| dc.contributor.advisor | 賴惠玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 葉秋杏 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 葉秋杏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:26:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:26:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:26:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0094555013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33382 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94555013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文「客語「打」字構式群：論元體現與及物性之檢測」旨在運用Kay (1995) 以及Goldberg (1995) 等學者所提出的構式語法觀點，對於客語中典型及物動詞「打」字極具廣泛的語意表徵、論元體現、以及其結構上之及物性程度與力道轉移現象進行檢視及探究。先前文獻普遍認為在動詞結構中，動詞是唯一可決定論元體現成分之主要角色。然而，藉由相關語言事實可以發現，除了仰賴動詞外，論元體現也必須靠結構來決定。這些由形式及語意組合而成的結構，亦各自帶有具區辨性之功能。後則採用Voorst (1996) 所提出的四種程度差異之及物性表徵，更進一步地對於詞組結構、句型結構、以及在言談中之句型變化進行討論。藉由檢視句法語意介面之結構類型，本研究將依據構式框架對於客語中「打」字結構群以及動詞「打」字在結構中的論元體現與及物性特徵提出完整縝密之分析。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In order to explore the comprehensive semantic representation of the prototypical transitive verb da2 (打) ‘hit’ in Hakka, this study, adopting the framework of Construction Grammar proposed by Kay (1995) and Goldberg (1995), examines the diversification of the structural types in Hakka da2 constructions. In addition, the facets of argument realization and transitivity which involves energy transfer and degrees of affectedness are probed into. In the previous literature, it is hypothesized that a verb is the center responsible for the argument realization of the verbal construction. The relevant facts, however, suggest that the argument structure integrates both the verb and the construction. Constructions — pairings of form and meaning — also carry their distinct functions. For a thorough consideration, the increasing level of closeness and intensity of transitivity offered by Voorst (1996) are applied to tackle not only phrasal but also sentential structures and the structural variations in discourse. In adopting these theories to examine the interaction of syntax and semantics, this paper draws on the constructional framework and attempts to capture both general and idiosyncratic properties with a fine-grained analysis for the family of da2 ‘hit’ constructions in Hakka. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements......................................................................................................ivFigures and Tables....................................................................................................viiiChinese Abstract..........................................................................................................ixEnglish Abstract...........................................................................................................xCHAPTERⅠ. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................11.1 Motivation and Purpose.........................................................................11.2 Conventions of the Data.........................................................................71.3 Organization of the Thesis.....................................................................7Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW...........................................................................92.1 The Hitting Verb da2 ‘hit’ Constructions among Various Languages..102.1.1 Lien (1998) .................................................................................102.1.2 Huang (2001)...............................................................................162.1.3 Hsu (2007)...................................................................................202.1.4 Chiu (2007).................................................................................222.2 Relevant Constructions........................................................................232.2.1 Causative Constructions..............................................................232.2.2 Inchoative Constructions.............................................................262.2.3 Unaccusative Constructions........................................................292.3 Remarks................................................................................................32Ⅲ. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS........................................................353.1 Construction Grammar.........................................................................353.2 Argument Realization...........................................................................383.3 Transitivity…………...........................................................................403.4 Remarks................................................................................................49Ⅳ. ANALYSIS.................................................................................................514.1 Phrasal Structures of da2 Constructions..............................................524.1.1 The [VN] Constructions..............................................................544.1.1.1 Noun Profiling a Patient.................................................554.1.1.2 Noun Profiling a Theme.................................................594.1.1.3 Noun Profiling a Result/Product....................................604.1.1.4 Noun Profiling a Location/Order...................................634.1.1.5 Noun Profiling a Manner................................................644.1.1.6 Noun Profiling an Instrument.........................................654.1.2 The [VC] Constructions..............................................................674.1.2.1 Complement Profiling a Result......................................674.1.2.2 Complement Profiling a Manner....................................704.1.2.3 Complement Profiling a Path.........................................734.1.3 The [VAV] Constructions............................................................734.1.4 The Classification of the Polysemous da2..................................784.2 Sentential Structures of da2 Constructions..........................................834.2.1 Causative Constructions..............................................................854.2.1.1 Causative Constructions with Causative Markers..........864.2.1.2 Causative Constructions without Causative Markers.....984.2.2 Inchoative Constructions.................................................1024.2.3 Unaccusative Constructions............................................1064.3 Structural Variations in Discourse Use...............................................1084.4 Summary.............................................................................................113Ⅴ. CONCLUDING REMARKS.................................................................1145.1 Summary............................................................................................1155.2 Issues for future research....................................................................117REFERENCES.................................................................................................119 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 67925 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 114700 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 78416 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 94508 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 79107 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 143687 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 98924 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 421506 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 54299 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 65081 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094555013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 構式語法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論元體現 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 及物性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 客語「打」字構式群：論元體現與及物性之檢測 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | A Family of da2 `hit` Constructions in Hakka: An Inspection of Argument Realization and Transitivity | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ahrens, Kathleen, Chu-ren Huang, and Yuan-hsun Chuang. 2003. Sense and Meaning Facets in Verbal Semantics: A MARVS Perspective. Language and Linguistics 4.3: 469-484. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alberti, Gábor. 1997. Argument Selection. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Boas, Hans Christian. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan. 1996. Lexicality and Argument Structure. Paper presented at Collogue de Syntax et Semantique Paris, October 12-14, 1995. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, Li-li. 2006. The Semantic Development from Causatives to Passives in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 7.1: 139-174. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chiang, Chien-lung. 2006. Causative and Inchoative Alternation in Taiwanese Southern Min: In Comparison with Mandarin and English. MA thesis, National Tsinghua University, Hsinchu. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chiang, Min-hua. 2006. Grammatical characteristics of tung and bun in Dongshi Hakka and the relatedness of the two markers. Language and Linguistics 7.2: 339-364. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chiang, Shu-mei. 2003. Force-Dynamic manifestation of Verbs of Hitting, Refraining, and Urging in Hakka. MA thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chiu, Hsiang-yun. 2007. The Progress of Grammaticalization of ‘ta’ in Hakka. Paper presented at 2007 National Conference on Linguistics, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, June 2-3. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chui, Kawai, Huei-ling Lai, and Hui-chen Chan. 2008. The NCCU Corpus of Spoken Chinese: Mandarin, Hakka, and Southern Min. http://140.119.174.187/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chung, Raung-fu. 2001a. Fuermosha de laoyin—Taiwan kejiahua daolun (shang ce) [Formosan Records: An Introduction to Hakka in Taiwan, vol.1]. Taipei: Council of Cultural Affairs, Executive Yuan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chung, Raung-fu. 2001b. Fuermosha de laoyin—Taiwan kejiahua daolun (xia ce) [Formosan Records: An Introduction to Hakka in Taiwan, vol.2]. Taipei: Council of Cultural Affairs, Executive Yuan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Croft, William, and David Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection. Language 67.3: 547-619. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fillmore, Charles. 1968a. The case for case. Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by E. Bach and R. T. Harms, 1-88. New York: Holt, Inehart, and Winston. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fillmore, Charles. 1968b. Lexical entries for verbs. Foundations of Language 4: 373-393. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fillmore, Charles. 1970. The grammar of Hitting and Breaking. Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. by R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum, 120-133. Waltham and London: Ginn. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fillmore, Charles and Beryl Atkins. 1992. Toward a Frame-based Lexicon: The Semantics of Risk and its Neighbors. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Freder Kittay, 75-102. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fillmore, Charles and Beryl Atkins. 2000. Describing Polysemy: The case of ‘crawl’. Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, ed. by Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock, 91-110. New York: Oxford Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay, and Mary Katherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501-38. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fowler, George. 1996. Oblique passivization in Russian. Slavic and East European Journal 40: 519-545. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fried, Mirjam and Jan-Ola Östman. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman, 11-86. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gao, Hong and Chin-chuan Cheng. 2003. Verbs of contact by impact in English and their equivalents in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4.3: 485-508. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, Adele Eva. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, Adele Eva. 2000. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: the role of information structure in argument distribution. Language Sciences 34/4-5: 503-524. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, Adele Eva. 2005. Argument realization: the role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. Construction Grammars: Cognitive and Cross-language dimensions, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Mirjam Fried, 17-43. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, Adele Eva. 2006. Constructions at Work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, Adele Eva, Devin Casenhiser, and Nitya Sethuraman. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 14: 289-316. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, Adele Eva and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions. Language 80: 532-565. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gong, Wan-zao. 2003. Kehua shiyong shouce [Hakka Manual]. Miaoli: KHAN. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grimshaw, Jane Barbara. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2004. Argument-function linking in resultatives. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30.2: 1-34. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2005. Optimality-Theoretic Lexical Mapping Theory: A case study of locative inversion. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction 2.1: 67-94. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2007. Argument-function mismatches in Mandarin Chinese: A lexical mapping account. Lingua 117.1: 221-246. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ho, Shi-song and Chun-xin Liu. 2004. Xiandai keyu cihui huibian [The lexicon of Modern Hakka]. Taipei: Taipei Hakka Affairs Commission. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hong, Jia-fei, Chu-ren Huang, and Kathleen Ahrens. 2007. The Polysemy of Da3: An ontology-based lexical semantic study. Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation, Seoul, Korea. November 1-3. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hopper, Paul and Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56: 251-299. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hsu, Cui-zhen. 2007. Taiwan Sixian kejiahua da zi sanzige gouci yanjiu [Three-morpheme words of hit in Sixian Hakka in Taiwan]. Paper presented at The Seventh International Conference on Hakka Dialects, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. January 20-21. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hsu, Zhao-quan. 2001. Taiwan Kejiahua Cidian [Hakka Dictionary of Taiwan]. Taipei: SMC. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, Han-chun. 2005. Causation Types and the Path to Passives: A Comparative Study of Hakka Pun and Mandarin Rang. Paper presented at 2005 National Conference on Linguistics, Hsinchu, Taiwan. July 3-4. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, Han-chun. 2006. A Constructional Approach to Argument Realization of Chinese Resultatives. University System of Taiwan Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 13-31. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, Shuan-fan. 1974. Mandarin causatives. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2.3: 354-369. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, Tiao-guan. 2001. Xiandai hanyu tushou dongci da de yuyi yufa tanxi [The semantic and syntactic investigation of the action verb hit in Modern Chinese]. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kay, Paul. 1995. Construction Grammar. Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J. Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and J. Blommaert, 171-177. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards A Universal Definition of “Subject”. Subject and Topic, ed. by Charles Li, 303-333. New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Huei-ling. 2001. On Hakka BUN: A case of polygrammticalization. Language and Linguistics 2.2: 137-153. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Huei-ling. 2003a. Hakka LAU constructions: A constructional approach. Language and Linguistics 4.2: 357-378. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Huei-ling. 2003b. The semantic extension of Hakka LAU. Language and Linguistics 4.3: 533-561. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Huei-ling. 2003c. The lexicalization patterns of verbs of hitting in Hakka. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 31.2: 340-361. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Huei-ling. 2004. The syntactic grounding and conceptualization of Hakka BUN and LAU. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 30.1: 87-105. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, Huei-ling and Shu-mei Chiang. 2003. Intrapsychological force-dynamic interaction: Verbs of refraining in Hakka. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 1.2: 35-64. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Langacker, Ronald. 