1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 以詞彙功能語法分析中文的「移位矛盾」
Movement Paradoxes in Mandarin Chinese: A Lexical-Functional Approach
作者 顏婉玲
Yen，Wan ling
貢獻者 何萬順
Her,One soon
顏婉玲
Yen，Wan ling
關鍵詞 移位矛盾
詞彙功能語法
主題化
階層
Movement paradoxes
LFG
Topicalization
Hierarchy
日期 2007
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 16:24:35 (UTC+8)
摘要 本論文以「詞彙功能語法」來分析中文「移位矛盾」之現象，以Bresnan (2001)針對英文movement paradoxes以及Huang (1989)，Her (1999)針對中文「移位矛盾」之研究為基礎，探討當述語所要求的典型的「名詞組賓語」被禁止出現時，將藉由體現為主題來滿足述語對賓語的要求，但並不是所有詞類的賓語都可以體現為滿足述語要求的主題。因此，本論文將中文中帶有移位矛盾現象的述語分為三大類，蒐集並分析這三大類述語在語料庫中的語料，將得以呈現只有名詞組、動詞組、句子以及帶有引介主題標記的介系詞組可以體現為主題。本論文更進一步為可以體現為主題的詞組建立一個階層，在此階層中位階最高的是名詞組，代表著名詞組在體現為帶有移位矛盾現象的述語之主題時，所受到的限制最小。除此之外，這個階層帶有遞移性，任一詞組若是可以體現為主題，則在階層中位階比該詞組高的詞組，也都可以體現為該述語的主題，反之則不一定成立。
Based on Bresnan’s (2001) study of movement paradoxes in English and Huang’s (1989) and Her’s (1999) studies of movement paradoxes in Mandarin Chinese, this study discusses that when the prototypical NP object required by the predicate is forbidden to map to the OBJ function in the f-structure, this required NP argument must be realized as TOP identified with the missing OBJ to satisfy the Completeness and Coherence Conditions. However, not all category types of phrases can be realized as TOPs. Thus, this study classes the Mandarin Chinese predicates with movement paradoxes into three types; collect and analyze the data in the corpus. The analysis presents that only NP, VP, CP, and PP with topic-introducing marker can be realized as TOPs identified with the missing OBJ.
Moreover, this study forms a hierarchy. The NP’s highest status in this hierarchy represents that it is the least restricted category type in being able to be realized as TOP of predicates with movement paradoxes. In addition, if one category type can be realized as TOP of one predicate, other category types with a higher priority can be realized as TOP of that predicate as well, but not vice versa.
參考文獻 Ackerman, F., Moore, J. 2001. A Theory of Argument Structure. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Alsina, A. 1992. On the Argument Structure of Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517-555.
Alsina, A. 1996. The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Alsina, A. and S. A. Mchombo. 1993. Object Asymmetries and the Chichewa Applicative Construction. In Sam A. Mchombo (eds.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, 17-45. Standard, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bresnan, J. and L. Moshi. 1990. Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147-185.
Bresnan, J. and A. Zaenen. 1990. Deep Unaccusativity in LFG. In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell, and Errapel Mejias-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective, 45-57. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
Bresnan, J. 1980. Polyadicity: Part I of a Theory of Lexical Rules and Representations. In T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst, and M. Moortgat (eds.), Lexical Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bresnan, J.W. 1982. The Passive in Lexical Theory. In Joan W. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
Bresnan, J. W. 1989. The Syntactic Projection Problem and the Comparative Syntax of Locative Inversion. Journal of Information Science and Engineering (5): 287-303.
Bresnan, J. W. 1991. Locative Case vs. Locative Gender. In the Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Bresnan, J. 1998b. Lexical-Functional Syntax. In J. Bresnan and L. Sadler (eds.), Modelling Dynamic Interactions between Morphology and Syntax. Reader of the 10th Euopean Summer School in Logic. Language and Information. Saarbrücken.
Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bresnan, J. and J. M. Kanerva. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1-50.
Bresnan, J. and J.M. Kanerva. 1992. ‘Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study in Factorization in Grammar’. In Stowell, T. and E. Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon. Academic Press
Breul, C. 2001. Movement Paradoxes. Linguist List 12.2826.
