| dc.contributor.advisor | 羅狼仁<br>林茂松 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Phillips,Brian David<br>Lin,Maosung | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 黃耀弘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Huang,Yao-Hung | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃耀弘 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Huang,Yao-Hung | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2006 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-九月-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-九月-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-九月-2009 16:21:11 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0925510031 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33354 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 英國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92551003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 《達文西密碼》這部作品在成為最暢銷的小說後，吸引了世界上許多各式各樣不同的讀者。然而在暢銷市場之外，這部作品卻被許多評論家認為是一部扭曲史實的作品；幾乎所有的評論家都一致認為這是一部充滿歷史錯誤與邏輯矛盾的創作。不過令人訝異的是，幾乎沒有任何評論家是從文學理論批評的角度來檢視這份虛擬的小說創作。 因此，本文除盡可能檢視過去所有探討及批評《達文西密碼》的文章外，筆者將探討文中引含的兩種能量：權力與抵抗。這兩種力量其實在此書中一直是兩股此起彼落的流動能量，筆者將採取文學理論的角度去探索此書裡的權力與抵抗互動脈絡；而且，在這之後，筆者會試著從理論面向，深入檢視造成《達文西密碼》一書全球風潮之因。 本論文將分作四個章節，在首章中，我會回顧其他批評及評論家對《達文西密碼》一書的見解，第二章則是對應用於此書中的文學理論的鋪陳及探討，第三章則是則分別討論傅科 (Michael Foucault) 的權力、克里多娃 (Julia Kristeav) 的母性抵抗，以及以瑟 (Wolfgang Iser) 的越界 (Boundary crossing ) 理論，如何運作在《達文西密碼》一書當中。最末章的總結則點出此本小說其實不僅僅是許多評論家眼中的一本充滿不實與問題的作品；相反的，它不但揭露出權力及抵抗兩種能量的運作和依存關係，而且也解釋了這本書造成閱讀風潮的原因，也就是讀者心中的那份永不滿足的失落。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Having been one of the most popular recent works of fiction, The Da Vinci Code has attracted readers throughout the world. Yet, many critics have commented that The Da Vinci code is a work full of historical mistakes. Almost no critic analyzes the reason for its success from a theoretical perspective. The novel enchants readers because it suggests the unexpected ways that the meaning of the sacred feminine has been repressed throughout history. As the reader decodes the clues that are hidden throughout the novel, an undiscovered history is suggested: the myth of the Holy Grail. In The Da Vinci Code, the Holy Grail stands for Mary Magdalene, who carried and conceived Jesus Christ’s child. In the novel Mary carries a significant symbolic meaning because she is portrayed as the wife of Jesus as well as the mother of His daughter. This stunning premise is responsible for making The Da Vinci Code not only popular, but also very controversial. Critics vary in their reaction to the ‘subversive’ ideas in The Da Vinci Code, but there are two predominant kinds of reaction to the novel. The first type reflects the view that The Da Vinci Code is a popular work that encourages feminine, independent thinking that works in opposition to conventional and social power. The second views it as a fictitious work fraught with historical inaccuracies. Generally speaking, both types mention the issues of power and resistance in The Da Vinci Code. This thesis consists of four chapters that focus respectively on the search for power, feminine resistance, and boundary crossing narrative techniques. Chapter one introduces how critics analyze their conventional elements. In the second chapter, I intend to employ Michael Foucault, Julia Kristeva, and Wolfgang Iser’s theories in an analysis of The Da Vinci Code. In the third chapter, I will employ textual evidence to support my theoretical analysis. In the conclusion of my thesis, I will claim that only through the dialectic oscillation between transgression and law can the individual escape the symbolic control and discover resistance. Furthermore, the narrative technique of boundary crossing is the key that has made the book a runaway success throughout the world and that also renders the reader eager to explore their own world further. Finally I reach the conclusion that The Da Vinci Code is not merely a work full of errors and conspiracies, but also a novel that exposes the violence, resistance and sense of loss in contemporary society. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | PageAcknowledgements………………………………………………………………… ivChinese Abstract…………………………………………………………………… viEnglish Abstract…………………………………………………………………….viiiChapter One……………………………………..……………………………...........1Chapter Two………………………………………………………………………...10 Chapter Three…….………………………………………………………………....53Chapter Four ……………..………………………………………………………..111Bibliography……………………………………………………………………….116 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 49293 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 12820 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 105225 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 11635 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 42264 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 119417 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 159126 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 23070 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 41499 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925510031 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 達文西密碼 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 丹布朗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 傅科 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 權力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 慾望 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 克莉斯提娃 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 抵抗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 越界 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | The Da Vinci Code | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Dan Brown | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Foucault | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Power | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Desire | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Kristeva | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Resistance | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Bounary corssing | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 丹‧布朗小說《達文西密碼》中的權力、抵抗與越界 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Power, Resistance, and Boundary Crossing in Dan Brown`s The Da Vinci Code | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Farrar,Straus, and Giroux,1975. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theories and Practice. Sage Publications, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bethune, Brian. “Cracking The Da VinCi Code.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 36-39. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernhauer, J. Michel Foucault’s Force of Flight: Toward an Ethics for Thought. London: Humanities Press International, 1990. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bock, Darrell L. Breaking The Da Vinci Code. Thomas Nelson, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Braidotti, R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Trans. Elizabeth Guild, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brooker, Peter. A Concise Glossary of Cultural Theory. Arnold, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, Dan. The Da Vinci Code. Doubleday. 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burstein, Dan. Et al. Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Diemert, Brain. “Pursuit of Justice: Graham Greene’s Refiguring of the Detective Story in It’s a Battlefild.” Paper on Language and Literature 30 (1994): 285- 297. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Easthope, Antony. Literature into Cultural Studies. London and New York, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eco, Umberto. Foucault’s Pendulum. Ballantine Books, 1990. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ehrman, Bart D. Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code. Oxford University Press, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Foucault, M. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books,1979. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. History of Sexuality. Pantheon Books, 1984. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gramsci, A. Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1968. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hull, Richard. “The Purloined Letter: Poe’s Detective Story V.S. Panoptic Foucauldian Theory.” Style, 1990. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hall, S. “For All on White: Metaphor of Transformation.” Critical Dialogue in Cultural Studies, London: Routlefge, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Iser, Wolfgang. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: John Hopkins Up, 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kantrowitz Barbara, et al. “The Bible’s Lost Stories.” Newsweek 142 (2003): 48-56 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Klinghoffer, David. “Religious Fiction.” National Review 55 (2003): 48-49 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kristeva, J. “Stabat Mater.” Tales of Love. Trans., Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. The Kristeva Reader. ed. Tori Moi. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. Tales of Love. Trans. Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. Desire in Language: The Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Léon | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roudiez. Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon Roudiez. New York, Columbia University Press, London, Basil Blackwell, 1980. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York : Columbia University Press, 1982. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. Revolutionary in Poetic Language. Trans. Margaret Waller. Columbia University Press, 1984. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kulman, Linda, Jay Tolson, and Katy Kelly. “Jesus in America: Behind the Wild Success of a Theological Thriller Lies a Centuries-old Urge to Rapture the Original Jesus.” US. News & World Report 135 (2003). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lacy, Norris J. “The Da Vinci Code: Dan Brown and the Grail that Never was.” Arthuriana 14 (2004): 81-93. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Linhart, Robert. The Assembly Line. Trans. Margaret Crosland, London: John Calder, 1981. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Macherey, Pierre. “A Theory of Literary Production.” Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed., Bob Ashley, Leicester University Press: London and Washington, 1997. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Makinen, Merja. Feminist Popular Fiction. New York: Palgrave, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCormick, Patrick “Painted out the Picture: Part of the Best-selling Appeal of The | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Da Vinci Code is a Conspiracy that Has Kept Women from Taking Their Rightful Place in the Church.” U.S. the Catholic 68(2003): 36-39. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender, and the Self. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McGuigan, J. Cultural Populism. London: Routledge, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McHale, Brain. Postmodernist Fiction. New York: Methuen, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Moretti, Franco. “Clues.” Signs Taken for Wonders: Essay in the Sociology if Literary Forms. Trans., Susan Fischer, David Forgacs, David Miller.Verso, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nealon, Jeffery T. “Work of the Detective, Work of the Writer.” Detecting Texts. Ed., Patricia Mervale, Susan Elizabeth. PENN, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Newman, Sharan. The Real History Behind The Da Vinci Code. Berkley Books, 2005. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Grady, Kathleen. “An Interview with Kristeva.” Parallax 8 (1998):5-16. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oliver, Kelly. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-bind. Indiana University, 1993. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parry, Alan. “Deconstruction and Theory Revisited: Including the Excluded.” Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 20-24 August 1999. 1-51. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pederson-Krag, Geralding “Detective Stories and the Primal Scene.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 13 (1949):203-14. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Putnam, Bill, and John Edwin Wood. “Unravelling The Da Vinci Code: Bill Putman and John Edwin Wood Peel Away the Evidence to Find an Extraordinary Hoax at the Heart of Dan Brown’s Best Selling Novel.” History Today 55 (2005):18-20. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rolvsjord, Randi. “Music as a Poetic Language.” Online. Internet. 11 May. 2006. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy Retrieved. May 14, 2006. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | <http://www.voices.no/mainissues/mi40004000138.html> | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sauer, Geoffrey. “Review of Foucault’s Pendulum.” Online. Internet. 12 Feb. 1990. The Modern World. Nov 20, 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | <http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_humanitas90.html> | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schor, N. “Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault, and Social difference.” Men in Feminism. Ed., A. Jardine and Paul Smith, New York : Routledge, 1989. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Seltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell Up, 1984. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sheridan, Alan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. Tavistock, 1980. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smart, Barry. Michel Foucault. Tavistock, 1985. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, Philip. Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spanos, William V. Repetitions: The Postmodernism Occasion in Literature and Culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1987. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Swope, Richard. “Approaching the Threshold(s) in Postmodernism Detective fiction : Hawthrone’s ‘Wakefild’ and Other Missing Persons.” Critique 39 (1998): 207-228. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wiliams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | William, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1976. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wilson, Robert Anton. “Mary Mary, Quite Contrary.” Online. Internet. 16 Sep. 2004. Conspiracy Coincidence & Code. <http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:z6fTFkGUdM4J:maybelogic.org/coincidancecode/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D2+Roberto+Anton+Wilson,+The+Widow%27s+Son,+Magdalene&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24> | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | - - -. The Widow’s Son. New Falcon Publications, 2004. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wilson-Smith, Anthony, “God and those Details.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 4. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zizek, Slavoj. “Two Ways to Avoid the Real of Desire.” Looking Away: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Trough Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. | zh_TW |
