外,筆者將探討文中引含的兩種能量:權力與抵抗。這兩種力量其實在此書中一直是兩股此起彼落的流動能量,筆者將採取文學理論的角度去探索此書裡的權力與抵抗互動脈絡;而且,在這之後,筆者會試著從理論面向,深入檢視造成《達文西密碼》一書全球風潮之因。
本論文將分作四個章節,在首章中,我會回顧其他批評及評論家對《達文西密碼》一書的見解,第二章則是對應用於此書中的文學理論的鋪陳及探討,第三
章則是則分別討論傅科 (Michael Foucault) 的權力、克里多娃 (Julia Kristeav) 的母性抵抗,以及以瑟 (Wolfgang Iser) 的越界 (Boundary crossing ) 理論,如何運作在《達文西密碼》一書當中。最末章的總結則點出此本小說其實不僅僅
是許多評論家眼中的一本充滿不實與問題的作品;相反的,它不但揭露出權力及抵抗兩種能量的運作和依存關係,而且也解釋了這本書造成閱讀風潮的原因,也就是讀者心中的那份永不滿足的失落。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Having been one of the most popular recent works of fiction, The Da Vinci Code has attracted readers throughout the world. Yet, many critics have commented that The Da Vinci code is a work full of historical mistakes. Almost no critic analyzes the reason for its success from a theoretical perspective.
The novel enchants readers because it suggests the unexpected ways that the meaning of the sacred feminine has been repressed throughout history. As the reader decodes the clues that are hidden throughout the novel, an undiscovered history is suggested: the myth of the Holy Grail. In The Da Vinci Code, the Holy Grail stands for Mary Magdalene, who carried and conceived Jesus Christ’s child. In the novel Mary carries a significant symbolic meaning because she is portrayed as the wife of Jesus as well as the mother of His daughter. This stunning premise is responsible for making The Da Vinci Code not only popular, but also very controversial. Critics vary in their reaction to the ‘subversive’ ideas in The Da Vinci Code, but there are two predominant kinds of reaction to the novel. The first type reflects the view that The Da Vinci Code is a popular work that encourages feminine, independent thinking that works in opposition to conventional and social power. The second views it as a fictitious work fraught with historical inaccuracies. Generally speaking, both types mention the issues of power and resistance in The Da Vinci Code.
This thesis consists of four chapters that focus respectively on the search for power, feminine resistance, and boundary crossing narrative techniques. Chapter one introduces how critics analyze their conventional elements. In the second chapter, I intend to employ Michael Foucault, Julia Kristeva, and Wolfgang Iser’s theories in an analysis of The Da Vinci Code. In the third chapter, I will employ textual evidence to support my theoretical analysis. In the conclusion of my thesis, I will claim that only through the dialectic oscillation between transgression and law can the individual escape the symbolic control and discover resistance. Furthermore, the narrative technique of boundary crossing is the key that has made the book a runaway success throughout the world and that also renders the reader eager to explore their own world further. Finally I reach the conclusion that The Da Vinci Code is not merely a work full of errors and conspiracies, but also a novel that exposes the violence, resistance and sense of loss in contemporary society.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Page
Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………… iv
Chinese Abstract…………………………………………………………………… vi
English Abstract…………………………………………………………………….viii
Chapter One……………………………………..……………………………...........1
Chapter Two………………………………………………………………………...10
Chapter Three…….………………………………………………………………....53
Chapter Four ……………..………………………………………………………..111
Bibliography……………………………………………………………………….116
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 49293 bytes-
dc.format.extent 12820 bytes-
dc.format.extent 105225 bytes-
dc.format.extent 11635 bytes-
dc.format.extent 42264 bytes-
dc.format.extent 119417 bytes-
dc.format.extent 159126 bytes-
dc.format.extent 23070 bytes-
dc.format.extent 41499 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925510031en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 達文西密碼zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 丹布朗zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 傅科zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 權力zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 慾望zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 克莉斯提娃zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 抵抗zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 越界zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) The Da Vinci Codeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dan Brownen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Foucaulten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Poweren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Desireen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Kristevaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resistanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bounary corssingen_US
dc.title (題名) 丹‧布朗小說《達文西密碼》中的權力、抵抗與越界zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Power, Resistance, and Boundary Crossing in Dan Brown`s The Da Vinci Codeen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Farrar,Straus, and Giroux,1975.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theories and Practice. Sage Publications, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bethune, Brian. “Cracking The Da VinCi Code.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 36-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bernhauer, J. Michel Foucault’s Force of Flight: Toward an Ethics for Thought. London: Humanities Press International, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bock, Darrell L. Breaking The Da Vinci Code. Thomas Nelson, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Braidotti, R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Trans. Elizabeth Guild, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brooker, Peter. A Concise Glossary of Cultural Theory. Arnold, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, Dan. The Da Vinci Code. Doubleday. 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burstein, Dan. Et al. Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Diemert, Brain. “Pursuit of Justice: Graham Greene’s Refiguring of the Detective Story in It’s a Battlefild.” Paper on Language and Literature 30 (1994): 285- 297.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Easthope, Antony. Literature into Cultural Studies. London and New York, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eco, Umberto. Foucault’s Pendulum. Ballantine Books, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ehrman, Bart D. Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code. Oxford University Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, M. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books,1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. History of Sexuality. Pantheon Books, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gramsci, A. Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hull, Richard. “The Purloined Letter: Poe’s Detective Story V.S. Panoptic Foucauldian Theory.” Style, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, S. “For All on White: Metaphor of Transformation.” Critical Dialogue in Cultural Studies, London: Routlefge, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Iser, Wolfgang. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: John Hopkins Up, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kantrowitz Barbara, et al. “The Bible’s Lost Stories.” Newsweek 142 (2003): 48-56zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Klinghoffer, David. “Religious Fiction.” National Review 55 (2003): 48-49zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kristeva, J. “Stabat Mater.” Tales of Love. Trans., Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. The Kristeva Reader. ed. Tori Moi. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. Tales of Love. Trans. Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. Desire in Language: The Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Léonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roudiez. Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon Roudiez. New York, Columbia University Press, London, Basil Blackwell, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York : Columbia University Press, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. Revolutionary in Poetic Language. Trans. Margaret Waller. Columbia University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kulman, Linda, Jay Tolson, and Katy Kelly. “Jesus in America: Behind the Wild Success of a Theological Thriller Lies a Centuries-old Urge to Rapture the Original Jesus.” US. News & World Report 135 (2003).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lacy, Norris J. “The Da Vinci Code: Dan Brown and the Grail that Never was.” Arthuriana 14 (2004): 81-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Linhart, Robert. The Assembly Line. Trans. Margaret Crosland, London: John Calder, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Macherey, Pierre. “A Theory of Literary Production.” Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed., Bob Ashley, Leicester University Press: London and Washington, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Makinen, Merja. Feminist Popular Fiction. New York: Palgrave, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCormick, Patrick “Painted out the Picture: Part of the Best-selling Appeal of Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Da Vinci Code is a Conspiracy that Has Kept Women from Taking Their Rightful Place in the Church.” U.S. the Catholic 68(2003): 36-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender, and the Self. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McGuigan, J. Cultural Populism. London: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McHale, Brain. Postmodernist Fiction. New York: Methuen, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moretti, Franco. “Clues.” Signs Taken for Wonders: Essay in the Sociology if Literary Forms. Trans., Susan Fischer, David Forgacs, David Miller.Verso, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nealon, Jeffery T. “Work of the Detective, Work of the Writer.” Detecting Texts. Ed., Patricia Mervale, Susan Elizabeth. PENN, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Newman, Sharan. The Real History Behind The Da Vinci Code. Berkley Books, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Grady, Kathleen. “An Interview with Kristeva.” Parallax 8 (1998):5-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, Kelly. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-bind. Indiana University, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Parry, Alan. “Deconstruction and Theory Revisited: Including the Excluded.” Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 20-24 August 1999. 1-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pederson-Krag, Geralding “Detective Stories and the Primal Scene.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 13 (1949):203-14.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Putnam, Bill, and John Edwin Wood. “Unravelling The Da Vinci Code: Bill Putman and John Edwin Wood Peel Away the Evidence to Find an Extraordinary Hoax at the Heart of Dan Brown’s Best Selling Novel.” History Today 55 (2005):18-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rolvsjord, Randi. “Music as a Poetic Language.” Online. Internet. 11 May. 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy Retrieved. May 14, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) <http://www.voices.no/mainissues/mi40004000138.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sauer, Geoffrey. “Review of Foucault’s Pendulum.” Online. Internet. 12 Feb. 1990. The Modern World. Nov 20, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) <http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_humanitas90.html>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schor, N. “Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault, and Social difference.” Men in Feminism. Ed., A. Jardine and Paul Smith, New York : Routledge, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Seltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell Up, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sheridan, Alan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. Tavistock, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smart, Barry. Michel Foucault. Tavistock, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Philip. Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spanos, William V. Repetitions: The Postmodernism Occasion in Literature and Culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Swope, Richard. “Approaching the Threshold(s) in Postmodernism Detective fiction : Hawthrone’s ‘Wakefild’ and Other Missing Persons.” Critique 39 (1998): 207-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wiliams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) William, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, Robert Anton. “Mary Mary, Quite Contrary.” Online. Internet. 16 Sep. 2004. Conspiracy Coincidence & Code. <http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:z6fTFkGUdM4J:maybelogic.org/coincidancecode/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D2+Roberto+Anton+Wilson,+The+Widow%27s+Son,+Magdalene&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24>zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - - -. The Widow’s Son. New Falcon Publications, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson-Smith, Anthony, “God and those Details.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zizek, Slavoj. “Two Ways to Avoid the Real of Desire.” Looking Away: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Trough Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.zh_TW