Butt, M., M. Dalrymple, A. Frank 1997. An Architecture for Linking Theory in LFG, in: M. Butt and T.H. King (eds): Proceedings of the LFG`97 conference, University of California, San Diego, CSLI Online Publications, http://www csli.stanford.edu/publications/.
Chao, Y. R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structure. Mouton: The Hague.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspect of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1977. ‘On Wh-movement’. In Peter Culicover, Ted Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 71-132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. 1993. ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cormack, A., and N. Smith, 1997. Checking features and split signs. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 223-252.
Dixon, R.M.W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? Mouton Publishers, Berlin.
Falk, Y. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Foley, W. A. and R. D. Van Valin. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, D. 2002. Antecedent Deletion and The Copy Theory of Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1): 63-96.
Gazdar, G., G. K. Pullum, and I. A. Sag, 1982. Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar. Language (58): 591-638.
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. E. 2004. But Do We Need Universal Grammar? A Comment on Lidz et al. 2003, Cognition
Goldberg, A. E. 2004. Argument Realization: The Role of Constructions, Lexical Semantics and Discourse Factors. In Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, 17-43. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Her, One-Soon. 1991. Topic as a Grammatical Function in Chinese. Lingua 84: 1-23.
Her, One-Soon. 1998. Lexical Mapping in Chinese Inversion Constructions. LFG98: International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference. Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia.
Her, One-Soon, 1999. Interaction of Thematic Structure and Syntactic Structures: On Mandarin Dative Alternations. Chinese Languages and Linguistics: V, Interaction (中國境內語言暨語言學 第五輯: 語言中的互動), 373-412, Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica
Her, One-Soon. 2003. Chinese Inversion Constructions Within a Simplified LMT. In Adams Bodomo and Kang Kwong Luke (eds.), Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Lexical-Functional Grammar Analysis of Chinese, 1-31.
Her, One-Soon, 2004. Argument-Function Linking in Resultatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30 (2): 1-34.
Her, One-Soon, 2006. Linking Agentive Objects in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, July 7-9, 2006, Queensland University.
Her, One-Soon, 2007a. Linking Agentive Objects in Mandarin Chinese. In Mary Laughren and Ilana Mushin (eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society.
Her, One-Soon. 2007b. Argument-Function Mismatches in Mandarin Chinese: A Lexical Mapping Account. Lingua, 117 (1): 221-246.
Huang, Chu-Ren. 1989. Subcategorized Topics in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 1989 CLTA Annual Meeting, November 17-19, Boston, MA.
Huang, Chu-Ren. 1993. Reverse Long-distance Dependency and Functional Uncertainty: The Interpretation of Mandarin Questions. In Chungmin Lee and Boem-mo Kang (eds.), Language, Information, and Computing, 111-120. Seoul, Thaehaksa.
Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jacobson, P. 1992. Raising Without Movement. In Richard K. Larson, et al. (eds.), Control and Grammar, 149-194. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kanerva, J. M. 1989. Focus and phrasing in Chichewa phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Kaplan, R. M. and J. Bresnan. 1982. Lexical Functional Grammar: a Formal System for Grammmatical Representation. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 173-281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kim, J. and I. Sag. 1996. French and English negation: A Lexicalist Alternative to Head Movement. Paper presented at the 1996 Bangor Workshop on Syntactic Categories.
Kiparsky, P. 1987. Morphology and Grammatical Relations, ms., Stanford University.
Krifka, M., F.J. Pelletier, G.N. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Link, and G. Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An Introduction. In G.N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, 1-124. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Langendoen, D. T. 1970. Essentials of English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Levin, B. 1987. The Middle Construction and Ergativity. Lingua 71, 17-31.
Li, N. and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Manzini, M. R. and A. Rossou. 2000. A Minimalist Theory of A-Movement and Control. Lingua 110: 409-447.
Nunberg, D. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistic Club.
Ostler, N. 1979. Case Linking: A Theory of Case and Verb Diathesis Applied to Classical Sanskrit. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Rosch, E., C. Mervis, W. Carey, D. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic Objects in Natural Categories, Cognitive Psychology (8): 382-439.
