dc.contributor.advisor | 尤雪瑛 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yu,Hsueh-ying | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (作者) | 陳良鳳 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (作者) | Chen,Liang-feng | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 陳良鳳 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Chen,Liang-feng | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2003 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 17-九月-2009 16:24:10 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 17-九月-2009 16:24:10 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-九月-2009 16:24:10 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0090555012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33368 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 90555012 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 92 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究主要探討在英文敘述文和論說文文本中,英文限定關係子句的篇章功能(discourse functions)。我們主要是從句法、語意、語用和篇章結構(discourse structure)的觀點,來探討限定性關係子句的功能與它在篇章單位(discourse unit)所出現的位置有何關聯。研究結果顯示多數的限定性關係子句出現在篇章單位最前面的位置,而且他們往往引導他們新的先行詞(new head NPs)作為整個篇章單位的主題(topic)。因此我們認為,大多數限定性關係子句會出現在篇章單位最前面的位置,是因為它們有一個很重要的篇章功能,那就是它們要引介新的先行詞作為整個篇章單位的主題。此外,本論文也探討大學英文系學生在他們的英文寫作中,使用限定性關係子句的情形。研究結果發現,在大學生的寫作中,限定性關係子句的先行詞常是泛指,而且限定性關係子句的內容常常是舊有的訊息。因此,台灣大學生鮮少使用限定性關係子句來引導新的先行詞作為篇章單位的主題。我們推論大部份學生並未習得限定性關係子句的篇章功能。本論文根據此研究結果提出一些在英語教學上的建議:在課堂上教導英文限定性關係子句時,應以篇章單位為主,使學生了解限定性關係子句的篇章功能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The findings of the previous studies on discourse functions of English restrictive relative clauses are mainly based on spontaneous conversations and written narrations. Rare studies were found on the discourse functions of English restrictive relative clauses in written data. The purpose of the present study, thus, is to investigate the discourse functions of English restrictive relative clauses in written expositions and argumentations by native speakers of English. Also, we study the use of English restrictive relative clauses in the compositions by Taiwanese college students. In particular, we want to know how the discourse functions of English restrictive relative clauses are related to their occurrences in discourse structures. Thus, our analysis includes considerations from four dimensions: syntax, semantics, pragmatics and discourse. We found that the majority of English restrictive relative clauses occur in the beginning position of discourse units. And they serve as a device to introduce their new head NPs as the topics in the subsequent discourse when occurring in such a position. Therefore, we conclude that the main purpose of using a restrictive relative clause is to introduce a new head NP as the topic when the new referent is firstly mentioned in a new discourse unit. Moreover, we examined English restrictive relative clauses in the compositions by English Department juniors to see if the factors found in native speakers’ writings are also at work in their compositions. We found that students have not fully understood the discourse functions of English restrictive relative clauses. Based on our findings, we offer pedagogical implications with the aim of hoping that students can learn the discourse functions of English restrictive relative clauses. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements………………………………………..…………………………ivTable of Contents..................................………………………………………………..vList of Tables……………...…………………..……………………………………..viiChinese Abstract……………………………...…………………………………...…viiiEnglish Abstract……..………………………….......…………………………………ixChapter1. Introduction………………………..………………………………………...…11.1 Motivation………………………………………………………………….11.2 Purpose of the Present Study……….………………………………….......41.3 Organization of the Thesis…………………………………………………52. Literature Review…………………………………………………………..….72.1 Grounding and Restrictive Relative Clauses………………………………72.2 Information Status of NPs…………………………………………...……122.3 Syntactic-Semantic Aspects of Restrictive Relative Clauses………….…172.4 Discourse Structures…………………………………………....…….......202.5 Summary and Conclusion……………………………………………...…263. Analysis of Native English Speakers’ Data………….…………………….…303.1 The Occurrences of RRCs in Discourse……………………………….…313.2 S-relatives in Native Speakers’ Writings………………...……….………333.3 A-relatives in Native Speakers’ Writings……...………………….………413.4 O-relatives in Native Speakers’ Writings…………...…………………….513.5 Discourse Functions of RRCs in the Middle and Final Positions of Discourse Units………………………………………………...................533.6 Summary………………………………………………………………….554. Analysis of Chinese College Students’ Compositions…………………..……584.1 The Occurrences of RRCs in Discourse…………………………….……584.2 S-relatives in Students’ Writings………………………………….………604.3 A-relatives in Students’ Writings…………………………………………634.4 O-relatives in Students’ Writings…………………………………………654.5 Comparison between RRC uses of Native English Speakers and Chinese Learners………………..............................................................................695. Conclusion and Pedagogical Implications…………………………….……..735.1 Summary…………………………………………………….............……735.2 Pedagogical Implications for Teaching English RRCs……………..…….75 5.2.1 Discourse Perspectives for Teaching English RRCs………….…....76 5.2.2 A Demonstration of Teaching English RRCs…………………...…78 5.3 Limitations………………………………………………………………83Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….……85 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 56585 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 71518 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 27032 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 32355 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 85488 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 125181 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 72087 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 47574 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 54654 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 62480 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090555012 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 英文限定性關係子句 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 篇章功能 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 英語教學 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | English restrictive relative clauses | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | discourse functions | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | pedagogical implications | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 英文限定性關係子句的篇章功能及其在英語教學上的啟示 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | Discourse Functions of English Restrictive Relative Clauses and Its Pedagogical Implications | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, M. 1999. Keys to Successful Writing. New York: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Beaman, K. 1984. Coordination and subordination revisited: syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse, In Deborah, Tennen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 45-80). Norwood, NJ: ABLEX Publishing. