| dc.contributor.advisor | 何萬順 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Her, One-soon | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 鄧敦弘 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 鄧敦弘 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:28:35 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:28:35 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:28:35 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0915550111 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33397 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 91555011 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文旨在描述並嘗試以優選詞彙功能語法理論(OT-LMT)處理雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能的連結。雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能連結呈現出作格語言的特性，以致跟中文或英文有很大的差別。並且雅美語的連結又受到了焦點系統的影響，所以更加的複雜。現存的連結理論無論是以變換語法理論為基礎或以詞彙語法為基礎的，似乎都無法很直接簡潔的描述雅美語。本論文嘗試架構一個以優選理論為基礎的新連結模型，並且除了將之使用在雅美語上之外，也同時以這個新的模型來處理中文和英文中的連結。由於優選理論具有彈性的特性，這三種語言不同的連結模式，都可以被包含在這個新的模型當中。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This thesis studies the problem of argument-function linking in Yami and makes the fundamental claim that linking in Yami shows an ergative pattern, quite different from that in accusative languages, such as Mandarin and English. The linking phenomenon in Yami is complicated by its special voice system. Existing linking theories do not account for Yami straightforwardly. In trying to find a framework that can handle the Yami data, we find the flexibility of Optimality Theory a promising solution. The first part of this thesis is a description of the argument-function linking pattern in Yami and the proper place of the voice system is also discussed. And then we review several grammatical theories on linking. Both transformation-based theories and lexicalist theories are examined. We will demonstrate how these theories fail to account for linking in Yami in a straightforward manner. Thus we provide an optimality-theoretic account based on the lexical mapping theory of Lexical-Functional Grammar. This newly developed framework is applied not only to the Yami data but also to the relevant Mandarin and English data. It is claimed that this framework can accommodate all three different languages. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements……………………………………………………ivTable of Contents……………………………………………………vChinese Abstract……………………………………………………viiEnglish Abstract……………………………………………………viiiCHAPTER1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………1 1.1 Background……………………………………………………1 1.2 Motivation of the thesis…………………………………5 1.3 Purpose of the thesis ……………………………………6 1.4 Data collection and methodology………………………7 1.5 Organization of this thesis………………………………8 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE YAMI LINKING……………………………10 2.1 Introduction………………………………………………10 2.2 The voice system in Yami………………………………10 2.2.1 Case system of Yami………………………………11 2.2.2 Voice markers………………………………………14 2.3 Case and grammatical functions………………………19 2.3.1 Evidence for the nominative elements as subjects………………………………………………20 2.3.2 Evidence supporting the genitive nominal as the object……………………………………………24 2.4 Argument- function linking patterns in Yami………28 2.5 Summary………………………………………………………313. PREVIOUS THEORIES……………………………………………………33 3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………34 3.2 Tranformation-based theories……………………………35 3.2.1 Basic mechanism………………………………………35 3.2.2 Guilfoyle, Hung, and Travis………………………37 3.3 Lexicalist theories………………………………………40 3.3.1 Lexical Mapping Theory……………………………40 3.3.2 Simplified LMT………………………………………43 3.4 Optimaility Theory-based account………………………50 3.5 Summary………………………………………………………554. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………………57 4.1 Introduction…………………………………………………57 4.2 OT-LMT…………………………………………………………58 4.3 The new model………………………………………………65 4.3.1 The problems of the constraints in OT-LMT……65 4.3.2 A revised OT-LMT……………………………………67 4.4 Discussion……………………………………………………76 4.4.1 Motivations for the constraints and rankings…76 4.4.2 Prediction about markedness………………………785. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………80 5.1 Summary ………………………………………………………80 5.2 Accusative versus ergative………………………………80 5.3 A new OT-LMT model…………………………………………84 5.4 Limitations and suggestions for further research…87 5.5 Concluding remarks…………………………………………88REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………90 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 45028 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 81043 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 13743 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 61802 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 27858 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 67877 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 123770 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 137324 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 29605 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 20211 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0915550111 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 優選理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 雅美語 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 優選詞彙映照理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 南島語 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論旨角色與語法功能連結 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Optimailty Theory | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Yami | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | OT-LMT | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Autronesian language | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Argument-function linking | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | Argument-Function Linking in Yami:An Optimality-Theoretic Account | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 雅美語的論旨角色與語法功能連結:以優選理論分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choices in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17. 673-711. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bittner, Maria and Ken Hale. 1996. The structure determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry. 27.1:1-68. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan. 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of universal grammar. Language 70.72-131. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan. 2000. Optimal syntax. Optimality Theory: Phonology, syntax and acquisition, ed by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw and Jeroen van de Weijer, 334-385. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Deep unaccusativity in LFG. Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective, ed by K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell and E. M. Bikandi, 45-57. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications/Stanford Linguistics Association. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan and J. M. Kanerva. 1989. Loctive inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20.1-50. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Butt, Miriam, Mary Dalrymple, and Anette Frank. 1997. An architecture for linking theory in LFG. The Proceedings of the LFG `97 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King. University of California, San Diego. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, Yung-li. 1997. Voice, case and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Tsing-Hua University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, Clair Hsun-huei. 2000. Yami reference grammar. Taipei: Yuen Liu. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Passive and voice. Passive and voice, ed by Masayoshi Shibatani, 9-23. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Co. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67.547-619. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Falk, Yehuda N. 2001. Lexical-Functional Grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gault, JoAnn. 1997. Thoughts concerning ergativity, subject and focus in Sama Bangingi’. Selected papers from the 8ICAL. 393-422. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gilbert, Dicky and Helen de Hoop. 1998. Conflicting constraints: An introduction to Optimaility Theory. Lingua 104.1-12. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guilfoyle E, H. Huang, and L.Travis. 1992. Spec of IP and Spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11.45-84. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2003. Chinese inversion constructions with a simplified LMT. Lexical-Functional Grammar analysis of chinese, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph, No. 19, ed by A.Botomo and K. Luke. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2005. Optimality-theoretic lexical mapping theory: A case study of locative inversion. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, Vol 2.1 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ho, Arlene Yue-ling. 1990. Yami Structure: A Descriptive Study of the Yami Language. M.A. Thesis, National Tsing Hua University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holmer, Arthur. 2001. The ergativity parameter. Lund unversity linguistic department working papers 48.101-13. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hopper, P. and Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56.2. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Toward a Universal Definition of “Subject”. Subject and topic, ed by Charles N. Li. London: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistics Inquiry 8.63-99. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kroeger, Paul R. 1993. Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Legendre, Geraldine, William Raymond, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. An optimality-theoretic typology of case and grammatical voice systems. Proceedings of BLS 19, 464-478. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1997. A syntactic typology of Formosan Languages – Case markers on nouns and pronouns. Typological studies of languages in China. Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, No. 4, 443-477. Academia Sinica. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Liao, Hsiu-chuan. (2004). Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lødrup, Helge. 1999. Linking and optimaility in the Norwegian presentational focus construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.205-30. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maclachlan, Anna. 2002. Optimailty and three western Austronesian case systems. Language universals and variation, ed by Mengistu Amberber and Peter Collins, 155-84. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Manning, Christopher. 1995. Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Paper presented in LSA 95. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marantz, A. P. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Morimoto, Yukiko. 1999. An optimality account of argument reversal. The Proceedings of the LFG `99 Conference, ed by Miriam Butt and Tracy King. University of Manchester, UK, July 19-21. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paul, Ileana M. 2000. Malagasy clause structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University. . | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Phillips, Collin. 1995. Ergative subjects. Grammatical relations: theoretical approaches to empirical questions, ed by Clifford S. Burgess, Katarzyna Dziwirek and Donna Gerdts. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prince, Alan and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. RuCCS Technical Report #2. Piscateway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rau Der-Hwa V. and Ma-nyu Tung. to appear. Tao dictionary: reference grammar, texts, and dictionary. Language and Linguistics Monograph. Taipei: Academia Sinica. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reid, Lawrence A. and Hsiu-chuan Liao. 2004. A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Special Issue of Language and Linguistics 5 (2):433–490 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic or none of the above. Subject and topic, ed by C. Li, 491-518. New York: Academic Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schachter, Paul and Fe T. Otanes. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sells, Peter. 1998. The function of voice markers in the Philippine Languages. Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, ed by Steven Lapointe et al., 111-137. Stanford: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sells, Peter. ed. 2001. Formal and empirical issues in optimality-theoretic Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shibatani, Masayahi. 1988. Voice in Philippine languages. Passive and Voice, ed by Masyahi Shibatani, 85-142. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Starosta, Stanley. 2002. Austronesian “focus” as derivation: evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2.427-79. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tung, Ma-nyu and Der-Hwa V. Rau. 2000. Yami Texts. Taipei: Crane. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wechsler, Stephen and I Wayan Arka. 1998. Syntatic ergativity in Balinese: An argument structure based theory. Natural language and linguistic theory 16. 387-441 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yami New Testament. 1994. Taipei: The Bible society in the R.O.C. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wang, Shan-shan. (2004). An ergative view of Thao syntax. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Hawai’i. | zh_TW |