Schneider-Zioga, P. 1996. An Argument in Favor of Agreement Phrase. In Virginia Montapayne and Anthony D. Green (eds.), Proceeding from the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Cornell University
Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76, 2:383 – 408.
Su, I-Wen. 2002. Why a Construction—That is the Question! Concentric: Studies in
English Literature and Linguistics 28(2): 27-42.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1987. A Topic-Comment Approach to the Ba Construction. JCL 15.1:1-54.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1990. Sentence and clause structures in Chinese: a functional perspective. Student Book, Co., Taipei.
Williams, E. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Zhang, N. 2001. Move is Remerge. ZAS-Berlin GLOW in Asia 2002.
Zhang, N. 2004. Move is Remerge. Language and Linguistics 5 (1):189-209.
張群. 2007. 華語反覆性事件格式“V+來+V+去”的探索：從格式語法的角度談起／The Iterative Event Construction “V-Lai-V-Qu” in Chinese: A Constructional Approach. 華語文教學期刊第四卷第一期，頁31-53。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
93555001
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093555001
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 何萬順zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Her,One soonen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 顏婉玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yen，Wan lingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 顏婉玲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yen，Wan lingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 16:24:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 16:24:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 16:24:35 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093555001en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33371-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 語言學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93555001zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文以「詞彙功能語法」來分析中文「移位矛盾」之現象，以Bresnan (2001)針對英文movement paradoxes以及Huang (1989)，Her (1999)針對中文「移位矛盾」之研究為基礎，探討當述語所要求的典型的「名詞組賓語」被禁止出現時，將藉由體現為主題來滿足述語對賓語的要求，但並不是所有詞類的賓語都可以體現為滿足述語要求的主題。因此，本論文將中文中帶有移位矛盾現象的述語分為三大類，蒐集並分析這三大類述語在語料庫中的語料，將得以呈現只有名詞組、動詞組、句子以及帶有引介主題標記的介系詞組可以體現為主題。本論文更進一步為可以體現為主題的詞組建立一個階層，在此階層中位階最高的是名詞組，代表著名詞組在體現為帶有移位矛盾現象的述語之主題時，所受到的限制最小。除此之外，這個階層帶有遞移性，任一詞組若是可以體現為主題，則在階層中位階比該詞組高的詞組，也都可以體現為該述語的主題，反之則不一定成立。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Based on Bresnan’s (2001) study of movement paradoxes in English and Huang’s (1989) and Her’s (1999) studies of movement paradoxes in Mandarin Chinese, this study discusses that when the prototypical NP object required by the predicate is forbidden to map to the OBJ function in the f-structure, this required NP argument must be realized as TOP identified with the missing OBJ to satisfy the Completeness and Coherence Conditions. However, not all category types of phrases can be realized as TOPs. Thus, this study classes the Mandarin Chinese predicates with movement paradoxes into three types; collect and analyze the data in the corpus. The analysis presents that only NP, VP, CP, and PP with topic-introducing marker can be realized as TOPs identified with the missing OBJ.