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernardo, R. 1979. The function and content of relative clauses in spontaneous oral narratives. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 5: 539-51. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Biber, D., Susan, Conrad and Randi, Reppen. 2000. Corpus linguistics: investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, G. and George, Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushell, B. and Brenda Dyer. 2003. Global outlook: High intermediate reading. New York: the McGraw-Hill Companies. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushell, B. and Brenda Dyer. 2003. Global outlook: Advanced reading. New York: the McGraw-Hill Companies. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chafe, W. L. 1974. Language and Consciousness. Language, 50: 111-33. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1976. Givenness, contrasiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (Ed.), Subject and Topic (pp. 25-55). New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1987. Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow. In Tomlin, Russell S. (Ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse (pp. 21-51). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4): 805-55. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fox, B. 1987. The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Language, 63(4): 856-70 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fox, B. and S. A. Thompson. 1990. A discourse analysis of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66(2): 297-316. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Firbas Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Givon, T. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1984. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, vol.1. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1993. English Grammar. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1997. Coherence in Text vs. Coherence in Mind. In M. A. Gernsbacher & T. Givon. (Eds.), Coherence in spontaneous text (pp.59-115). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Halliday, M.A.K. 1967. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3: 199-244. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1974. The place of “functional sentence perspective” in the system of linguistic description. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective (pp. 43-57). The Hague: Mouton. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1981. Options and Functions in the English Clause. In M.A.K Halliday & J. R. Martin (Ed.), Readings in Systemic Linguistics (pp. 138-45). London: Batford Academic and Educational. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hann, Pieter De. 1987. Relative clauses in indefinite noun phrases. English Studies, 2: 171-89. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hawkin, J. A. 1991. On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Linguistics, 27: 405-42. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoey, M. P. 1983. On the surface of discourse. London: Allen and Unwin. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoey, M. P., and E. O. Winter. 1986. Clause Relations and the Writer’s Communicative Task. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional Approaches to Writing Research Perspective. London: Frances Pinter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keenan, E. L. and B. Comrie. 1977. Noun accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1): 63-99. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kirn, Elaine and Pamela Hartmann. 1990. Interaction II: A Reading Skills Book. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Krahnke, K. 1998. Reading together: A reading/activities text. Cambridge: University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kuno, S. 1972. Functional Sentence Perspective: A Case Study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry, 3: 269-320. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1977. Generative Discourse Analysis in America. In W. U. Dressler (Ed.), Current Trends in Textlinguistics (pp. 275-294). New York: Walter de Gruyter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1980. Functional Syntax. In E. A. Moravcsik & J. R. Wirth (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 13: Current Approaches to Syntax (pp. 117-35). New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Liu Chen, Pi-fen. 1985. Determiners and Relative Clauses in English. MA. thesis, Michigan State University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCarthy, M. and Ronald Carter. 1994. Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Teaching. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCarthy, M. 2001. Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nuamthanom, L. 2003. A study of discourse functions of relative clauses from a functional sentence perspective framework. Ph. D. dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prince, E. F. 1979. On the Given/New Distinction. In W. Hanks, C. Hofbauer & P. Clyne (Eds.), Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago (pp. 267-78). | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | -----. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 223-55). New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schachter, P. 1971. Focus and relativization. Language, 47: 19-46. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stockwell, Robert P., Paul Schacter and Barbara Hall Partee. 1973. The Major Syntactic Structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tabakowska, E. 1980. Existential presupposition and the choice of head noun determiner in English restrictive relative clauses. In Johan Van Auwera (Ed.), The Semantics of Determiners (pp.189-210). London : Croom Helm. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Quirk, R. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vande Kopple, W. J. 1986. Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In C. R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (Ed.), Studying writing: linguistic approaches (pp. 72-111). Baverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wegmann Brenda and Miki Prijic Knezevic. 1990. Mosaic I: A Reading Skills Book. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wegmann Brenda, Miki Prijic Knezevic and Marilyn Bernstein. 1990. Mosaic II: A Reading Skills Book. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳純音 1998. 遠東新英文法:溝通式的文法教學 台北:遠東圖書公司 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蘇玉如、應惠蕙 1999. 英文文法 台北:三民書局 | zh_TW |