2003. Constructional Integration, Grammaticization, and Serial Verb Constructions. Language and Linguistics 4.2: 251-278. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Beth. 1999. Objecthood: An Event Structure Perspective. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 35, volume 1: The Main Session, ed. by Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle, and Aaron M. Griffith, 223-247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1994. A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. Lingua 92: 35-77. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Liao, Pei-yun. 2007. Verbs of removal in Hakka: Integration of verbal meanings and constructions. MA thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 1998. Shi lun Tai yu fanyi ci ‘phah4’ [On the underspecified verb ‘phah4’ in Taiwanese]. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Languages and Language Teaching in Taiwan, ed. by Chungszu Tung, 375-390. Hsinchu: National Hsinchu Normal College. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 1999. A typological study of causatives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29: 395-422. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 2000. A frame-based account of lexical polysemy in Taiwanese. Language and Linguistics 1: 119-138. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 2001. The semantic extension of tioh8 著 in Taiwanese Southern Min: An Interactive approach. Language and Linguistics 2.2: 173-202. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 2002. Interface between construction and lexical semantics: a case study of the polysemous word kek4 激 and its congeners tin3 佯, chng1 裝 and ke3 假 in Taiwanese Southern Min. Language and Linguistics 3: 569-588. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 2003a. In search of covert grammatical categories in Taiwanese Southern Min: a cognitive approach to verb semantics. Language and Linguistics 4: 379-402. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 2003b. Coding causatives and putatives in a diachronic perspective. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 1: 1-28. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lien, Chinfa. 2006. Verb Classification, Aktionsart and Constructions in Li Jing Ji. Language and Linguistics 7.1: 27-61. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Luo, Wan-jyun. 2007. Piong3 `put` and its congeners in Hakka: Frames and constructions. MA thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Luo, Zhao-jin. 1988. Keyu yufa [Hakka Grammar]. Taipei: Student. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maling, Joan. 2001. Dative: The heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case, grammatical functions, and thematic roles. Lingua 111: 419-464. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Markman Vita. 2004. Causatives without Causers and Burzio’s Generalization. Proceedings of NELS 34 Conference, 425-440. New York: Stony Brook University. October 2-4, 2003. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Palmer, Frank Robert. 1994. Grammatical roles and relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Podlesskaya Vera. 1993. Causatives and causativity: towards a semantic typology of causal relations. Studies in Language 23: Causatives and Transitivity, ed. by Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky, 289-322. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, James Hao-yi. 2003. Cognitive Relativism: Resultative Construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4.2: 301-316. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Talmy, Leonard. 2000a. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1: Concept Structuring System. Cambridge: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Talmy, Leonard. 2000b. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tang, Ting-chi. 1988. Han yu ci fa ju fa lun ji [Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax]. Taipei: Student. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tang, Ting-chi. 2002. The Causative-Inchoative Alternation in Chinese Compound Verbs. Language and Linguistics 3.3: 615-644. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taylor, John. 2003. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tsao, Feng fu. 1987. A Topic Comment Approach to the Ba Construction. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 15.1: l-¬54. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tsao, Feng fu. 1988. The Function of Mandarin Gei and Taiwanese Hou in the Double Object and the Passive Constructions. The Structure of Taiwanese: A Modern Synthesis, ed. by R. L. Cheng and S. F. Huang, 165-208. Taipei: Crane. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tsao, Feng fu. 1996. On Verb Classification in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 24.1: 138 191. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van Valin, Robert, Jr. and David Wilkins. 1996. The Case for ‘Effector’: Case roles, agents and agency revisited’. Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, ed. by M. Shibitani and S. Thompson, 289-322. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van Voorst, Jan. 1996. Some Systematic Differences Between the Dutch, French, and English Transitive Construction. Language Science 18: 227-245. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wechsler, Stephen. 1995. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument Structure and Morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81-114. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yamaguchi Toshiko. 1998. Lexical Semantic Analysis of Causative/Inchoative Alternation in Japanese: A preliminary investigation of subclasses of verbs. Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics, ed. by D. Arnold. http://www.essex.ac.uk/linguistics/pgr/egspll/volume2/PDFs/Yamaguchi.pdf | zh_TW |