Moreover, this study forms a hierarchy. The NP’s highest status in this hierarchy represents that it is the least restricted category type in being able to be realized as TOP of predicates with movement paradoxes. In addition, if one category type can be realized as TOP of one predicate, other category types with a higher priority can be realized as TOP of that predicate as well, but not vice versa.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgements.......................................iv
Table of Contents.......................................v
Chinese Abstract........................................vii
English Abstract........................................viii
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION.........................................1
1.1 Transformational grammar............................2
1.2 Projection Principle................................5
1.3 Movement paradoxes in English.......................8
1.4 Movement paradoxes in Mandarin Chinese.............13
1.5 Aims of the thesis.................................16
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS..............................18
2.1 LFG................................................18
2.1.1 C-Structure......................................19
2.1.2 F-Structure......................................19
2.2 Lexical Mapping Theory (LMT).......................21
2.2.1 The theory of a-structure........................21
2.2.2 Mapping a-structure to syntactic functions.......24
2.3 Summary............................................26
3. LITERATURE REVIEW...................................28
3.1 Zhang (2001, 2004).................................32
3.2 Bresnan (2001).....................................33
3.3 Huang (1989); Her (1999)...........................38
3.4 Summary............................................43
4. DATABASE AND INITIAL OBSERVATIONS...................44
4.1 The database.......................................44
4.1.1 Initial observations of the category types that could be realized as TOP.....................................45
4.2 Summary............................................48
5. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION.............................49
5.1 The first two types of predicates with movement paradoxes..............................................49
5.2 The third type of predicates with movement paradoxes: VLVQ construction......................................66
5.3 Semantic restrictions for NPs as TOP...............72
5.4 PP with TOP-introducing marker.....................77
5.5 Summary............................................80
6. CONCLUSION..........................................82
6.1 Summary............................................82
6.2 Further research...................................84
REFERENCES.............................................86		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 48418 bytes-
dc.format.extent 10921 bytes-
dc.format.extent 10784 bytes-
dc.format.extent 82133 bytes-
dc.format.extent 22879 bytes-
dc.format.extent 63518 bytes-
dc.format.extent 19632 bytes-
dc.format.extent 75793 bytes-
dc.format.extent 61740 bytes-
dc.format.extent 84048 bytes-
dc.format.extent 52689 bytes-
dc.format.extent 149967 bytes-
dc.format.extent 30513 bytes-
dc.format.extent 52761 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093555001en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 移位矛盾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 詞彙功能語法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主題化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 階層zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Movement paradoxesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) LFGen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Topicalizationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hierarchyen_US
dc.title (題名) 以詞彙功能語法分析中文的「移位矛盾」zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Movement Paradoxes in Mandarin Chinese: A Lexical-Functional Approachen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ackerman, F., Moore, J. 2001. A Theory of Argument Structure. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alsina, A. 1992. On the Argument Structure of Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517-555.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alsina, A. 1996. The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alsina, A. and S. A. Mchombo. 1993. Object Asymmetries and the Chichewa Applicative Construction. In Sam A. Mchombo (eds.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar, 17-45. Standard, Calif.: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. and L. Moshi. 1990. Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. and A. Zaenen. 1990. Deep Unaccusativity in LFG. In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell, and Errapel Mejias-Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective, 45-57. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. 1980. Polyadicity: Part I of a Theory of Lexical Rules and Representations. In T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst, and M. Moortgat (eds.), Lexical Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J.W. 1982. The Passive in Lexical Theory. In Joan W. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. W. 1989. The Syntactic Projection Problem and the Comparative Syntax of Locative Inversion. Journal of Information Science and Engineering (5): 287-303.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. W. 1991. Locative Case vs. Locative Gender. In the Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. 1998b. Lexical-Functional Syntax. In J. Bresnan and L. Sadler (eds.), Modelling Dynamic Interactions between Morphology and Syntax. Reader of the 10th Euopean Summer School in Logic. Language and Information. Saarbrücken.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. and J. M. Kanerva. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresnan, J. and J.M. Kanerva. 1992. ‘Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study in Factorization in Grammar’. In Stowell, T. and E. Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon. Academic Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Breul, C. 2001. Movement Paradoxes. Linguist List 12.2826.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butt, M., M. Dalrymple, A. Frank 1997. An Architecture for Linking Theory in LFG, in: M. Butt and T.H. King (eds): Proceedings of the LFG`97 conference, University of California, San Diego, CSLI Online Publications, http://www csli.stanford.edu/publications/.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chao, Y. R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structure. Mouton: The Hague.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspect of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chomsky, N. 1977. ‘On Wh-movement’. In Peter Culicover, Ted Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 71-132. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chomsky, N. 1993. ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cormack, A., and N. Smith, 1997. Checking features and split signs. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 223-252.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dixon, R.M.W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? Mouton Publishers, Berlin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Falk, Y. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Parallel Constraint-Based Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foley, W. A. and R. D. Van Valin. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fox, D. 2002. Antecedent Deletion and The Copy Theory of Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1): 63-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gazdar, G., G. K. Pullum, and I. A. Sag, 1982. Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restrictive Theory of Grammar. Language (58): 591-638.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldberg, A. E. 2004. But Do We Need Universal Grammar? A Comment on Lidz et al. 2003, Cognitionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldberg, A. E. 2004. Argument Realization: The Role of Constructions, Lexical Semantics and Discourse Factors. In Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions, 17-43. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon. 1991. Topic as a Grammatical Function in Chinese. Lingua 84: 1-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon. 1998. Lexical Mapping in Chinese Inversion Constructions. LFG98: International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference. Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon, 1999. Interaction of Thematic Structure and Syntactic Structures: On Mandarin Dative Alternations. Chinese Languages and Linguistics: V, Interaction (中國境內語言暨語言學 第五輯: 語言中的互動), 373-412, Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinicazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon. 2003. Chinese Inversion Constructions Within a Simplified LMT. In Adams Bodomo and Kang Kwong Luke (eds.), Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Lexical-Functional Grammar Analysis of Chinese, 1-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon, 2004. Argument-Function Linking in Resultatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30 (2): 1-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon, 2006. Linking Agentive Objects in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, July 7-9, 2006, Queensland University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon, 2007a. Linking Agentive Objects in Mandarin Chinese. In Mary Laughren and Ilana Mushin (eds.), Selected Papers from the 2006 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Her, One-Soon. 2007b. Argument-Function Mismatches in Mandarin Chinese: A Lexical Mapping Account. Lingua, 117 (1): 221-246.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huang, Chu-Ren. 1989. Subcategorized Topics in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 1989 CLTA Annual Meeting, November 17-19, Boston, MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huang, Chu-Ren. 1993. Reverse Long-distance Dependency and Functional Uncertainty: The Interpretation of Mandarin Questions. In Chungmin Lee and Boem-mo Kang (eds.), Language, Information, and Computing, 111-120. Seoul, Thaehaksa.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacobson, P. 1992. Raising Without Movement. In Richard K. Larson, et al. (eds.), Control and Grammar, 149-194. Dordrecht: Kluwer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kanerva, J. M. 1989. Focus and phrasing in Chichewa phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaplan, R. M. and J. Bresnan. 1982. Lexical Functional Grammar: a Formal System for Grammmatical Representation. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 173-281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kim, J. and I. Sag. 1996. French and English negation: A Lexicalist Alternative to Head Movement. Paper presented at the 1996 Bangor Workshop on Syntactic Categories.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kiparsky, P. 1987. Morphology and Grammatical Relations, ms., Stanford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krifka, M., F.J. Pelletier, G.N. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Link, and G. Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An Introduction. In G.N. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, 1-124. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Langendoen, D. T. 1970. Essentials of English Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levin, B. 1987. The Middle Construction and Ergativity. Lingua 71, 17-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Li, N. and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manzini, M. R. and A. Rossou. 2000. A Minimalist Theory of A-Movement and Control. Lingua 110: 409-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nunberg, D. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistic Club.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ostler, N. 1979. Case Linking: A Theory of Case and Verb Diathesis Applied to Classical Sanskrit. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosch, E., C. Mervis, W. Carey, D. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem. 1976. Basic Objects in Natural Categories, Cognitive Psychology (8): 382-439.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schneider-Zioga, P. 1996. An Argument in Favor of Agreement Phrase. In Virginia Montapayne and Anthony D. Green (eds.), Proceeding from the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Cornell Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language 76, 2:383 – 408.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Su, I-Wen. 2002. Why a Construction—That is the Question! Concentric: Studies inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) English Literature and Linguistics 28(2): 27-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsao, Feng-fu. 1987. A Topic-Comment Approach to the Ba Construction. JCL 15.1:1-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsao, Feng-fu. 1990. Sentence and clause structures in Chinese: a functional perspective. Student Book, Co., Taipei.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williams, E. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zhang, N. 2001. Move is Remerge. ZAS-Berlin GLOW in Asia 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zhang, N. 2004. Move is Remerge. Language and Linguistics 5 (1):189-209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張群. 2007. 華語反覆性事件格式“V+來+V+去”的探索：從格式語法的角度談起／The Iterative Event Construction “V-Lai-V-Qu” in Chinese: A Constructional Approach. 華語文教學期刊第四卷第一期，頁31-53。zh_TW